Immune-checkpoint inhibitor use in patients with cancer and pre-existing autoimmune diseases

MMP1, IL-1β, sTNFR-1, and IL-6 are prognostic factors for patients with unresectable or metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Few studies have reported reliable prognostic factors for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Therefore, we investigated prognostic factors in patients treated with ICIs for unresectable or metastatic RCC.

METHODS

We included 43 patients who received ICI treatment for RCC between January 2018 and October 2021. Blood samples were drawn before treatment, and 73 soluble factors in the plasma were analyzed using a bead-based multiplex assay. We examined factors associated with progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and immune-related adverse events (irAE) using the Chi-squared test, Kaplan-Meier method, and the COX proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

Patients exhibited a median PFS and OS of 212 and 783 days, respectively. Significant differences in both PFS and OS were observed for MMP1 (PFS, p < 0.001; OS, p = 0.003), IL-1β (PFS, p = 0.021; OS, p = 0.008), sTNFR-1 (PFS, p = 0.017; OS, p = 0.005), and IL-6 (PFS, p = 0.004; OS, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed significant differences in PFS for MMP1 (hazard ratio [HR] 5.305, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.648-17.082; p = 0.005) and OS for IL-6 (HR 23.876, 95% CI, 3.426-166.386; p = 0.001). Moreover, 26 patients experienced irAE, leading to ICI discontinuation or withdrawal. MMP1 was significantly associated with irAE (p = 0.039).

CONCLUSION

MMP1 may be associated with severe irAE, and MMP1, IL-1β, sTNFR-1, and IL-6 could serve as prognostic factors in unresectable or metastatic RCC treated with ICIs. MMP1 and IL-6 were independent predictors of PFS and OS, respectively. Thus, inhibiting these soluble factors may be promising for enhancing antitumor responses in patients with RCC treated with ICIs.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in patients with cancer and pre-existing systemic sclerosis

OBJECTIVE

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapies have dramatically improved outcomes in multiple cancers. ICI's mechanism of action involves immune system activation to augment anti-tumor immunity. Patients with pre-existing autoimmune diseases, such as systemic sclerosis (SSc), were excluded from initial ICI clinical trials due to concern that such immune system activation could precipitate an autoimmune disease flare or new, severe immune related adverse events (irAE). In the present study, we report our experience with ICIs in patients with pre-existing SSc.

METHODS

Patients with SSc who received ICI therapy for cancer were identified from the Johns Hopkins Scleroderma Center Research Registry. Through chart review and prespecified definitions, we identified whether patients experienced worsening SSc activity or new irAEs. SSc disease activity worsening was pre-defined as an increase in modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS), new scleroderma renal crisis, progression of interstitial lung disease (ILD) on CT scan, increased Raynaud's phenomenon frequency or severity, new pulmonary hypertension, or myositis flare. IrAEs also included active inflammatory arthritis and dermatitis.

RESULTS

Eight patients with SSc who received ICI therapy for cancer were included. Overall, SSc symptoms remained stable during and after ICI therapy. None of the patients with long-standing sine or limited cutaneous SSc (lcSSc) had progressive skin thickening after ICI therapy. One patient, who was early in his diffuse cutaneous SSc (dcSSc) disease course, experienced worsening skin thickening and renal crisis. Three patients (38 %) experienced a total of five irAEs (grade 2: diarrhea, mucositis and dermatitis; grade 3: pneumonitis, and grade 4: nephritis). The patient with grade 4 nephritis developed scleroderma renal crisis and immune checkpoint related nephritis simultaneously. There were no deaths due to irAEs.

CONCLUSION

In this study, ICI therapy was well tolerated in patients with longstanding, sine or lcSSc. IrAE were common but generally manageable. Patients with early, active SSc may be at greater risk from ICI therapy, but more research is needed.

Impact of Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs, Glucocorticoids, and Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs on Cancer Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy for advanced malignancies often leads to off-target adverse events. Rheumatic immune-related adverse events can often linger beyond the duration of ICI therapy and sometimes requires the use of immunomodulator therapy. A key question, therefore, is if the commonly used therapies affect cancer outcomes. In this review, the authors summarize the state of the data as it currently stands, taking into consideration the limitations of the various source studies. The most information is known about glucocorticoids, which appear to be harmful especially when used early and at high doses.

Pre-existing Autoimmune Diseases and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Cancer Treatment: Considerations About Initiation, Flares, Immune-Related Adverse Events, and Cancer Progression

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are increasingly used to treat a variety of cancer types. Patients with preexisting autoimmune diseases may be vulnerable to underlying disease flare as well as immune-related adverse events from ICIs. There has also been concern that immunosuppression needed to control the autoimmune disease may blunt ICI efficacy. Much of the literature is focused on diverse preexisting autoimmune diseases, which may limit conclusions to specific diseases. There is a growing literature of specific diseases, such as preexisting rheumatoid arthritis, investigating outcomes after ICI.

Neuromyelitis optica associated with the use of Atezolizumab in a patient with advanced lung adenocarcinoma

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are a pharmacological group increasingly used in Oncology and Hematology. These treatments can lead to autoimmune complications, with neurological conditions, especially central nervous system (CNS) involvement, being rare. We describe a case of seropositive neuromyelitis optica in a patient with locally advanced lung adenocarcinoma treated with Atezolizumab.

Flotillin-2 dampens T cell antigen-sensitivity and functionality

T cell receptor (TCR) engagement triggers T cell responses, yet how TCR-mediated activation is regulated at the plasma membrane remains unclear. Here, we report that deleting the membrane scaffolding protein Flotillin-2 (Flot2) increases T cell antigen sensitivity, resulting in enhanced TCR signaling and effector function to weak TCR stimulation. T cell-specific Flot2-deficient mice exhibited reduced tumor growth and enhanced immunity to infection. Flot2-null CD4 + T cells exhibited increased T helper 1 polarization, proliferation, Nur77 induction, and phosphorylation of ZAP70 and LCK upon weak TCR stimulation, indicating a sensitized TCR-triggering threshold. Single cell-RNA sequencing suggested that Flot2 - null CD4 + T cells follow a similar route of activation as wild-type CD4 + T cells but exhibit higher occupancy of a discrete activation state under weak TCR stimulation. Given prior reports that TCR clustering influences sensitivity of T cells to stimuli, we evaluated TCR distribution with super-resolution microscopy. Flot2 ablation increased the number of surface TCR nanoclusters on naïve CD4 + T cells. Collectively, we posit that Flot2 modulates T cell functionality to weak TCR stimulation, at least in part, by regulating surface TCR clustering. Our findings have implications for improving T cell reactivity in diseases with poor antigenicity, such as cancer and chronic infections.

