A multicenter phase 2 trial of camrelizumab plus famitinib for women with recurrent or metastatic cervical squamous cell carcinoma

Efficacy and safety of camrelizumab for the treatment of cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Cervical cancer (CC) is a prevalent malignancy in women and ranks fourth in global cancer-related mortality. The prognosis for women with metastatic or recurring cervical cancer is unfavorable. Camrelizumab is a humanized high-affinity IgG4-kappa monoclonal antibody targeting programmed cell death 1 (PD-1), which has been progressively documented as a therapy for advanced cervical cancer with good result metrics. Nonetheless, a comprehensive investigation of Camrelizumab's efficacy in treating cervical cancer has yet to be conducted.

Methods

We conducted a search across PubMed, Ovid Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Scopus, ProQuest, CNKI, Wan Fang, VIP database, and CBMdisc, restricting the establishment date of the databases to October 2024. The ROBINS-I Scale was utilized to evaluate the methodological quality of the included studies. Furthermore, information about CR, PR, SD, PD, ORR, DCR, median OS, median PFS, adverse events (AEs), and other relevant data was obtained. A meta-analysis was performed utilizing a random-effects model and effect size for illness.

Results

This meta-analysis included six trials, including 238 people with CC. The aggregated outcomes for patients were as follows: CR (0.097, 95% CI: 0.032-0.186), PR (0.465, 95% CI: 0.291-0.638), SD (0.264, 95% CI: 0.124-0.403), PD (0.174, 95% CI: 0.051-0.296), ORR (0.577, 95% CI: 0.354-0.799), DCR (0.784, 95% CI: 0.652-0.916), AEs (all grades: 0.836, 95% CI: 0.629-1.000, ≥grade III: 0.472, 95% CI: 0.111-0.834). The predominant treatment-related adverse events included anemia (≤grade II: 0.295, 95% CI: 0.187-0.402; ≥grade III: 0.124, 95% CI: 0.018-0.230), elevated aspartate aminotransferase (≤grade II: 0.196, 95% CI: 0.013-0.380; ≥grade III: 0.030, 95% CI: 0.007-0.053), neutropenia (≤grade II: 0.206, 95% CI: 0.150-0.261; ≥grade III: 0.114, 95% CI: 0.066-0.162), thrombocytopenia (≤grade II: 0.295, 95% CI: 0.187-0.402), and fatigue (≤grade II: 0.174, 95% CI: 0.046-0.303).

Conclusions

This meta-analysis demonstrates that camrelizumab is efficacious and well-tolerated in patients with cervical cancer.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42024527065.

Efficacy of PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors for the therapy of cervical cancer with varying PD-L1 expression levels: a single-arm meta-analysis

Objective

To assess the effectiveness and tolerability of both PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors in advanced cervical cancer (CC), focusing on varying PD-L1 levels.

Methods

A comprehensive exploration was carried out on EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Library databases as well as Web of Science up to May 25, 2024, for studies involving advanced CC patients receiving PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Inclusion criteria were studies reporting objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), median progression-free survival (PFS), as well as median overall survival (OS). Data extraction and quality assessment were performed by two reviewers using the JBI Case Series Critical Appraisal Checklist, followed by a meta-analysis via STATA/MP 16.0.

Results

Five eligible studies comprising 223 patients were chosen. ORR and DCR were 42% (95% CI: 17%-66%, P = 0.00) and 70% (95% CI: 22%-117%, P = 0.00), respectively, in the PD-L1 positive patients and were 36% (95% CI: 17%-54%, P = 0.00) and 47% (95% CI: 30%-63%, P = 0.00), respectively, in patients with PD-L1 negativity. For patients exhibiting PD-L1 positivity, median PFS and median OS were 3.98 months (95% CI: 0.80-7.16, P = 0.01) and 11.26 months (95% CI: 3.01-12.58, P = 0.00), respectively.

