Effects of horizontal distance and limb crossing on perceived hand spacing and ownership: Differential sensory processing across hand configurations

Proprioceptive uncertainty promotes the rubber hand illusion

Body ownership is the multisensory perception of a body as one's own. Recently, the emergence of body ownership illusions like the visuotactile rubber hand illusion has been described by Bayesian causal inference models in which the observer computes the probability that visual and tactile signals come from a common source. Given the importance of proprioception for the perception of one's body, proprioceptive information and its relative reliability should impact this inferential process. We used a detection task based on the rubber hand illusion where participants had to report whether the rubber hand felt like their own or not. We manipulated the degree of asynchrony of visual and tactile stimuli delivered to the rubber hand and the real hand under two levels of proprioceptive noise using tendon vibration applied to the lower arm's antagonist extensor and flexor muscles. As hypothesized, the probability of the emergence of the rubber hand illusion increased with proprioceptive noise. Moreover, this result, well fitted by a Bayesian causal inference model, was best described by a change in the a priori probability of a common cause for vision and touch. These results offer new insights into how proprioceptive uncertainty shapes the multisensory perception of one's own body.

Do interoception and attending to the upper limbs affect body ownership and body representation in the grasp illusion?

Passively grasping an unseen artificial finger induces ownership over this finger and an illusory coming together of one's index fingers: a grasp illusion. Here we determine how interoceptive ability and attending to the upper limbs influence this illusion. Participants passively grasped an unseen artificial finger with their left index finger and thumb for 3 min while their right index finger, located 12 cm below, was lightly clamped. Experiment 1 (n = 30) investigated whether the strength of the grasp illusion (perceived index finger spacing and perceived ownership) is related to a person's level of interoceptive accuracy (modified heartbeat counting task) and sensibility (Noticing subscale of the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness). Experiment 2 (n = 30) investigated the effect of providing verbal or tactile cues to guide participants' attention to their upper limbs. On their own, neither interoceptive accuracy and sensibility or verbal and tactile cueing had an effect on the grasp illusion. However, verbal cueing increased the strength of the grasp illusion in individuals with lower interoceptive ability. Across the observed range of interoceptive accuracy and sensibility, verbal cueing decreased perceived index spacing by 5.6 cm [1.91 to 9.38] (mean [95%CI]), and perceived ownership by ∼3 points on a 7-point Likert scale (slope -0.93 [-1.72 to -0.15]). Thus, attending to the upper limbs via verbal cues increases the strength of the grasp illusion in a way that is inversely proportional to a person's level of interoceptive accuracy and sensibility.

Judgements of hand location and hand spacing show minimal proprioceptive drift

With a visual memory of where our hands are, their perceived location drifts. We investigated whether the perceived location of one hand or the spacing between two hands drifts in the absence of visual memories or cues. In 30 participants (17 females, mean age 27 years, range 20-45 years), perceived location of the right index finger was assessed when it was 10 cm to the right or left of the midline. Perceived spacing between the index fingers was assessed when they were spaced 20 cm apart, centred on the midline. Testing included two conditions, one with ten measures at 30 s intervals and another where a 3 min delay was introduced after the fifth measure. Participants responded by selecting a point on a ruler or a line from a series of lines of different lengths. Overall, participants mislocalised their hands closer to the midline. However, there was little to no drift in perceived index finger location when measures were taken at regular intervals (ipsilateral slope: 0.073 cm/measure [[Formula: see text] to 0.160], mean [99% CI]; contralateral slope: 0.045 cm/measure [[Formula: see text] to 0.120]), or across a 3 min delay (ipsilateral: ([Formula: see text] cm [[Formula: see text] to 0.17]; contralateral: [Formula: see text] cm [[Formula: see text] to 0.24]). There was a slight drift in perceived spacing when measures were taken at regular intervals (slope: [Formula: see text] cm/measure [[Formula: see text] to [Formula: see text]]), but none across a 3 min delay (0.08 cm [[Formula: see text] to 1.24]). Thus, proprioceptive-based perceptions of where our hands are located or how they are spaced drift minimally or not at all, indicating these perceptions are stable.

Hand posture affects brain-function measures associated with listening to speech

A major difficulty in studies of the brain, from the molecular to large-scale network level, is ensuring the accuracy and reliability of results, since repeatability has been a problem in studies utilizing functional magnetic resonance imaging (f-MRI) near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), and positron-emission tomography (PET). More generally, an effort to replicate psychological studies has shown that the original results were unambiguously reobtained only 39% of the time. It has been suggested that researchers must undertake studies to identify factors that reduce reliability and conduct more carefully controlled studies to improve reliability. In our previous work, we examined whether changes in hand/arm posture can have a confounding effect on task-related brain activity. Here we show a solution to enhance reproducibility in a NIRS study in a hearing task. The results showed that crossed posture can lead to different results than parallel posture with respect to asymmetric functional connectivity, especially during non-resting state. Even when the only task is listening to speech stimuli, participants should be asked to place their hands on a surface and feet on the floor and keep the same stable posture to increase reproducibility of results. To achieve accurate reliability and reproductively of results, stable hand posture through the experiment is important.

The hidden hand is perceived closer to midline

Whether visible or not, knowing the location of our hands is fundamental to how we perceive ourselves and interact with our environment. The present study investigated perceived hand location in the absence of vision in 30 participants. Their right index finger was placed 10, 20 or 30 cm away on either side of the body midline, with and without their left index finger placed 10 cm to the left of the right index. On average, at each position, participants perceived their right hand closer to the body midline than it actually was. This underestimation increased linearly with increased distance of the hand from body midline [slope 0.77 (0.74 to 0.81), mean (95% CI)]. Participants made smaller errors in perceived hand location when the right hand was in the contralateral workspace [mean difference 2.13 cm (1.57 to 2.69)]. Presence of the left hand on the support surface had little or no effect on perceived location of the right hand [mean difference [Formula: see text] cm ([Formula: see text] to 0.02)]. Overall, participants made systematic perceptual errors immediately after hand placement. The magnitude of these errors grew linearly as the hand got further away from the body midline. Because of their magnitude, these errors may contribute to errors in motor planning when visual feedback is not available. Also, these errors are important for studies in which perceived hand location is assessed after some time, for example, when studying illusions of body ownership and proprioceptive drift.