Epidural Dexmedetomidine Reduces the Requirement of Propofol during Total Intravenous Anaesthesia and Improves Analgesia after Surgery in Patients undergoing Open Thoracic Surgery

Effects of epidurally administered dexmedetomidine and dexamethasone on postoperative pain, analgesic requirements, inflammation, and oxidative stress in thoracic surgery

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of dexmedetomidine and dexamethasone as adjuvants to preoperative epidural administration of local anesthetic (ropivacaine) in thoracic surgery on the postoperative level of pain, use of analgesics, inflammation, and oxidative stress. The study enrolled 42 patients who underwent elective thoracic surgery in a one-year period at the University Hospital Dubrava (Zagreb, Croatia). Based on a computer-generated randomization list the patients were assigned to the dexmedetomidine (n = 18) or dexamethasone (n = 24) group. Postoperatively, patients of dexmedetomidine group reported lower pain (VAS value 1 h post surgery, 3.4 ± 2.7 vs. 5.4 ± 1.8, dexmedetomidine vs. dexamethasone, p < 0.01) and had lower anal-gesic requirements in comparison with dexamethasone group. Thus, dexmedetomidine in comparison with dexamethasone was more efficient in lowering pain and analgesia requirements 24 h after the surgery. On the contrary, dexamethasone had better anti-inflammatory properties (CRP level 24 h post surgery, 131.9 ± 90.7 vs. 26.0 ± 55.2 mg L-1, dexmedetomidine vs. dexamethasone, p < 0.01). Both dexmedetomidine and dexamethasone exhibited antioxidant effects, however, their antioxidant properties should be further explored. The results of this study improve current knowledge of pain control in thoracic surgery.

Transversus abdominis plane block versus caudal block with bupivacaine and dexmedetomidine for unilateral inguinal hernia repair in pediatric patients: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

This study compared the transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block with bupivacaine and dexmedetomidine to the same mixture in the caudal block in delivering postoperative analgesia in children after unilateral inguinal hernia surgery.

METHODS

The current study included 80 children aged two to eight years who were scheduled for unilateral inguinal hernia surgery under general anesthesia. A caudal block (1 mL/kg 0.25% bupivacaine and one µg /kg dexmedetomidine) or a TAP block (1 mL/kg 0.25% bupivacaine and one µg /kg dexmedetomidine) was given to each participant at random. The time it took to request analgesia for the first time, the postoperative pain score, total analgesic use, sedation, family satisfaction, and side effects were all measured. The primary outcome was time to first analgesic request.

RESULTS

The caudal block group had a considerably shorter time to first analgesic request than the TAP block group. The caudal block group received more rescue analgesia doses within 24 hours than the TAP block group. The mean total dose of intravenous paracetamol within the first 24 hours postoperatively was greater in the caudal block group. The caudal block group had much higher family satisfaction.

CONCLUSIONS

The TAP block and caudal block provide good postoperative analgesia in children undergoing unilateral inguinal hernia repair. Adding dexmedetomidine to the TAP block was superior to the caudal block in terms of extending the length of the initial analgesic request, lowering analgesic requirement, and lowering pain scores without causing substantial adverse effects.

Effect of dexmedetomidine combined with propofol on stress response, hemodynamics, and postoperative complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy

OBJECTIVE

This research was designed to probe the effect of dexmedetomidine combined with propofol on stress response, hemodynamics, and postoperative complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

METHODS

Altogether 144 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the Beibei Traditional Chinese Medical Hospital, the Sixth People's Hospital of Chongqing from January 2018 to July 2020 were research subjects. The control group (CG) (n=68) received propofol continuous pumping sedation, while the research group (RG) (n=76) was given dexmedetomidine combined with propofol continuous pumping sedation. The quality of postoperative recovery and incidence of postoperative complications of the two groups were observed and compared. The hemodynamic indexes (HR, SpO₂ and MAP) before anesthesia induction (T0), tracheal intubation (T1), at the commencement of operation (T2), at the end of operation (T3), and extubation (T4) were observed. The stress response indexes (Cortisol, ACTH and norepinephrine, NE) were monitored, and the scores of pain, anxiety and cognitive dysfunction before and after operation were evaluated.