Antinuclear antibodies may predict the development of immune-related adverse events in asymptomatic patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: results from a single-center cohort

We aim at investigating the association between subclinical autoimmunity and immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in a cohort of patients treated by immune checkpoint inhibitors for solid metastatic cancer. In the context of an oncology/rheumatology outpatient clinic, we evaluated patients treated with anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1. Before treatment, each patient underwent a physical evaluation and a blood sample to identify the presence of a set of autoantibodies. Indeed, all the patients were followed during treatment to identify irAEs and to assess the association with autoantibodies. Fifty-one patients (M/F 16/35; median age 70 years, IQR 16.5) were evaluated; 34.8% of patients showed ANA positivity, 6.5% ENA positivity (anti-SSA), 4.3% Ratest positivity, and 2.1% (one patient) ACPA positivity. During a median period of 21 months (IQR 38.75), 39.2% of patients developed irAEs. Musculo-skeletal manifestations, in particular arthritis, were the most frequent. We found a significant association between the positivity for ANA and the development of irAES (p = 0.03, RR 2.01, 95% CI 1.03-3.92). Furthermore, the progression-free survival was significantly longer in patients developing irAEs compared to those who are not experiencing these events (p = 0.007). This study underlines the potential role of ANA positivity as a predictive biomarker for the development of irAEs.

Targeting novel regulated cell death: Ferroptosis, pyroptosis and necroptosis in anti-PD-1/PD-L1 cancer immunotherapy

Chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and immunotherapy represent key tumour treatment strategies. Notably, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), particularly anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD1) and anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1), have shown clinical efficacy in clinical tumour immunotherapy. However, the limited effectiveness of ICIs is evident due to many cancers exhibiting poor responses to this treatment. An emerging avenue involves triggering non-apoptotic regulated cell death (RCD), a significant mechanism driving cancer cell death in diverse cancer treatments. Recent research demonstrates that combining RCD inducers with ICIs significantly enhances their antitumor efficacy across various cancer types. The use of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy activates CD8+ T cells, prompting the initiation of novel RCD forms, such as ferroptosis, pyroptosis, and necroptosis. However, the functions and mechanisms of non-apoptotic RCD in anti-PD1/PD-L1 therapy remain insufficiently explored. This review summarises the emerging roles of ferroptosis, pyroptosis, and necroptosis in anti-PD1/PD-L1 immunotherapy. It emphasises the synergy between nanomaterials and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors to induce non-apoptotic RCD in different cancer types. Furthermore, targeting cell death signalling pathways in combination with anti-PD1/PD-L1 therapies holds promise as a prospective immunotherapy strategy for tumour treatment.

Immune-Related Adverse Events Due to Cancer Immunotherapy: Immune Mechanisms and Clinical Manifestations

The landscape of cancer treatment has undergone a significant transformation with the introduction of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs). Patients undergoing these treatments often report prolonged clinical and radiological responses, albeit with a potential risk of developing immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Here, we reviewed and discussed the mechanisms of action of ICIs and their pivotal role in regulating the immune system to enhance the anti-tumor immune response. We scrutinized the intricate pathogenic mechanisms responsible for irAEs, arising from the evasion of self-tolerance checkpoints due to drug-induced immune modulation. We also summarized the main clinical manifestations due to irAEs categorized by organ types, detailing their incidence and associated risk factors. The occurrence of irAEs is more frequent when ICIs are combined; with neurological, cardiovascular, hematological, and rheumatic irAEs more commonly linked to PD1/PD-L1 inhibitors and cutaneous and gastrointestinal irAEs more prevalent with CTLA4 inhibitors. Due to the often-nonspecific signs and symptoms, the diagnosis of irAEs (especially for those rare ones) can be challenging. The differential with primary autoimmune disorders becomes sometimes intricate, given the clinical and pathophysiological similarities. In conclusion, considering the escalating use of ICIs, this area of research necessitates additional clinical studies and practical insights, especially the development of biomarkers for predicting immune toxicities. In addition, there is a need for heightened education for both clinicians and patients to enhance understanding and awareness.

Gastric carcinoma in autoimmune gastritis: a histopathologic and molecular study

Patients with autoimmune gastritis (AIG) have a 13-fold risk of developing type-1 neuroendocrine tumors, whereas the risk for gastric adenocarcinoma is still uncertain. Here we describe the clinicopathological and molecular features of a series of gastric carcinomas (GC) arising in the context of AIG. A total of 26 AIG-associated GC specimens were collected from four Italian Institutions. Immunohistochemistry for MUC1, MUC2, MUC5AC, MUC6, CDX2, HER2, PD-L1, CLDN18, Mismatch Repair (MMR) proteins, and p53 and EBER in situ hybridization were performed. Histologic features and IHC were jointly reviewed by five expert gastrointestinal pathologists. Next-generation sequencing analysis (TrueSight Oncology 500, Illumina) of 523 cancer-related genes was performed on 19 cases. Most tumors were diagnosed as pT1 (52%), were located in the corpus/fundus (58%) and were associated with OLGA stage II gastritis (80.8%), absence of parietal cells, complete intestinal metaplasia and ECL-cell micronodular hyperplasia. Only 4 (15.4%) GCs were diagnosed during follow-up for AIG. The following histotypes were identified: 20 (77%) adenocarcinomas; 3 (11%) mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasms, and 2 (8%) high-grade solid adenocarcinomas with focal neuroendocrine component, 1 (4%) adenocarcinoma with an amphicrine component. Overall, 7 cases (27%) showed MMR deficiency, 3 (12%) were positive (score 3+) for HER2, 6 (23%) were CLDN18 positive, and 11 (42%) had PD-L1 Combined Positive Score ≥ 10. EBER was negative in all cases. Molecular analysis revealed 5/19 (26%) MSI cases and 7 (37%) TMB-high. The most frequently altered genes were: TP53 (8/19, 42%), RNF43 (7/19, 37%), ERBB2 (7/19, 37% [two amplified and five mutated cases]), ARID1A (6/19, 32%), and PIK3CA (4/19, 21%). In summary, AIG-associated GCs are often diagnosed at low stage in patients with long-standing misrecognized severe AIG; they often display a neuroendocrine component or differentiation, have relatively higher rates of MMR deficiency, and TMB-high.

