1
|
Gillon CJ, Pina JE, Lecoq JA, Ahmed R, Billeh YN, Caldejon S, Groblewski P, Henley TM, Kato I, Lee E, Luviano J, Mace K, Nayan C, Nguyen TV, North K, Perkins J, Seid S, Valley MT, Williford A, Bengio Y, Lillicrap TP, Richards BA, Zylberberg J. Responses to Pattern-Violating Visual Stimuli Evolve Differently Over Days in Somata and Distal Apical Dendrites. J Neurosci 2024; 44:e1009232023. [PMID: 37989593 PMCID: PMC10860604 DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.1009-23.2023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Revised: 09/14/2023] [Accepted: 09/16/2023] [Indexed: 11/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Scientists have long conjectured that the neocortex learns patterns in sensory data to generate top-down predictions of upcoming stimuli. In line with this conjecture, different responses to pattern-matching vs pattern-violating visual stimuli have been observed in both spiking and somatic calcium imaging data. However, it remains unknown whether these pattern-violation signals are different between the distal apical dendrites, which are heavily targeted by top-down signals, and the somata, where bottom-up information is primarily integrated. Furthermore, it is unknown how responses to pattern-violating stimuli evolve over time as an animal gains more experience with them. Here, we address these unanswered questions by analyzing responses of individual somata and dendritic branches of layer 2/3 and layer 5 pyramidal neurons tracked over multiple days in primary visual cortex of awake, behaving female and male mice. We use sequences of Gabor patches with patterns in their orientations to create pattern-matching and pattern-violating stimuli, and two-photon calcium imaging to record neuronal responses. Many neurons in both layers show large differences between their responses to pattern-matching and pattern-violating stimuli. Interestingly, these responses evolve in opposite directions in the somata and distal apical dendrites, with somata becoming less sensitive to pattern-violating stimuli and distal apical dendrites more sensitive. These differences between the somata and distal apical dendrites may be important for hierarchical computation of sensory predictions and learning, since these two compartments tend to receive bottom-up and top-down information, respectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colleen J Gillon
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Cell & Systems Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Mila, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Jason E Pina
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Centre for Vision Research, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Timothy M Henley
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Centre for Vision Research, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Eric Lee
- Allen Institute, Seattle, Washington
| | | | - Kyla Mace
- Allen Institute, Seattle, Washington
| | | | | | - Kat North
- Allen Institute, Seattle, Washington
| | | | - Sam Seid
- Allen Institute, Seattle, Washington
| | | | | | - Yoshua Bengio
- Mila, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Département d'informatique et de recherche opérationnelle, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Learning in Machines and Brains Program, Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Timothy P Lillicrap
- DeepMind, Inc., London, United Kingdom
- Centre for Computation, Mathematics and Physics in the Life Sciences and Experimental Biology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Blake A Richards
- Mila, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Learning in Machines and Brains Program, Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- School of Computer Science, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Neurology & Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Joel Zylberberg
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Centre for Vision Research, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Learning in Machines and Brains Program, Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Vector Institute for Artificial Intelligence, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
de Vries SEJ, Siegle JH, Koch C. Sharing neurophysiology data from the Allen Brain Observatory. eLife 2023; 12:e85550. [PMID: 37432073 PMCID: PMC10335829 DOI: 10.7554/elife.85550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2022] [Accepted: 06/27/2023] [Indexed: 07/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Nullius in verba ('trust no one'), chosen as the motto of the Royal Society in 1660, implies that independently verifiable observations-rather than authoritative claims-are a defining feature of empirical science. As the complexity of modern scientific instrumentation has made exact replications prohibitive, sharing data is now essential for ensuring the trustworthiness of one's findings. While embraced in spirit by many, in practice open data sharing remains the exception in contemporary systems neuroscience. Here, we take stock of the Allen Brain Observatory, an effort to share data and metadata associated with surveys of neuronal activity in the visual system of laboratory mice. Data from these surveys have been used to produce new discoveries, to validate computational algorithms, and as a benchmark for comparison with other data, resulting in over 100 publications and preprints to date. We distill some of the lessons learned about open surveys and data reuse, including remaining barriers to data sharing and what might be done to address these.
Collapse
|