Amantadine delayed release/extended release capsules significantly reduce OFF time in Parkinson's disease

Amantadine mitigates the cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of doxorubicin in SH-SY5Y cells and reduces its mutagenicity

Amantadine (AMA) is a useful drug in neuronal disorders, but few studies have been performed to access its toxicological profile. Conversely, doxorubicin (Dox) is a well-known antineoplastic drug that has shown neurotoxic effects leading to cognitive impairment. The aims of this study are to evaluate the cytotoxic, genotoxic, and mutagenic effects of AMA, as well as its possible protective actions against deleterious effects of Dox. The Salmonella/microsome assay was performed to assess mutagenicity while cytotoxicity and genotoxicity were evaluated in SH-SY5Y cells using MTT and comet assays. Possible modulating effects of AMA on the cytotoxicity, genotoxicity, and mutagenicity induced by Dox were evaluated through cotreatment procedures. Amantadine did not induce mutations in the Salmonella/microsome assay and decreased Dox-induced mutagenicity in the TA98 strain. AMA reduced cell viability and induced DNA damage in SH-SY5Y cells. In cotreatment with Dox, AMA attenuated the cytotoxicity of Dox and showed an antigenotoxic effect. In conclusion, AMA does not induce gene mutations, although it has shown a genotoxic effect. Furthermore, AMA decreases frameshift mutations induced by Dox as well as the cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of Dox in SH-SY5Y cells, suggesting that AMA can interfere with Dox mutagenic activity and attenuate its neurotoxic effects.

Extended-release amantadine for OFF-related dystonia in Parkinson's disease

INTRODUCTION

Dystonia is a painful OFF-related complication in Parkinson's disease (PD) with limited treatment options.

METHODS

Post-hoc analysis using pooled data from two extended-release amantadine pivotal trials and follow-on open-label extension. Dystonia was assessed using the Unified Dyskinesia Rating Scale (UDysRS) Part 2 and the Movement Disorder Society-Unified PD Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) item 4.6.

RESULTS

Of 196 participants, 119 (60.7%) reported OFF-related dystonia at baseline per UDysRS. Twelve-week treatment with extended-release amantadine improved OFF dystonia (treatment differences vs placebo: UDysRS Part 2, -1.0 [-1.9,-0.1]; p = 0.03 and MDS-UPDRS Item 4.6, -0.3 [-0.6,-0.05]; p = 0.02). There was no correlation between changes in OFF time and changes in OFF dystonia. Double-blind improvements in OFF dystonia were sustained throughout the 2-year follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Extended-release amantadine yielded a sustained reduction in OFF-related dystonia in PD patients that was independent from a reduction in OFF time. A randomized controlled trial is warranted to confirm these findings.

Future Directions for Developing Non-dopaminergic Strategies for the Treatment of Parkinson's Disease

The symptomatic treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD) has been dominated by the use of dopaminergic medication, but significant unmet need remains, much of which is related to non-motor symptoms and the involvement of non-dopaminergic transmitter systems. As such, little has changed in the past decades that has led to milestone advances in therapy and significantly improved treatment paradigms and patient outcomes, particularly in relation to symptoms unresponsive to levodopa. This review has looked at how pharmacological approaches to treatment are likely to develop in the near and distant future and will focus on two areas: 1) novel non-dopaminergic pharmacological strategies to control motor symptoms; and 2) novel non-dopaminergic approaches for the treatment of non-motor symptoms. The overall objective of this review is to use a 'crystal ball' approach to the future of drug discovery in PD and move away from the more traditional dopamine-based treatments. Here, we discuss promising non-dopaminergic and 'dirty drugs' that have the potential to become new key players in the field of Parkinson's disease treatment.

