1
|
Agnew A, Humm E, Zhou K, Gunsalus RP, Zhou ZH. Reconstruction and identification of the native PLP synthase complex from Methanosarcina acetivorans lysate. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2024.07.09.602819. [PMID: 39026688 PMCID: PMC11257533 DOI: 10.1101/2024.07.09.602819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/20/2024]
Abstract
Many protein-protein interactions behave differently in biochemically purified forms as compared to their in vivo states. As such, determining native protein structures may elucidate structural states previously unknown for even well-characterized proteins. Here we apply the bottom-up structural proteomics method, cryoID , toward a model methanogenic archaeon. While they are keystone organisms in the global carbon cycle and active members of the human microbiome, there is a general lack of characterization of methanogen enzyme structure and function. Through the cryoID approach, we successfully reconstructed and identified the native Methanosarcina acetivorans pyridoxal 5'-phosphate (PLP) synthase (PdxS) complex directly from cryogenic electron microscopy (cryoEM) images of fractionated cellular lysate. We found that the native PdxS complex exists as a homo-dodecamer of PdxS subunits, and the previously proposed supracomplex containing both the synthase (PdxS) and glutaminase (PdxT) was not observed in cellular lysate. Our structure shows that the native PdxS monomer fashions a single 8α/8β TIM-barrel domain, surrounded by seven additional helices to mediate solvent and interface contacts. A density is present at the active site in the cryoEM map and is interpreted as ribose 5-phosphate. In addition to being the first reconstruction of the PdxS enzyme from a heterogeneous cellular sample, our results reveal a departure from previously published archaeal PdxS crystal structures, lacking the 37 amino acid insertion present in these prior cases. This study demonstrates the potential of applying the cryoID workflow to capture native structural states at atomic resolution for archaeal systems, for which traditional biochemical sample preparation is nontrivial.
Collapse
|
2
|
Chang YC, Liu WL, Fang PH, Li JC, Liu KL, Huang JL, Chen HW, Kao CF, Chen CH. Effect of C-type lectin 16 on dengue virus infection in Aedes aegypti salivary glands. PNAS NEXUS 2024; 3:pgae188. [PMID: 38813522 PMCID: PMC11134184 DOI: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2023] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024]
Abstract
C-type lectins (CTLs) are a family of carbohydrate-binding proteins and an important component of mosquito saliva. Although CTLs play key roles in immune activation and viral pathogenesis, little is known about their role in regulating dengue virus (DENV) infection and transmission. In this study, we established a homozygous CTL16 knockout Aedes aegypti mutant line using CRISPR/Cas9 to study the interaction between CTL16 and viruses in mosquito vectors. Furthermore, mouse experiments were conducted to confirm the transmission of DENV by CTL16-/- A. aegypti mutants. We found that CTL16 was mainly expressed in the medial lobe of the salivary glands (SGs) in female A. aegypti. CTL16 knockout increased DENV replication and accumulation in the SGs of female A. aegypti, suggesting that CTL16 plays an important role in DENV transmission. We also found a reduced expression of immunodeficiency and Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription pathway components correlated with increased DENV viral titer, infection rate, and transmission efficiency in the CTL16 mutant strain. The findings of this study provide insights not only for guiding future investigations on the influence of CTLs on immune responses in mosquitoes but also for developing novel mutants that can be used as vector control tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ya-Chen Chang
- National Mosquito-Borne Diseases Control Research Center, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli 35053, Taiwan
- National Institute of Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli 35053, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Liang Liu
- National Mosquito-Borne Diseases Control Research Center, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli 35053, Taiwan
| | - Pai-Hsiang Fang
- National Institute of Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli 35053, Taiwan
| | - Jian-Chiuan Li
- National Institute of Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli 35053, Taiwan
| | - Kun-Lin Liu
- National Mosquito-Borne Diseases Control Research Center, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli 35053, Taiwan
| | - Jau-Ling Huang
- Department of Bioscience Technology, Chang Jung Christian University, Tainan 711301, Taiwan
| | - Hsin-Wei Chen
- National Institute of Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli 35053, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Fei Kao
- Department of Biological Science and Technology, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu 300093, Taiwan
| | - Chun-Hong Chen
- National Mosquito-Borne Diseases Control Research Center, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli 35053, Taiwan
