Gastrectomy compared to oesophagectomy for Siewert II and III gastro-oesophageal junctional cancer in relation to resection margins, lymphadenectomy and survival

Siewert II esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma: Still searching for the right treatment transabdominal or transthoracic surgical approaches?

INTRODUCTION

To date, the discussion is still ongoing whether the Siewert II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) should be resected either by thoracoabdominal esophagectomy or gastrectomy with resection of the distal esophagus by transhiatal extension. The aim of our study was to compare the oncological and perioperative outcomes of the transthoracic approach (TTA) and the transabdominal approach (TAA).

METHODS

Searches of electronic databases identifying studies from Cochrane, PubMed and Google Scholar were performed. Randomised and non-randomised studies comparing TTA and TAA approaches for surgical treatment of AEG Siewert type II were included. The Newcastle-Ottawa and Jada scales were used to evaluate methodological quality. The risk of bias was assessed using the Rob v2 and Robins-I tools. Meta-analyses were conducted for the outcomes.

RESULTS

We included 17 trials (2 randomised controlled trials and 15 cohorts) involving 15297 patients. Longer three-year overall survival, five-year overall survival and R0 resection rates were observed in the TTA group. However, TTA had greater morbidity and pulmonary complications.

CONCLUSION

Transthoracic approach appears to be preferable for selected Siewert II tumours. This may lead to higher survival rates and better R0 resection rate. Well-designed studies are needed to confirm the results of this systematic review.

The Multidisciplinary Approach and Surgical Management of GE Junction Adenocarcinoma

Gastroesophageal (GE) junction adenocarcinoma is an aggressive malignancy of growing incidence and is associated with public health issues such as obesity and GERD. Management has evolved over the last two decades to incorporate a multidisciplinary approach, including endoscopic intervention, neoadjuvant chemotherapy/chemoradiation, and minimally invasive or more limited surgical approaches. Surgical approaches include esophagectomy, total gastrectomy, and, more recently, proximal gastrectomy. This review analyzes the evidence for and applicability of these varied approaches in management, as well as areas of continued controversy and investigation.

[Surgical treatment of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction type II : Comparison between transhiatal extended gastrectomy and thoracoabdominal esophagectomy]

BACKGROUND

The incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) has significantly increased. However, the best surgical treatment for AEG type II is still the subject of current research. The goal of this retrospective cohort study is to compare survival and recurrence rates in patients, who underwent either thoracoabdominal esophagectomy (TAE) or transhiatal extended gastrectomy (TEG).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study is based on a cohort of 272 patients diagnosed with AEG type II between 2002 and 2020, recorded by a population-based clinical cancer registry. Of the included patients 63 underwent TAE and 209 TEG. In order to compare overall survival, recurrence rates, and recurrence free survival, we applied the Kaplan-Meier method, univariable and multivariable Cox regression.

RESULTS

Our analysis showed no statistically significant difference concerning overall survival (p = 0.333). However a tendency towards higher survival rates after TAE for the period from 2016-2020 (p = 0,058) is possible. In contrast a significant difference concerning higher cumulative recurrence rates after TAE was found after Kaplan-Meier analysis (p = 0.049). This trend was not observed for the time after 2016 (p = 0.993), in which over 50% of TAE were performed. No differences were found regarding recurrence-free survival (p = 0.772).

CONCLUSION

Our findings in a rather small cohort are concordant with most studies showing no differences or a trend towards better survival after TAE. Other studies found no significant difference regarding recurrence-free survival as well. In conclusion, no significant differences were found between TEG and TAE in surgical treatment of AEG type II.

Changes in Perioperative Platelet Lymphocyte Ratio Predict Survival in Oesophago-Gastric Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) is associated with survival in oesophageal cancer. We explored whether PLR changes during different stages of treatment correlate with survival outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective single-centre study was performed. Consecutive patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery for oesophageal adenocarcinoma were identified. Changes in PLR were calculated during two time periods: the first spanning the neoadjuvant period (T1); the second the perioperative period (T2). Differences in PLR were calculated for clinicopathological variables during both T1 and T2 and for variables with regards to their association with median overall survival (OS). Variables found to be significant on univariate analysis were included in a multivariate Cox regression model. Using ROC analysis, optimal cut-offs for PLR changes were identified and plotted on a Kaplan-Meir curve.

RESULTS

Of the 370 patients identified, 110 (29.7%) were included in the analysis. During T1 a positive correlation was noted between higher positive lymph node ratio and PLR change. During T2, PLR change was positively higher in patients who suffered major postoperative complications. Median survival for the cohort as a whole was 42.3 months and 5-year OS was 57.3%. Survival at 5 years was associated with lower PLR changes during T2. On univaraite analysis, median OS was significantly less for patients with a tumour size > 3 cm, poor differentiation and change in PLR ≥ 43.4 during T2. The latter two variables remained significant on multivariate analysis. Using the same PLR threshold, the survival curve comparing changes in PLR during T2 remained statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Perioperative PLR changes are highly prognostic of survival outcomes in patients treated for oesophageal adenocarcinoma.

BRAZILIAN GASTRIC CANCER ASSOCIATION GUIDELINES (PART 2): UPDATE ON TREATMENT

BACKGROUND

: The II Brazilian Consensus on Gastric Cancer of the Brazilian Gastric Cancer Association BGCA (Part 1) was recently published. On this occasion, countless specialists working in the treatment of this disease expressed their opinion in the face of the statements presented.

