Mistimed origin licensing and activation stabilize common fragile sites under tight DNA-replication checkpoint activation

Assembly and activation of replicative helicases at origin DNA for replication initiation

To initiate DNA replication, it is essential to properly assemble a pair of replicative helicases at each replication origin. While the general principle of this process applies universally from prokaryotes to eukaryotes, the specific mechanisms governing origin selection, helicase loading, and subsequent helicase activation vary significantly across different species. Recent advancements in cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) have revolutionized our ability to visualize large protein or protein-DNA complexes involved in the initiation of DNA replication. Complemented by real-time single-molecule analysis, the available high-resolution cryo-EM structures have greatly enhanced our understanding of the dynamic regulation of this process at origin DNA. This review primarily focuses on the latest structural discoveries that shed light on the key molecular machineries responsible for driving replication initiation, with a particular emphasis on the assembly of pre-replication complex (pre-RC) in eukaryotes.

Quantity and quality of minichromosome maintenance protein complexes couple replication licensing to genome integrity

Accurate and complete replication of genetic information is a fundamental process of every cell division. The replication licensing is the first essential step that lays the foundation for error-free genome duplication. During licensing, minichromosome maintenance protein complexes, the molecular motors of DNA replication, are loaded to genomic sites called replication origins. The correct quantity and functioning of licensed origins are necessary to prevent genome instability associated with severe diseases, including cancer. Here, we delve into recent discoveries that shed light on the novel functions of licensed origins, the pathways necessary for their proper maintenance, and their implications for cancer therapies.

Key Proteins of Replication Stress Response and Cell Cycle Control as Cancer Therapy Targets

Replication stress (RS) is a characteristic state of cancer cells as they tend to exchange precision of replication for fast proliferation and increased genomic instability. To overcome the consequences of improper replication control, malignant cells frequently inactivate parts of their DNA damage response (DDR) pathways (the ATM-CHK2-p53 pathway), while relying on other pathways which help to maintain replication fork stability (ATR-CHK1). This creates a dependency on the remaining DDR pathways, vulnerability to further destabilization of replication and synthetic lethality of DDR inhibitors with common oncogenic alterations such as mutations of TP53, RB1, ATM, amplifications of MYC, CCNE1 and others. The response to RS is normally limited by coordination of cell cycle, transcription and replication. Inhibition of WEE1 and PKMYT1 kinases, which prevent unscheduled mitosis entry, leads to fragility of under-replicated sites. Recent evidence also shows that inhibition of Cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs), such as CDK4/6, CDK2, CDK8/19 and CDK12/13 can contribute to RS through disruption of DNA repair and replication control. Here, we review the main causes of RS in cancers as well as main therapeutic targets-ATR, CHK1, PARP and their inhibitors.

RAD52 and ERCC6L/PICH have a compensatory relationship for genome stability in mitosis

The mammalian RAD52 protein is a DNA repair factor that has both strand annealing and recombination mediator activities, yet is dispensable for cell viability. To characterize genetic contexts that reveal dependence on RAD52 to sustain cell viability (i.e., synthetic lethal relationships), we performed genome-wide CRISPR knock-out screens. Subsequent secondary screening found that depletion of ERCC6L in RAD52-deficient cells causes reduced viability and elevated genome instability, measured as accumulation of 53BP1 into nuclear foci. Furthermore, loss of RAD52 causes elevated levels of anaphase ultrafine bridges marked by ERCC6L, and conversely depletion of ERCC6L causes elevated RAD52 foci both in prometaphase and interphase cells. These effects were enhanced with combination treatments using hydroxyurea and the topoisomerase IIα inhibitor ICRF-193, and the timing of these treatments are consistent with defects in addressing such stress in mitosis. Thus, loss of RAD52 appears to cause an increased reliance on ERCC6L in mitosis, and vice versa. Consistent with this notion, combined depletion of ERCC6L and disrupting G2/M progression via CDK1 inhibition causes a marked loss of viability in RAD52-deficient cells. We suggest that RAD52 and ERCC6L play compensatory roles in protecting genome stability in mitosis.