Liquid biopsy for brain metastases and leptomeningeal disease in patients with breast cancer

CDK4/6 inhibitors for metastatic breast cancer in routine clinical practice in Spain: survey of patterns of use and oncologists' perceptions

PURPOSE

To assess the use of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors in routine clinical practice in Spain, as well as the perceptions from oncologists.

METHODS

A survey was developed by nine oncologists, experts in breast cancer, practising in Spain. Survey responses were collected between July 2022 and April 2023.

RESULTS

Fifty-one survey responses were obtained. Most oncologists used CDK4/6 inhibitors in the first line. The first-line endocrine therapy most frequently used was an aromatase inhibitor (endocrine-sensitive disease) and fulvestrant (endocrine-resistant disease). CDK4/6 inhibitors were used for primary or secondary resistance, or visceral disease without visceral crisis. A lower-than-standard starting dose was considered (57% of respondents) for specific profiles. Strategies to manage toxicity included switching to another CDK4/6 inhibitor or delaying the next dose. CDK4/6 inhibitors were mostly considered to improve quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of CDK4/6 inhibitors in Spain follows current recommendations and aligns with the evidence.

Molecular Underpinnings of Brain Metastases

Brain metastases are the most commonly diagnosed type of central nervous system tumor, yet the mechanisms of their occurrence are still widely unknown. Lung cancer, breast cancer, and melanoma are the most common etiologies, but renal and colorectal cancers have also been described as metastasizing to the brain. Regardless of their origin, there are common mechanisms for progression to all types of brain metastases, such as the creation of a suitable tumor microenvironment in the brain, priming of tumor cells, adaptations to survive spreading in lymphatic and blood vessels, and development of mechanisms to penetrate the blood-brain barrier. However, there are complex genetic and molecular interactions that are specific to every type of primary tumor, making the understanding of the metastatic progression of tumors to the brain a challenging field of study. In this review, we aim to summarize current knowledge on the pathophysiology of brain metastases, from specific genetic characteristics of commonly metastatic tumors to the molecular and cellular mechanisms involved in progression to the central nervous system. We also briefly discuss current challenges in targeted therapies for brain metastases and how there is still a gap in knowledge that needs to be overcome to improve patient outcomes.

Leptomeningeal metastatic disease: new frontiers and future directions

Leptomeningeal metastatic disease (LMD), encompassing entities of 'meningeal carcinomatosis', neoplastic meningitis' and 'leukaemic/lymphomatous meningitis', arises secondary to the metastatic dissemination of cancer cells from extracranial and certain intracranial malignancies into the leptomeninges and cerebrospinal fluid. The clinical burden of LMD has been increasing secondary to more sensitive diagnostics, aggressive local therapies for discrete brain metastases, and improved management of extracranial disease with targeted and immunotherapeutic agents, resulting in improved survival. However, owing to drug delivery challenges and the unique microenvironment of LMD, novel therapies against systemic disease have not yet translated into improved outcomes for these patients. Underdiagnosis and misdiagnosis are common, response assessment remains challenging, and the prognosis associated with this disease of whole neuroaxis remains extremely poor. The dearth of effective therapies is further challenged by the difficulties in studying this dynamic disease state. In this Review, a multidisciplinary group of experts describe the emerging evidence and areas of active investigation in LMD and provide directed recommendations for future research. Drawing upon paradigm-changing advances in mechanistic science, computational approaches, and trial design, the authors discuss domain-specific and cross-disciplinary strategies for optimizing the clinical and translational research landscape for LMD. Advances in diagnostics, multi-agent intrathecal therapies, cell-based therapies, immunotherapies, proton craniospinal irradiation and ongoing clinical trials offer hope for improving outcomes for patients with LMD.

