1
|
Zou H, Wei X, Li L, Wei D, Mao H, Huang Y, Lu P, Li Z, Zhong D, Chen Q. Comparison of objective visual quality between SMILE and FS-LASIK in moderate-to-high myopia. Front Med (Lausanne) 2024; 11:1408516. [PMID: 39359915 PMCID: PMC11446171 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1408516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2024] [Accepted: 08/07/2024] [Indexed: 10/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study aims to compare the changes in the corneal wavefront aberrations and the objective visual quality resulting from two types of eye surgery-small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK)-in patients with moderate-to-high myopia. Methods A prospective analysis was performed on 98 eyes of 51 patients who underwent SMILE. Additionally, 88 eyes of 45 patients who underwent FS-LASIK were analyzed. All patients underwent ocular examination preoperatively and at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively. Corneal aberrations and objective visual quality were measured using the Optical Quality Analysis System II (OQAS II) and Optical Path Difference Scan III (OPD-Scan III). Results At postoperative 1 day and 1 week, there was a statistically significant difference in uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) between SMILE and FS-LASIK (P < 0.05). Postoperative spherical (S), cylinder (C) and spherical equivalent refraction (SE) were similar between the two groups (P > 0.05). In both groups, the absolute magnitude of total higher-aberrations (tHOA), piston, vertical tilt, vertical coma, and spherical aberration (SA) increased after surgery compared to preoperative values (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in Δhorizontal tHOA, Δhorizontal tilt, Δhorizontal coma, and Δhorizontal trefoil between the two groups (P > 0.05), and the FS-LASIK had higher Δvertical trefoil and ΔSA (P < 0.05) but lower Δpiston, Δvertical tilt, and Δvertical coma than the SMILE group (P < 0.05). There was a rise in objective scattering index (OSI) and a decline in both modulation transfer function (MTF) cutoff and Strehl ratio (SR) after surgery compared to preoperative values in both groups (P < 0.05). There was a statistically significant difference in the OSI at 1 day and 3 months between the two groups (P < 0.05). Postoperative MTF cutoff and SR were similar between the two groups (P > 0.05). Postoperative OSI was positively correlated with corneal tHOA (0.261 ≤ R ≤ 0.483, P < 0.05) and was negatively correlated with vertical tilt and vertical coma (-0.315 ≤ R ≤ -0.209, P < 0.05) in both groups. Conclusion While both SMILE and FS-LASIK can effectively correct moderate-to-high myopia, there is an increase in corneal aberrations and a postoperative delay in objective visual quality. The cornea may require a longer recovery period in the SMILE. OPD-Scan III combined with OQAS II is a useful supplementary inspection for assessing the optical quality following refractive surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huaxian Zou
- Visual Science and Optometry Center, The People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Eye Health, Guangxi Health Commission Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Related Systemic Diseases Artificial Intelligence Screening Technology, Institute of Ophthalmic Diseases, Guangxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Nanning, China
- Graduate School of Guilin Medical University, Guilin, China
| | - Xianxian Wei
- Visual Science and Optometry Center, The People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Eye Health, Guangxi Health Commission Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Related Systemic Diseases Artificial Intelligence Screening Technology, Institute of Ophthalmic Diseases, Guangxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Nanning, China
- Graduate School of Guilin Medical University, Guilin, China
| | - Lili Li
- Visual Science and Optometry Center, The People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Eye Health, Guangxi Health Commission Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Related Systemic Diseases Artificial Intelligence Screening Technology, Institute of Ophthalmic Diseases, Guangxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Nanning, China
| | - Diefeng Wei
- Visual Science and Optometry Center, The People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Eye Health, Guangxi Health Commission Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Related Systemic Diseases Artificial Intelligence Screening Technology, Institute of Ophthalmic Diseases, Guangxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Nanning, China
| | - Hejuan Mao
- Visual Science and Optometry Center, The People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Eye Health, Guangxi Health Commission Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Related Systemic Diseases Artificial Intelligence Screening Technology, Institute of Ophthalmic Diseases, Guangxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Nanning, China
| | - Yanyan Huang
- Visual Science and Optometry Center, The People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Eye Health, Guangxi Health Commission Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Related Systemic Diseases Artificial Intelligence Screening Technology, Institute of Ophthalmic Diseases, Guangxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Nanning, China
| | - Pengfei Lu