AIM

: To present the BGCA Guidelines (Part 2) regarding indications for surgical treatment, operative techniques, extension of resection and multimodal treatment.

METHODS

To formulate these guidelines, the authors carried out an extensive and current review regarding each declaration present in the II Consensus, using the Medline/PubMed, Cochrane Library and SciELO databases initially with the following descriptors: gastric cancer, gastrectomy, lymphadenectomy, multimodal treatment. In addition, each statement was classified according to the level of evidence and degree of recommendation.

RESULTS

: Of the 43 statements present in this study, 11 (25,6%) were classified with level of evidence A, 20 (46,5%) B and 12 (27,9%) C. Regarding the degree of recommendation, 18 (41,9%) statements obtained grade of recommendation 1, 14 (32,6%) 2a, 10 (23,3%) 2b e one (2,3%) 3.

CONCLUSION

: The guidelines complement of the guidelines presented here allows surgeons and oncologists who work to combat gastric cancer to offer the best possible treatment, according to the local conditions available.

Advances in the surgical management of gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer

Since Theodore Billroth and Cesar Roux perfected the methods of post-gastrectomy reconstruction in the late 19^th century, surgical management of gastric and gastroesophageal cancer has made incremental progress. The majority of patients with localized disease are treated with perioperative combination chemotherapy or neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Staging laparoscopy before initiation of treatment or before surgical resection has improved staging accuracy and can drastically inform treatment decisions. The longstanding and contentious debate on the optimal extent of lymph node dissection for gastric cancer appears to have settled in favor of D2 dissection with the recently published 15-year follow-up of the Dutch randomized trial. Minimally invasive gastric and gastroesophageal resections are performed routinely in most centers affording faster recovery and equivalent oncologic outcomes. Pylorus-preserving distal (central) gastrectomy has emerged as a less invasive, function-preserving option for T1N0 middle-third gastric cancers, while randomized data on its oncologic adequacy are pending. Multi-visceral resections and cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy has been utilized selectively for patients with locally advanced tumors who have demonstrated disease control on preoperative chemotherapy. This review summarizes the current standard of surgical care for gastroesophageal junction and gastric cancer as well as highlights recent and upcoming advances to the field.

For Gastroesophageal Junction Cancers, Does an "Esophageal" or "Gastric" Surgical Approach Offer Better Perioperative and Oncologic Outcomes?

BACKGROUND

The optimal surgical approach to the resection of gastoesophageal junction cancer is unknown. A comprehensive literature search was conducted to further compare the esophageal and gastric approaches to gastroesophageal junction cancer.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature from January 1990 to May 2018 was performed to determine whether an esophageal or gastric surgical approach offers better perioperative and oncologic outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 179 abstracts were identified and after excluding publications for non-English language, primary focus on neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant treatment, lack of comparison of surgical approaches or not addressing morbidity, mortality, or survival-related outcomes, a total of 14 nonrandomized, comparative studies were reviewed in detail.

CONCLUSIONS

The proximal and distant extent of the tumor based on Siewert type classification greatly influences choice of operation. Overall survival rates and surgical outcomes are comparable, and surgical approach should be dictated by patient factors.

What Is the Best Operation for Proximal Gastric Cancer and Distal Esophageal Cancer?

Cancer of the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) is increasing in incidence, likely as a result of rising obesity and gastroesophageal reflux disease rates. The tumors that arise here share features of esophageal and gastric cancer, and are classified based on their location in relationship to the GEJ. The definition of the GEJ itself, as well as optimal resection strategy, extent of lymph node dissection, resection margin length, and reconstruction methods are still very much a subject of debate. This article summarizes the available evidence on this topic, and highlights specific areas for further research.

Thoracoabdominal versus transhiatal surgical approaches for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction-a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the oncological and perioperative outcomes of transhiatally extended gastrectomy (TEG) and thoracoabdominal esophagectomy (TAE) for therapy of adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) with focus on AEG type II, as the optimal approach for these tumors is still unclear.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library (CENTRAL) were searched until July 24, 2018. Studies comparing TAE and TEG for surgical treatment of AEG type tumors have been included. Patient's baseline and perioperative data have been extracted and meta-analyses have been conducted for the outcomes: number of dissected lymph nodes, R0-resection rate, anastomotic leak rate, postoperative morbidity, and 30-day mortality.

RESULTS

Of 6709 articles identified, 8 studies have been included for further analysis. One thousand thirty-four patients underwent TAE, and 1177 patients TEG. No differences were found between the approaches in regard to number of dissected lymph nodes (MD - 0.96; 95% CI - 3.07 to 1.15; p = 0.37), R0-resection rates (OR 0.97; 95% CI 0.57 to 1.63; p = 0.90), anastomotic leak rates (OR 1.13; 95% CI 0.69 to 1.86; p = 0.63), and 30-day mortality (OR 1.53; 95% CI 0.90 to 2.61; p = 0.11). However, a higher rate of postoperative morbidity was found after TAE (OR 1.55; 95% CI 1.12 to 2.14; p = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

The optimal approach to surgical therapy of AEG II still remains unclear. This study identified a significantly higher rate of postoperative morbidity after TAE at comparable surgical outcomes. Due to major limitations concerning the quality of included studies, current data strongly mandates a properly designed randomized controlled trial to identify the optimal surgical approach for AEG type II tumors.