- National Institute of Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli 35053, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Alexander LT, Durairaj J, Kryshtafovych A, Abriata LA, Bayo Y, Bhabha G, Breyton C, Caulton SG, Chen J, Degroux S, Ekiert DC, Erlandsen BS, Freddolino PL, Gilzer D, Greening C, Grimes JM, Grinter R, Gurusaran M, Hartmann MD, Hitchman CJ, Keown JR, Kropp A, Kursula P, Lovering AL, Lemaitre B, Lia A, Liu S, Logotheti M, Lu S, Markússon S, Miller MD, Minasov G, Niemann HH, Opazo F, Phillips GN, Davies OR, Rommelaere S, Rosas‐Lemus M, Roversi P, Satchell K, Smith N, Wilson MA, Wu K, Xia X, Xiao H, Zhang W, Zhou ZH, Fidelis K, Topf M, Moult J, Schwede T. Protein target highlights in CASP15: Analysis of models by structure providers. Proteins 2023; 91:1571-1599. [PMID: 37493353 PMCID: PMC10792529 DOI: 10.1002/prot.26545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 06/15/2023] [Indexed: 07/27/2023]
Abstract
We present an in-depth analysis of selected CASP15 targets, focusing on their biological and functional significance. The authors of the structures identify and discuss key protein features and evaluate how effectively these aspects were captured in the submitted predictions. While the overall ability to predict three-dimensional protein structures continues to impress, reproducing uncommon features not previously observed in experimental structures is still a challenge. Furthermore, instances with conformational flexibility and large multimeric complexes highlight the need for novel scoring strategies to better emphasize biologically relevant structural regions. Looking ahead, closer integration of computational and experimental techniques will play a key role in determining the next challenges to be unraveled in the field of structural molecular biology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leila T. Alexander
- BiozentrumUniversity of BaselBaselSwitzerland
- Computational Structural BiologySIB Swiss Institute of BioinformaticsBaselSwitzerland
| | - Janani Durairaj
- BiozentrumUniversity of BaselBaselSwitzerland
- Computational Structural BiologySIB Swiss Institute of BioinformaticsBaselSwitzerland
| | | | - Luciano A. Abriata
- School of Life SciencesÉcole Polytechnique Fédérale de LausanneLausanneSwitzerland
| | - Yusupha Bayo
- Department of BiosciencesUniversity of MilanoMilanItaly
- IBBA‐CNR Unit of MilanoInstitute of Agricultural Biology and BiotechnologyMilanItaly
| | - Gira Bhabha
- Department of Cell BiologyNew York University School of MedicineNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | | | | | - James Chen
- Department of Cell BiologyNew York University School of MedicineNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | | | - Damian C. Ekiert
- Department of Cell BiologyNew York University School of MedicineNew YorkNew YorkUSA
- Department of MicrobiologyNew York University School of MedicineNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Benedikte S. Erlandsen
- Wellcome Centre for Cell BiologyInstitute of Cell Biology, University of EdinburghEdinburghUK
| | - Peter L. Freddolino
- Department of Biological Chemistry, Computational Medicine and BioinformaticsUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborMichiganUSA
| | - Dominic Gilzer
- Department of ChemistryBielefeld UniversityBielefeldGermany
| | - Chris Greening
- Department of Microbiology, Biomedicine Discovery InstituteMonash UniversityClaytonVictoriaAustralia
- Securing Antarctica's Environmental FutureMonash UniversityClaytonVictoriaAustralia
- Centre to Impact AMRMonash UniversityClaytonVictoriaAustralia
- ARC Research Hub for Carbon Utilisation and RecyclingMonash UniversityClaytonVictoriaAustralia
| | - Jonathan M. Grimes
- Division of Structural Biology, Wellcome Centre for Human GeneticsUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| | - Rhys Grinter
- Department of Microbiology, Biomedicine Discovery InstituteMonash UniversityClaytonVictoriaAustralia
- Centre for Electron Microscopy of Membrane ProteinsMonash Institute of Pharmaceutical SciencesParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
| | - Manickam Gurusaran
- Wellcome Centre for Cell BiologyInstitute of Cell Biology, University of EdinburghEdinburghUK
| | - Marcus D. Hartmann
- Max Planck Institute for BiologyTübingenGermany
- Interfaculty Institute of Biochemistry, University of TübingenTübingenGermany
| | - Charlie J. Hitchman
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, Leicester Institute of Structural and Chemical BiologyUniversity of LeicesterLeicesterUK
| | - Jeremy R. Keown
- Division of Structural Biology, Wellcome Centre for Human GeneticsUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| | - Ashleigh Kropp
- Department of Microbiology, Biomedicine Discovery InstituteMonash UniversityClaytonVictoriaAustralia
| | - Petri Kursula
- Department of BiomedicineUniversity of BergenBergenNorway
- Faculty of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine & Biocenter OuluUniversity of OuluOuluFinland
| | | | - Bruno Lemaitre
- School of Life SciencesÉcole Polytechnique Fédérale de LausanneLausanneSwitzerland
| | - Andrea Lia
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, Leicester Institute of Structural and Chemical BiologyUniversity of LeicesterLeicesterUK
- ISPA‐CNR Unit of LecceInstitute of Sciences of Food ProductionLecceItaly
| | - Shiheng Liu
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Molecular GeneticsUniversity of CaliforniaLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
- California NanoSystems InstituteUniversity of CaliforniaLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | - Maria Logotheti
- Max Planck Institute for BiologyTübingenGermany
- Interfaculty Institute of Biochemistry, University of TübingenTübingenGermany
