Phase 1b trial of anti-EGFR antibody JMT101 and Osimertinib in EGFR exon 20 insertion-positive non-small-cell lung cancer

[EGFR Exon 20 Insertion Mutation: Research Status and New Treatment Strategies]

In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), as an improtant oncogenic driver gene, epidermal growth factor receptor exon 20 insertion (EGFR ex20ins) has a unique protein structure and is primarily drug-resistant to traditional EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). In recent years, exploration of targeted therapy for EGFR ex20ins has never stopped. Firstly Mobocertinib and Amivantamab obtained approval from U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for EGFR ex20ins mutant NSCLC patients, then other drugs, such as Sunvozertinib, made breakthroughs and combination therapies also obtained gains. Multi-pronged measures are hopeful to overcome EGFR ex20ins drug resistance. As mentioned above, it's definitely important to gain deeper understanding of molecular mechanism of EGFR ex20ins and assess effect and difference between novel drugs. This review is devoted to make a summary about newest achievement so to provide valuable reference about precise therapy for patients with EGFR ex20ins.
.

[Chinese Expert Consensus on the Standardized Diagnosis and Treatment of Non‑small Cell Lung Cancer with EGFR Exon 20 Insertion Mutations (2024 Edition)]

The standard clinical practice of managing the non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion (ex20ins) mutations was elaborated in Chinese expert consensus on non‑small cell lung cancer with EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations (2023 edition), and this rare subset has gradually attracted attention recently. With the deepening of treatment area exploration and the approval of new targeted drugs, there are more options for the diagnosis and treatment of EGFR ex20ins positive NSCLC patients. Therefore, based on the previous version of consensus, the expert panel has updated this consensus on the standardized clinical diagnosis and treatment of EGFR ex20ins mutation NSCLC through reference to literature and clinical data, and combined with the experts' own clinical experience. The updated recommendations includes disease congnition, testing methods, therapy and recent relevant clinical trials for NSCLC patients with EGFR ex20ins mutation, in order to provide better medication reference for clinical physicians.
.

Phase 1b trial of anti-HER2 antibody inetetamab and pan-HER inhibitor pyrotinib in HER2-positive advanced lung cancer

There remains an unmet need for targeted therapies against advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with HER2 mutations. To improve the antitumor activity of single anti-HER2 agent, this prospective, single-arm clinical trial (NCT05016544) examined the safety profile and efficacy of anti-HER2 antibody inetetamab and pan-HER TKI pyrotinib in HER2-posivite advanced NSCLC patients. Enrolled patients received inetetamab every 3 weeks and pyrotinib once per day (pyrotinib, dose-escalation part, 240 mg, 320 mg; dose-expansion part, 320 mg). Primary endpoints were dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) dosage and safety. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR). A total of 48 patients were enrolled. During the dose-escalation period, no DLT occurred. Diarrhea was the most commonly reported treatment-related adverse event (TRAE). Grade 3 TRAEs occurred in seven patients. The median PFS (mPFS) was 5.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 4.4-8.6 months]. The confirmed ORR and DCR reached 25% (11/44) and 84.1% (37/44), respectively. Responses were shown in patients with distinct HER2 aberrations. In summary, inetetamab in combination with pyrotinib demonstrated acceptable safety and antitumor activity among patients with advanced HER2-mutant NSCLC.

Bispecific antibody drug conjugates: Making 1+1>2

Bispecific antibody‒drug conjugates (BsADCs) represent an innovative therapeutic category amalgamating the merits of antibody‒drug conjugates (ADCs) and bispecific antibodies (BsAbs). Positioned as the next-generation ADC approach, BsADCs hold promise for ameliorating extant clinical challenges associated with ADCs, particularly pertaining to issues such as poor internalization, off-target toxicity, and drug resistance. Presently, ten BsADCs are undergoing clinical trials, and initial findings underscore the imperative for ongoing refinement. This review initially delves into specific design considerations for BsADCs, encompassing target selection, antibody formats, and the linker-payload complex. Subsequent sections delineate the extant progress and challenges encountered by BsADCs, illustrated through pertinent case studies. The amalgamation of BsAbs with ADCs offers a prospective solution to prevailing clinical limitations of ADCs. Nevertheless, the symbiotic interplay among BsAb, linker, and payload necessitates further optimizations and coordination beyond a simplistic "1 + 1" to effectively surmount the extant challenges facing the BsADC domain.

Advances in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer With EGFR Exon 20 Insertion Mutation

The discovery of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations has greatly changed the clinical outlook for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Unlike the most common EGFR mutations, such as exon 19 deletion (del19) and exon 21 L858R point mutation, EGFR exon 20 insertion mutation (EGFR ex20ins) is a rare mutation of EGFR. Due to its structural specificity, it exhibits primary resistance to traditional epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs), leading to poor overall survival prognosis for patients. In recent years, there has been continuous progress in the development of new drugs targeting EGFR ex20ins, bringing new hope for the treatment of this patient population. In this regard, we conducted a systematic review of the molecular characteristics, diagnostic advances, and treatment status of EGFR ex20ins. We summarized the latest data on relevant drug development and clinical research, aiming to provide reference for clinical diagnosis, treatment, and drug development.

EGFR and ERBB2 Exon 20 Insertion Mutations in Chinese Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients: Pathological and Molecular Characterization, and First-Line Systemic Treatment Evaluation

BACKGROUND

Data from studies looking at both EGFR and ERBB2 exon 20 insertion mutations (-20ins) in the same cohort of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are limited.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to analyze EGFR/ERBB2-20ins in all-stage NSCLC patients to reveal their histological and molecular features, and to retrospectively evaluate the results of first-line real-world systemic treatments in patients with advanced-stage disease.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We collected 13,920 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded NSCLC specimens. Clinicopathological features were recorded and DNA-based next-generation sequencing was performed. First-line systemic treatment data were obtained via chart review.

RESULTS

In total, 414 (2.97%) EGFR-20ins cases and 666 (4.78%) ERBB2-20ins cases were identified. Both were more common in women, non-smokers, and patients with adenocarcinoma. The incidence of EGFR/ERBB2-20ins in adenocarcinoma is inversely proportional to the degree of invasion; 77 and 26 variants were detected in EGFR-20ins and ERBB2-20ins cases, respectively. The most common concurrently mutated genes were TP53 and RB1. In invasive adenocarcinoma, lepidic components were more common in EGFR/ERBB2-20ins-alone cases than in those with other concurrent mutated genes. In EGFR-/ERBB2-20ins patients, there was no significant difference in progression-free survival (PFS) or treatment response to first-line systemic treatments in this study. There was no significant difference in PFS or treatment response among patients with different EGFR/ERBB2-20ins variants and those with or without concurrent mutated genes.

CONCLUSIONS

EGFR/ERBB2-20ins is more common in early lung adenocarcinoma. EGFR-20ins had more variants. In both cohorts, the results for first-line systemic treatments showed no significant difference.