Conclusion

With PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, PD-L1 positive CC patients demonstrate superior ORR, DCR, median PFS, and median OS, underscoring PD-L1 as one biomarker for immunotherapy response.

Advanced, recurrent, and persistent cervical cancer management: in the era of immunotherapy

Cervical cancer constitutes a significant health burden for women worldwide despite being preventable by vaccination and screening. Advanced stages of the disease are associated with a poor prognosis, and treatment approaches have seen little change over several decades, resulting in an overall survival rate of no more than 17 months. Additionally, there are limited options for second-line treatment. The urgent need for innovative and effective therapies to improve the outlook for this group of patients, along with an enhanced understanding of the interactions between the disease and the host's immune system, has propelled immunotherapy into a rapidly advancing field with notable achievements. Among various immunotherapeutic approaches, immune checkpoint inhibitors emerge as the most advanced treatment option. Clinical trials assessing these inhibitors as single agents or in combination with chemotherapy show promising results. As immunotherapy begins to redefine standards of care for metastatic, recurrent, or persistent cervical cancer, this review addresses recent advances and current recommendations for its management in both first and second-line treatment. The goal is to provide insights into the evolving landscape of cervical cancer treatment, specifically focusing on immunotherapeutic interventions.

Efficacy of nimotuzumab in combination with immunotherapy for a young recurrent cervical cancer patient: a case report and literature review

Cervical cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors in women, and more than one-third of the patients have already developed to a locally advanced stage at initial diagnosis. After standard concurrent chemoradiotherapy, recurrence still occurs in 29-38% of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC), and the 5-year survival rate of patients with recurrence is only 3.8-13.0%, resulting in a poor prognosis and limited therapeutic choices. Currently, the recommended first-line systemic treatment for recurrent metastatic cervical cancer involves cisplatin or carboplatin in combination with paclitaxel-based chemotherapy, supplemented with the antivascular agent bevacizumab and the immune checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab. The use of these drugs, however, is limited due to side effects such as myelosuppression, gastrointestinal perforation, and bleeding, so new treatment modalities need to be explored. Anti-EGFR (epithelial growth factor receptor, anti-surface growth factor receptor antibody) targeted drugs have been demonstrated to have a significant radiosensitizing effect on synchronous chemoradiotherapy in LACC and are now considered to have potential for the treatment of recurrent cervical cancer. We represented a LACC patient who relapsed 6 months after concurrent chemoradiotherapy. The patient received six cycles of nimotuzumab combined with camrelizumab, and the efficacy was evaluated to be partial remission after two or four cycles of treatment, with progression-free survival up to 9 months, without significant side effects. Until March 2024, the patient was still undergoing treatment. Promising efficacy and tolerable side effects of nimotuzumab in combination with camrelizumab were observed in this case.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Pediatric Cancers: Is It Still a Stalemate?

The knowledge surrounding the application of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the treatment of pediatric cancers is continuously expanding and evolving. These therapies work by enhancing the body's natural immune response against tumors, which may have been suppressed by certain pathways. The effectiveness of ICIs in treating adult cancers has been widely acknowledged. However, the results of early phase I/II clinical trials that exclusively targeted the use of ICIs for treating different pediatric cancers have been underwhelming. The response rates to ICIs have generally been modest, except for cases of pediatric classic Hodgkin lymphoma. There seems to be a notable disparity in the immunogenicity of childhood cancers compared to adult cancers, potentially accounting for this phenomenon. On average, childhood cancers tend to have significantly fewer neoantigens. In recent times, there has been a renewed sense of optimism regarding the potential benefits of ICI therapies for specific groups of children with cancer. In initial research, individuals diagnosed with pediatric hypermutated and SMARCB1-deficient cancers have shown remarkable positive outcomes when treated with ICI therapies. This is likely due to the underlying biological factors that promote the expression of neoantigens and inflammation within the tumor. Ongoing trials are diligently assessing the effectiveness of ICIs for pediatric cancer patients in these specific subsets. This review aimed to analyze the safety and effectiveness of ICIs in pediatric patients with different types of highly advanced malignancies.

