Repeatability of corneal elevation maps in keratoconus patients using the tomography matching method

Comparative Study of Primary SMILE, SMILE Enhancement, and Femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK on Higher Order Aberrations and Corneal Densitometry

PURPOSE

To compare differences in corneal densitometry (CD) and higher order aberrations (HOAs) in eyes that underwent small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) for the treatment of myopia and myopic astigmatism at postoperative months 3, 6, and 12, and to evaluate their changes in a separate cohort of eyes after SMILE enhancement.

METHODS

In this prospective, randomized, paired-eye clinical trial, consecutive eligible participants were randomized to undergo SMILE or FS-LASIK in either eye. Main outcome measures were CD and HOAs preoperatively and at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. A separate cohort of consecutive patients who had SMILE and underwent enhancement were also included for comparison.

RESULTS

For CD, no significant differences were found between SMILE and FS-LASIK up to month 12. For HOA measured by wavefront aberrometry, both SMILE and FS-LASIK had an increase in total root mean square (RMS) HOAs, spherical aberration (SA), and vertical coma up to month 12. SMILE had an additional increase in vertical quatrefoil, and FS-LASIK had an increase in horizontal coma at month 12. FS-LASIK had higher SA than SMILE, whereas SMILE had higher vertical quatrefoil than FS-LASIK at month 12. Central and posterior zone CD had significantly decreased after SMILE enhancement compared to after primary SMILE up to 2 years after enhancement. RMS HOAs, lower order aberrations, and SA were all increased after SMILE enhancement compared to after primary SMILE.

CONCLUSIONS

SMILE induced lower SA but higher vertical quatrefoil than FS-LASIK at 1 year. Both SMILE and FS-LASIK had similar increases in RMS HOAs and vertical coma up to 1 year. There were no differences in CD between both groups. SMILE enhancement additionally had decreased central and posterior CD but greater RMS HOAs and SA compared to primary SMILE. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(5):e291-e303.].

Minimum Corneal Diameter and Anterior Steep Axis Curvature Share the Same Meridian: A Novel Finding

PURPOSE

To define the external scleral sulcus (ESS) on a Scheimpflug image and use it for a morphometric analysis of corneal diameter (CD).

DESIGN

Retrospective, cross-sectional study of pediatric Asian-Indian eyes.

METHODS

One random eye of 353 subjects between 5 and 18 years underwent 25-scan Pentacam HR imaging. For all scans, densitometry values along the anterior corneal edge were recorded and differentiated. The peaks on the differentiated curve were chosen as the ESS points, and this distance between them was called CD. Vertical (vCD), maximum (maxCD), minimum (minCD) CD and their meridians were defined. Multiple regression models (MRMs) with CD and other Pentacam parameters were built to predict astigmatism and its axis, mean keratometry (Kmean), and Belin/Ambrósio enhanced ectasia display deviation (BAD-D). MRMs were validated using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Estimated horizontal CD (hCD) was validated against digital caliper measurement using ICC.

RESULTS

The ICC (95% CI) between caliper and hCD was 0.96 (0.93, 0.97). MRM predictions (P < .001) used CD parameters, anterior chamber depth, corneal volume and distance from the corneal thinnest location to apex. These predictions achieved an ICC of 0.34 (0.18, 0.46), 0.82 (0.78, 0.86), 0.87 (0.84, 0.89), and 0.81 (0.76, 0.84), respectively. The astigmatism axis prediction depended on the minCD and maxCD meridians. Its within-subject SD (4.97°) was less than 2 consecutive Pentacam scan angles (7.2°).

CONCLUSIONS

The CD metric strongly correlated with the astigmatism axis, keratometry, and BAD-D. Its spatial description may be significant in corneal treatment planning and disease diagnoses.

National survey of corneal cross-linking (CXL) practice patterns in the United Kingdom during 2019

OBJECTIVE

To provide an insight into trends in corneal cross-linking (CXL) practice in the UK, including criteria for progression of corneal ectasia, identification of patients for CXL, the CXL procedure itself and post-operative management.

METHODS

All ophthalmologist members of the UK Cross-linking (UK-CXL) Consortium were invited to complete an online survey about CXL practice for the year 2019. The data collected was anonymised by site and analysed with descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

Responses were received from 16 individual CXL centres (16/38; 42% response rate) and the data represented ~2,000 CXL procedures performed in the UK in 2019. The commonest indication for CXL was progressive keratoconus. Between centres, there were variations in diagnostic evaluation, patient selection for CXL, the CXL procedure and the pre- and post-operative monitoring of patients.

CONCLUSION

Consistent with the wide number of CXL treatment techniques described in the published literature world-wide, variations in the monitoring of corneal ectasia, indications for CXL, CXL practice and post-CXL follow-up were found to exist between UK-based CXL centres.