Preclinical development of novel PD-L1 tracers and first-in-human study of [68Ga]Ga-NOTA-RW102 in patients with lung cancers

BACKGROUND

The programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1)/programmed death receptor ligand 1 (PD-L1) axis critically facilitates cancer cells' immune evasion. Antibody therapeutics targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis have shown remarkable efficacy in various tumors. Immuno-positron emission tomography (ImmunoPET) imaging of PD-L1 expression may help reshape solid tumors' immunotherapy landscape.

METHODS

By immunizing an alpaca with recombinant human PD-L1, three clones of the variable domain of the heavy chain of heavy-chain only antibody (VHH) were screened, and RW102 with high binding affinity was selected for further studies. ABDRW102, a VHH derivative, was further engineered by fusing RW102 with the albumin binder ABD035. Based on the two targeting vectors, four PD-L1-specific tracers ([68Ga]Ga-NOTA-RW102, [68Ga]Ga-NOTA-ABDRW102, [64Cu]Cu-NOTA-ABDRW102, and [89Zr]Zr-DFO-ABDRW102) with different circulation times were developed. The diagnostic efficacies were thoroughly evaluated in preclinical solid tumor models, followed by a first-in-human translational investigation of [68Ga]Ga-NOTA-RW102 in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

RESULTS

While RW102 has a high binding affinity to PD-L1 with an excellent KD value of 15.29 pM, ABDRW102 simultaneously binds to human PD-L1 and human serum albumin with an excellent KD value of 3.71 pM and 3.38 pM, respectively. Radiotracers derived from RW102 and ABDRW102 have different in vivo circulation times. In preclinical studies, [68Ga]Ga-NOTA-RW102 immunoPET imaging allowed same-day annotation of differential PD-L1 expression with specificity, while [64Cu]Cu-NOTA-ABDRW102 and [89Zr]Zr-DFO-ABDRW102 enabled longitudinal visualization of PD-L1. More importantly, a pilot clinical trial shows the safety and diagnostic value of [68Ga]Ga-NOTA-RW102 immunoPET imaging in patients with NSCLCs and its potential to predict immune-related adverse effects following PD-L1-targeted immunotherapies.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed and validated a series of PD-L1-targeted tracers. Initial preclinical and clinical evidence indicates that immunoPET imaging with [68Ga]Ga-NOTA-RW102 holds promise in visualizing differential PD-L1 expression, selecting patients for PD-L1-targeted immunotherapies, and monitoring immune-related adverse effects in patients receiving PD-L1-targeted treatments.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT06165874.

Microwave ablation enhances the systemic immune response in patients with lung cancer

Microwave ablation (MWA) is a key alternative therapy to conventional surgery for the treatment of lung cancer. In addition to eliminating local tumors, MWA may promote antitumor immunological responses, such as abscopal effects in distant lesions. However, the intensity of MWA is limited and the underlying mechanisms are not well-defined. The present study assessed the impact of MWA on immune cell subsets and cytokines in patients with lung cancer. A total of 45 patients with lung cancer who underwent percutaneous lung tumor MWA were enrolled. Peripheral blood samples were collected before and 24 h after MWA and changes in immune cell subsets [lymphocytes, CD3+, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, B cells and natural killer (NK) cells] and serum cytokine levels (IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12p70, IL-17A and F, IL-22, TNF-α, TNF-β and IFN-γ) were assessed by flow cytometry and ELISA. The number of total lymphocytes, CD4+ T and NK cells in the peripheral blood significantly decreased 24 h after MWA, while number of CD8+ T cells remained stable, leading to a higher proportion of CD8+ T cells. In addition, the serum levels of IL-2, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-12p70, IL-22, TNF-α and IFN-γ were significantly increased 24 h after MWA, indicating a T helper 1 type immune response. The immune response in patients with advanced stage disease was comparable with patients in the early stage group; however, the number of total lymphocytes and CD3+ T cells significantly decreased and the ratio of CD4/CD8 and IL-2 levels significantly increased. The early immune response after MWA may contribute to systemic antitumor immunity in patients with both early and advanced disease. Thus, MWA may exhibit potential as a local therapy and trigger abscopal effects in distant lesions in patients with lung cancer.

Melanoma-Modern Treatment for Metastatic Melanoma

ABSTRACT

Traditional chemotherapy has been ineffective in the treatment of metastatic melanoma. Until the use of checkpoint inhibitors, patients had very limited survival. Since the original US Food and Drug Administration approval of ipilimumab over a decade ago, the armamentarium of immunotherapeutic agents has expanded to include programmed cell death protein 1 and lymphocyte activation gene 3 antibodies, requiring a nuanced approach to the selection of frontline treatments, managing patients through recurrence and progression, and determining length of therapy. Herein, we review the existing evidence supporting current standard immunotherapy regimens and discuss the clinical decision-making involved in treating patients with metastatic melanoma with checkpoint inhibitors.