- Present address:
Institute of BiochemistryUniversity of GreifswaldGreifswaldGermany
| | - Shuze Lu
- Lanzhou University School of Life SciencesLanzhouChina
| | | | | | - George Minasov
- Department of Microbiology‐ImmunologyNorthwestern Feinberg School of MedicineChicagoIllinoisUSA
| | | | - Felipe Opazo
- NanoTag Biotechnologies GmbHGöttingenGermany
- Institute of Neuro‐ and Sensory PhysiologyUniversity of Göttingen Medical CenterGöttingenGermany
- Center for Biostructural Imaging of Neurodegeneration (BIN)University of Göttingen Medical CenterGöttingenGermany
| | - George N. Phillips
- Department of BiosciencesRice UniversityHoustonTexasUSA
- Department of ChemistryRice UniversityHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Owen R. Davies
- Wellcome Centre for Cell BiologyInstitute of Cell Biology, University of EdinburghEdinburghUK
| | - Samuel Rommelaere
- School of Life SciencesÉcole Polytechnique Fédérale de LausanneLausanneSwitzerland
| | - Monica Rosas‐Lemus
- Department of Microbiology‐ImmunologyNorthwestern Feinberg School of MedicineChicagoIllinoisUSA
- Present address:
Department of Molecular Genetics and MicrobiologyUniversity of New MexicoAlbuquerqueNew MexicoUSA
| | - Pietro Roversi
- IBBA‐CNR Unit of MilanoInstitute of Agricultural Biology and BiotechnologyMilanItaly
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, Leicester Institute of Structural and Chemical BiologyUniversity of LeicesterLeicesterUK
| | - Karla Satchell
- Department of Microbiology‐ImmunologyNorthwestern Feinberg School of MedicineChicagoIllinoisUSA
| | - Nathan Smith
- Department of Biochemistry and the Redox Biology CenterUniversity of NebraskaLincolnNebraskaUSA
| | - Mark A. Wilson
- Department of Biochemistry and the Redox Biology CenterUniversity of NebraskaLincolnNebraskaUSA
| | - Kuan‐Lin Wu
- Department of ChemistryRice UniversityHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Xian Xia
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Molecular GeneticsUniversity of CaliforniaLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
- California NanoSystems InstituteUniversity of CaliforniaLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | - Han Xiao
- Department of BiosciencesRice UniversityHoustonTexasUSA
- Department of ChemistryRice UniversityHoustonTexasUSA
- Department of BioengineeringRice UniversityHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Wenhua Zhang
- Lanzhou University School of Life SciencesLanzhouChina
| | - Z. Hong Zhou
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Molecular GeneticsUniversity of CaliforniaLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
- California NanoSystems InstituteUniversity of CaliforniaLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | | | - Maya Topf
- University Medical Center Hamburg‐Eppendorf (UKE)HamburgGermany
- Centre for Structural Systems BiologyLeibniz‐Institut für Virologie (LIV)HamburgGermany
| | - John Moult
- Department of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology ResearchUniversity of MarylandRockvilleMarylandUSA
| | - Torsten Schwede
- BiozentrumUniversity of BaselBaselSwitzerland
- Computational Structural BiologySIB Swiss Institute of BioinformaticsBaselSwitzerland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Huang GJ, Parry TK, McLaughlin WA. Assessment of the Performances of the Protein Modeling Techniques Participating in CASP15 Using a Structure-Based Functional Site Prediction Approach: ResiRole. Bioengineering (Basel) 2023; 10:1377. [PMID: 38135968 PMCID: PMC10740689 DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10121377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2023] [Revised: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Model quality assessments via computational methods which entail comparisons of the modeled structures to the experimentally determined structures are essential in the field of protein structure prediction. The assessments provide means to benchmark the accuracies of the modeling techniques and to aid with their development. We previously described the ResiRole method to gauge model quality principally based on the preservation of the structural characteristics described in SeqFEATURE functional site prediction models. METHODS We apply ResiRole to benchmark modeling group performances in the Critical Assessment of Structure Prediction experiment, round 15. To gauge model quality, a normalized Predicted Functional site Similarity Score (PFSS) was calculated as the average of one minus the absolute values of the differences of the functional site prediction probabilities, as found for the experimental structures versus those found at the corresponding sites in the structure models. RESULTS The average PFSS per modeling group (gPFSS) correlates with standard quality metrics, and can effectively be used to rank the accuracies of the groups. For the free modeling (FM) category, correlation coefficients of the Local Distance Difference Test (LDDT) and Global Distance Test-Total Score (GDT-TS) metrics with gPFSS were 0.98239 and 0.87691, respectively. An example finding for a specific group is that the gPFSS for EMBER3D was higher than expected based on the predictive relationship between gPFSS and LDDT. We infer the result is due to the use of constraints imprinted by function that are a part of the EMBER3D methodology. Also, we find functional site predictions that may guide further functional characterizations of the respective proteins. CONCLUSION The gPFSS metric provides an effective means to assess and rank the performances of the structure prediction techniques according to their abilities to accurately recount the structural features at predicted functional sites.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - William A. McLaughlin
