Micro-computed tomography for the quantification of blocked fibers in hemodialyzers

Detection and Scoring of Extracorporeal Circuit Clotting During Hemodialysis

Maintaining patency of the extracorporeal hemodialysis (HD) circuit is a prerequisite to perform HD. Unfractionated heparin and low-molecular-weight heparins are the most used anticoagulants in maintenance HD, but their administration comes with a major trade-off of bleeding complications. This narrative review article discusses technical factors impacting on HD circuit patency, such as tubings, dialyzer membranes, priming practices, and treatment settings. Strategies for monitoring extracorporeal circuit clotting during and after treatment are also reviewed, as these are essential tools for optimizing anticoagulation.

The optimized anticoagulation strategy in prolonged hemodialysis

Background

During extended (nocturnal) hemodialysis (ENHD), the dose of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) can be administered as a single injection or as a divided dose over different time points. Our hypothesis was that a single injection might be sufficient to maintain dialyzer fiber patency. In addition, we investigated whether the biochemical clotting parameter anti-Xa accurately predicts fiber blocking.

Methods

Our hypothesis was tested in 20 stable patients on ENHD in a random cross-over setting during two consecutive midweek sessions. The regular total dose of LMWH (i.e. enoxaparin, Clexane® 40-100  mg, Sanofi, Belgium) was either given (i) in a single injection at the dialysis start or (ii) divided over two injections, at the start and halfway the dialysis session. Blood samples were taken from the arterial blood line at different time points to determine plasma anti-Xa activity levels. Post-dialysis, the rinsed and dried hemodialyzers were scanned with a reference micro-computed tomography (µCT) scanning technique, and non-blocked fibers were counted in a central cross-section of the dialyzer outlet potting (ImageJ, NIH, USA).

Results

The percentage of open fibers in the dialyzers after a single injection of LMWH [91 (61-96)%] versus divided administration [94 (79-98)%] was not different. Time averaged anti-Xa activity levels were clinically not significantly different between both sessions. Anti-Xa activity levels correlated with the administered anticoagulation doses normalized for body weight, but not with the percentages open fibers in the dialyzers.

Conclusion

Our results indicate that there is no need to administer enoxaparin over two injections for ENHD up to 8 h. The usefulness of monitoring anti-Xa levels to predict fiber patency, assessed by µCT, can be questioned, but further clinical trials are needed.

Association between anticoagulation strategy and quality of life in chronic hemodialysis patients

Prevention of clotting in hemodialysis (HD) is a concern, but tools to monitor anticoagulation strategies as well as data on bleeding and its impact on quality of life (QoL) are scant. In this prospective longitudinal observational study, bleeding tendency in 70 HD patients was scored with ISTH-BAT and HAS-BLED at week 0, 4, and 8. Patient's limbs were visually scored for bruises and hematomas, and Quality of Life (QoL) was assessed using EQ5D-3L and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) questionnaires. At week 0, the used hemodialyzer was scanned in a micro-CT scanner to quantify the number of patent fibers. Bleeding scores were 0 [0; 1] and 3 [2; 4] for ISTH-BAT and HAS-BLED, and visual scoring showed 2 [0; 4] bruises/hematomas. QoL was 0.85 [0.77; 1.00] for EQ5D and 70 [60; 80] for VAS. Fiber patency was 81 [70; 90]%, but was not associated with anticoagulation dose (p = 0.103). Patients in the highest tertile of anticoagulation dose had a worse VAS score (p = 0.027), and patients identified as having bleeding tendency by ISTH also had a worse VAS score (p = 0.010). This supports our postulate that in maintenance HD patients the current personal anticoagulation dose regimens may be too high, leading to more mainly minor bleeding that may negatively impact health related quality of life.

Impact of intradialytic fiber clotting on dialyzer extraction and solute removal: a randomized cross-over study

Previous studies revealed the importance of biocompatibility, anticoagulation strategy, and dialysis mode and duration on fiber blocking at the end of a hemodialysis session. The present study was set up in ten hemodialysis patients to relate fiber patency to dialyzer extraction and removal of small and middle molecules. With only 1/4th of the regular anticoagulation dose, and using a Solacea 19H and FX800 CorDiax dialyzer, fiber patency was quantified using 3D micro-CT scanning for different dialysis durations (i.e. 60, 120 and 240 min). While Solacea showed enhanced fiber patency in all test sessions, fiber blocking in the FX800 CorDiax did not follow a linear process during dialysis, but was rather accelerated near the end of dialysis. Dialyzer extraction ratios were correlated with the percentages of open fibers. While the fiber blocking process affected extraction ratios (i.e. for phosphorus and myoglobin in the FX800 CorDiax), it had only minor impact on the removal of toxins up to at least 12 kDa.