Multilayer concept of autoimmune mechanisms and manifestations in inborn errors of immunity: Relevance for precision therapy

Autoimmunity in inborn errors of immunity (IEIs) has a multifactorial pathogenesis and develops subsequent to a genetic predisposition in conjunction with gene regulation, environmental modifiers, and infectious triggers. On the basis of incremental data availability owing to upfront application of omics technologies, a more granular and dynamic view of mechanisms and manifestations is warranted. Here, we present a comprehensive novel concept of autoimmunity in IEIs that considers multiple layers of interdependent elements and connects 101 causative genes or deletions according to the quality of the allelic variants with 47 molecular pathways and 22 immune effector mechanisms. Furthermore, we list 50 resulting manifestations together with the corresponding Human Phenotype Ontology terms and review the types and frequencies of the most relevant clinical presentations. When all of its elements are taken together, this concept (1) extends the historical anatomic view of central versus peripheral tolerance toward multiple interdependent mechanisms of immune tolerance, (2) delineates the mechanisms underlying the protean clinical manifestations, and thereby, (3) points toward the most suitable precision therapy for autoimmunity in IEIs. The multilayer concept of autoimmune mechanisms and manifestations in IEIs will facilitate research design and provide clinical guidance on the use of precision medicine irrespective of the data depth available in each health care scenario.

Immunomodulator use, risk factors and management of flares, and mortality for patients with pre-existing rheumatoid arthritis after immune checkpoint inhibitors for cancer

OBJECTIVE

To investigate immunomodulator use, risk factors and management for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) flares, and mortality for patients with pre-existing RA initiating immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) for cancer.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of all patients with RA meeting 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria that initiated ICI for cancer at Mass General Brigham or Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston, MA (2011-2022). We described immunomodulator use and changes at baseline of ICI initiation. We identified RA flares after baseline, categorized the severity, and described the management. Baseline factors were examined for RA flare risk using Fine and Gray competing risk models. We performed a landmark analysis to limit the potential for immortal time bias, where the analysis started 3 months after ICI initiation. Among those who survived at least 3 months, we examined whether RA flare within 3 months after ICI initiation was associated with mortality using Cox regression.

RESULTS

Among 11,901 patients who initiated ICI for cancer treatment, we analyzed 100 pre-existing RA patients (mean age 70.3 years, 63 % female, 89 % on PD-1 monotherapy, 50 % lung cancer). At ICI initiation, 71 % were seropositive, 82 % had remission/low RA disease activity, 24 % were on glucocorticoids, 35 % were on conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), and 10 % were on biologic or targeted synthetic DMARDs. None discontinued glucocorticoids and 3/35 (9 %) discontinued DMARDs in anticipation of starting ICI. RA flares occurred in 46 % (incidence rate 1.84 per 1000 person-months, 95 % CI 1.30, 2.37); 31/100 flared within 3 months of baseline. RA flares were grade 1 in 16/46 (35 %), grade 2 in 25/46 (54 %), and grade 3 in 5/46 (11 %); 2/46 (4 %) required hospitalization for RA flare. Concomitant immune-related adverse events occurred in 15/46 (33 %) that flared. A total of 72/100 died during follow-up; 21 died within 3 months of baseline. Seropositivity had an age-adjusted sdHR of 1.95 (95 % CI 1.02, 3.71) for RA flare compared to seronegativity, accounting for competing risk of death. Otherwise, no baseline factors were associated with RA flare, including cancer type, disease activity, RA duration, and deformities. 9/46 (20 %) patients had their ICI discontinued/paused due to RA flares. In the landmark analysis among 79 patients who survived at least 3 months, RA flare in the first 3 months was not associated with lower mortality (adjusted HR 1.24, 95 % CI 0.71, 2.16) compared to no RA flare.

CONCLUSION

Among patients with pre-existing RA, few changed immunomodulator medications in anticipation of starting ICI, but RA flares occurred in nearly half. RA flares were mostly mild and treated with typical therapies. Seropositivity was associated with RA flare risk. A minority had severe RA flares requiring disruption of ICI, and RA flares were not associated with mortality.

Neurological adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors and the development of paraneoplastic neurological syndromes

Immune checkpoint inhibitors, a class of oncological treatments that enhance antitumour immunity, can trigger neurological adverse events closely resembling paraneoplastic neurological syndromes. Unlike other neurological adverse events caused by these drugs, post-immune checkpoint inhibitor paraneoplastic neurological syndromes predominantly affect the CNS and are associated with neural antibodies and cancer types commonly found also in spontaneous paraneoplastic neurological syndromes. Furthermore, post-immune checkpoint inhibitor paraneoplastic neurological syndromes have poorer neurological outcomes than other neurological adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Early diagnosis and initiation of immunosuppressive therapy are likely to be crucial in preventing the accumulation of neurological disability. Importantly, the neural antibodies found in patients with post-immune checkpoint inhibitor paraneoplastic neurological syndromes are sometimes detected before treatment, indicating that these antibodies might help to predict the development of neurological adverse events. Experimental and clinical evidence suggests that post-immune checkpoint inhibitor paraneoplastic neurological syndromes probably share immunological features with spontaneous paraneoplastic syndromes. Hence, the study of post-immune checkpoint inhibitor paraneoplastic neurological syndromes can help in deciphering the immunopathogenesis of paraneoplastic neurological syndromes and in identifying novel therapeutic targets.

Immunosuppressive therapy management in cancer patients with autoimmune diseases treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A case series and systematic literature review

INTRODUCTION

Prescribing immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) to cancer patients with an autoimmune disease (AID) is presumed safe when cautious adverse event management is applied. However, guidelines on immunosuppressant (IS) adaptations are limited and real-world evidence is scarce.

METHODS

Current practice of IS adaptations is described in a case series of AID patients treated with ICIs in a tertiary university hospital in Belgium (1/1/2016-31/12/2021). Patient, drug and disease-related data were documented using retrospective chart review. A systematic search of the PubMed database was performed to identify similar cases (1/1/2010-30/11/2022).

