1
|
Fan ZY, Wu CW, An DA, Chen BH, Wesemann LD, He J, Hu JN, Bu J, Xu JR, Zhou Y, Wu LM. Myocardial area at risk and salvage in reperfused acute MI measured by texture analysis of cardiac T2 mapping and its prediction value of functional recovery in the convalescent stage. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2021; 37:3549-3560. [PMID: 34279752 DOI: 10.1007/s10554-021-02336-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2021] [Accepted: 06/29/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We sought to distinguish area at risk from salvage myocardial zone and to predict left ventricle functional recovery in the convalescent stage by Texture Analysis (TA) of T2-Mapping. METHODS One hundred and six patients diagnosed with AMI and treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) underwent acute cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) and 45 of whom had a subsequent CMR scan following recovery. Cine imaging, T2-Mapping, T2-weighted STIR imaging, and LGE imaging were performed. In the texture analysis, regions of interest (infarcted, salvageable, and remote) were drawn by two blinded, independent readers. RESULTS Seven independent texture features on T2-Mapping were selected: Perc.50%, S(2,2)InvDfMom, S(2.-2)AngScMom, S(4,0)Entropy, 45dgrLngREmph, 45dgr_Fraction and 135dr_GLevNonU. Among them, the average value of 135dr_GLevNonU in the infarct zone, AAR zone, and the remote zone was: 61.96±26.03, 31.811±18.933 and 99.839±26.231, respectively. Additionally, 135dr_GLevNonU provided the highest area under the curve (AUC) from the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curve) for distinguishing AAR from the infarct zone in each subgroup (all patients, patients with MVO and)were 0.845 ± 0.052 0.855 ± 0.083 and 0.845 ± 0.066, respectively, and were more promise than T2-Mapping mean (p<0.001). The AUC for differentiating AAR from the remote zone is 0.942±0.041. Texture features are not associated with convalescent decreased strain, ejection fraction (EF) or left ventricle remodeling (LVR) in analysis (p>0.05). CONCLUSION TA of T2-mapping can distinguish AAR from both the infarct zone and the remote myocardial zone without LGE imaging in reperfused AMI. However, these features are not able to predict patients' functional recovery in the convalescent stage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zi-Yang Fan
- Department of Radiology, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200127, China
| | - Chong-Wen Wu
- Department of Radiology, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200127, China
| | - Dong-Aolei An
- Department of Radiology, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200127, China
| | - Bing-Hua Chen
- Department of Radiology, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200127, China
| | - Luke D Wesemann
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA
| | - Jie He
- Department of Cardiology, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200127, China
| | - Jia-Ni Hu
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA
| | - Jun Bu
- Department of Cardiology, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200127, China
| | - Jian-Rong Xu
- Department of Radiology, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200127, China.
| | - Yan Zhou
- Department of Radiology, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200127, China.
| | - Lian-Ming Wu
- Department of Radiology, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200127, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hausenloy DJ, Lim MX, Chan MHH, Paradies V, Francis R, Kotecha T, Knight DS, Fontana M, Kellman P, Moon JC, Bulluck H. Interrogation of the infarcted and salvaged myocardium using multi-parametric mapping cardiovascular magnetic resonance in reperfused ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients. Sci Rep 2019; 9:9056. [PMID: 31227761 PMCID: PMC6588689 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-45449-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2018] [Accepted: 06/03/2019] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
We used multi-parametric cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) mapping to interrogate the myocardium following ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Forty-eight STEMI patients underwent CMR at 4 ± 2 days. One matching short-axis slice of native T1 map, T2 map, late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), and automated extracellular volume fraction (ECV) maps per patient were analyzed. Manual regions-of-interest were drawn within the infarcted, the salvaged and the remote myocardium. A subgroup analysis was performed in those without MVO and with ≤75% transmural extent of infarct. For the whole cohort, T1, T2 and ECV in both the infarcted and the salvaged myocardium were significantly higher than in the remote myocardium. T1 and T2 could not differentiate between the salvaged and the infarcted myocardium, but ECV was significantly higher in the latter. In the subgroup analysis of 15 patients, similar findings were observed for T1 and T2. However, there was only a trend towards ECVsalvage being higher than ECVremote. In the clinical setting, current native T1 and T2 methods with the specific voxel sizes at 1.5 T could not differentiate between the infarcted and salvaged myocardium, whereas ECV could differentiate between the two. ECV was also higher in the salvaged myocardium when compared to the remote myocardium.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Derek J Hausenloy
