Aberrant neuronal differentiation is common in glioma but is associated neither with epileptic seizures nor with better survival

Navigating glioblastoma complexity: the interplay of neurotransmitters and chromatin

Glioblastoma is the most aggressive brain cancer with an unfavorable prognosis for patient survival. Glioma stem cells, a subpopulation of cancer cells, drive tumor initiation, self-renewal, and resistance to therapy and, together with the microenvironment, play a crucial role in glioblastoma maintenance and progression. Neurotransmitters such as noradrenaline, dopamine, and serotonin have contrasting effects on glioblastoma development, stimulating or inhibiting its progression depending on the cellular context and through their action on glioma stem cells, perhaps changing the epigenetic landscape. Recent studies have revealed that serotonin and dopamine induce chromatin modifications related to transcriptional plasticity in the mammalian brain and possibly in glioblastoma; however, this topic still needs to be explored because of its potential implications for glioblastoma treatment. Also, it is essential to consider that neurotransmitters' effects depend on the tumor's microenvironment since it can significantly influence the response and behavior of cancer cells. This review examines the possible role of neurotransmitters as regulators of glioblastoma development, focusing on their impact on the chromatin of glioma stem cells.

Spatial analysis of the glioblastoma proteome reveals specific molecular signatures and markers of survival

Molecular heterogeneity is a key feature of glioblastoma that impedes patient stratification and leads to large discrepancies in mean patient survival. Here, we analyze a cohort of 96 glioblastoma patients with survival ranging from a few months to over 4 years. 46 tumors are analyzed by mass spectrometry-based spatially-resolved proteomics guided by mass spectrometry imaging. Integration of protein expression and clinical information highlights three molecular groups associated with immune, neurogenesis, and tumorigenesis signatures with high intra-tumoral heterogeneity. Furthermore, a set of proteins originating from reference and alternative ORFs is found to be statistically significant based on patient survival times. Among these proteins, a 5-protein signature is associated with survival. The expression of these 5 proteins is validated by immunofluorescence on an additional cohort of 50 patients. Overall, our work characterizes distinct molecular regions within glioblastoma tissues based on protein expression, which may help guide glioblastoma prognosis and improve current glioblastoma classification.

Acidosis induces RIPK1-dependent death of glioblastoma stem cells via acid-sensing ion channel 1a

Eliciting regulated cell death, like necroptosis, is a potential cancer treatment. However, pathways eliciting necroptosis are poorly understood. It has been reported that prolonged activation of acid-sensing ion channel 1a (ASIC1a) induces necroptosis in mouse neurons. Glioblastoma stem cells (GSCs) also express functional ASIC1a, but whether prolonged activation of ASIC1a induces necroptosis in GSCs is unknown. Here we used a tumorsphere formation assay to show that slight acidosis (pH 6.6) induces necrotic cell death in a manner that was sensitive to the necroptosis inhibitor Nec-1 and to the ASIC1a antagonist PcTx1. In addition, genetic knockout of ASIC1a rendered GSCs resistant to acid-induced reduction in tumorsphere formation, while the ASIC1 agonist MitTx1 reduced tumorsphere formation also at neutral pH. Finally, a 20 amino acid fragment of the ASIC1 C-terminus, thought to interact with the necroptosis kinase RIPK1, was sufficient to reduce the formation of tumorspheres. Meanwhile, the genetic knockout of MLKL, the executive protein in the necroptosis cascade, did not prevent a reduction in tumor sphere formation, suggesting that ASIC1a induced an alternative cell death pathway. These findings demonstrate that ASIC1a is a death receptor on GSCs that induces cell death during prolonged acidosis. We propose that this pathway shapes the evolution of a tumor in its acidic microenvironment and that pharmacological activation of ASIC1a might be a potential new strategy in tumor therapy.

Pathogenetic Features and Current Management of Glioblastoma

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common form of primary malignant brain tumor with a devastatingly poor prognosis. The disease does not discriminate, affecting adults and children of both sexes, and has an average overall survival of 12-15 months, despite advances in diagnosis and rigorous treatment with chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and surgical resection. In addition, most survivors will eventually experience tumor recurrence that only imparts survival of a few months. GBM is highly heterogenous, invasive, vascularized, and almost always inaccessible for treatment. Based on all these outstanding obstacles, there have been tremendous efforts to develop alternative treatment options that allow for more efficient targeting of the tumor including small molecule drugs and immunotherapies. A number of other strategies in development include therapies based on nanoparticles, light, extracellular vesicles, and micro-RNA, and vessel co-option. Advances in these potential approaches shed a promising outlook on the future of GBM treatment. In this review, we briefly discuss the current understanding of adult GBM's pathogenetic features that promote treatment resistance. We also outline novel and promising targeted agents currently under development for GBM patients during the last few years with their current clinical status.