Long days enhance recognition memory and increase insulin-like growth factor 2 in the hippocampus

Photoperiod, food restriction and memory for objects and places in mice

The suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) contains a population of cell-autonomous circadian oscillators essential for entrainment to daily light-dark (LD) cycles. Synchrony among SCN oscillators is modified by photoperiod and determines functional properties of SCN clock cycling, including its amplitude, phase angle of entrainment, and free running periodicity (τ). For many species, encoding of daylength in SCN output is critical for seasonal regulation of metabolism and reproduction. C57BL/6 mice do not show seasonality in these functions, yet do show photoperiodic modulation of SCN clock output. The significance of this for brain systems and functions downstream from the SCN in these species is largely unexplored. C57BL/6 mice housed in a long-day photoperiod have been reported to perform better on tests of object, spatial and fear memory compared to mice in a standard 12 h photoperiod. We previously reported that encoding of photoperiod in SCN output, evident in τ in constant dark (DD), can be blocked by limiting food access to a 4 h mealtime in the light period. To determine whether this might also block the effect of long days on memory, mice entrained to 18 h:6 h (L18) or 6 h:18 h (L6) LD cycles were tested for 24 h object memory (novel object preference, NOP) and spatial working memory (Y-maze spontaneous alternation, SA), at 4 times of day, first with food available ad libitum and then during weeks 5-8 of daytime restricted feeding. Photoperiod modified τ as expected, but did not affect performance on the NOP and SA tests, either before or during restricted feeding. NOP performance did improve in the restricted feeding condition in both photoperiods, eliminating a weak time of day effect evident with food available ad-libitum. These results highlight benefits of restricted feeding on cognitive function, and suggest a dose-response relationship between photoperiod and memory, with no benefits at daylengths up to 18 h.

Iterative Metaplasticity Across Timescales: How Circadian, Ultradian, and Infradian Rhythms Modulate Memory Mechanisms

Work in recent years has provided strong evidence for the modulation of memory function and neuroplasticity mechanisms across circadian (daily), ultradian (shorter-than-daily), and infradian (longer-than-daily) timescales. Despite rapid progress, however, the field has yet to adopt a general framework to describe the overarching role of biological rhythms in memory. To this end, Iyer and colleagues introduced the term iterative metaplasticity, which they define as the "gating of receptivity to subsequent signals that repeats on a cyclic timebase." The central concept is that the cyclic regulation of molecules involved in neuroplasticity may produce cycles in neuroplastic capacity-that is, the ability of neural cells to undergo activity-dependent change. Although Iyer and colleagues focus on the circadian timescale, we think their framework may be useful for understanding how biological rhythms influence memory more broadly. In this review, we provide examples and terminology to explain how the idea of iterative metaplasticity can be readily applied across circadian, ultradian, and infradian timescales. We suggest that iterative metaplasticity may not only support the temporal niching of neuroplasticity processes but also serve an essential role in the maintenance of memory function.

Dim light in the evening causes coordinated realignment of circadian rhythms, sleep, and short-term memory

In modern societies, people are regularly exposed to artificial light (e.g., light-emitting electronic devices). Dim light in the evening (DLE) imposes an artificial extension of the solar day, increasing our alertness before bedtime, delaying melatonin timing and sleep onset, and increasing sleepiness in the next morning. Using laboratory mice as a model organism, we show that 2 wk of 4-h, 20-lux DLE postpones rest–activity rhythms, delays molecular rhythms in the brain and body, and reverses the diurnal pattern of short-term memory performance. These results highlight the biological impact of DLE and emphasize the need to optimize our evening light exposure if we are to avoid shifting our biological clocks.

Light provides the primary signal for entraining circadian rhythms to the day/night cycle. In addition to rods and cones, the retina contains a small population of photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (pRGCs) expressing the photopigment melanopsin (OPN4). Concerns have been raised that exposure to dim artificial lighting in the evening (DLE) may perturb circadian rhythms and sleep patterns, and OPN4 is presumed to mediate these effects. Here, we examine the effects of 4-h, 20-lux DLE on circadian physiology and behavior in mice and the role of OPN4 in these responses. We show that 2 wk of DLE induces a phase delay of ∼2 to 3 h in mice, comparable to that reported in humans. DLE-induced phase shifts are unaffected in Opn4^−/− mice, indicating that rods and cones are capable of driving these responses in the absence of melanopsin. DLE delays molecular clock rhythms in the heart, liver, adrenal gland, and dorsal hippocampus. It also reverses short-term recognition memory performance, which is associated with changes in preceding sleep history. In addition, DLE modifies patterns of hypothalamic and cortical cFos signals, a molecular correlate of recent neuronal activity. Together, our data show that DLE causes coordinated realignment of circadian rhythms, sleep patterns, and short-term memory process in mice. These effects are particularly relevant as DLE conditions―due to artificial light exposure―are experienced by the majority of the populace on a daily basis.

