1
|
Ruprecht JE, King IP, Mitrovic SM, Dafforn KA, Miller BM, Deiber M, Westhorpe DP, Hitchcock JN, Harrison AJ, Glamore WC. Assessing the validity and sensitivity of microbial processes within a hydrodynamic model. WATER RESEARCH 2022; 218:118445. [PMID: 35462260 DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2022.118445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2021] [Revised: 04/05/2022] [Accepted: 04/08/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Eutrophication due to excess anthropogenic nutrients in waterways is a significant issue worldwide. The pressure-stressor-response of a waterway to excessive nutrient loading is reliant on numerous physical and biological factors, including hydrodynamics and microbial processing. While substantial progress has been made towards simulating these mechanisms there are limited multi-disciplinary studies that relate the physical hydrodynamics of a site with the ecological response from linked laboratory and field studies. This paper presents the development of a coupled hydrodynamic and aquatic ecosystem response model, expanded to include an integrated microbial loop, that allows the explicit representation of heterotrophic bacteria growth and dissolved organic nutrient mineralisation. A unique long-term water quality dataset at an estuary in south-eastern Australia was used to validate and assess the model's sensitivity to complex biophysical processes driving the observed water quality variability. Results indicate that explicit time-varying bacterial mineralisation rates provide a substantially improved understanding of the broader aquatic ecosystem response than assigned fixed bulk rate parameter values, which are typically derived from non-local literature. Implementation of a microbial loop at the study site indicated that the model is sensitive to the boundary conditions, in particular catchment loads, with both net transport rates and the net growth rates of heterotrophic bacteria demonstrating different responses. Under average flow conditions, a smaller net transport and reduced nutrient availability has a pronounced effect of lowering net growth rates through the applied limitation factors. During high flow conditions, freshwater inflows increased net transport and nutrient loads, which resulted in higher net growth rates. Further, temporal variability in water temperature had a compounding effect on the model's response sensitivity. This approach has broader application in other riverine systems subject to eutrophication, and in interrogating linkages in hydrodynamic and microbial mediated processes (e.g., productivity). Future studies are recommended to better understand the sensitivity of aquatic ecosystem response models to microbial net growth rate kinetics at different temperatures and from top-down predation (e.g., zooplankton grazing).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J E Ruprecht
- Water Research Laboratory, School of Civil & Environmental Engineering, UNSW Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.
| | - I P King
- Water Research Laboratory, School of Civil & Environmental Engineering, UNSW Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia; Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, United States
| | - S M Mitrovic
- Freshwater and Estuarine Research Group, School of Life Sciences, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia
| | - K A Dafforn
- Evolution and Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, UNSW Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia; Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia
| | - B M Miller
- Water Research Laboratory, School of Civil & Environmental Engineering, UNSW Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia
| | - M Deiber
- Water Research Laboratory, School of Civil & Environmental Engineering, UNSW Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia
| | - D P Westhorpe
- NSW Department of Planning, Industry and Environment, Australia
| | - J N Hitchcock
- Centre for Applied Water Science, University of Canberra, Australia
| | - A J Harrison
- Water Research Laboratory, School of Civil & Environmental Engineering, UNSW Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia
| | - W C Glamore
- Water Research Laboratory, School of Civil & Environmental Engineering, UNSW Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wlodkowic D, Czerw A, Karakiewicz B, Deptała A. Recent progress in cytometric technologies and their applications in ecotoxicology and environmental risk assessment. Cytometry A 2021; 101:203-219. [PMID: 34652065 DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.24508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2021] [Revised: 09/20/2021] [Accepted: 09/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Environmental toxicology focuses on identifying and predicting impact of potentially toxic anthropogenic chemicals on biosphere at various levels of biological organization. Presently there is a significant drive to gain deeper understanding of cellular and sub-cellular mechanisms of ecotoxicity. Most notable is increased focus on elucidation of cellular-response networks, interactomes, and greater implementation of cell-based biotests using high-throughput procedures, while at the same time decreasing the reliance on standard animal models used in ecotoxicity testing. This is aimed at discovery and interpretation of molecular pathways of ecotoxicity at large scale. In this regard, the applications of cytometry are perhaps one of the most fundamental prospective analytical tools for the next generation and high-throughput ecotoxicology research. The diversity of this modern technology spans flow, laser-scanning, imaging, and more