Comparative efficacy and safety of adjunctive drugs to levodopa for fluctuating Parkinson's disease - network meta-analysis

It remains unclear which adjunctive drug for Parkinson's disease (PD) in combination with levodopa is more effective, tolerable, and safe. We aimed to compare the efficacy, tolerability, and safety among anti-PD drugs from several classes in patients with fluctuating PD who received levodopa through network meta-analysis (NMA). Twelve anti-PD drugs belonging to 4 different drug classes (dopamine agonists, monoamine oxidase type B inhibitors, catechol-O-methyl transferase inhibitors, and an adenosine A2A receptor antagonist) were selected. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing placebo with anti-PD drug or among anti-PD drugs in patients with PD who experienced motor fluctuations or wearing-off and received levodopa. We included 54 RCTs in the analysis. The NMA was performed under a frequentist framework using a random-effects model. The efficacy outcome was change in daily off-time, and the tolerability outcome was discontinuation due to all causes. Safety outcomes included discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs) and the incidence of AEs, dyskinesia, hallucination, and orthostatic hypotension. According to the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) in the NMA, ropinirole transdermal patch (SUCRA, 0.861) ranked the highest in efficacy, followed by pramipexole (0.762), ropinirole extended release (ER) (0.750), and safinamide (0.691). In terms of tolerability, ropinirole (0.954) ranked the highest, followed by pramipexole (0.857), safinamide (0.717), and ropinirole ER (0.708). Each anti-PD drug had different SUCRA ranking profiles for the safety outcomes. These findings suggest that ropinirole, pramipexole, and safinamide are well-balanced anti-PD drugs that satisfy both efficacy and tolerability outcomes.

Altered Amantadine Effects after Repetitive Treatment for l-dopa-induced Involuntary Movements in a Rat Model of Parkinson's Disease

BACKGROUND

l-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (l-dopa) is the most effective drug for Parkinson's disease (PD); however, most PD patients develop motor fluctuations including wearing-off and l-dopa-induced dyskinesia (LID). Amantadine is beneficial for improving the motor symptoms, reducing "off" time, and ameliorating LID, although its long-term efficacy remains unknown.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the effects of amantadine on PD and LID using a rat model with repetitive drug treatment.

METHOD

We utilized 6-hydroxydopamine injections to develop a hemiparkinsonian rat model. The rats were assigned to four groups: five rats received l-dopa and benserazide for 31 days, six rats received l-dopa and benserazide plus amantadine for 31 days, five rats received l-dopa and benserazide for 15 days followed by l-dopa and benserazide plus amantadine for 16 days, and five rats received l-dopa and benserazide plus amantadine for 15 days followed by l-dopa and benserazide treatment for 16 days. We evaluated the l-dopa-induced abnormal involuntary movements on treatment days 1, 7, 14, 16, 22, and 29. Subsequently, immunohistochemistry for drebrin was performed.

RESULTS

l-dopa-induced abnormal movements were reduced on the first day of amantadine treatment, and these effects disappeared with repetitive treatment. In contrast, the extension of l-dopa "on" time was observed after repetitive amantadine treatment. All groups showed enlarged drebrin immunoreactive dots in the dopamine-denervated striatum, indicating that amantadine did not prevent priming effects of repetitive l-dopa treatment.

CONCLUSION

Anti-LID effect of amantadine diminished after repetitive treatment, and the effect of amantadine on wearing-off emerged after repetitive treatment in a hemiparkinsonian rat model. Fluctuations in amantadine effects should be considered when using it in clinical settings.