RESULTS

Sixteen patients were described in the case series (62% with active AID). Systemic IS were changed before ICI initiation in 5/9 patients. Four patients continued therapy, of which one achieved partial remission. Patients who had IS (partially) stopped before ICI start (n = 4) had AID flares in two cases; immune-related adverse events in three cases. In the systematic review, 37 cases were identified in 9 articles. Corticosteroids (n = 12) and non-selective IS (n = 27) were continued in, respectively, 66% and 68% of patients. Methotrexate was frequently discontinued (13/21). Biologicals, excluding tocilizumab and vedolizumab, were withheld during ICI treatment. Out of all patients with flares (n = 15), 47% had stopped IS therapy before ICI start and 53% had continued their AID drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

A detailed overview of IS management in patients with AID receiving ICI therapy is presented. Expanding the knowledge base germane to IS management with ICI therapy in the diverse population is essential to evaluate their mutual impact, thus advancing responsible patient care.

Combining immune-checkpoint inhibitors with tocilizumab to treat a lung adenocarcinoma patient with pre-existing polymyalgia rheumatica: A case report

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have changed the management of advanced cancers. However, patients with pre-existing autoimmune diseases (ADs) have usually been excluded from clinical trials of ICIs due to concerns about exacerbation of AD. Here, we combined ICIs with selective immunosuppressant treatment in a metastatic lung adenocarcinoma patient with active pre-existing polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR). Remarkably, the strategy led to durable response and no exacerbation of PMR. Thus, we provide the first clinical evidence of treating metastatic cancer with ICIs and concomitant use of tocilizumab and hydroxychloroquine for active pre-existing PMR.

Prognostic significance of Lymphocyte-activation gene 3 (LAG3) in patients with solid tumors: a systematic review, meta-analysis and pan-cancer analysis

BACKGROUND

Lymphocyte-activation gene 3 (LAG3) is a recently discovered immune checkpoint molecule that has been linked to immunosuppression and the advancement of cancer in different types of solid tumors. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic importance of LAG3 and its role in the immune system within solid tumors.

METHODS

Extensive literature searches were conducted using the Pubmed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases to identify relevant studies exploring the effect of LAG3 on survival outcomes. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with its 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to evaluate the prognostic values of LAG3. Afterwards, subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were conducted. Pan-cancer analysis investigated the possible relationships between LAG3 expression and genetic alterations, RNA methylation modification-related genes, genomic instability, immune checkpoint genes, and infiltration of immune cells.

RESULTS

A total of 43 studies with 7,118 patients were included in this analysis. Higher expression of LAG3 was associated with worse overall survival (HR = 1.10, 95% CI 1.01-1.19, P = 0.023), but not disease-free survival (HR = 1.41, 95% CI 0.96-2.07, P = 0.078), progression-free survival (HR = 1.12, 95% CI 0.90-1.39, P = 0.317) or recurrence-free survival (HR = 0.98, 95% CI 0.81-1.19, P = 0.871). Subgroup analysis showed that LAG3 might play different prognostic roles in different solid tumors. LAG3 expression was positively associated with immune cell infiltration and immune checkpoint genes in all of the cancers included. LAG3 expression was also found to be associated with microsatellite instability (MSI), copy number variation (CNV), simple nucleoside variation (SNV), tumor mutation burden (TMB), and neoantigen in various types of cancers.

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated expression of LAG3 is linked to poorer prognosis among patients diagnosed with solid cancers. LAG3 might play varying prognostic roles in different types of solid tumors. Given its substantial involvement in cancer immunity and tumorigenesis, LAG3 has garnered attention as a promising prognostic biomarker and a potential target for immunotherapy.

Reflecting on the cardiac toxicity in non-small cell lung cancer in the era of immune checkpoint inhibitors therapy combined with thoracic radiotherapy

In recent years, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become a widely used treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and the combination with traditional radiotherapy (RT) has shown significant potential in prolonging patient survival. However, both thoracic RT and ICIs can lead to cardiac toxicity, including radiation-induced heart damage (RIHD) and immunotherapy-related heart damage (IRHD). It still remains uncertain whether the combination of thoracic RT and immunotherapy will exacerbate acute or late cardiovascular (CV) toxicity and incidence. In this review, we summarize safety data from relevant clinical studies regarding CV toxicity for the combination therapy in NSCLC patients, explore the underlying synergetic mechanisms and common risk factors, and proposed treatment and management strategies. We hope to increase emphasis on the long-term assessment of CV toxicity risks associated with the combination therapy, and reduce the incidence of CV deaths resulting from such regimens.

Sequencing Systemic Therapy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

OPINION STATEMENT

Multiple treatment options are now approved for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). An immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-containing regimen should be highly considered as the first-line treatment when there is no contraindication, especially in those with hepatitis virus-related HCC, due to proven superior overall survival (OS) compared to sorafenib. Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and durvalumab plus tremelimumab remain the treatment of choice among all ICI-containing regimens, unless contraindications to either of the medications exist. Although sorafenib is still the only medication currently approved for select patients with Child-Pugh B (CP) HCC in the first-line setting, atezolizumab plus bevacizumab is being studied in this patient population. Moreover, patients with post-liver transplantation recurrence may benefit from tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), while more studies are still needed to determine the safety of ICIs in this setting. Interestingly, multiple potential biomarkers, including tumor mutational burden (TMB), microsatellite instability (MSI) status, and PD-L1 expression level, have inconsistently predicted response to ICIs in patients with HCC. Limited evidence is available to guide treatment choice in later-line settings after progressing on ICIs, and decisions should be based on the safety profile of the treatment regimen and patient preference. Multiple trials are ongoing to elucidate the optimal treatment sequence. Of note, we believe that TKIs (e.g., cabozantinib, regorafenib, lenvatinib, and sorafenib) could be more beneficial in later-line settings to broaden inhibition of other pathways apart from vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). When conventional treatment options are exhausted, tissue biopsy may be helpful to reveal rare targetable mutations, such as RET gene fusions.

Efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1 monotherapy versus anti-PD-1 antibodies plus lenvatinib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a real-world experience

Background

The efficacy of anti-programmed cell death (PD)-1 monotherapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) is limited, and combination therapy with lenvatinib and pembrolizumab has shown promising results. However, comparative studies between immune monotherapies and combination therapies are lacking.