First-line treatment with camrelizumab plus famitinib in advanced or metastatic NSCLC patients with PD-L1 TPS ≥1%: results from a multicenter, open-label, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

The combination of immune-checkpoint inhibitors and antiangiogenic agents can synergistically modulate the tumor microenvironment and represents a promising treatment option. Here, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of camrelizumab plus famitinib (a receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor) as a first-line treatment for advanced or metastatic NSCLC patients with a programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) of ≥1%, in an open-label, multicenter, phase 2 basket trial.

METHODS

Eligible patients received camrelizumab (200 mg once every 3 weeks via intravenous infusion) plus oral famitinib at an initial dose of 20 mg once daily. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR), as assessed by the investigator per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors V.1.1. Key secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), duration of respons, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), 12-month OS rate, and safety profile.

RESULTS

Of the enrolled 41 patients, 21 (51.2%) had a PD-L1 TPS of 1-49%. As of the cut-off date on June 22, 2022, the combination regimen of camrelizumab and famitinib achieved an ORR of 53.7% (95% CI 37.4% to 69.3%) and a DCR of 92.7% (95% CI 80.1% to 98.5%). The median PFS was 16.6 months (95% CI 8.3 to not reached), and OS data were not yet mature, with an estimated 12-month OS rate of 76.8% (95% CI 60.0% to 87.3%). The most common treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or higher included hypertension (22.0%), increased alanine aminotransferase (12.2%), decreased neutrophil count (9.8%), proteinuria (7.3%), decrease platelet count (7.3%), and hypokalemia (7.3%). One (2.4%) patient died from grade 5 hemoptysis, which was considered possibly related to the study treatment by the investigator.

CONCLUSION

Camrelizumab plus famitinib demonstrated promising antitumor activity in advanced or metastatic NSCLC patients and had an acceptable safety profile. These findings suggest that this combination regimen could be an alternative therapeutic option and warrant further investigation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04346381.

Clinical benefit analysis of PD-1 inhibitors in patients with advanced, recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer: a meta-analysis and systematic review

Purpose

This study aims to comprehensively evaluate the efficacy and safety of programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) in patients with advanced, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer (ARMCC) and identify the population that may benefit the most.

Methods

We conducted a search of PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Collaboration Library from their inception to September 2023. We extracted and analyzed the results related to the efficacy and safety of PD-1 in patients with ARMCC. The primary endpoints included the overall objective response rate (ORR) and adverse events (AEs), while the secondary endpoints encompassed the 1-year overall survival (OS) rate, 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate, as well as OS and PFS. We used a random effects model to conduct a meta-analysis on single-group rates, and the Mantel-Haenszel method was utilized to compare the ORR and the incidence of AEs.

Results

Our study included a total of 21 trials involving 2,097 patients. The ORR of the combination of PD-1 inhibitors with chemotherapy was 56.36%, the combination of PD-1 inhibitors with anti-angiogenic agents was 38.72%, the combination of PD-1 inhibitors with Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 inhibitors was 25.60%, and PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy was 15.99%. The subgroup analysis showed that the group of patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) exhibited a significantly higher ORR compared to the non-SCC group in patients who received PD-1 inhibitors combined with other anti-tumor drugs (Odds Ratio =2.43, P=0.002). Additionally, the group of patients with a programmed death-ligand 1 combined positive score (PD-L1 CPS) ≥1 exhibited a significantly higher ORR compared to the PD-L1 CPS <1 group in patients who received PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy (OR=4.14, P=0.02). PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy or PD-1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy did not significantly increase the incidence of all grades of adverse events (Relative Risk=0.99, p=0.788) or the incidence of serious adverse events (RR=0.99, p=0.788) compared to chemotherapy alone.