recently, Raman as well as mass cytometry. The cornerstone advantages of cytometry include the possibility of multi-parameter measurements, gating and rapid analysis. Cytometry overcomes, thus, limitations of traditional bulk techniques such as spectrophotometry or gel-based techniques that average the results from pooled cell populations or small model organisms. Novel technologies such as cell imaging in flow, laser scanning cytometry, as well as mass cytometry provide innovative and tremendously powerful capabilities to analyze cells, tissues as well as to perform in situ analysis of small model organisms. In this review, we outline cytometry as a tremendously diverse field that is still vastly underutilized and often largely unknown in environmental sciences. The main motivation of this work is to highlight the potential and wide-reaching applications of cytometry in ecotoxicology, guide environmental scientists in the technological aspects as well as popularize its broader adoption in environmental risk assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donald Wlodkowic
- The Neurotox Lab, School of Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Aleksandra Czerw
- Department of Health Economics and Medical Law, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Beata Karakiewicz
- Subdepartment of Social Medicine and Public Health, Department of Social Medicine, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Andrzej Deptała
- Department of Cancer Prevention. Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ruprecht JE, Birrer SC, Dafforn KA, Mitrovic SM, Crane SL, Johnston EL, Wemheuer F, Navarro A, Harrison AJ, Turner IL, Glamore WC. Wastewater effluents cause microbial community shifts and change trophic status. WATER RESEARCH 2021; 200:117206. [PMID: 34022631 DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2021.117206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2021] [Revised: 04/26/2021] [Accepted: 04/27/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Widespread wastewater pollution is one of the greatest challenges threatening the sustainable management of rivers globally. Understanding microbial responses to gradients in environmental stressors, such as wastewater pollution, is crucial to identify thresholds of community change and to develop management strategies that protect ecosystem integrity. This study used multiple lines of empirical evidence, including a novel combination of microbial ecotoxicology methods in the laboratory and field to link pressure-stressor-response relationships. Specifically, community-based whole effluent toxicity (WET) testing and environmental genomics were integrated to determine real-world community interactions, shifts and functional change in response to wastewater pollution. Here we show that wastewater effluents above moderate (>10%) concentrations caused consistent significant shifts in bacterial community structure and function. These thresholds of community shifts were also linked to changes in the trophic state of receiving waters in terms of nutrient concentrations. Differences in the community responses along the effluent concentration gradient were primarily driven by two globally relevant bacterial indicator taxa, namely Malikia spp. (Burkholderiales) and hgcI_clade (Frankiales). Species replacement occurred above moderate effluent concentrations with abundances of Malikia spp. increasing, while abundances of hgcI_clade decreased. The responses of Malikia spp. and hgcI_clade matched gene patterns associated with globally important nitrogen cycling pathways, such as denitrification and nitrogen fixation, which linked the core individual taxa to putative function and ecosystem processes, rarely achieved in previous studies. This study has identified potential indicators of change in trophic status and the functional consequences of wastewater pollution. These findings have immediate implications for both the management of environmental stressors and protection of aquatic ecosystems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J E Ruprecht
- Water Research Laboratory, School of Civil & Environmental Engineering, UNSW Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
| | - S C Birrer
- Evolution and Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, UNSW Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
| | - K A Dafforn
- Evolution and Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, UNSW Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia; Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia
| | - S M Mitrovic
- Freshwater and Estuarine Research Group, School of Life Sciences, University of Technology Sydney, Australia
| | - S L Crane
- Ferrari Lab, School of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, UNSW Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
| | - E L Johnston
- Evolution and Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, UNSW Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
| | - F Wemheuer
- Evolution and Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, UNSW Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
| | - A Navarro
- Evolution and Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, UNSW Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
| | - A J Harrison
- Water Research Laboratory, School of Civil & Environmental Engineering, UNSW Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
| | - I L Turner
- Water Research Laboratory, School of Civil & Environmental Engineering, UNSW Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
| | - W C Glamore
- Water Research Laboratory, School of Civil & Environmental Engineering, UNSW Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
| |
Collapse
|