Objectives

To investigate the efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1 monotherapy (PD-1) and anti-PD-1 plus lenvatinib (PD-1 + L) in patients with aHCC to guide clinical treatment decisions.

Design

A retrospective study was conducted on a cohort of patients with aHCC who received either PD-1 monotherapy or PD-1 + L combination therapy between January 2018 and January 2020.

Methods

The study retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 94 eligible patients with aHCC, with 39 in the PD-1 group and 55 in the PD-1 + L group. The efficacy outcomes, including objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety, were assessed.

Results

With a median follow-up of 30.1 months, the PD-1 + L group demonstrated a significantly higher ORR (32.7% versus 10.3%, p = 0.013), better DCR (80.0% versus 53.8%, p = 0.012), longer median PFS (10.6 versus 4.4 months, p < 0.001) and longer median OS (18.4 versus 8.5 months, p = 0.013) than PD-1 group. For the responders, the efficacy of the two groups was durable (DOR was 11.6 versus 3.5 months, p = 0.009). Subgroup analyses based on prior tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment and the presence or absence of macrovascular tumor thrombosis or extrahepatic metastases favored the PD-1 + L group. The combination therapy was a good predictor of PFS and OS in multivariate analysis. Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events were more common in PD-1 + L group, with higher incidences of hypertension and hand-foot skin reactions.

Conclusions

PD-1 monotherapy and PD-1 plus lenvatinib combination therapy were well-tolerated in patients with aHCC. PD-1 + L showed significantly better survival benefits than PD-1 monotherapy.

Autoimmune PaneLs as PrEdictors of Toxicity in Patients TReated with Immune Checkpoint InhibiTors (ALERT)

BACKGROUND

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) can lead to immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in a significant proportion of patients. The mechanisms underlying irAEs development are mostly unknown and might involve multiple immune effectors, such as T cells, B cells and autoantibodies (AutoAb).

METHODS

We used custom autoantigen (AutoAg) microarrays to profile AutoAb related to irAEs in patients receiving ICI. Plasma was collected before and after ICI from cancer patients participating in two clinical trials (NCT03686202, NCT02644369). A one-time collection was obtained from healthy controls for comparison. Custom arrays with 162 autoAg were used to detect IgG and IgM reactivities. Differences of median fluorescent intensity (MFI) were analyzed with Wilcoxon sign rank test and Kruskal-Wallis test. MFI 500 was used as threshold to define autoAb reactivity.

RESULTS

A total of 114 patients and 14 healthy controls were included in this study. irAEs of grade (G) ≥ 2 occurred in 37/114 patients (32%). We observed a greater number of IgG and IgM reactivities in pre-ICI collections from patients versus healthy controls (62 vs 32 p < 0.001). Patients experiencing irAEs G ≥ 2 demonstrated pre-ICI IgG reactivity to a greater number of AutoAg than patients who did not develop irAEs (39 vs 33 p = 0.040). We observed post-treatment increase of IgM reactivities in subjects experiencing irAEs G ≥ 2 (29 vs 35, p = 0.021) and a decrease of IgG levels after steroids (38 vs 28, p = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, these results support the potential role of autoAb in irAEs etiology and evolution. A prospective study is ongoing to validate our findings (NCT04107311).

Systemic treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer is a deadly disease with an extremely poor 5-year survival rate due to treatment resistance and late-stage detection. Despite numerous years of research and pharmaceutical development, these figures have not changed. Treatment options for advanced pancreatic cancer are still limited. This illness is typically detected at a late stage, making curative surgical resection impossible. Chemotherapy is the most commonly utilized technique for treating advanced pancreatic cancer but has poor efficacy. Targeted therapy and immunotherapy have made significant progress in many other cancer types and have been proven to have extremely promising possibilities; these therapies also hold promise for pancreatic cancer. There is an urgent need for research into targeted treatment, immunotherapy, and cancer vaccines. In this review, we emphasize the foundational findings that have fueled the therapeutic strategy for advanced pancreatic cancer. We also address current advancements in targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and cancer vaccines, all of which continue to improve the clinical outcome of advanced pancreatic cancer. We believe that clinical translation of these novel treatments will improve the low survival rate of this deadly disease.

Ocular surface toxicities associated with modern anticancer therapies

Cancer treatments have recently shifted from broad-spectrum cytotoxic therapies to more focused treatments, maximizing anti-cancerous activity while reducing toxicity to healthy cells. These modern anticancer therapies (MATs) encompass a wide range of innovative molecules that mainly include immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and targeted anticancer therapies (TATs), comprising antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) and inhibitors of signal transduction (IST). Some MATs are associated with ocular surface (OS) adverse events (AEs) that can cause severe discomfort and even lead to loss of vision. While these complications remain rare, they're probably underreported. It is likely that both oncologists and ophthalmologists will come across MATs-associated OS-AEs in their practices, due to the increasing number of patients being treated with MATs. Rapid identification of OS-AEs is crucial, as early intervention can manage these conditions to avoid vision loss and reduce negative impacts on quality of life (QoL). We discuss characteristics of OS pathologies attributed to MATs, describe the suspected underlying pathophysiological mechanisms, and outline the main lines of treatment.

The evolving role of lenvatinib at the new era of first-line hepatocellular carcinoma treatment

Emergence of multi-targeted kinase inhibitors (MTIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have changed the landscape of management in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Combination therapy involving ICI has superseded sorafenib as the first-line treatment option for advanced HCC due to their superior response rates and survival benefits based on recently published phase III trials. However, the role of first-line lenvatinib remains uncertain as no prospective trials have compared its efficacy with ICI in advanced HCC. Several retrospective studies have shown that first-line lenvatinib may not be inferior to ICI combination. Indeed, a growing body of evidence suggests that ICI treatment is associated with inferior treatment outcome in non-viral HCC patients, questioning the supremacy of ICI treatment in all patients and rendering first-line lenvatinib as a potential preferred treatment option. Furthermore, in high-burden intermediate-stage HCC, accumulating evidence supports first-line lenvatinib, or in combination with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), as a preferred treatment option over TACE alone. In this Review, we describe the latest evidence surrounding the evolving role of first-line lenvatinib in HCC.