Off-time Treatment Options for Parkinson's Disease

Motor fluctuations (MF) are deemed by patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) as the most troublesome disease feature resulting from the increasing impairment in responsiveness to dopaminergic drug treatments. MF are characterized by the loss of a stable response to levodopa over the nychthemeron with the reappearance of motor (and non-motor) parkinsonian clinical signs at various moments during the day and night. They normally appear after a few years of levodopa treatment and with a variable, though overall increasing severity, over the disease course. The armamentarium of first-line treatment options has widened in the last decade with new once-a-daily compounds, including a catechol O-methyltransferase inhibitor - Opicapone-, two MAO-B inhibitors plus channel blocker - Zonisamide and Safinamide and one amantadine extended-release formulation - ADS5012. In addition to apomorphine injection or oral levodopa dispersible tablets, which have been available for a long time, new on-demand therapies such as apomorphine sublingual or levodopa inhaled formulations have recently shown efficacy as rescue therapies for Off-time treatment. When the management of MF becomes difficult in spite of oral/on-demand options, more complex therapies should be considered, including surgical, i.e. deep brain stimulation, or device-aided therapies with pump systems delivering continuous subcutaneous or intestinal levodopa or subcutaneous apomorphine formulation. Older and less commonly used ablative techniques (radiofrequency pallidotomy) may also be effective while there is still scarce data regarding Off-time reduction using a new lesional approach, i.e. magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound. The choice between the different advanced therapies options is a shared decision that should consider physician opinion on contraindication/main target symptom, patients' preference, caregiver's availability together with public health systems and socio-economic environment. The choice of the right/first add-on treatment is still a matter of debate as well as the proper time for an advanced therapy to be considered. In this narrative review, we discuss all the above cited aspects of MF in patients with PD, including their phenomenology, management, by means of pharmacological and advanced therapies, on-going clinical trials and future research and treatment perspectives.

Effective Management of "OFF" Episodes in Parkinson's Disease: Emerging Treatment Strategies and Unmet Clinical Needs

Motor complications related to the chronic administration of levodopa and failure to prevent the neurodegenerative disease process counterbalance the pivotal discovery of levodopa as the cornerstone of PD treatment. Excellent motor control is offered early during the course of treatment, but this diminishes as pathological changes in the striatum lead to synaptic dopamine levels becoming completely dependent on exogenous dopamine. This non-physiologic stimulation of dopamine receptors eventually manifests as OFF episodes. As no disease modifying therapy exists for PD that can disrupt these pathological changes, most research and treatment focuses on optimization of dopaminergic stimulation of striatal receptors so that they mimic tonic, physiologic stimulation as closely as possible. Strategies focusing on these challenges have included non-pharmacologic approaches, optimizing levodopa pharmacokinetics, using adjunctive treatments including those with non-dopaminergic mechanisms, and implementing rescue therapies. Device aided therapies, including surgery, are also available. In this review, we will focus on effective management of motor symptoms related to OFF periods, including emerging strategies. Unmet clinical needs will be discussed, including non-motor symptoms, targeted molecular therapies and disease modifying therapy.

Why do 'OFF' periods still occur during continuous drug delivery in Parkinson's disease?

Continuous drug delivery (CDD) is used in moderately advanced and late-stage Parkinson’s disease (PD) to control motor and non-motor fluctuations (‘OFF’ periods). Transdermal rotigotine is indicated for early fluctuations, while subcutaneous apomorphine infusion and levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel are utilised in advanced PD. All three strategies are considered examples of continuous dopaminergic stimulation achieved through CDD. A central premise of the CDD is to achieve stable control of the parkinsonian motor and non-motor states and avoid emergence of ‘OFF’ periods. However, data suggest that despite their efficacy in reducing the number and duration of ‘OFF’ periods, these strategies still do not prevent ‘OFF’ periods in the middle to late stages of PD, thus contradicting the widely held concepts of continuous drug delivery and continuous dopaminergic stimulation. Why these emergent ‘OFF’ periods still occur is unknown. In this review, we analyse the potential reasons for their persistence. The contribution of drug- and device-related involvement, and the problems related to site-specific drug delivery are analysed. We propose that changes in dopaminergic and non-dopaminergic mechanisms in the basal ganglia might render these persistent ‘OFF’ periods unresponsive to dopaminergic therapy delivered via CDD.

Istradefylline for OFF Episodes in Parkinson’s Disease: A US Perspective of Common Clinical Scenarios

The effective management of OFF episodes remains an important unmet need for patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) who develop motor complications with long-term levodopa therapy. Istradefylline is a selective adenosine A_2A receptor antagonist for the treatment of patients with PD experiencing OFF episodes while on levodopa/decarboxylase inhibitor. Originally approved in Japan, istradefylline was recently approved in the USA. In this article, we provide a specific review of the four clinical studies that the FDA included in the approval of istradefylline in the USA, and discuss common clinical scenarios, based on our experience, where treatment with istradefylline may benefit patients experiencing motor fluctuations.