Auxiliary interfaces support the evolution of specific toxin-antitoxin pairing

Molecular stripping underpins derepression of a toxin-antitoxin system

Transcription factors control gene expression; among these, transcriptional repressors must liberate the promoter for derepression to occur. Toxin-antitoxin (TA) modules are bacterial elements that autoregulate their transcription by binding the promoter in a T:A ratio-dependent manner, known as conditional cooperativity. The molecular basis of how excess toxin triggers derepression has remained elusive, largely because monitoring the rearrangement of promoter-repressor complexes, which underpin derepression, is challenging. Here, we dissect the autoregulation of the Salmonella enterica tacAT3 module. Using a combination of assays targeting DNA binding and promoter activity, as well as structural characterization, we determine the essential TA and DNA elements required to control transcription, and we reconstitute a repression-to-derepression path. We demonstrate that excess toxin triggers molecular stripping of the repressor complex off the DNA through multiple allosteric changes causing DNA distortion and ultimately leading to derepression. Thus, our work provides important insight into the mechanisms underlying conditional cooperativity.

Bacterial Toxin-Antitoxin Systems' Cross-Interactions-Implications for Practical Use in Medicine and Biotechnology

Toxin-antitoxin (TA) systems are widely present in bacterial genomes. They consist of stable toxins and unstable antitoxins that are classified into distinct groups based on their structure and biological activity. TA systems are mostly related to mobile genetic elements and can be easily acquired through horizontal gene transfer. The ubiquity of different homologous and non-homologous TA systems within a single bacterial genome raises questions about their potential cross-interactions. Unspecific cross-talk between toxins and antitoxins of non-cognate modules may unbalance the ratio of the interacting partners and cause an increase in the free toxin level, which can be deleterious to the cell. Moreover, TA systems can be involved in broadly understood molecular networks as transcriptional regulators of other genes' expression or modulators of cellular mRNA stability. In nature, multiple copies of highly similar or identical TA systems are rather infrequent and probably represent a transition stage during evolution to complete insulation or decay of one of them. Nevertheless, several types of cross-interactions have been described in the literature to date. This implies a question of the possibility and consequences of the TA system cross-interactions, especially in the context of the practical application of the TA-based biotechnological and medical strategies, in which such TAs will be used outside their natural context, will be artificially introduced and induced in the new hosts. Thus, in this review, we discuss the prospective challenges of system cross-talks in the safety and effectiveness of TA system usage.

Comparative Analysis of Diverse Acetyltransferase-Type Toxin-Antitoxin Loci in Klebsiella pneumoniae

Toxin-antitoxin (TA) modules containing a Gcn5-related N-acetyltransferase (GNAT) toxin domain regulate bacterial physiology under adverse environmental stresses. Multiple GNAT-ribbon-helix-helix domain (RHH) TA loci have been identified in single bacterial genomes. However, their diversity and interactions are still obscure. Our previous analysis showed that the GNAT toxin of Klebsiella pneumoniae, KacT, introduces antibiotic tolerance and the toxicity of GNAT is neutralized by KacA, an RHH antitoxin. We here present a phylogenetic analysis of GNAT toxins of more than 1,000 GNAT-RHH pairs detected in completely sequenced K. pneumoniae genomes, revealing that the GNAT toxins are diverse and grouped into four distinct clades. Overexpression of GNAT toxins representative of each of the four clades halts the cell growth of K. pneumoniae, while the coexpression of the cognate RHH antitoxin neutralizes GNAT toxicity. We also identify point mutations that inactivate the GNAT toxins. Moreover, we observe a cross-interaction between GNAT-RHH pairs encoded by different replicons, where a chromosomal toxin (KacT2) can be neutralized by its cognate RHH antitoxin (KacA2 on a chromosome) and another antitoxin (KacA3 on a plasmid). Finally, statistical analysis of the distribution of GNAT-RHH loci in K. pneumoniae strains shows pronounced deviation from random distribution within the same clades. Moreover, we also obtain statistically significant correlations between different clades, which we discuss in terms of the experimental results.

IMPORTANCE Elucidating the roles of multifaceted GNAT-RHH TA loci is essential for understanding how these TAs interact among themselves. Recently, the reaction mechanisms and structures of several GNAT-RHH pairs have been reported. While bacterial strains can carry multiple GNAT-RHH loci with diverse origins, studies on the possible cross-interactions of these TA pairs are still limited. Here, we find that 1,000 predicted GNAT toxins of K. pneumoniae can be grouped into four distinct clades. The distributions of TA loci within these clades in K. pneumoniae strains are highly nonrandom, with the presence of a single locus of each clade per strain being highly overrepresented. Moreover, the toxicity of a GNAT toxin encoded by a chromosome was alleviated by a noncognate RHH antitoxin on a plasmid. These results might yield a profound understanding of the widespread GNAT-RHH TA pairs and the cross-interactions between noncognate TA pairs located on different replicons.

The two paralogous copies of the YoeB-YefM toxin-antitoxin module in Staphylococcus aureus differ in DNA binding and recognition patterns

Toxin-antitoxin (TA) systems are ubiquitous regulatory modules for bacterial growth and cell survival following stress. YefM-YoeB, the most prevalent type II TA system, is present in a variety of bacterial species. In Staphylococcus aureus, the YefM-YoeB system exists as two independent paralogous copies. Our previous research resolved crystal structures of the two oligomeric states (heterotetramer and heterohexamer-DNA ternary complex) of the first paralog as well as the molecular mechanism of transcriptional autoregulation of this module. However, structural details reflecting molecular diversity in both paralogs have been relatively unexplored. To understand the molecular mechanism of how Sa₂YoeB and Sa₂YefM regulate their own transcription and how each paralog functions independently, we solved a series of crystal structures of the Sa₂YoeB-Sa₂YefM. Our structural and biochemical data demonstrated that both paralogous copies adopt similar mechanisms of transcriptional autoregulation. In addition, structural analysis suggested that molecular diversity between the two paralogs might be reflected in the interaction profile of YefM and YoeB and the recognition pattern of promoter DNA by YefM. Interaction analysis revealed unique conformational and activating force effected by the interface between Sa₂YoeB and Sa₂YefM. In addition, the recognition pattern analysis demonstrated that residues Thr⁷ and Tyr¹⁴ of Sa₂YefM specifically recognizes the flanking sequences (G and C) of the promoter DNA. Together, these results provide the structural insights into the molecular diversity and independent function of the paralogous copies of the YoeB-YefM TA system.