Integrated genetic analyses of immunodeficiency-associated Epstein-Barr virus- (EBV) positive primary CNS lymphomas

Immunodeficiency-associated primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) represents a distinct clinicopathological entity, which is typically Epstein-Barr virus-positive (EBV+) and carries an inferior prognosis. Genetic alterations that characterize EBV-related CNS lymphomagenesis remain unclear precluding molecular classification and targeted therapies. In this study, a comprehensive genetic analysis of 22 EBV+ PCNSL, therefore, integrated clinical and pathological information with exome and RNA sequencing (RNASeq) data. EBV+ PCNSL with germline controls carried a median of 55 protein-coding single nucleotide variants (SNVs; range 24-217) and 2 insertions/deletions (range 0-22). Genetic landscape was largely shaped by aberrant somatic hypermutation with a median of 41.01% (range 31.79-53.49%) of SNVs mapping to its target motifs. Tumors lacked established SNVs (MYD88, CD79B, PIM1) and copy number variants (CDKN2A, HLA loss) driving EBV- PCNSL. Instead, EBV+ PCNSL were characterized by SOCS1 mutations (26%), predicted to disinhibit JAK/STAT signaling, and mutually exclusive gain-of-function NOTCH pathway SNVs (26%). Copy number gains were enriched on 11q23.3, a locus directly targeted for chromosomal aberrations by EBV, that includes SIK3 known to protect from cytotoxic T-cell responses. Losses covered 5q31.2 (STING), critical for sensing viral DNA, and 17q11 (NF1). Unsupervised clustering of RNASeq data revealed two distinct transcriptional groups, that shared strong expression of CD70 and IL1R2, previously linked to tolerogenic tumor microenvironments. Correspondingly, deconvolution of bulk RNASeq data revealed elevated M2-macrophage, T-regulatory cell, mast cell and monocyte fractions in EBV+ PCNSL. In addition to novel insights into the pathobiology of EBV+ PCNSL, the data provide the rationale for the exploration of targeted therapies including JAK-, NOTCH- and CD70-directed approaches.

Construction of an aging-related risk signature in high-grade serous ovarian cancer for predicting survival outcome and immunogenicity

Studies have shown that aging significantly impacts tumorigenesis, survival outcome, and treatment efficacy in various tumors, covering high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC). Therefore, the objective for this investigation is to construct an aging-relevant risk signature for the first time, which will help evaluate the immunogenicity and survival status for patients with HGSOC. Totaling 1727 patients with HGSOC, along with their mRNA genomic data and clinical survival data, were obtained based on 5 independent cohorts. The Lasso-Cox regression model was utilized to identify the aging genes that had the most significant impact on prognosis. The risk signature was developed by integrating the determined gene expression and accordant model weights. Additionally, immunocytes in the microenvironment, signaling pathways, and immune-relevant signatures were assessed based on distinct risk subgroups. Finally, 2 cohorts that underwent treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) were employed to confirm the effects of identified risk signature on ICI efficacy. An aging signature was constructed from 12 relevant genes, which showed improved survival outcomes in low-risk HGSOC patients across discovery and 4 validation cohorts (all P < .05). The low-risk subgroup showed better immunocyte infiltration and higher enrichment of immune pathways and ICI predictors based on further immunology analysis. Notably, in the immunotherapeutic cohorts, low-risk aging signature was observed to link to better immunotherapeutic outcomes and increased response rates. Together, our constructed signature of aging has the potential to assess not only the prognosis outcome and immunogenicity, but also, importantly, the efficacy of ICI treatment. This signature provides valuable insights for prognosis prediction and immunotherapeutic effect evaluation, ultimately promoting individualized treatment for HGSOC patients.

The role of lenvatinib in the era of immunotherapy of hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) frequently presents as advanced stage with poor prognosis and high mortality. Systemic treatment is the treatment of choice for advanced disease. In 2007, the first multi-kinase inhibitor (MKI) sorafenib was approved and shown to modestly prolong overall survival (OS). The progress of systemic therapy has been slow afterwards until 2018 when lenvatinib, another MKI, was shown to be non-inferior to sorafenib on median OS as the first-line therapy for HCC. Since then, remarkable progress has been achieved on the treatment of advanced HCC, including the development of second-line targeted treatment, including regorafenib, cabozantinib and ramucirumab from 2017 to 2019. A growing focus has been placed on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting programmed cell death-1 (PD-1), its ligand PD-L1, and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4. These ICIs have proven their potency in treating HCC as both initial and subsequent line of therapy. At present, both regimens of atezolizumab combined with bevacizumab, as well as the combination of tremelimumab and durvalumab, are recommended as the first-line treatments based on positive phase III clinical trials. With the advancement of ICIs, it is anticipated that the role of MKIs in the treatment of HCC will evolve. In this article, lenvatinib, one of the most commonly used MKIs in HCC, is chosen to be reviewed.

Molecular Mechanisms of Cutaneous Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs) Induced by Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Over the past few decades, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have emerged as promising therapeutic options for the treatment of various cancers. These novel treatments effectively target key mediators of immune checkpoint pathways. Currently, ICIs primarily consist of monoclonal antibodies that specifically block cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4), programmed cell death 1 (PD-1), programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), and lymphocyte activation gene 3 protein (LAG-3). Despite the notable efficacy of ICIs in cancer treatment, they can also trigger immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which present as autoimmune-like or inflammatory conditions. IrAEs have the potential to affect multiple organ systems, with cutaneous toxicities being the most commonly observed. Although cutaneous irAEs are typically of low-grade severity and can usually be managed effectively, there are cases where severe irAEs can become life-threatening. Therefore, early recognition and a comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms underlying cutaneous irAEs are crucial for improving clinical outcomes in cancer patients. However, the precise pathogenesis of cutaneous irAEs remains unclear. This review focuses on the skin manifestations induced by ICIs, the prognosis related to cutaneous irAEs, and the exploration of potential mechanisms involved in cutaneous irAEs.

