Ensuring health equity for sexual and/or gender minority individuals

Mistrust and missed opportunities: BDSM practitioner experiences in healthcare

BACKGROUND

Stigma and discrimination have been shown to be significant barriers to healthcare utilization and provider trust among sexual minority groups including BDSM and kink communities.

AIM

This exploratory study sought to better understand medical mistrust and experiences of discrimination in primary care settings and how these factors predict hiding kink-related injuries from healthcare providers.

METHODS

A total of 301 individuals who self-identified as being a member of the BDSM community and engaged in BDSM-play activities completed an online survey.

OUTCOMES

Participants completed measures including experiences with BDSM-play-related injuries, disclosure of BDSM activity to healthcare providers, measures addressing mistrust in in healthcare providers (such as avoidance of questions about sexual health or STI testing), and experiences with discrimination in healthcare settings because of BDSM group membership (such as perceptions of being insulted or receiving poor care).

RESULTS

Nearly, 40% of participants indicated at least one experience with discrimination in the healthcare system because they identified as a member of the kink community. Over 20% of participants indicated there were BDSM-related concerns they would have liked to discuss with their primary care provider but did not. Participants who hid injuries from their primary care provider had higher levels of medical mistrust and more experiences with medical discrimination than those who disclosed their injuries. A stepwise logistic regression determined that medical mistrust served as a significant predictor of hiding injuries from healthcare providers.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Patients who are members of the BDSM community are likely to have had negative healthcare experiences, and these experiences impact their communication with and trust in future medical encounters.

STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS

Strengths of the study include addressing diverse components of stigma in healthcare including both experiences with discrimination as well as perceptions of the medical field. Furthermore, potential direct consequences of past negative experiences such as hiding injuries from healthcare providers were examined. Given the likely impact of race, gender, and BDSM group membership on experiences with discrimination, a limitation includes the limited representations of BDSM participants from minoritized racial and ethnic groups. Furthermore, in addressing injuries, the survey did not differentiate intended or expected injuries obtained in BDSM play from unintentional or unwanted injuries.

CONCLUSION

Mistrust in the medical system impacts members of the BDSM community's willingness to disclose injuries to their healthcare provider.

Brain Health Outcomes in Sexual and Gender Minority Groups: Results From the All of Us Research Program

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Sexual and gender minority (SGM) groups have been historically underrepresented in neurologic research, and their brain health disparities are unknown. We aim to evaluate whether SGM persons are at higher risk of adverse brain health outcomes compared with cisgender straight (non-SGM) individuals.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study in the All of Us Research Program, a US population-based study, including all participants with information on gender identity and sexual orientation. We used baseline questionnaires to identify sexual minority (lesbian, gay, bisexual, diverse sexual orientation; nonstraight sexual orientation) and gender minority (gender diverse and transgender; gender identity different from sex assigned at birth) participants. The primary outcome was a composite of stroke, dementia, and late-life depression, assessed using electronic health record data and self-report. Secondarily, we evaluated each disease separately. Furthermore, we evaluated all subgroups of gender and sexual minorities stratified by sex assigned at birth. We used multivariable logistic regression (adjusted for age, sex assigned at birth, race/ethnicity, cardiovascular risk factors, other relevant comorbidities, and neighborhood deprivation index) to assess the relationship between SGM groups and the outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 413,457 US adults enrolled between May 31, 2017, and June 30, 2022, we included 393,041 participants with available information on sexual orientation and gender identity (mean age 51 [SD 17] years), of whom 39,632 (10%) belonged to SGM groups. Of them, 38,528 (97%) belonged to a sexual minority and 4,431 (11%) to a gender minority. Compared with non-SGM, SGM persons had 15% higher odds of the brain health composite outcome (odds ratio [OR] 1.15, 95% CI 1.08-1.22). In secondary analyses, these results persisted across sexual and gender minorities separately (all 95% CIs > 1). Assessing individual diseases, all SGM groups had higher odds of dementia (SGM vs non-SGM: OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.00-1.29) and late-life depression (SGM vs non-SGM: OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.17-1.38) and transgender women had higher odds of stroke (OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.04-2.70).

DISCUSSION

In a large US population study, SGM persons had higher odds of adverse brain health outcomes. Further research should explore structural causes of inequity to advance inclusive and diverse neurologic care.

A Qualitative Study of Factors Influencing Hospital Participation in the Healthcare Equality Index

ABSTRACT

Gender and sexual minority individuals experience higher rates of mistreatment and discrimination in healthcare compared with their non-lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and other nonheterosexual (LGBTQ+) peers. The Healthcare Equality Index (HEI) aims to create more inclusive environments and to provide metrics for quality improvement. Currently, only one adult hospital in the District of Columbia has earned the highest recognition from the HEI. Our institution is part of the same regional health system as this hospital, yet has never been evaluated by the HEI. This study explores the knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions surrounding the HEI at our institution to assess the feasibility of its participation. During the study period of July 2021 to June 2022, a total of 12 physicians, administrators, and educators from both hospitals and our affiliated school of medicine were interviewed. All participants expressed support after HEI requirements and improving inclusivity for LGBTQ+ patients. Participants at the other hospital cited unanimous support amongst hospital administrators as key for successful HEI implementation. Participants also mentioned cost, staff shortages, and the school of medicine's religious affiliation as potential barriers to this goal. Ultimately, hospital implementation of HEI guidelines is feasible despite shifting institutional priorities and resource limitations through greater stakeholder buy-in and streamlining a systemwide approach.

Proposed mechanisms of hypertension and risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in LGBT communities

Hypertension (HTN), a highly prevalent public issue affecting one in two adults in the United States, has recently been shown to differentially burden individuals belonging to marginalized communities, such as the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) communities. The minority stress theory posits that a unique combination of marginalization-related psychosocial stressors and coping behaviors may underlie the increased burden of diseases like HTN in LGBT populations. Uncontrolled or poorly managed HTN often leads to the development of adverse cardiovascular outcomes, such as heart failure (HF). Despite our understanding of minority stress theory and demonstrated associations between LGBT identities and HTN, the mechanisms whereby psychosocial stress drives HTN in LGBT populations remain unclear. This mini-review discusses the physiological systems governing blood pressure and the epidemiology of HTN across different subgroups of LGBT people. In addition, we propose mechanisms demonstrated in the general population whereby psychological stress has been implicated in elevating blood pressure that may be occurring in LGBT populations. Finally, we discuss the limitations of current studies and methodological frameworks to make suggestions for study designs to better delineate the mechanisms of psychosocial stress-related HTN in LGBT communities.