PGxCorpus, a manually annotated corpus for pharmacogenomics

PubTator 3.0: an AI-powered literature resource for unlocking biomedical knowledge

PubTator 3.0 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/research/pubtator3/) is a biomedical literature resource using state-of-the-art AI techniques to offer semantic and relation searches for key concepts like proteins, genetic variants, diseases and chemicals. It currently provides over one billion entity and relation annotations across approximately 36 million PubMed abstracts and 6 million full-text articles from the PMC open access subset, updated weekly. PubTator 3.0's online interface and API utilize these precomputed entity relations and synonyms to provide advanced search capabilities and enable large-scale analyses, streamlining many complex information needs. We showcase the retrieval quality of PubTator 3.0 using a series of entity pair queries, demonstrating that PubTator 3.0 retrieves a greater number of articles than either PubMed or Google Scholar, with higher precision in the top 20 results. We further show that integrating ChatGPT (GPT-4) with PubTator APIs dramatically improves the factuality and verifiability of its responses. In summary, PubTator 3.0 offers a comprehensive set of features and tools that allow researchers to navigate the ever-expanding wealth of biomedical literature, expediting research and unlocking valuable insights for scientific discovery.

Extract antibody and antigen names from biomedical literature

BACKGROUND

The roles of antibody and antigen are indispensable in targeted diagnosis, therapy, and biomedical discovery. On top of that, massive numbers of new scientific articles about antibodies and/or antigens are published each year, which is a precious knowledge resource but has yet been exploited to its full potential. We, therefore, aim to develop a biomedical natural language processing tool that can automatically identify antibody and antigen entities from articles.

RESULTS

We first annotated an antibody-antigen corpus including 3210 relevant PubMed abstracts using a semi-automatic approach. The Inter-Annotator Agreement score of 3 annotators ranges from 91.46 to 94.31%, indicating that the annotations are consistent and the corpus is reliable. We then used the corpus to develop and optimize BiLSTM-CRF-based and BioBERT-based models. The models achieved overall F1 scores of 62.49% and 81.44%, respectively, which showed potential for newly studied entities. The two models served as foundation for development of a named entity recognition (NER) tool that automatically recognizes antibody and antigen names from biomedical literature.

CONCLUSIONS

Our antibody-antigen NER models enable users to automatically extract antibody and antigen names from scientific articles without manually scanning through vast amounts of data and information in the literature. The output of NER can be used to automatically populate antibody-antigen databases, support antibody validation, and facilitate researchers with the most appropriate antibodies of interest. The packaged NER model is available at https://github.com/TrangDinh44/ABAG_BioBERT.git .

The OpenDeID corpus for patient de-identification

For research purposes, protected health information is often redacted from unstructured electronic health records to preserve patient privacy and confidentiality. The OpenDeID corpus is designed to assist development of automatic methods to redact sensitive information from unstructured electronic health records. We retrieved 4548 unstructured surgical pathology reports from four urban Australian hospitals. The corpus was developed by two annotators under three different experimental settings. The quality of the annotations was evaluated for each setting. Specifically, we employed serial annotations, parallel annotations, and pre-annotations. Our results suggest that the pre-annotations approach is not reliable in terms of quality when compared to the serial annotations but can drastically reduce annotation time. The OpenDeID corpus comprises 2,100 pathology reports from 1,833 cancer patients with an average of 737.49 tokens and 7.35 protected health information entities annotated per report. The overall inter annotator agreement and deviation scores are 0.9464 and 0.9726, respectively. Realistic surrogates are also generated to make the corpus suitable for distribution to other researchers.

Extracting Concepts for Precision Oncology from the Biomedical Literature

This paper describes an initial dataset and automatic natural language processing (NLP) method for extracting concepts related to precision oncology from biomedical research articles. We extract five concept types: Cancer, Mutation, Population, Treatment, Outcome. A corpus of 250 biomedical abstracts were annotated with these concepts following standard double-annotation procedures. We then experiment with BERT-based models for concept extraction. The best-performing model achieved a precision of 63.8%, a recall of 71.9%, and an F1 of 67.1. Finally, we propose additional directions for research for improving extraction performance and utilizing the NLP system in downstream precision oncology applications.

A Novel Statistic-Based Corpus Machine Processing Approach to Refine a Big Textual Data: An ESP Case of COVID-19 News Reports

With developments of modern and advanced information and communication technologies (ICTs), Industry 4.0 has launched big data analysis, natural language processing (NLP), and artificial intelligence (AI). Corpus analysis is also a part of big data analysis. For many cases of statistic-based corpus techniques adopted to analyze English for specific purposes (ESP), researchers extracted critical information by retrieving domain-oriented lexical units. However, even if corpus software embraces algorithms such as log-likelihood tests, log ratios, BIC scores, etc., the machine still cannot understand linguistic meanings. In many ESP cases, function words reduce the efficiency of corpus analysis. However, many studies still use manual approaches to eliminate function words. Manual annotation is inefficient and time-wasting, and can easily cause information distortion. To enhance the efficiency of big textual data analysis, this paper proposes a novel statistic-based corpus machine processing approach to refine big textual data. Furthermore, this paper uses COVID-19 news reports as a simulation example of big textual data and applies it to verify the efficacy of the machine optimizing process. The refined resulting data shows that the proposed approach is able to rapidly remove function and meaningless words by machine processing and provide decision-makers with domain-specific corpus data for further purposes.