Immune mechanisms of toxicity from checkpoint inhibitors

Immunotherapy has changed the treatment landscape for cancer over the past decade. Inhibitors of the immune checkpoint proteins cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen (CTLA)-4, programmed death (PD)-1, and PD ligand 1 (PD-L1) can induce durable remissions in a subset of patients with metastatic disease. However, these treatments can be limited by inflammatory toxicities that can affect any organ system in the body and in some cases can be life threatening. Considerable progress has been made in understanding the drivers of these toxicities as well as effective management strategies. Further research into understanding the molecular and cellular mechanisms that drive toxicity will enable better prediction of toxicity and development of optimized therapies for these toxicities that avoid interfering with antitumor immunity. In this review, we discuss our current understanding of the inflammatory toxicities from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and propose optimal treatment strategies for these toxicities.

Review of the Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in the Context of Cancer Treatment

Checkpoint proteins are an integral part of the immune system and are used by the tumor cells to evade immune response, which helps them grow uncontrollably. By blocking these proteins, immune checkpoint inhibitors can restore the capability of the immune system to attack cancer cells and stop their growth. These findings are backed by adequate clinical trial data and presently, several FDA-approved immune checkpoint inhibitors exist in the market for treating various types of cancers, including melanoma, hepatocellular, endometrial, lung, kidney and others. Their mode of action is inhibition by targeting the checkpoint proteins CTLA-4, PD-1, PD-L1, etc. They can be used alone as well as in amalgamation with other cancer treatments, like surgery, radiation or chemotherapy. Since these drugs target only specific immune system proteins, their side effects are reduced in comparison with the traditional chemotherapy drugs, but may still cause a few affects like fatigue, skin rashes, and fever. In rare cases, these inhibitors are known to have caused more serious side effects, such as cardiotoxicity, and inflammation in the intestines or lungs. Herein, we provide an overview of these inhibitors and their role as biomarkers, immune-related adverse outcomes and clinical studies in the treatment of various cancers, as well as present some future perspectives.

Immunotherapy-induced thyroid dysfunction: an updated review

Immunotherapy medicines (immune checkpoint inhibitors, ICIs) that work directly on the immune system have shown vastly increased survival for people with cancer in phases 2 and 3 clinical studies during the past few years. Nevertheless, ICI treatment (irAEs) may trigger immune-related adverse effects. An underactive thyroid is among the most frequent endocrine irAE, affecting about 40% of individuals who received ICIs. Our review aims to collect and organize the most recent data on immunotherapy-induced thyroid dysfunction in cancer patients, including its prevalence, diagnostic criteria, and treatment options and to summarize those findings in a comprehensive review article. The incidence of irAEs varies depending on the type of cancer and the treatment regimen. Thyroid ultrasound, radioactive uptake scan, and PET CT scan can aid in diagnosing thyroid dysfunction. Thyroid dysfunction treatment necessitates collaboration between specialists in oncology, endocrinology, and primary care in a multidisciplinary team discussion. The prognosis of patients who suffered from thyroid dysfunction while on ICIs treatment is reasonably good. Suboptimal baseline thyroid function was linked with decreased overall survival (OS) among ICI-treated patients, but initiating replacement hormonal therapy after ICI initiation was associated with enhanced OS. More research work is required to identify these links and mechanisms of action.

Neurologic Complications of Cancer Immunotherapy

Immunotherapy has revolutionized cancer treatment over the past decade. As it is increasingly introduced into routine clinical practice, immune-related complications have become more frequent. Accurate diagnosis and treatment are essential, with the goal of reduced patient morbidity. This review aims to discuss the various clinical manifestations, diagnosis, treatments, and prognosis of neurologic complications associated with the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors, adoptive T-cell therapies, and T-cell redirecting therapies. We also outline a suggested clinical approach related to the clinical use of these agents.

Rheumatic Immune-Related Adverse Events due to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors—A 2023 Update

With the aging of the population, malignancies are becoming common complications in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), particularly in elderly patients. Such malignancies often interfere with RA treatment. Among several therapeutic agents, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) which antagonize immunological brakes on T lymphocytes have emerged as a promising treatment option for a variety of malignancies. In parallel, evidence has accumulated that ICIs are associated with numerous immune-related adverse events (irAEs), such as hypophysitis, myocarditis, pneumonitis, and colitis. Moreover, ICIs not only exacerbate pre-existing autoimmune diseases, but also cause de novo rheumatic disease–like symptoms, such as arthritis, myositis, and vasculitis, which are currently termed rheumatic irAEs. Rheumatic irAEs differ from classical rheumatic diseases in multiple aspects, and treatment should be individualized based on the severity. Close collaboration with oncologists is critical for preventing irreversible organ damage. This review summarizes the current evidence regarding the mechanisms and management of rheumatic irAEs with focus on arthritis, myositis, and vasculitis. Based on these findings, potential therapeutic strategies against rheumatic irAEs are discussed.

Nanoparticles overcome adaptive immune resistance and enhance immunotherapy via targeting tumor microenvironment in lung cancer

Lung cancer is one of the common malignant cancers worldwide. Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has improved survival of lung cancer patients. However, ICI therapy leads to adaptive immune resistance and displays resistance to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in lung cancer, leading to less immune response of lung cancer patients. Tumor microenvironment (TME) is an integral tumor microenvironment, which is involved in immunotherapy resistance. Nanomedicine has been used to enhance the immunotherapy in lung cancer. In this review article, we described the association between TME and immunotherapy in lung cancer. We also highlighted the importance of TME in immunotherapy in lung cancer. Moreover, we discussed how nanoparticles are involved in regulation of TME to improve the efficacy of immunotherapy, including Nanomedicine SGT-53, AZD1080, Nanomodulator NRF2, Cisplatin nanoparticles, Au@PG, DPAICP@ME, SPIO NP@M-P, NBTXR3 nanoparticles, ARAC nanoparticles, Nano-DOX, MS NPs, Nab-paclitaxel, GNPs-hPD-L1 siRNA. Furthermore, we concluded that targeting TME by nanoparticles could be helpful to overcome resistance to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in lung cancer.