- Department of Medical Education, Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, 525 Pine Street, Scranton, PA 18509, USA (T.K.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ozden B, Kryshtafovych A, Karaca E. The Impact of AI-Based Modeling on the Accuracy of Protein Assembly Prediction: Insights from CASP15. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.07.10.548341. [PMID: 37503072 PMCID: PMC10369898 DOI: 10.1101/2023.07.10.548341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/29/2023]
Abstract
In CASP15, 87 predictors submitted around 11,000 models on 41 assembly targets. The community demonstrated exceptional performance in overall fold and interface contact prediction, achieving an impressive success rate of 90% (compared to 31% in CASP14). This remarkable accomplishment is largely due to the incorporation of DeepMind's AF2-Multimer approach into custom-built prediction pipelines. To evaluate the added value of participating methods, we compared the community models to the baseline AF2-Multimer predictor. In over 1/3 of cases the community models were superior to the baseline predictor. The main reasons for this improved performance were the use of custom-built multiple sequence alignments, optimized AF2-Multimer sampling, and the manual assembly of AF2-Multimer-built subcomplexes. The best three groups, in order, are Zheng, Venclovas and Wallner. Zheng and Venclovas reached a 73.2% success rate over all (41) cases, while Wallner attained 69.4% success rate over 36 cases. Nonetheless, challenges remain in predicting structures with weak evolutionary signals, such as nanobody-antigen, antibody-antigen, and viral complexes. Expectedly, modeling large complexes remains also challenging due to their high memory compute demands. In addition to the assembly category, we assessed the accuracy of modeling interdomain interfaces in the tertiary structure prediction targets. Models on seven targets featuring 17 unique interfaces were analyzed. Best predictors achieved the 76.5% success rate, with the UM-TBM group being the leader. In the interdomain category, we observed that the predictors faced challenges, as in the case of the assembly category, when the evolutionary signal for a given domain pair was weak or the structure was large. Overall, CASP15 witnessed unprecedented improvement in interface modeling, reflecting the AI revolution seen in CASP14.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Burcu Ozden
- Izmir Biomedicine and Genome Center, Izmir, Türkiye
- Izmir International Biomedicine and Genome Institute, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Türkiye
| | - Andriy Kryshtafovych
- Protein Structure Prediction Center, Genome and Biomedical Sciences Facilities, University of California, Davis, California, USA
| | - Ezgi Karaca
- Izmir Biomedicine and Genome Center, Izmir, Türkiye
- Izmir International Biomedicine and Genome Institute, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Türkiye
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mulvaney T, Kretsch RC, Elliott L, Beton J, Kryshtafovych A, Rigden DJ, Das R, Topf M. CASP15 cryoEM protein and RNA targets: refinement and analysis using experimental maps. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.08.07.552287. [PMID: 37609268 PMCID: PMC10441278 DOI: 10.1101/2023.08.07.552287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/24/2023]
Abstract
CASP assessments primarily rely on comparing predicted coordinates with experimental reference structures. However, errors in the reference structures can potentially reduce the accuracy of the assessment. This issue is particularly prominent in cryoEM-determined structures, and therefore, in the assessment of CASP15 cryoEM targets, we directly utilized density maps to evaluate the predictions. A method for ranking the quality of protein chain predictions based on rigid fitting to experimental density was found to correlate well with the CASP assessment scores. Overall, the evaluation against the density map indicated that the models are of high accuracy although local assessment of predicted side chains in a 1.52 Å resolution map showed that side-chains are sometimes poorly positioned. The top 136 predictions associated with 9 protein target reference structures were selected for refinement, in addition to the top 40 predictions for 11 RNA targets. To this end, we have developed an automated hierarchical refinement pipeline in cryoEM maps. For both proteins and RNA, the refinement of CASP15 predictions resulted in structures that are close to the reference target structure, including some regions with better fit to the density. This refinement was successful despite large conformational changes and secondary structure element movements often being required, suggesting that predictions from CASP-assessed methods could serve as a good starting point for building atomic models in cryoEM maps for both proteins and RNA. Loop modeling continued to pose a challenge for predictors with even short loops failing to be accurately modeled or refined at times. The lack of consensus amongst models suggests that modeling holds the potential for identifying more flexible regions within the structure.
Collapse
|