RESULTS

Compared with the CG, the incidence of postoperative complications in the RG was lower, and the quality of postoperative recovery (time of breathing recovery, eye opening, consciousness and extubation) was better. Besides, the hemodynamic indexes of the RG were more stable, and the levels of stress indexes Cortisol, ACTH, and NE were lower. The RG had VAS and SAS scores that were lower, and MMSE scores were higher.

CONCLUSION

Dexmedetomidine combined with propofol can effectively alleviate the stress response of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, stabilize perioperative hemodynamics, and reduce postoperative complications.

Thoracic Paravertebral Nerve Block with Ropivacaine and Adjuvant Dexmedetomidine Produced Longer Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy: A Randomized Trial

Purpose

This study evaluated the postoperative analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided single-point thoracic paravertebral nerve block (TPVB) combined with dexmedetomidine (DEX) in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy.

Methods

Sixty adult patients of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I-III were randomly assigned into three groups (n = 20 each). G group: patients received routine general anesthesia; PR group: patients received 0.5% ropivacaine; and PRD group: patients received 0.5% ropivacaine with 1 μg/kg DEX. TPVB was performed in the T5 space before surgery, and then, general anesthesia induction and video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy were performed. Analgesics were administered through the patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device intravenously. The background infusion of each PCA device was set to administer 0.02 μg/kg/h sufentanil, with a lockout time of 15 min, and a total allowable volume is 100 ml.

Results

Compared to PR and G groups, the total sufentanil consumption after operation, the times of analgesic pump pressing, the pain score, and the incidence of postoperative nausea or vomiting in the PRD group were significantly reduced (p < 0.05). Also, the duration of first time of usage of the patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) was longer. The heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) during operation were lower in the PRD group as compared with the other two groups in most of the time. However, hypotension and arrhythmia occurred in three groups with no statistically significant difference.

Conclusions

A small volume of TPVB with ropivacaine and DEX by single injection produced longer analgesia in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy, reduced postoperative opioids consumption, and the incidence of side effects.

Combination of sufentanil, dexmedetomidine and ropivacaine to improve epidural labor analgesia effect: A randomized controlled trial

Opioids and α2-agonists have been used as epidural adjuvants in local anesthetics for a long time, but the effect of the combination of opioids and α2-agonists as epidural adjuvants is not completely understood. In the present study, the combination of dexmedetomidine (Dex) and sufentanil as adjuvants to ropivacaine for epidural labor analgesia was investigated. A total of 108 parturient women receiving labor epidural analgesia were randomly divided into three groups: i) Group RD received 0.1% ropivacaine + 0.5 µg/ml Dex; ii) Group RS received 0.1% ropivacaine + 0.5 µg/ml sufentanil; and iv) Group RDS received 0.1% ropivacaine + 0.25 µg/ml Dex + 0.25 µg/ml sufentanil. Patients received a 10 ml loading dose followed by a maintenance by patient controlled epidural analgesia. The visual analog scale scores, onset time, local anesthetic requirements, motor blockage and adverse effects were recorded. Group RDS displayed an improved labor analgesia effect compared with Groups RD and RS. Group RDS displayed a shorter onset time compared with Groups RD and RS, and a reduced local anesthetic requirement compared with Group RS. The motor blockage in Groups RDS and RS was significantly lower compared with Group RD, and the incidence of pruritus in Groups RDS and RD was lower compared with Group RS. In conclusion, the combined use of 0.25 µg/ml Dex and 0.25 µg/ml sufentanil as adjuvants to 0.1% ropivacaine for epidural labor analgesia displayed an improved analgesia effect compared with the use of either 0.5 µg/ml sufentanil or 0.5 µg/ml Dex alone. The present study was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Center on 23 February, 2018 (registration no. ChiCTR-IOR-1800014943).