Metastatic brain tumors: from development to cutting-edge treatment

Metastatic brain tumors, also called brain metastasis (BM), represent a challenging complication of advanced tumors. Tumors that commonly metastasize to the brain include lung cancer and breast cancer. In recent years, the prognosis for BM patients has improved, and significant advancements have been made in both clinical and preclinical research. This review focuses on BM originating from lung cancer and breast cancer. We briefly overview the history and epidemiology of BM, as well as the current diagnostic and treatment paradigms. Additionally, we summarize multiomics evidence on the mechanisms of tumor occurrence and development in the era of artificial intelligence and discuss the role of the tumor microenvironment. Preclinically, we introduce the establishment of BM models, detailed molecular mechanisms, and cutting-edge treatment methods. BM is primarily treated with a comprehensive approach, including local treatments such as surgery and radiotherapy. For lung cancer, targeted therapy and immunotherapy have shown efficacy, while in breast cancer, monoclonal antibodies, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and antibody-drug conjugates are effective in BM. Multiomics approaches assist in clinical diagnosis and treatment, revealing the complex mechanisms of BM. Moreover, preclinical agents often need to cross the blood-brain barrier to achieve high intracranial concentrations, including small-molecule inhibitors, nanoparticles, and peptide drugs. Addressing BM is imperative.

Genomic predictors of radiation response: recent progress towards personalized radiotherapy for brain metastases

Radiotherapy remains a key treatment modality for both primary and metastatic brain tumors. Significant technological advances in precision radiotherapy, such as stereotactic radiosurgery and intensity-modulated radiotherapy, have contributed to improved clinical outcomes. Notably, however, molecular genetics is not yet widely used to inform brain radiotherapy treatment. By comparison, genetic testing now plays a significant role in guiding targeted therapies and immunotherapies, particularly for brain metastases (BM) of lung cancer, breast cancer, and melanoma. Given increasing evidence of the importance of tumor genetics to radiation response, this may represent a currently under-utilized means of enhancing treatment outcomes. In addition, recent studies have shown potentially actionable mutations in BM which are not present in the primary tumor. Overall, this suggests that further investigation into the pathways mediating radiation response variability is warranted. Here, we provide an overview of key mechanisms implicated in BM radiation resistance, including intrinsic and acquired resistance and intratumoral heterogeneity. We then discuss advances in tumor sampling methods, such as a collection of cell-free DNA and RNA, as well as progress in genomic analysis. We further consider how these tools may be applied to provide personalized radiotherapy for BM, including patient stratification, detection of radiotoxicity, and use of radiosensitization agents. In addition, we describe recent developments in preclinical models of BM and consider their relevance to investigating radiation response. Given the increase in clinical trials evaluating the combination of radiotherapy and targeted therapies, as well as the rising incidence of BM, it is essential to develop genomically informed approaches to enhance radiation response.

Modeling the management of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer with liquid biopsy: the future of precision medicine

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In the evolving landscape of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer (BC) management, liquid biopsy offers unprecedented opportunities for guiding clinical decisions. Here, we review the most recent findings on liquid biopsy applications in HER2-positive BC and its potential role in addressing challenges specific to this BC subtype.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies have highlighted the significance of liquid biopsy analytes, primarily circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and circulating tumor cells (CTCs), in stratifying patients' prognosis, predicting treatment response, and monitoring tumor evolution in both early and advanced stages of BC. Liquid biopsy holds promise in studying minimal residual disease to detect and potentially treat disease recurrence before it manifests clinically. Additionally, liquid biopsy may have significant implication in the management of brain metastasis, a major challenge in HER2-positive BC, and could redefine parameters for determining HER2 positivity. Combining ctDNA and CTCs is crucial for a comprehensive understanding of HER2-positive tumors, as they provide complementary insights.

SUMMARY

Research efforts are needed to address analytical challenges, validate, and broaden the application of liquid biopsy in HER2-positive BC. This effort will ultimately facilitate its integration into clinical practice, optimizing the care of patients with HER2-positive tumors.

The early recognition and diagnosis of neoplastic meningitis

INTRODUCTION

The diagnosis and monitoring of leptomeningeal metastases (LM) from solid tumors are challenging, and the combination of neurological symptoms, MRI findings, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cytology does not always allow to achieve a definitive diagnosis.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes the studies that have investigated CSF liquid biopsy to improve the initial diagnosis of LM in case the CSF cytology is negative or only suspicious for tumor cells, and monitoring of tumor response following targeted therapies or immunotherapy. In this regard, the early detection of LM recurrence and the development of resistant mutations are critical issues. Moreover, the early identification of subgroups of patients with a higher risk of LM progression, as well as the correlation of LM burden with survival, are discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

There is an urgent need of prospective studies to monitor longitudinally LM using CSF liquid biopsy and investigate the role of CTC, ctDNA or novel assays. The optimal setting for the longitudinal CSF and blood collection can be clinical trials focused on the molecular diagnosis of LM as well as the response and monitoring following targeted agents.