Effects of intracorneal ring segments implementation technique and design on corneal biomechanics and keratometry in a personalized computational analysis

The implementation of intracorneal ring segments (ICRS) is one of the successfully applied refractive operations for the treatment of keratoconus (kc) progression. The different selection of ICRS types along with the surgical implementation techniques can significantly affect surgical outcomes. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the influence of ICRS implementation techniques and design on the postoperative biomechanical state and keratometry results. The clinical data of three patients with different stages and patterns of keratoconus were assessed to develop a three-dimensional (3D) patient-specific finite-element model (FEM) of the keratoconic cornea. For each patient, the exact surgery procedure definitions were interpreted in the step-by-step FEM. Then, seven surgical scenarios, including different ICRS designs (complete and incomplete segment), with two surgical implementation methods (tunnel incision and lamellar pocket cut), were simulated. The pre- and postoperative predicted results of FEM were validated with the corresponding clinical data. For the pre- and postoperative results, the average error of 0.4% and 3.7% for the mean keratometry value ([Formula: see text]) were predicted. Furthermore, the difference in induced flattening effects was negligible for three ICRS types (KeraRing segment with arc-length of 355, 320, and two separate 160) of equal thickness. In contrast, the single and double progressive thickness of KeraRing 160 caused a significantly lower flattening effect compared to the same type with constant thickness. The observations indicated that the greater the segment thickness and arc-length, the lower the induced mean keratometry values. While the application of the tunnel incision method resulted in a lower [Formula: see text] value for moderate and advanced KC, the induced maximum Von Mises stress on the postoperative cornea exceeded the induced maximum stress on the cornea more than two to five times compared to the pocket incision and the preoperative state of the cornea. In particular, an asymmetric regional Von Mises stress on the corneal surface was generated with a progressive ICRS thickness. These findings could be an early biomechanical sign for a later corneal instability and ICRS migration. The developed methodology provided a platform to personalize ICRS refractive surgery with regard to the patient's keratoconus stage in order to facilitate the efficiency and biomechanical stability of the surgery.

Corneal aberrations measured with a high-resolution Scheimpflug tomographer: repeatability and reproducibility

PURPOSE

To evaluate the precision of elevation and wavefront aberration measurements with the Pentacam HR (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH).

SETTING

Flinders University, Australia.

DESIGN

Instrument evaluation study.

METHODS

A randomly selected eye of 100 participants was scanned twice with the Pentacam HR by 1 observer on the 3 measurement modes: 25-picture, 50-picture, and cornea fine. A second observer performed 2 scans on the same random eye with the 25-picture mode. Repeatability and reproducibility were assessed using the within-subject SD (Sw) statistic from a 1-way analysis of variance.

RESULTS

From the 100 scanned eyes, the higher-order aberration root mean square (RMS) repeatability limit for both elevation and wavefront, and anterior and posterior measurements was 0.03 μm for all 3 measurement modes. Anterior, posterior, and total corneal wavefront Zernike terms were highly precise, with most Zernike terms displaying a repeatability limit of 0.03 μm. The least repeatable measurement was the posterior elevation Zernike term with the 25-picture scan (repeatability limit 1.50 μm). The cornea fine measurement mode provided the most precise measurements. Reproducibility limits (second observer) were similar to repeatability limits with the 25-picture scan mode.

CONCLUSIONS

The Pentacam HR provided highly precise aberration outputs. The most precise measurements are achievable with the cornea fine measurement mode and wavefront aberrations. One should be cognizant of posterior elevation aberration precision, particularly for lower radial order and higher azimuthal frequency terms. Accounting for tilt and misalignment of aberrations, all RMS and Zernike aberrations were extremely precise (repeatability and reproducibility limit less than 0.000001 μm).

Comparison of corneal elevation and pachymetry measurements made by two state of the art corneal tomographers with different measurement principles

PURPOSE

To compare corneal tomography measurements (elevation and pachymetry) as made by two corneal tomographers: Pentacam AXL and CASIA 2.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The devices were used in a standard measuring mode. 77 normal eyes were measured five times with both devices. The data maps for anterior and posterior corneal elevation and pachymetry were exported and analyzed. Repeatability and average values were calculated for each valid data point on the exported data maps. We also calculated a corrected repeatability of the elevation data maps by removing rotation, tilt, and decentration through realignment of the elevation measurement of each eye prior to analyzing the variations in the measurement usingthe same method as for the repeatability.

RESULTS

Pentacam AXL offered the better (corrected) repeatability for anterior corneal elevation measurements. CASIA 2 offered better repeatability for the pachymetry measurements. The tomographers could not be used interchangeably. The central corneal thickness was measured 9 μm ± 3 μm larger when measured with Pentacam AXL compared to CASIA 2.