- The Hatter Cardiovascular Institute, Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom.,The National Institute of Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, United Kingdom.,Tecnologico de Monterrey, Centro de Biotecnologia-FEMSA, Nuevo Leon, Mexico.,National Heart Research Institute Singapore, National Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.,Cardiovascular and Metabolic Disorders Program, Duke-National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.,Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Mei Xing Lim
- National Heart Research Institute Singapore, National Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.,Cardiovascular and Metabolic Disorders Program, Duke-National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Mervyn H H Chan
- National Heart Research Institute Singapore, National Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.,Cardiovascular and Metabolic Disorders Program, Duke-National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Valeria Paradies
- National Heart Research Institute Singapore, National Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Rohin Francis
- The Hatter Cardiovascular Institute, Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom.,National Amyloidosis Centre, University College London, Royal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Tushar Kotecha
- National Amyloidosis Centre, University College London, Royal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel S Knight
- National Amyloidosis Centre, University College London, Royal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Marianna Fontana
- National Amyloidosis Centre, University College London, Royal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Peter Kellman
- National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA
| | - James C Moon
- The National Institute of Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, United Kingdom.,Tecnologico de Monterrey, Centro de Biotecnologia-FEMSA, Nuevo Leon, Mexico
| | - Heerajnarain Bulluck
- The Hatter Cardiovascular Institute, Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom. .,Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Clydebank, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bulluck H, Fröhlich GM, Nicholas JM, Mohdnazri S, Gamma R, Davies J, Sirker A, Mathur A, Blackman D, Garg P, Moon JC, Greenwood JP, Hausenloy DJ. Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist pre-treatment and early post-treatment to minimize reperfusion injury after ST-elevation myocardial infarction: The MINIMIZE STEMI trial. Am Heart J 2019; 211:60-67. [PMID: 30893577 PMCID: PMC6483973 DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2018] [Accepted: 02/11/2019] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
Background Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) therapy has been shown to prevent adverse left ventricular (LV) remodeling in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with heart failure. Whether initiating MRA therapy prior to primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) accrues additional benefit of reducing myocardial infarct size and preventing adverse LV remodeling is not known. We aimed to investigate whether MRA therapy initiated prior to reperfusion reduces myocardial infarct (MI) size and prevents adverse LV remodeling in STEMI patients. Methods STEMI patients presenting within 12 hours and with a proximal coronary artery occlusion with Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction flow grade 0 were consented and randomized to either an intravenous bolus of potassium canrenoate, followed by oral spironolactone for 3 months or matching placebo. The primary endpoint was MI size by cardiovascular magnetic resonance at 3 months. Results Sixty-seven patients completed the study. There was no significant difference in the final MI size at 3 months between the 2 groups (placebo: 17 ± 11%, MRA: 16 ± 10%, P = .574). There was also no difference in acute MI size (26 ± 16% versus 23 ± 14%, P = .425) or myocardial salvage (26 ± 12% versus 24 ± 8%, P = .456). At follow-up, there was a trend towards an improvement in LVEF (placebo: 49 ± 8%, MRA: 54 ± 11%, P = .053), and the MRA group had significantly greater percentage decrease in LVEDV (mean difference: −12.2 (95% CI −20.3 to −4.4)%, P = .003) and LVESV (mean difference: −18.2 (95% CI −30.1 to −6.3)%, P = .003). Conclusion This pilot study showed no benefit of MRA therapy in reducing MI size in STEMI patients when initiated prior to reperfusion, but there was an improvement in LV remodeling at 3 months. Adequately powered studies are warranted to confirm these findings.
