Abstract spatial, but not body-related, visual information guides bimanual coordination

Stability of bimanual finger tapping coordination is constrained by salient phases

In bimanual cyclical continuous movements, the relative timing of the most salient movement phase in each movement is a predominant constraint. This is the case for coordination when both movements have a single most salient phase (the relative-salience hypothesis). We tested whether the relative-salience hypothesis could explain results obtained for repetitive discrete movements, utilizing finger tapping. In experiment 1, participants performed unimanual alternate two-finger tapping with the metronome beat (i.e., one finger taps on the beat and the other finger taps off the beat). The stability of the tapping timing relative to the beat, which reflects the extent of salience, was higher in the index finger than the middle finger, and was lower in the ring finger than the middle finger. In experiment 2, participants performed four conditions of repetitive bimanual four-finger tapping (i.e., alternate two-finger tapping in each hand) without external pacing signals. Under all four conditions, a more stable pattern occurred when the timing of the more salient tapping in each hand was simultaneous rather than alternate, regardless of relative direction in the external space or movement coupling of the homologous fingers. The results indicated that bimanual four-finger tapping could be explained by the relative-salience hypothesis.

Using visual and/or kinesthetic information to stabilize intrinsic bimanual coordination patterns is a function of movement frequency

Coordination dynamics suggest that both in-phase and anti-phase movements are intrinsic and can be readily performed without practice. As movement frequency increases, individuals performing anti-phase movement inevitably switch to perform in-phase movement. However, due to different frames of reference used to define intrinsic coordination patterns in visual and kinesthetic domains, the perception of intrinsic coordination patterns could be ambiguous, which leads to the question whether the visually or kinesthetically perceived information is used to maintain the intrinsic coordination patterns. The current study explored how the consistency between visual and kinesthetic information would impact the performance and the associated metabolic energy consumption of intrinsic bimanual coordination patterns as movement frequency increased. Thirty participants were recruited and randomly assigned to one of three groups ("Info + Spatial +", "Info + Spatial -", and "Info-Spatial +") to perform intrinsic bimanual coordination tasks using a computer-joystick system at low, high, and self-selected frequencies. The visual and kinesthetic information were manipulated to be either consistent or inconsistent by changing the spatial mapping between the motion of display and motion of joysticks. The results showed that the kinesthetic information was largely used to maintain the stability of intrinsic coordination patterns at high frequency, which could be an energy-conserving solution. However, spatial mapping alone seemed to be beneficial for keeping the visually perceived in-phase and anti-phase coordination patterns equally stable at low movement frequency, and spatially mapping the visual information to be consistent with kinesthetic information greatly enhanced the stability of anti-phase coordination. The dynamical use of visual and kinesthetic information for control of bimanual coordination is discussed.

Neural activities behind the influence of sensorimotor incongruence on dysesthesia and motor control

Sensorimotor incongruence (SMI) is associated with pathological pain, such as phantom limb pain. Additionally, patients with pathological pain and brain dysfunction typically present with movement disorders, including diminished voluntary control and increased variability in bimanual movement performance. In healthy subjects, SMI leads to dysesthesia and bimanual movement motor dysfunction. However, the brain localization of this activity remains unclear, particularly in SMI-induced dysesthesia and decrease in movement accuracy. In this study, 17 healthy participants were asked to perform repetitive flexion/extension exercises with their wrists in a congruent/incongruent position while viewing the activity in a mirror. Indeed, SMI induced dysesthesia and decreased bimanual movement accuracy. Moreover, beta band activities of the bilateral presupplementary (P < 0.01) and bilateral cingulate (P < 0.05) motor areas were decreased. Collectively, our findings indicate that SMI induces dysesthesia and movement disorders and reduces beta band activities in motor-related areas.

The effects of feedback format, and egocentric & allocentric relative phase on coordination stability

The stability of coordinated rhythmic movement is primarily affected by the required mean relative phase. In general, symmetrical coordination is more stable than asymmetrical coordination; however, there are two ways to define relative phase and the associated symmetries. The first is in an egocentric frame of reference, with symmetry defined relative to the sagittal plane down the midline of the body. The second is in an allocentric frame of reference, with symmetry defined in terms of the relative direction of motion. Experiments designed to separate these constraints have shown that both egocentric and allocentric constraints contribute to overall coordination stability, with the former typically showing larger effects. However, separating these constraints has meant comparing movements made either in different planes of motion, or by limbs in different postures. In addition, allocentric information about the coordination is either in the form of the actual limb motion, or a transformed, Lissajous feedback display. These factors limit both the comparisons that can be made and the interpretations of these comparisons. The current study examined the effects of egocentric relative phase, allocentric relative phase, and allocentric feedback format on coordination stability in a single task. We found that while all three independently contributed to stability, the egocentric constraint dominated. This supports previous work. We examine the evidence underpinning theoretical explanations for the egocentric constraint, and describe how it may reflect the haptic perception of relative phase.