Keratoconic eyes with stable corneal tomography could benefit more from custom intraocular lens design than normal eyes

We investigated whether eyes with keratoconic corneal tomography pattern could benefit more from aberration correction with custom intraocular lenses (IOLs) than normal cataractous eyes despite the effect of misalignment on the correction of aberrations. Custom IOLs (cIOLs) were calculated for twelve normal and twelve keratoconic eyes using personalized numerical ray tracing models. The Stiles-Crawford weighted root-mean-square spot-size (wRMS) at the virtual fovea was evaluated for cIOLs and aberration-neutral IOLs (nIOLs) in a simulated clinical study with 500 virtual IOL implantations per eye and per IOL. IOL misalignment (decentration, tilt, rotation) and pupillary ectopia (4.5 mm iris aperture) were varied upon each virtual implantation. The nIOLs achieved average wRMS of 16.4 ± 4.3 μm for normal, and 92.7 ± 34.4 μm for keratoconic eyes (mean ± standard deviation). The cIOLs reduced the average wRMS to 10.3 ± 5.8 μm for normal, and 28.5 ± 18.6 μm for keratoconic eyes. The cIOLs produced smaller wRMS than nIOLs in most virtual implantations (86.7% for normal and 99.4% for keratoconic eyes). IOL misalignment resulted in larger wRMS variations in the keratoconus group than in the normal group. Custom freeform IOL-optics-design may become a promising option for the correction of advanced aberrations in eyes with non-progressive keratoconic corneal tomography pattern.

Assessment of Pattern and Shape Symmetry of Bilateral Normal Corneas by Scheimpflug Technology

Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess bilateral symmetry in normal fellow eyes by using optical and geometric morphometric parameters. Methods: All participants underwent complete biocular examinations. Scheimpflug tomography data from 66 eyes of 33 patients were registered. The interocular symmetry was based on five patterns: morphogeometric symmetry, axial symmetry at the corneal vertex, angular-spatial symmetry, direct symmetry (equal octants), and enantiomorphism (mirror octants). Results: No statistically significant differences were found between right and left eyes in corneal morphogeometric (p ≥ 0.488) and aberrometric parameters (p ≥ 0.102). Likewise, no statistically significant differences were found in any of the axial symmetry parameters analyzed (p ≥ 0.229), except in the surface rotation angle beta (p = 0.102) and translation coordinates X0 and Y0 (p < 0.001) for the anterior corneal surface, and the rotation angle gamma (p < 0.001) for the posterior surface. Similarly, no statistically significant differences were identified for direct symmetry (p ≥ 0.20) and enantiomorphism (p ≥ 0.75), except for some elevation data in the posterior surface (p < 0.01). Conclusions: The level of symmetry of both corneas of a healthy individual is high, with only some level of disparity between fellow corneas in rotation and translation references. Abnormalities in this pattern of interocular asymmetry may be useful as a diagnostic tool.

Improving precision for detecting change in the shape of the cornea in patients with keratoconus

To investigate a method for precision analysis to discriminate true corneal change from measurement imprecision in keratoconus (KC). Thirty patients with KC and 30 healthy controls were included. Coefficients of repeatability and limits of agreement (LOA) were compared using multiple measurements for inter-observer and inter-device agreement with the Pentacam HR, Orbscan IIz, and Tomey Casia SS-1000. Correlation of repeated measurements was evaluated using a linear mixed effect model (also called random effect model). A formula was derived for the theoretical expected change in precision and compared with measured change. Correlation between measurements from the same eye was small (R = 0.13). The 99.73% LOA (3 SD) of the mean of three measurements, provided better precision than 95% LOA (2 SD) of single cut-off values as expected from statistical theory for uncorrelated measurements for evidence of a significant change in corneal shape in patients with keratoconus. This enabled the determination of cut-off values for the detection of true change in corneal shape. The mean of three repeated measurements will provide better precision when there is minimal correlation. Three (rather than two) standard deviations provides a precise estimate of the LOA within or between observers and can be used as a reliable measure for identifying stage-independent corneal shape changes (progression) in keratoconus.

Comparison of Corneal Tomography: Repeatability, Precision, Misalignment, Mean Elevation, and Mean Pachymetry

PURPOSE

To compare corneal tomography and its statistical uncertainty for measurements obtained by three clinically used corneal tomographers: A Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam HR), a swept source optical coherence tomography system (CASIA SS-1000), and Placido ring imaging (TMS-5).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Repeated measurements with all three devices on 34 normal eyes were used to estimate the repeatability, precision, and mean values of corneal elevation and pachymetry within 8 mm diameter. The repeatability (standard deviation) was calculated for each data point of the corneal elevation data-maps of anterior and posterior cornea as well as for the pachymetry data-maps. Uncertainty on the position of the eye at each measurement might contribute to the differences between elevation data-maps. To take this into account, we defined the precision as the standard deviation for the elevation data-maps of anterior and posterior cornea after correction of misalignment-effects (rotation, translation). The mean elevation and pachymetry data-maps were fitted with Zernike polynomials for interdevice-comparison.

RESULTS

Pentacam HR offered the best repeatability and precision for the anterior corneal elevation (<3 and <1.6 μm, respectively). CASIA SS-1000 offered good repeatability and precision with high resolution for posterior corneal elevation, and the best repeatability for pachymetry (<3 μm). TMS-5 measured anterior elevation with similar repeatability to CASIA SS-1000 (<6 μm). The data-maps of the three tomographers could not be used interchangeably. The largest differences were observed for pachymetry and posterior corneal elevation data-maps.

CONCLUSIONS

Misalignment limited the repeatability of TMS-5 and Pentacam HR, but had little influence on the repeatability of CASIA SS-1000.