Conclusion

PD-1 inhibitors demonstrate outstanding efficacy in the treatment of patients with ARMCC. Patients with SCC may benefit more from treatments including PD-1 inhibitors in combination with other anti-tumor drugs, and PD-L1 CPS ≥1 can be considered a favorable indicator of immune therapy response. Importantly, the use of PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy or PD-1 inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy did not lead to an increased incidence of AEs compared with chemotherapy alone, indicting safety during treatment.

Systematic Review Registration

PROSPERO (CRD42023457945).

Whether specific genetic feature predicted immunotherapy efficacy: A case report

RATIONALE

Blockade of programmed death protein 1 (PD-1), have been observed to have quite good efficacy in recurrent and metastatic cervical cancer. Generally, we believe that the biomarkers of PD-1 inhibitors are programmed cell death-ligand 1, tumor mutational burden, high microsatellite instability, or deficient mismatch repair. However, in the case reported below, we observed that the patient with negative existing predictive biomarkers have significant benefits after zimberelimab monotherapy, indicating that there were other biomarkers that may predict immunotherapy efficacy. However, currently, no one has explored and studied the other potential biomarkers of PD-1 inhibitors.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 51-year-old patient, diagnosed with cervical adenocarcinoma nearly 11 years ago, requested treatment.

DIAGNOSES

The next-generation sequencing has shown PIK3CA E545K, SMAD4 1309-1G, and ALK E717K gene mutations, receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (ErbB-2) amplification, microsatellite stability, and low tumor mutational burden of 6.3 mutations per megabase. And immunohistochemistry revealed that the tumor was programmed cell death-ligand 1 negative.

INTERVENTION

Zimberelimab monotherapy was accepted as third-line treatment.

OUTCOMES

The patient had received zimberelimab for nearly 10 months, the best tumor response was PR (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours) and no noticeable adverse reactions were observed.

LESSONS

PIK3CA-E542K, ErbB2 amplification, and SMAD4 mutations could be potential biomarkers for PD-1 inhibitors, but a single instance is insufficient to validate the hypotheses. A larger number of patients or more clinical data will be necessary to determine whether these gene mutations are appropriate biomarkers for patients when treatment with PD-1 inhibitors.

Advances in the Management of Recurrent Cervical Cancer: State of the Art and Future Perspectives

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review aims to give an insight into the currently available options for recurrent/metastatic (R/M) cervical cancer (CC), along with the main future, potentially practice-changing perspectives in this field.

RECENT FINDINGS

Improvements in terms of tumor responses were observed with the use of immune checkpoints inhibitors (ICIs) in the previously treated CC population, followed by emerging striking data in terms of both antitumor activity and survival rates with the addition of the ICIs to platinum-based chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab in the first-line setting. Furthermore, the CC treatment landscape took another step forward in 2021 with the introduction of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) in the second-line setting, a highly targeted therapeutic strategy, which demonstrated to be a valid alternative option in the recurrent setting. R/M CC is a hard-to-treat disease. However, after several years of limited systemic therapeutic options for the recurrent setting, the year 2018 marked a turning point for R/M CC patients, with the introduction of immunotherapy in the treatment paradigm, which completely reshaped the therapeutic armamentarium of the disease. Besides, another valuable treatment option represented by ADCs demonstrated its efficacy in the recurrent setting, thus further widening the treatment landscape for those patients. Yet, the introduction of immunotherapy in the upfront setting brought along new issues to be addressed such as the emerging ICIs resistance and the following need for alternative options in the post-ICIs setting. Several innovative therapeutic strategies are under investigation in ongoing clinical trials, with the aim of overcoming ICIs resistance with the addition of immunomodulatory agents or bypassing the ICIs resistance with novel alternative drugs.

