Nigrostriatal dopamine modulates the striatal-amygdala pathway in auditory fear conditioning

Cell-type-specific auditory responses in the striatum are shaped by feedforward inhibition

The posterior "tail" region of the striatum receives dense innervation from sensory brain regions and is important for behaviors that require sensorimotor integration. The output neurons of the striatum, D1 and D2 striatal projection neurons (SPNs), which make up the direct and indirect pathways, are thought to play distinct functional roles, although it remains unclear if these neurons show cell-type-specific differences in their response to sensory stimuli. Here, we examine the strength of synaptic inputs onto D1 and D2 SPNs following the stimulation of upstream auditory pathways. We report that auditory-evoked depolarizations onto D1 SPN responses are stronger and faster. This is due to differences in feedforward inhibition, with fast-spiking interneurons forming stronger synapses onto D2 SPNs. Our results support a model in which differences in feedforward inhibition enable the preferential recruitment of D1 SPNs by auditory stimuli, positioning the direct pathway to initiate sound-driven actions.

Dopaminergic circuits controlling threat and safety learning

The ability to learn from experience that certain cues and situations are associated with threats or safety is crucial for survival and adaptive behavior. Understanding the neural substrates of threat and safety learning has high clinical significance because deficits in these forms of learning characterize anxiety disorders. Traditionally, dopamine neurons were thought to uniformly support reward learning by signaling reward prediction errors. However, the dopamine system is functionally more diverse than was initially appreciated and is also critical for processing threat and safety. In this review, I highlight recent studies demonstrating that dopamine neurons generate prediction errors for threat and safety, and describe how dopamine projections to the amygdala, medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), and striatum regulate associative threat and safety learning.

Corticonigral projections recruit substantia nigra pars lateralis dopaminergic neurons for auditory threat memories

Dopaminergic neurons (DANs) in the lateral substantia nigra project to the tail of striatum (TS), which is involved in threat conditioning. Auditory cortex also contributes to threatening behaviors, but whether it directly interacts with midbrain DANs and how these interactions might influence threat conditioning remain unclear. Here, functional mapping revealed robust excitatory input from auditory and temporal association cortexes to substantia nigra pars lateralis (SNL) DANs, but not to pars compacta (SNc) DANs. SNL DANs exhibited unique firing patterns, with irregular pacemaking and higher maximal firing, reflecting different channel complements than SNc DANs. Behaviorally, inhibiting cortex to SNL projections impaired memory retrieval during auditory threat conditioning. Thus, we demonstrate robust corticonigral projections to SNL DANs, contrasting with previous observations of sparse cortical input to substantia nigra DANs. These findings distinguish SNL DANs from other nigral populations, highlighting their role in threatening behaviors and expanding knowledge of cortex to midbrain interactions.

Cell-type specific auditory responses in the striatum are shaped by feed forward inhibition

The posterior "tail" region of the striatum receives dense innervation from sensory brain regions and has been demonstrated to play a role in behaviors that require sensorimotor integration including discrimination 1,2 , avoidance 3 and defense 4 responses. The output neurons of the striatum, the D1 and D2 striatal projection neurons (SPNs) that make up the direct and indirect pathways, respectively, are thought to play differential roles in these behavioral responses, although it remains unclear if or how these neurons display differential responsivity to sensory stimuli. Here, we used whole-cell recordings in vivo and ex vivo to examine the strength of excitatory and inhibitory synaptic inputs onto D1 and D2 SPNs following the stimulation of upstream auditory pathways. While D1 and D2 SPNs both displayed stimulus-evoked depolarizations, D1 SPN responses were stronger and faster for all stimuli tested in vivo as well as in brain slices. This difference did not arise from differences in the strength of excitatory inputs but from differences in the strength of feed forward inhibition. Indeed, fast spiking interneurons, which are readily engaged by auditory afferents exerted stronger inhibition onto D2 SPNs compared to D1 SPNs. Our results support a model in which differences in feed forward inhibition enable the preferential recruitment of the direct pathway in response to auditory stimuli, positioning this pathway to initiate sound-driven actions.

Linking the Extended Autonomic System with the Homeostat Theory: New Perspectives about Dysautonomias

Dysautonomias are conditions in which altered functions of one or more components of the autonomic nervous system (ANS) adversely affect health. This essay is about how elucidating mechanisms of dysautonomias may rationalize personalized treatments. Emphasized here are two relatively new ideas-the "extended" autonomic system (EAS) and the "homeostat" theory as applied to the pathophysiology and potential treatments of dysautonomias. The recently promulgated concept of the EAS updates Langley's ANS to include neuroendocrine, immune/inflammatory, and central components. The homeostat theory builds on Cannon's theory of homeostasis by proposing the existence of comparators (e.g., a thermostat, glucostat, carbistat, barostat) that receive information about regulated variables (e.g., core temperature, blood glucose, blood gases, delivery of blood to the brain). Homeostats sense discrepancies between the information and response algorithms. The presentation links the EAS with the homeostat theory to understand pathophysiological mechanisms of dysautonomias. Feed-forward anticipatory processes shift input-output curves and maintain plateau levels of regulated variables within different bounds of values-"allostasis". Sustained allostatic processes increase long-term wear-and-tear on effectors and organs-allostatic load. They decreaseing thresholds for destabilizing and potentially fatal positive feedback loops. The homeostat theory enables mathematical models that define stress, allostasis, and allostatic load. The present discussion applies the EAS and homeostat concepts to specific examples of pediatric, adolescent/adult, and geriatric dysautonomias-familial dysautonomia, chronic orthostatic intolerance, and Lewy body diseases. Computer modeling has the potential to take into account the complexity and dynamics of allostatic processes and may yield testable predictions about individualized treatments and outcomes.