Short-term increase in discs' apparent diffusion is associated with pain and mobility improvements after spinal mobilization for low back pain

Variability of Intradiscal Pressure During Cervical Spine Posterior-Anterior Mobilization: A Cadaveric Investigation

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to investigate in cadaveric specimens the reliability of measuring cervical intradiscal pressure (CIDP) and if posterior-anterior (PA) mobilizations targeting the cervical spine were associated with CIDP changes.

METHODS

Cervical PA mobilizations were performed on the spinous processes of 7 (3 men, 4 women) cadaveric specimens using a servo-controlled linear actuator to provide 25N and 45N forces. CIDP measurements were performed at C4-5, C5-6, C6-7, and C7-T1 intervertebral discs (IVDs) using a fiberoptic catheter system that recorded CIDP for each IVD cervical segment. To assess CIDP measurement reliability, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC [3,k]) was calculated. Repeated measures Friedman analysis of variance assessed effect of cervical mobilizations on CIDP for before, during, and immediately after mobilization at 25N and 45N forces for each cervical IVD segment.

RESULTS

All CIDP measurements demonstrated excellent reliability (ICC >0.98). During the 25N mobilizations, the median CIDP varied from -0.12 to 0.91 (interquartile range, 5.22-5.36), while for 45N mobilizations the median ranged from -0.94 to 1.21 (interquartile range, -7.74 to 43.49). These changes were not statistically significant (P > .40) during 25N and 45N PA mobilizations, with the exception of C5-6 CIDP at 25N and 45N (P = .05 and .018, respectively).

CONCLUSION

There was high CIDP variability between cadavers during and after mobilization. Mobilizations of 1 cervical vertebra resulted in both CIDP increase or decrease at adjacent and remote cervical IVD segments that were not consistent. Cervical PA mobilizations produced variable CIDP changes at adjacent and remote cervical segments in cadavers.

Three-Dimensional Spinal Position With and Without Manual Distraction Load Increases Spinal Height

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate if spinal height increases using 3-dimensional (3-D) spinal position with and without manual distraction load and to assess the correlation between spine height changes and degrees of trunk rotation.

METHODS

Fifty-six participants were randomly placed in one of two groups: (1) 3-D spinal position with manual distraction load, and (2) without manual distraction load. Spinal height was measured before and after the interventions using a stadiometer. For the statistical analysis, we used a 2 (Loading status: pre- versus post-intervention height) X 2 (3-D spinal position: with versus without manual distraction load) repeated measures Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was used to identify significant interaction and main effects. Paired t-tests were used to calculate differences in spinal height changes between the two interventions. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to measure correlations between changes in spinal heights and degrees of trunk rotation.

RESULTS

Mean spinal height increase with 3-D spinal position with and without manual distraction load was 6.30 mm (±6.22) and 5.69 mm (±4.13), respectively. No significant interaction effect was present between loading status and 3-D spinal position but a significant main effect in loading status was. Paired t-tests revealed significant differences in spinal heights between pre-and post-3-D spinal position with and without manual distraction load. No significant correlation was measured between trunk rotation and spinal height changes.

CONCLUSION

3-D spinal position with or without distraction load increased spinal height. This suggests that 3-D spinal positioning without manual distraction could be used in home settings to help maintain intervertebral disc (IVD) health.