Biocompatibility of Surface-Modified Membranes for Chronic Hemodialysis Therapy

Hemodialysis is a life-sustaining therapy for millions of people worldwide. However, despite considerable technical and scientific improvements, results are still not fully satisfactory in terms of morbidity and mortality. The membrane contained in the hemodialyzer is undoubtedly the main determinant of the success and quality of hemodialysis therapy. Membrane properties influence solute removal and the interactions with blood components that define the membrane’s biocompatibility. Bioincompatibility is considered a potential contributor to several uremic complications. Thus, the development of more biocompatible polymers used as hemodialyzer membrane is of utmost importance for improving results and clinical patient outcomes. Many different surface-modified membranes for hemodialysis have been manufactured over recent years by varying approaches in the attempt to minimize blood incompatibility. Their main characteristics and clinical results in hemodialysis patients were reviewed in the present article.

The effect of SARS-Co-V2 infection on prothrombotic and anticoagulant factors in dialysis patients

BACKGROUND

Patients with COVID-19 infection are at increased risk of thrombosis. We wished to determine whether this was is due to an increase in prothrombotic or reduction in anticoagulant factors, and whether heparin would be an appropriate anticoagulant.

METHODS

We measured routine coagulation and prothrombtic factors in dialysis patients after a positive COVID-19 test between March 2020 -April 2021.

RESULTS

Routine coagulation tests were measured in 227 dialysis patients, 148 males (65.2%), median age 67.5 (53.8-77.0) years. The international normalised ratio was prolonged in 11.5%, activated partial thromboplastin time in 48.5%, thrombin time in 57%. Factor VIII was increased in 59.1%, fibrinogen in 73.8%, and D-dimer 95.5%. Protein C was reduced in 15.3%, protein S in 28%, and antithrombin (AT) in 12.1%. Two patients were Lupus anticoagulant positive , and two Factor V_Leiden positive. Factor VIII levels increased with clinical disease; outpatients 159 (136-179) IU/dL, hospitalised but not ventilated 228 (167-311) IU, ventilated 432 (368-488) IU/dL (p<0.01). Overall 75% had an AT level ≥ 88 IU/dL (reference range 79-106), but only 11.7% of non-hospitalised patientscompared to 45% of those who died, p<0.01, Fibrinogen,D-dimers, proteins S or C did not differ with clinical disease severity, whether patients required hospital admission or not and between survivors and those who died.

CONCLUSION

COVID-19 dialysis patients have increased levels of fibrinogen and D-Dimers, but only factor VIII levels in the clotting profile increased with clinical disease severity increasing systemic hypercoagulability. AT concentrations are maintained and as such should not compromise anticoagulation with heparins.

How biocompatible haemodialysers can conquer the need for systemic anticoagulation even in post-dilution haemodiafiltration: a cross-over study

Background

While systemic anticoagulation is most widely used in haemodialysis (HD), contraindications to its use might occur in particular settings. The Solacea^™ haemodialyser with an asymmetric triacetate membrane claims improved biocompatibility and has already shown promising results when used in combination with only half dose of anticoagulation. To quantify the performance of the Solacea^™ when further decreasing anticoagulation to zero, fibre blocking was assessed by micro-computed tomography (micro-CT).

Methods

Ten maintenance HD patients underwent six dialysis sessions at midweek using a Solacea^™ 19H dialyser, consecutively in pre-dilution haemodiafiltration (pre-HDF), HD and post-dilution HDF (post-HDF). After the first three sessions with only a quarter of their regular anticoagulation dose (one-quarter), the last three sessions were performed without anticoagulation (zero). Dialyser fibre blocking was quantified in the dialyser outlet potting using a 3D micro-CT scanning technique post-dialysis.

Results

Even in case of reduced (one-quarter) anticoagulation, the relative number of open fibres post-dialysis was almost optimal, i.e. 0.96 (0.87-0.99) with pre-HDF, 0.99 (0.97-0.99) with HD and 0.97 (0.92-0.99) with post-HDF. Fibre patency was mildly decreased for pre-HDF and HD when anticoagulation was decreased from one-quarter to zero, i.e. to 0.76 (0.61-0.85) with pre-HDF (P = 0.004) and to 0.80 (0.77-0.89) with HD (P = 0.013). Comparing the results for zero anticoagulation, post-HDF [i.e. 0.94 (0.82-0.97)] performed as well as HD and pre-HDF.

Conclusions

The Solacea^™ dialyser provides promising results for use in conditions where systemic anticoagulation is contraindicated. Post-HDF, although inducing haemoconcentration in the dialyser, is equally effective for fibre patency in case of zero anticoagulation as pre-HDF and HD when using Solacea^™.

A randomized cross-over study with objective quantification of the performance of an asymmetric triacetate and a polysulfone dialysis membrane using different anticoagulation strategies

Background

Different strategies can be used to counteract coagulation of extracorporeal systems. Systemic anticoagulation is most widely used in routine clinical practice, but can be contraindicated in specific settings. The Solacea^™ dialyser, containing the asymmetric triacetate membrane, claims improved biocompatibility, which should result in decreased tendency for coagulation. We quantified the performance of the Solacea^™ versus the FX800CORDIAX dialyser regarding resistance to fibre blocking as assessed by micro-computed tomography (CT).