Addition of dexmedetomidine to epidural morphine to improve anesthesia and analgesia for cesarean section

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the combination of epidural dexmedetomidine and morphine in providing anesthesia during cesarean surgery and analgesia for post-cesarean pain relief when added to epidural ropivacaine. A total of 80 females at term scheduled for elective cesarean delivery were randomly assigned to two groups (n=40/group): In the morphine group (group M), patients received an epidural injection of 0.75% ropivacaine (12 ml) and morphine (2 mg) for surgical anesthesia, and epidural infusion of morphine (2 mg) in 100 ml 0.2% ropivacaine at 2 ml/h for 48-h post-operative analgesia; and in the morphine combined with dexmedetomidine group (group DM), patients received an epidural injection of 0.75% ropivacaine (12 ml) and morphine (2 mg) combined with dexmedetomidine (0.5 µg/kg) for surgical anesthesia, and epidural infusion of morphine (2 mg) and dexmedetomidine (200 µg) in 100 ml 0.2% ropivacaine at 2 ml/h for 48-h post-operative analgesia. The primary outcomes included blockade and analgesic effects, sedation and adverse reactions associated with the drugs. Neonatal outcome was also assessed by determining the Apgar score and umbilical cord blood analysis. There was no significant difference between the groups in the cephalad levels of sensory blockade at 20 min post-injection, or in muscle relaxation scores or pain intensity scores at rest or upon movement at 4, 12, 24 or 48 h post-injection (P>0.05). The maternal patients in the DM group experienced more complete motor blockade at 20 min post-injection, better sedation during surgery and following delivery, and less visceral pain caused by peritoneal traction during surgery and by uterine contraction after delivery, compared with those in group M (P<0.05). The patients in group M had a lower incidence and severity score of post-operative nausea than those in the DM group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of Apgar score or umbilical cord blood gas values (P>0.05). In conclusion, epidural dexmedetomidine reduces intra-operative and post-operative visceral pain and produces better sedation during surgery and following delivery, without any significant influence on morphine-associated side effects and post-operative analgesia, in females undergoing elective cesarean section under epidural anesthesia with morphine and ropivacaine (registration number ChiCTR1900027942; retrospectively registered with the Chinese Clinical Registry Center on December 6, 2019).

Comparison of dexmedetomidine or sufentanil combined with ropivacaine for epidural analgesia after thoracotomy: a randomized controlled study

Background

Thoracotomy is frequently accompanied with moderate-to-severe postoperative pain, and excellent pain management is important for early rehabilitation. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of dexmedetomidine combined with ropivacaine for epidural analgesia after thoracotomy.

Methods

One hundred and thirty patients undergoing elective lung lobectomy were enrolled in the double-blind study and randomly divided into two groups. Group A received 0.5 µg/mL of dexmedetomidine plus 0.1% ropivacaine for postoperative analgesia, and group B (control group) received 0.5 µg/mL of sufentanil plus 0.1% ropivacaine for postoperative analgesia. Hemodynamic parameters were monitored. Pain intensity at rest was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) at 2, 4, 6，8, 12, 24, and 48 hrs postoperatively. Ramsay sedation score (RSS), analgesic consumption, postoperative respiratory depression, nausea and vomiting, pruritus, and bradycardia were recorded.

Results

The VAS values at rest during the postoperative 6–48 hrs were lower in group A than those in group B (P<0.05), and the RSS values were higher in group A during the postoperative 4–48 hrs compared to group B (P<0.05). Side effects were similar between the groups (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Dexmedetomidine combined with ropivacaine may provide better postoperative analgesia and sedative effect in patients undergoing thoracic surgery with fewer side effects. It is superior to sufentanil in analgesic effect during postoperative analgesia after thoracotomy.