Collapse
|
4
|
Vassiliou VS, Cameron D, Prasad SK, Gatehouse PD. Magnetic resonance imaging: Physics basics for the cardiologist. JRSM Cardiovasc Dis 2018; 7:2048004018772237. [PMID: 30128147 PMCID: PMC6093143 DOI: 10.1177/2048004018772237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2017] [Revised: 02/23/2018] [Accepted: 03/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging physics can be a complex and challenging topic for the practising cardiologist. Its evolving nature and the increasing number of novel sequences used in clinical scanning have been topics of excellent reviews; however, the basic understanding of physics underlying the creation of images remains difficult for many cardiologists. In this review, we go back to the basic physics theories underpinning magnetic resonance and explain their application and use in achieving good quality cardiac imaging, whilst describing established and novel magnetic resonance sequences. By understanding these basic principles, it is anticipated that cardiologists and other health professionals will then appreciate more advanced physics manuscripts on cardiac scanning and novel sequences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vassilios S Vassiliou
- Royal Brompton Hospital and Imperial College London, CMR Unit, London, UK.,Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Bob Champion Research and Education, Norwich, UK
| | - Donnie Cameron
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Bob Champion Research and Education, Norwich, UK
| | - Sanjay K Prasad
- Royal Brompton Hospital and Imperial College London, CMR Unit, London, UK
| | - Peter D Gatehouse
- Royal Brompton Hospital and Imperial College London, CMR Unit, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
T1 and T2 mapping in the identification of acute myocardial injury in patients with NSTEMI. Radiol Med 2018; 123:926-934. [PMID: 30132183 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-018-0931-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2018] [Accepted: 08/07/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To test T1 and T2 mapping in the assessment of acute myocardial injury in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), evaluated before revascularization. METHODS Forty-seven patients with acute NSTEMI underwent cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) at 1.5 T, including T1 and T2 mapping. RESULTS Coronary angiography (CA) evidenced an obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) in 36 patients (80%) and a non-obstructive CAD in 11 patients (20%). Edema was detected in 51.1/65.9% of patients in T1/T2 maps, respectively. This difference was due to artifacts in T1 maps. T1/T2 values were significantly higher in the infarcted myocardium (IM) compared with the remote myocardium (RM) (in T1: 1151.6 ± 53.5 ms vs. 958.2 ± 38.6 ms, respectively; in T2: 69 ± 6 ms vs. 51.9 ± 2.9 ms, respectively; p < 0.0001 for both). We found both an obstructive CAD at CA and myocardial edema at CMR in 53.2% of patients, while 8.5% of patients had a non-obstructive CAD and no edema. However, 25.5% of patients had an obstructive CAD without edema, while 12.8% of patients showed edema despite a non-obstructive CAD. Furthermore, in 6 of the edema-positive patients with multi-vessels obstructive CAD, CMR identified myocardial edema in a vascular territory different from that of the lesion supposed to be the culprit at CA. CONCLUSIONS In a non-negligible percentage of NSTEMI patients, T1 and T2 mapping detect myocardial edema without significant stenosis at CA and vice versa. Therefore, CA and CMR edema imaging might provide complementary information in the evaluation of NSTEMI.
Collapse
|
6
|
Redefining viability by cardiovascular magnetic resonance in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Sci Rep 2017; 7:14676. [PMID: 29116176 PMCID: PMC5676975 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-15353-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2017] [Accepted: 10/24/2017] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
In chronic myocardial infarction (MI), segments with a transmural extent of infarct (TEI) of ≤50% are defined as being viable. However, in the acute phase of an ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) has been demonstrated to overestimate MI size and TEI. We aimed to identify the optimal cut-off of TEI by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) for defining viability during the acute phase of an MI, using ≤50% TEI at follow-up as the reference standard. 40 STEMI patients reperfused by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) underwent a CMR at 4 ± 2 days and 5 ± 2 months. The large majority of segments with 1–25%TEI and 26–50%TEI that were viable acutely were also viable at follow-up (59/59, 100% and 75/82, 96% viable respectively). 56/84(67%) segments with 51–75%TEI but only 4/63(6%) segments with 76–100%TEI were reclassified as viable at follow-up. TEI on the acute CMR scan had an area-under-the-curve of 0.87 (95% confidence interval of 0.82 to 0.91) and ≤75%TEI had a sensitivity of 98% but a specificity of 66% to predict viability at follow-up. Therefore, the optimal cut-off by CMR during the acute phase of an MI to predict viability was ≤75% TEI and this would have important implications for patients undergoing viability testing prior to revascularization during the acute phase.
Collapse
|