Methods

This cross-over study with four arms randomized consecutively 10 maintenance haemodialysis patients to a 4-h post-dilution haemodiafiltration session at midweek, using either Solacea^™ 19 H or FX800CORDIAX, with either regular or half dose of anticoagulation (EC2017/1459-NCT03820401). Dialyser fibre blocking was visualized in the dialyser outlet potting using a 3D CT scanning technique on micrometre resolution. Extraction ratios of middle molecules [myoglobin, lambda and kappa free light chains (FLCs)] were determined.

Results

The relative number of open fibres post-dialysis was lower in FX800CORDIAX versus Solacea^™ dialyser, and this was irrespective of the anticoagulation dose used or the threshold for counting open fibres. Extraction ratios of FLCs were not different at regular anticoagulation between Solacea^™ and FX800CORDIAX (21% ± 4% for kappa and 32% ± 8% for lambda with Solacea^™ versus 23% ± 7% and 38% ± 6% for FX800CORDIAX), but were superior with the Solacea^™ (34% ± 12% versus 22% ± 8% with FX800CORDIAX; P = 0.02) for myoglobin in case of halving anticoagulation dose. No clinically relevant albumin loss was detected.

Conclusions

The Solacea^™ dialyser seems to be promising for use in conditions where systemic anticoagulation is contraindicated, as even under conditions of low systemic anticoagulation, virtually no signs of fibre blocking could be observed using the sensitive micro-CT scanning technique. This finding is in line with its presumed good performance in terms of biocompatibility.

Evaluation of Different Dialyzers and the Impact of Predialysis Albumin Priming in Intermittent Hemodialysis With Reduced Anticoagulation

Introduction

Systemic anticoagulation is widely used in routine clinical hemodialysis, but can be contraindicated in specific settings. Anticoagulant-free treatment regimens are prone to failure even in chronic intermittent hemodialysis. We quantified fiber blocking in settings of reduced anticoagulation to assess performance of different dialyzers and the potential benefit of albumin priming.

Methods

This crossover study included 10 patients performing 4 hours of hemodialysis at midweek in 7 different settings: that is, using Solacea 19H and FX800, both with regular and half dose of anticoagulation, Evodial 1.3 without systemic anticoagulation, and FX800 (half dose) and Evodial (no anticoagulation) when primed with a human albumin solution. Dialyzer fiber blocking was visualized in the dialyzer outlet potting using a 3-dimensional computed tomography (CT) scanning technique on micrometer resolution.

Results

No sessions had to be prematurely interrupted because of circuit clotting. The relative number of open fibers post dialysis was not influenced by the reduction of anticoagulation in the Solacea making this dialyzer superior in fiber patency in this setting above both the FX800 with reduced anticoagulation and the Evodial with no anticoagulation. Furthermore, no differences in relative number of open fibers were found in the FX800 and Evodial dialyzers with versus without albumin priming.

Conclusion

In situations in which reduced anticoagulation is indicated, the asymmetric triacetate ATA Solacea dialyzer outperforms a dialyzer with a conventional polysulfone membrane (FX800) or with the heparin-coated polyacrylonitrile membrane (Evodial). The use of human albumin to prime the dialysis circuit did not improve dialyzer patency.

Evaluation with micro-CT of different anticoagulation strategies during hemodialysis in patients with thrombocytopenia: A randomized crossover study

In patients with enhanced risk for bleeding, heparin-free hemodialysis (HD) with conventional dialyzers is routinely used. To explore the potential benefit of using heparin-coated dialyzers, we used a reference CT-scanning technique and registered different clotting parameters to quantify coagulation with heparin-coated versus non-coated dialyzers. Six HD patients with thrombocytopenia were dialyzed 240 min in a randomized crossover study with Evodial 1.3 or FX600 Cordiax, each without anticoagulation. Blood samples were taken from the vascular access predialysis, and from the dialyzer inlet and outlet at 5 and 240 min after dialysis start. Predialysis blood samples were analyzed for hemoglobin, hematocrit, thrombocytes, fibrinogen, and activated partial thromboplastin time. On dialyzer inlet and outlet blood samples, a viscoelastic measurement of blood coagulation was performed using a Sonoclot analyzer. After dialysis, dialyzers were visually scored, subsequently dried for 24 h, weighed, and scanned with micro-CT at a resolution of 25 µm. After image reconstruction, the open, non-coagulated fibers were counted in a representative cross-section at the dialyzer outlet. No sessions were terminated prematurely for circuit clotting. Heparin-coated dialyzers had more patent fibers on micro-CT versus non-coated dialyzers and also had a better score of subjective visual assessment of fiber clotting. There was no difference in subjective assessment of clotting at the venous drip chamber. With both dialyzers, all ACT values remained in the normal range, and were lower at the dialyzer outlet versus inlet. In conclusion, dialysis with a heparin-coated versus non heparin-coated membrane results in substantially less coagulated fibers during 4 h hemodialysis without systemic anticoagulation. Eventual leaching of heparin, immobilized on the fiber membrane, does not result in measurable systemic anticoagulation.