Effectiveness and safety of intravenous application of dexmedetomidine for cesarean section under general anesthesia: a meta-analysis of randomized trials

Objective

The meta-analysis was conducted to assess the effectiveness and safety of intravenous administration of dexmedetomidine for cesarean section under general anesthesia, as well as neonatal outcomes.

Materials and methods

We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure database for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about the application of intravenous dexmedetomidine under general anesthesia for cesarean section. RevMan 5.3 was used to conduct the meta-analysis of the outcomes of interest.

Results

Eight RCTs involved 376 participants were included in this study. The meta-analysis showed that the mean blood pressure at the time of intubation (weighted mean difference [WMD]: -15.67, 95% CI: -21.21, -10.13, P<0.00001), skin incision (WMD: -12.83, 95% CI -20.53, -5.14, P=0.001), and delivery (WMD: -11.65, 95% CI -17.18, -6.13, P<0.0001) in dexmedetomidine group were significantly lower than that in the control group. The heart rate (HR) at the time of intubation (WMD: -31.41, 95% CI -35.01, -27.81, P<0.00001), skin incision (WMD: -22.32, 95% CI -34.55, -10.10, P=0.0003), and delivery (WMD: -19.07, 95% CI -22.09, -16.04, P<0.00001) were also lower than that in control group. For neonatal parameters, no differences existed in umbilical blood gases at delivery, and Apgar scores at 1 minute (WMD: -0.12, 95% CI -0.37, 0.12, P=0.33) and 5 minutes (WMD: -0.17, 95% CI -0.13, 0.46, P=0.27) among two groups.

Conclusion

Intravenous administration of dexmedetomidine could efficiently attenuate the maternal cardiovascular response during cesarean section, without affecting Apgar score of the neonate.

Comparison of the Effects of Thoracic Epidural Anesthesia with General Anesthesia on Hemodynamic Changes and its Complications in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Background:

Epidural anesthesia (EA) today has been used extensively in surgical procedures and the management of pain associated with midwifery and chronic pain. This type of anesthesia can be done in different technical, physiological, and pharmacological ways. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of thoracic EA with general anesthesia (GA) on hemodynamic changes and its complications in patients underwent laparoscopic colonoscopy.

Materials and Methods:

This clinical trial study was conducted on 80 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy with EA or GA based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. The patients were randomly divided into two groups of 40 and changes in blood pressure, systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), heart rate (HR), and arterial blood oxygen saturation were measured. The incidence of nausea, vomiting, chills, and itching in the two groups was recorded. The analysis was performed descriptively and also using t-test and Chi-square tests.

Results:

The results showed that the mean of SBP and DBP, HR, and arterial blood oxygen saturation and the incidence of nausea and vomiting was statistically significant (P < 0.05) between the two groups at 4, 6, and 12 h after anesthesia and it was higher in a group of GA. There was no significant difference in shivering and itching between the two groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusion:

The results of this study indicated that thoracic EA in patients with laparoscopic cholecystectomy has significant effects on factors such as SBP and DBP and arterial blood oxygen saturation. Furthermore, EA has fewer complications than GA, and it is the preferable approach.

Effect of dexmedetomidine added to ropivicaine for caudal anesthesia in patients undergoing hemorrhoidectomy: A prospective randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

To assess the effect of dexmedetomidine added to ropivaccaine on the onset and duration of sensory block, as well as postoperative analgesia during caudal anesthesia in patients undergoing hemorrhoidectomy.

METHODS

Fifty adult patients scheduled for hemorrhoidectomy were divided into 2 groups. The group R received caudal anesthesia using 18 mL 0.3% ropivacaine plus 2 mL normal saline. The group RD received 18 mL 0.3% ropivacaine plus 2 mL 1 μg/kg dexmedetomidine. Heart rate, mean blood pressure, onset time and duration of sensory block, and duration of analgesia were observed.