Insulin-Like Growth Factor 2 As a Possible Neuroprotective Agent and Memory Enhancer-Its Comparative Expression, Processing and Signaling in Mammalian CNS

A number of studies performed on rodents suggest that insulin-like growth factor 2 (IGF-2) or its analogs may possibly be used for treating some conditions like Alzheimer’s disease, Huntington’s disease, autistic spectrum disorders or aging-related cognitive impairment. Still, for translational research a comparative knowledge about the function of IGF-2 and related molecules in model organisms (rats and mice) and humans is necessary. There is a number of important differences in IGF-2 signaling between species. In the present review we emphasize species-specific patterns of IGF-2 expression in rodents, humans and some other mammals, using, among other sources, publicly available transcriptomic data. We provide a detailed description of Igf2 mRNA expression regulation and pre-pro-IGF-2 protein processing in different species. We also summarize the function of IGF-binding proteins. We describe three different receptors able to bind IGF-2 and discuss the role of IGF-2 signaling in learning and memory, as well as in neuroprotection. We hope that comprehensive understanding of similarities and differences in IGF-2 signaling between model organisms and humans will be useful for development of more effective medicines targeting IGF-2 receptors.

Effect of photoperiod and light intensity on learning ability and memory formation of the pond snail Lymnaea stagnalis

Natural light is regarded as a key regulator of biological systems and typically serves as a Zeitgeber for biological rhythms. As a natural abiotic factor, it is recognized to regulate multiple behavioral and physiological processes in animals. Disruption of the natural light regime due to light pollution may result in significant effects on animal learning and memory development. Here, we investigated whether sensitivity to various photoperiods or light intensities had an impact on intermediate-term memory (ITM) and long-term memory (LTM) formation in the pond snail Lymnaea stagnalis. We also investigated the change in the gene expression level of molluscan insulin-related peptide II (MIP II) is response to the given light treatments. The results show that the best light condition for proper LTM formation is exposure to a short day (8 h light) and low light intensity (1 and 10 lx). Moreover, the more extreme light conditions (16 h and 24 h light) prevent the formation of both ITM and LTM. We found no change in MIP II expression in any of the light treatments, which may indicate that MIP II is not directly involved in the operant conditioning used here, even though it is known to be involved in learning. The finding that snails did not learn in complete darkness indicates that light is a necessary factor for proper learning and memory formation. Furthermore, dim light enhances both ITM and LTM formation, which suggests that there is an optimum since both no light and too bright light prevented learning and memory. Our findings suggest that the upsurge of artificial day length and/or night light intensity may also negatively impact memory consolidation in the wild.

Jet Lag Recovery and Memory Functions Are Correlated with Direct Light Effects on Locomotion

Jet lag is a circadian disruption that affects millions of people, resulting, among other things, in extreme sleepiness and memory loss. The hazardous implications of such effects are evident in situations in which focus and attention are required. Remarkably, there is a limited understanding of how jet lag recovery and associated memory loss vary year round under different photoperiods. Here we show, using different cycles representing winter, summer, and equinox in male mice, that jet lag recovery and memory vary significantly with photoperiod changes. We uncover a positive correlation of acute light effects on circadian-driven locomotion (known as negative masking) with photoentrainment speed and memory enhancement during jet lag. Specifically, we show that enhancing or reducing negative masking is correlated with better or worse memory performance, respectively. This study indicates that in addition to timed-light exposure for phase shifting, the negative masking response could also be biologically relevant when designing effective treatments of jet lag.

Memory and the circadian system: Identifying candidate mechanisms by which local clocks in the brain may regulate synaptic plasticity

The circadian system is an endogenous biological network responsible for coordinating near-24-h cycles in behavior and physiology with daily timing cues from the external environment. In this review, we explore how the circadian system regulates memory formation, retention, and recall. Circadian rhythms in these memory processes may arise through several endogenous pathways, and recent work highlights the importance of genetic timekeepers found locally within tissues, called local clocks. We evaluate the circadian memory literature for evidence of local clock involvement in memory, identifying potential nodes for direct interactions between local clock components and mechanisms of synaptic plasticity. Our discussion illustrates how local clocks may pervasively modulate neuronal plastic capacity, a phenomenon that we designate here as circadian metaplasticity. We suggest that this function of local clocks supports the temporal optimization of memory processes, illuminating the potential for circadian therapeutic strategies in the prevention and treatment of memory impairment.