East Asian Gynecologic Oncology Trial Group (EAGOT): founding history and future perspective

Racial and regional differences exist in morbidity, histology, drug response, toxicity, and prognosis of gynecologic cancer. However, most large-scale phase III studies have been conducted in Western countries, and these data on Asians, who account for more than half of the world's population, are limited. To build a global clinical trial network in Asia, four clinical trial groups with high expertise and international competitiveness in East Asia, namely the Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group in Japan, the Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group in Korea, the Taiwanese Gynecologic Oncology Group in Taiwan, and the Chinese Gynecologic Cancer Society in the People's Republic of China, established a new group called the East Asia Gynecologic Oncology Trial Group (EAGOT) on November 19, 2021. It includes four committees: the Cervical Cancer Committee, Uterine Corpus Cancer Committee, Ovarian Cancer Committee, and Translational Research Committee. The purpose of EAGOT is to conduct international clinical trials in an effort to provide the best treatments for Asian women affected by gynecologic cancer. Discussions on new collaborative clinical trials have already begun. The first Annual EAGOT Meeting was held on May 25-27, 2023 in Niigata, Japan. EAGOT, the largest healthcare/investigational innovation network in Asia in the area of gynecologic cancers, will become a platform for establishing standards of care and lead to guidelines for Asian women suffering from gynecologic cancer. The harmonization of regulatory/investigator-initiated clinical trials, simultaneous approval of unapproved drugs in the four countries under a common protocol, and expansion of indications will improve the prognosis of gynecologic cancers in Asia in the near future.

Targeted therapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma microenvironment

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) originates from the squamous epithelium of the oral cavity, oropharynx, larynx, and hypopharynx. HNSCC in the oral cavity and larynx is strongly associated with tobacco smoking and alcohol consumption, while oropharyngeal cancer is increasingly attributed to infection by human papillomavirus (HPV), particularly HPV-16. The tumor microenvironment (TME) is a complex network of cancer cells, immune cells, stromal cells, surrounding blood vessels, and signaling molecules, and plays a critical role in tumor cell survival, invasion, and recurrence. Therefore, it is critical to elucidate the molecular basis of the interaction between tumor cells and the TME in order to develop innovative anti-cancer therapeutic strategies.

Camrelizumab plus famitinib in patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with PD-1 blockade: data from a multicohort phase 2 study

Background

Treatment options for patients with recurrent/metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (RM-NPC) are not clear after progression on previous treatment with PD-(L)1 inhibitor; critical gaps in evidence remain for such cases. Immunotherapy combined with antiangiogenic therapy has been reported to have synergistic antitumor activity. Therefore, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of camrelizumab plus famitinib in patients with RM-NPC who failed treatment with PD-1 inhibitor-containing regimens.

Methods

This multicenter, adaptive Simon minimax two-stage, phase II study enrolled patients with RM-NPC refractory to at least one line of systemic platinum-containing chemotherapy and anti-PD-(L)1 immunotherapy. The patient received camrelizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks and famitinib 20 mg once per day. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR), and the study could be stopped early as criterion for efficacy was met (>5 responses). Key secondary endpoints included time to response (TTR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DoR), overall survival (OS), and safety. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04346381.

Findings

Between October 12, 2020, and December 6, 2021, a total of 18 patients were enrolled since six responses were observed. The ORR was 33.3% (90% CI, 15.6-55.4) and the DCR was 77.8% (90% CI, 56.1-92.0). The median TTR was 2.1 months, the median DoR was 4.2 months (90% CI, 3.0-not reach), and the median PFS was 7.2 months (90% CI, 4.4-13.3), with a median follow-up duration of 16.7 months. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of grade ≥3 were reported in eight (44.4%) patients, with the most common being decreased platelet count and/or neutropenia (n = 4, 22.2%). Treatment-related serious AEs occurred in six (33.3%) patients, and no deaths occurred due to TRAEs. Four patients developed grade ≥3 nasopharyngeal necrosis; two of them developed grade 3-4 major epistaxis, and they were cured by nasal packing and vascular embolization.

Interpretation

Camrelizumab plus famitinib exhibited encouraging efficacy and tolerable safety profiles in patients with RM-NPC who failed frontline immunotherapy. Further studies are needed to confirm and expand these findings.

Funding

Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.