RESULTS

The onset time of sensory block was shortened (9.2 ± 1.3 vs 7.2 ± 1.2), and the duration of sensory block (3.0 ± 0.7 vs 3.8 ± 0.8) and duration of analgesia (3.9 ± 0.7 vs 5.3 ± 0.8) were prolonged in group RD compared with group R (P < .05). The heart rate and the mean blood pressure were also lower in the group RD compared with group R at each observation time points, except the baseline (P < .05). No bradycardia or hypotension was reported.

CONCLUSION

Dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to ropivacaine prolonged the duration of caudal block and improved postoperative analgesia without significant side effects in adult patients undergoing hemorrhoidectomy.

Investigation of single-dose thoracic paravertebral analgesia for postoperative pain control after thoracoscopic lobectomy - A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Thoracoscopic lobectomy is less painful than normal thoracotomy, but pain management is still an issue in the postoperative period. Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) is considered as the gold standard for post-thoracotomy pain control, but is associated with numerous risks.

METHODS

A total of 114 patients undergoing thoracoscopic lobectomy were randomly divided into three groups. Patients in the PVB-R group received a single-dose 0.5% ropivacaine paravertebral block (PVB), combined with patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) after extubation during the 48-h postoperative period; those in the PVB-RD group received a single-dose 0.5% ropivacaine and dexmedetomidine (1 μg/kg) PVB, combined with the same PCIA scheme; and those in the TEA group received intraoperative thoracic epidural anesthesia with 0.5% ropivacaine, and a single dose of epidural morphine (0.03 mg/kg) after extubation combined with the same PCIA scheme. The dose and first time of postoperative analgesia, verbal rating score (VRS), change in catecholamine, cortisol and cytokine levels, change in hemodynamic parameters, and side effects during the postoperative period were recorded.

RESULTS

Compared to the PVB-R group, the dose of postoperative analgesia and VRS were lower and the first time of postoperative analgesia were longer in the PVB-RD and TEA group. Patients in the PVB-RD group had a lower incidence of side effects compared to those in the TEA group.

CONCLUSIONS

Single-dose 0.5% ropivacaine combined with dexmedetomidine (1 μg/kg) PVB provides satisfactory postoperative pain control after thoracoscopic lobectomy, and can reduce the incidence of postoperative side effects.

Paravertebral dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to ropivacaine protects against independent lung injury during one-lung ventilation: a preliminary randomized clinical trial

Background

To investigate the effect of paravertebral dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to ropivacaine on independent lung injury during one-lung ventilation.

Methods

In total, 120 patients who underwent elective radical resection of pulmonary carcinoma were randomly assigned to one of six groups (n = 20): normal saline (C group), ropivacaine (R group), intravenous dexmedetomidine (Div group), 0.5 μg/kg paravertebral dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to ropivacaine (RD0.5 group), 1.0 μg/kg paravertebral dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to ropivacaine (RD1.0 group), or 2.0 μg/kg paravertebral dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to ropivacaine (RD2.0 group).

Patients in the R, Div, RD0.5, RD1.0 and RD2.0 groups underwent a thoracic paravertebral block, and normal saline was administered as a control to C group. Small marginal lung samples next to the tumor were harvested immediately after the tumor tissues were excised.

Lung injury was evaluated as follows: an injury score was determined via light microscopy, and cell apoptosis was determined via a TUNEL assay. TNF-α, IL-6, miRNA-210, HIF-1α, Tom20 and ISCU2 were also detected.

Results

Both intravenous and paravertebral dexmedetomidine attenuated independent lung injury. Downregulation of HIF-1α and miRNA-210 and upregulation of Tom20 and ISCU2 may be the underlying mechanism. No difference was observed between the Div and RD0.5 groups, and no further improvement of lung injury was found in the RD1.0 and RD2.0 groups with increased paravertebral dexmedetomidine doses.

Conclusions

Paravertebral dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to ropivacaine, which is comparable to intravenous dexmedetomidine, could protect against independent lung injury during one-lung ventilation.

Trial registration

ISRCTN, 13000406; retrospectively registered on 22.05.2018.