Bright light exposure advances consolidation of motor skill accuracy in humans

Light has attracted increasing attention as a critical determinant of memory processing. While sleep selectively consolidates newly encoded memories according to their future relevance, the role of light in human memory consolidation is largely unknown. Here, we report how bright light (BL), provided during encoding, influences online and offline consolidation of motor skill learning. We sought to determine whether relatively slower and faster key-press transitions within individuals were differentially consolidated by BL. Healthy human subjects were briefly exposed to either BL (>8000 lx) or control light (CL; <500 lx) during memory encoding at 13:00 h, when light minimally affects circadian phase-shifting, and were retested 24 h later. The effects of BL on online and offline performance gains were determined by accuracy and speed. BL-exposed subjects showed better overall performance accuracy during training and lower overnight accuracy gains after a subsequent night of sleep than did CL-exposed subjects. BL preferentially improved the initially most difficult individual key-press transitions during practice; these were only improved overnight under CL. By contrast, accuracy during what had been the easiest key-press transitions at the beginning of the experiment was unaffected by light conditions or online/offline learning processes. BL effects were not observed for performance speed, mood, or sleep-wake patterns. Brief BL exposure during training may advance motor memory selection and consolidation that optimally meet individual requirements for potential gains, which would otherwise depend on post-training sleep. This suggests a new way of enhancing brain plasticity to compensate for impaired sleep-dependent memory consolidation in neuropsychiatric conditions.

Divergent projection patterns of M1 ipRGC subtypes

In addition to its well-known role in pattern vision, light influences a wide range of non-image forming, subconscious visual behaviors including circadian photoentrainment, sleep, mood, learning, and the pupillary light reflex. Each of these behaviors is thought to require input from the M1 subtype of melanopsin-expressing, intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cell (ipRGC). Recent work has demonstrated that the M1 subtype of ipRGC can be further subdivided based on expression of the transcription factor Brn3b. Brn3b-positive M1 ipRGCs project to the olivary pretectal nucleus and are necessary for the pupillary light reflex, while Brn3b-negative M1 ipRGCs project to the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) and are sufficient for circadian photoentrainment. However, beyond the circadian and pupil systems, little is known about the projection patterns of M1 ipRGC subtypes. Here we show that Brn3b-positive M1 ipRGCs comprise the majority of sparse M1 ipRGC inputs to the thalamus, midbrain, and hypothalamus. Our data demonstrate that very few brain targets receive convergent input from both M1 ipRGC subpopulations, suggesting that each subpopulation drives a specific subset of light-driven behaviors.

Photoperiod-Induced Neuroplasticity in the Circadian System

Seasonal changes in light exposure have profound effects on behavioral and physiological functions in many species, including effects on mood and cognitive function in humans. The mammalian brain's master circadian clock, the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), transmits information about external light conditions to other brain regions, including some implicated in mood and cognition. Although the detailed mechanisms are not yet known, the SCN undergoes highly plastic changes at the cellular and network levels under different light conditions. We therefore propose that the SCN may be an essential mediator of the effects of seasonal changes of day length on mental health. In this review, we explore various forms of neuroplasticity that occur in the SCN and other brain regions to facilitate seasonal adaptation, particularly altered phase distribution of cellular circadian oscillators in the SCN and changes in hypothalamic neurotransmitter expression.

Chronic stress alters adrenal clock function in a sexually dimorphic manner

Glucocorticoid production is gated at the molecular level by the circadian clock in the adrenal gland. Stress influences daily rhythms in behavior and physiology, but it remains unclear how stress affects the function of the adrenal clock itself. Here, we examine the influence of stress on adrenal clock function by tracking PERIOD2::LUCIFERASE (PER2::LUC) rhythms in vitro Relative to non-stressed controls, adrenals from stressed mice displayed marked changes in PER2::LUC rhythms. Interestingly, the effect of stress on adrenal rhythms varied by sex and the type of stress experienced in vivo To investigate the basis of sex differences in the adrenal response to stress, we next stimulated male and female adrenals in vitro with adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH). ACTH shifted phase and increased amplitude of adrenal PER2::LUC rhythms. Both phase and amplitude responses were larger in female adrenals than in male adrenals, an observation consistent with previously described sex differences in the physiological response to stress. Lastly, we reversed the sex difference in adrenal clock function using stress and sex hormone manipulations to test its role in driving adrenal responses to ACTH. We find that adrenal responsiveness to ACTH is inversely proportional to the amplitude of adrenal PER2::LUC rhythms. This suggests that larger ACTH responses from female adrenals may be driven by their lower amplitude molecular rhythms. Collectively, these results indicate a reciprocal relationship between stress and the adrenal clock, with stress influencing adrenal clock function and the state of the adrenal clock gating the response to stress in a sexually dimorphic manner.