1
|
Li SW, Chiu AW, Huang AC, Lai YW, Leu JD, Hsiao YC, Chen SS, Hsueh TY. Ten-years outcome analysis in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer treated by radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation therapy. Front Surg 2022; 9:966025. [PMID: 35965869 PMCID: PMC9372291 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.966025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2022] [Accepted: 07/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Since there was no consensus on treatment options for localized prostate cancer, we performed a retrospective study to compare the long-term survival benefit of radiotherapy (RT) versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) in Taiwan. Methods 218 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer treated between 2008 and 2017 (64 with LRP and 154 with RT) were enrolled in this study. The outcomes of RT and LRP were assessed after patients were stratified according to Gleason score, stage, and risk group. Crude survival, prostate cancer-specific survival, and metastasis-free survival were evaluated using the log-rank test. Results The 5-year crude survival rate was 93.3% in the LRP group and 59.3% in the RT group. A significant survival benefit was found in the LRP group compared with the RT group (p = 0.004). Furthermore, significant differences were found in disease-specific survival (93.3% vs. 64.7%, p = 0.022) and metastasis-free survival (48% vs. 40.2%, p = 0.045) between the LRP and RT groups. Conclusions Men with localized prostate cancer treated initially with LRP had a lower risk of prostate cancer-specific death and metastases compared with those treated with RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shu-Wen Li
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei City Hospital renai Branch, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Allen W. Chiu
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei City Hospital renai Branch, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming Chiao-Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Andy C. Huang
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei City Hospital renai Branch, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming Chiao-Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Wei Lai
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei City Hospital renai Branch, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming Chiao-Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jyh-Der Leu
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Taipei City Hospital Renai Branch, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Chun Hsiao
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei City Hospital renai Branch, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Shiou-Sheng Chen
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming Chiao-Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei City Hospital Zhongxiao Branch, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Thomas Y. Hsueh
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei City Hospital renai Branch, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming Chiao-Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Correspondence: Thomas Y. Hsueh
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Moderate hypofractionated helical tomotherapy for older patients with localized prostate cancer: long-term outcomes of a phase I-II trial. Radiol Oncol 2022; 56:216-227. [PMID: 35344645 PMCID: PMC9122298 DOI: 10.2478/raon-2022-0011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2021] [Accepted: 02/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Our previous study showed that two different regimens of moderate hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) delivered with helical tomotherapy (HT) are well tolerated in older prostate cancer patients. We provide a longterm efficacy and toxicity after > 7 years of follow-up. PATIENTS AND METHODS The study recruited 33 patients from February 2009 to July 2011 (76 Gy/34F; Group-1); and 34 from July 2011 to February 2014 (71.6 Gy/28F; 50.4 Gy/25F for the risk of pelvic lymph nodes involvement (LNI) >15%; Group-2). The primary outcomes were biochemical failure (BF), biochemical failure and clinical disease failure (BCDF), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), late genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity. RESULTS The average ages of two groups were 80 and 77 years and the proportions of patients with LNI > 15% were 69.7% and 73.5%, respectively. At the final follow-up in February 2020, 27.3% and 20.6% cases experienced BF, with a median time until BF of 3.3 years. A total of 38.8% patients reached primary endpoints, in which 18 deaths were reported BCDF events (45.5% vs. 32.4%, p = 0.271). There was no significant difference in 7-year PFS (68.6% vs. 74.8%, p = 0.591), BCDF (45.5% vs. 32.4%, p = 0.271) and OS (71.9% vs. 87.5%, p = 0.376) for full set analysis and for subgroup analysis (all p > 0.05). The incidence of grade ≥ 2 late GU (6.2% vs. 6.3%, p = 0.127) and GI toxicities (9.4% vs. 15.6%, p = 0.554) was comparable. CONCLUSIONS In older patients with localized prostate cancer, two moderate hypofractionated regimens were all well tolerated with similar, mild late toxicities and satisfactory survival, without necessity of prophylactic pelvic node irradiation.
Collapse
|
3
|
Samson N, Khanolkar RA, Quirk S, Quon H, Roumeliotis M, Balogh A, Sia M, Thind K, Husain S, Martell K. Clinical Outcomes from Dose-Reduced Radiotherapy to the Prostate in Elderly Patients with Localized Prostate Cancer. Curr Oncol 2021; 28:3729-3737. [PMID: 34677236 PMCID: PMC8534720 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol28050318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2021] [Revised: 09/13/2021] [Accepted: 09/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Radical treatment of localized prostate cancer in elderly patients may lead to unacceptable treatment-associated toxicities that adversely impact quality of life without improving survival outcomes. This study reports on a cohort of 54 elderly (>70 years) patients that received 4000–5000 cGy of palliative external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) as an alternative to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). The primary outcome of interest was the period of ADT-free survival, and secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS) and metastases-free survival (MFS). Kaplan–Meier regression was used to estimate survival outcomes. Thirty-six (67%) patients achieved a break in ADT post-radiotherapy, with a median time to ADT reinitiation of 20 months. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) were limited to low-grade gastrointestinal (GI) or genitourinary (GU) toxicities, with no skin toxicities observed. Grade 1 GI toxicity was observed in 9 (17%) patients, and grades 1 and 2 GU toxicities were observed in 13 (24%) and 3 (6%) patients, respectively, with no higher-grade toxicities reported. Five-year MFS and OS were 56% and 78%, respectively. In summary, the treatment regimen was well-tolerated and achieved durable ADT-free survival in most patients. Dose-reduced EBRT appears to be a viable alternative to ADT in elderly patients with localized prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina Samson
- Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada; (N.S.); (R.A.K.); (H.Q.); (A.B.); (M.S.); (S.H.)
- Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada; (S.Q.); (M.R.); (K.T.)
| | - Rutvij A. Khanolkar
- Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada; (N.S.); (R.A.K.); (H.Q.); (A.B.); (M.S.); (S.H.)
- Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada; (S.Q.); (M.R.); (K.T.)
| | - Sarah Quirk
- Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada; (S.Q.); (M.R.); (K.T.)
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
| | - Harvey Quon
- Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada; (N.S.); (R.A.K.); (H.Q.); (A.B.); (M.S.); (S.H.)
- Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada; (S.Q.); (M.R.); (K.T.)
| | - Michael Roumeliotis
- Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada; (S.Q.); (M.R.); (K.T.)
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
| | - Alex Balogh
- Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada; (N.S.); (R.A.K.); (H.Q.); (A.B.); (M.S.); (S.H.)
- Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada; (S.Q.); (M.R.); (K.T.)
| | - Michael Sia
- Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada; (N.S.); (R.A.K.); (H.Q.); (A.B.); (M.S.); (S.H.)
- Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada; (S.Q.); (M.R.); (K.T.)
| | - Kundan Thind
- Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada; (S.Q.); (M.R.); (K.T.)
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
| | - Siraj Husain
- Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada; (N.S.); (R.A.K.); (H.Q.); (A.B.); (M.S.); (S.H.)
- Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada; (S.Q.); (M.R.); (K.T.)
| | - Kevin Martell
- Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada; (N.S.); (R.A.K.); (H.Q.); (A.B.); (M.S.); (S.H.)
- Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada; (S.Q.); (M.R.); (K.T.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-403-521-3515
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lu YJ, Duan WM. Establishment and validation of a novel predictive model to quantify the risk of bone metastasis in patients with prostate cancer. Transl Androl Urol 2021; 10:310-325. [PMID: 33532320 PMCID: PMC7844484 DOI: 10.21037/tau-20-1133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Patients with prostate cancer (PCa) commonly suffer from bone metastasis during disease progression. This study aims to construct and validate a nomogram to quantify bone metastasis risk in patients with PCa. Methods Clinicopathological data of patients diagnosed with PCa between 2010 and 2015 were retrospectively retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Predictors for bone metastasis were identified by logistic regression analyses to establish a nomogram. The concordance index (c-index) and calibration plots were generated to assess the nomogram’s discrimination, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to compare the precision of the nomogram with routine staging systems. The nomogram’s clinical performance was evaluated by decision curve analysis (DCA) and clinical impact curves (CIC). Independent prognostic factors were identified by Cox regression analysis. Results A total of 168,414 eligible cases were randomly assigned to the training cohort or validation cohort at a ratio of 1:1. The nomogram, which was established based on independent factors, showed good accuracy, with c-indexes of 0.911 in the training set and 0.910 in the validation set. Calibration plots also approached 45 degrees. After other distant metastatic sites were included in the predictive model, the new nomogram displayed superior prediction performance. The AUCs and net benefit of the nomograms were both higher than those of other routine staging systems. Furthermore, bone metastasis prediction points were shown to be a new risk factor for overall survival. Conclusions Novel validated nomograms can effectively predict the risk of bone metastasis in patients with PCa and help clinicians improve cancer management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-Jie Lu
- Department of Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Wei-Ming Duan
- Department of Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cuccia F, Fiorentino A, Corrao S, Mortellaro G, Valenti V, Tripoli A, De Gregorio G, Serretta V, Verderame F, Ognibene L, Lo Casto A, Ferrera G. Moderate hypofractionated helical tomotherapy for prostate cancer in a cohort of older patients: a mono-institutional report of toxicity and clinical outcomes. Aging Clin Exp Res 2020; 32:747-753. [PMID: 31267377 DOI: 10.1007/s40520-019-01243-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2019] [Accepted: 06/05/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OR OBJECTIVE To evaluate toxicity and outcomes of moderately hypofractionated helical tomotherapy for the curative treatment of a cohort of patients aged ≥ 75 years with localized prostate cancer (PC). MATERIALS AND METHODS From January 2013 to February 2017, 95 patients with median age 77 years (range 75-88) were treated for PC. 39% were low risk, 33% intermediate risk (IR), 28% high risk (HR). Median iPSA was 9.42 ng/ml (1.6-107). Androgen deprivation was prescribed according to NCCN recommendations. All patients received 70 Gy in 28 fractions to the prostate; 61.6 Gy were delivered to the seminal vesicles for IR; whole pelvis irradiation with a total dose of 50.4 Gy was added in the HR group. Toxicity evaluation was based on CTCAE V4.0 criteria, biochemical failure was defined following Phoenix criteria. Quality of Life was assessed with the EPIC-26 index. Overall survival and biochemical failure-free survival were analysed with Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS With a median follow-up of 36 months (range 24-73), acute and late toxicity were acceptable. No correlation between toxicity patterns and clinical or dosimetric parameter was registered. EPIC-26 showed a negligible difference in urinary and bowel function post-treatment that did not reach statistical significance. The 2- and 3-years OS were 93% and 87% with cancer specific survival of 97.9% and 96.2%. CONCLUSION Moderate hypofractionated RT reported excellent outcomes in our cohort of older patients. Shorter schedules may be proposed regardless of chronological age facilitating the treatment compliance in the older population.
Collapse
|