- Visual Science and Optometry Center, The People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Eye Health, Guangxi Health Commission Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Related Systemic Diseases Artificial Intelligence Screening Technology, Institute of Ophthalmic Diseases, Guangxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Nanning, China
| | - Ziyu Li
- Visual Science and Optometry Center, The People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Eye Health, Guangxi Health Commission Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Related Systemic Diseases Artificial Intelligence Screening Technology, Institute of Ophthalmic Diseases, Guangxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Nanning, China
| | - Dedong Zhong
- Visual Science and Optometry Center, The People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Eye Health, Guangxi Health Commission Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Related Systemic Diseases Artificial Intelligence Screening Technology, Institute of Ophthalmic Diseases, Guangxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Nanning, China
| | - Qi Chen
- Visual Science and Optometry Center, The People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Eye Health, Guangxi Health Commission Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Related Systemic Diseases Artificial Intelligence Screening Technology, Institute of Ophthalmic Diseases, Guangxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Nanning, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pradhan KR, Arba Mosquera S. Comparing high and low energy outcomes on day one for SmartSight myopic-astigmatism treatments with the SCHWIND ATOS: a retrospective case series. BMC Ophthalmol 2023; 23:328. [PMID: 37464345 DOI: 10.1186/s12886-023-03076-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Accepted: 07/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Impact of low energy asymmetric spacings vs. high energy symmetric spacings on the immediate/early (postoperative day 1 (POD1)) outcomes of SmartSight lenticule extraction for myopic astigmatism with a new femtosecond laser system. METHODS The first 112 eyes of 56 patients consecutively treated using low energy asymmetric spacings (Group A; Study group) were compared at POD1 to the last 112 eyes of 56 patients consecutively treated using high energy symmetric spacings (Group S; Controls). Mean age of the patients was 28 ± 5 years with a mean spherical equivalent of -4.41 ± 1.76 diopters (D) and a mean magnitude of refractive astigmatism of 0.89 ± 0.82 D. RESULTS Laser Energy was -25 ± 1nJ lower for asymmetric treatments (p < .0001); Spot and Track distances were + 0.7 ± 0.1 µm larger and -0.8 ± 0.1 µm tighter for asymmetric treatments, respectively (p < .0001 for both). At POD1, astigmatism was -0.08 ± 0.02D lower for asymmetric treatments (p < .0003); uncorrected and corrected visual acuities (UDVA and CDVA, respectively) were -0.03 ± 0.01logMAR better for asymmetric treatments (p < .0007); differences between postop UDVA and preop CDVA along with change in CDVA were + 0.3 ± 0.1lines better for asymmetric treatments (p < .0003). CONCLUSIONS Lenticule extraction treatment using SmartSight is safe and efficacious already at POD1. Findings suggest that low energy asymmetric spacings may further improve the immediate and short-term outcomes of SmartSight lenticule extraction in the treatment of myopic astigmatism compared to conventional settings (high energy symmetric spacings).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kishore Raj Pradhan
- Matrika Eye Center, Dhunge Dhara Marg, Ward number 9, Kathmandu, 44600, Nepal
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Payne CJ, Webster CR, Moshirfar M, Handlon JJ, Ronquillo YC, Hoopes PC. One-Year Visual Outcomes and Corneal Higher-Order Aberration Assessment of Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction for the Treatment of Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism. J Clin Med 2022; 11:6294. [PMID: 36362522 PMCID: PMC9655124 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11216294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2022] [Revised: 10/04/2022] [Accepted: 10/21/2022] [Indexed: 09/05/2023] Open
Abstract
We present a retrospective, single-center report of one-year visual outcomes for Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) to treat myopia and myopic astigmatism, as well as to compare outcomes with other published literature, including results from the United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA). A total of 405 eyes with a mean preoperative spherical equivalent of -5.54 diopters (D) underwent SMILE between April 2017 and April 2022. The outcomes measured included visual acuity, manifest refraction, vector analysis, and wavefront aberrometry at various time points, specifically pre-operative and twelve months post-operatively. Results were compared to other similar published studies of SMILE outcomes between 2012 and 2021. A total of 308 and 213 eyes were evaluated at three and twelve months, respectively. At twelve months, 79% of eyes achieved UDVA ≥ 20/20, and 99% had ≥20/40, with no patients losing ≥2 lines of vision. For accuracy, 84% of eyes were within 0.5 D of target SEQ, and 97% were within 1 D. Total corneal higher order aberrations (HOA) increased from 0.33 to 0.61 um. Significant change was found in vertical coma and spherical aberration at twelve months. SMILE remains a safe and effective treatment for myopia and myopic astigmatism. Clinical outcomes are likely to improve with increased surgeon experience and refinement of technology and nomograms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carter J. Payne
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
- Hoopes Vision Research Center, Hoopes Vision, 11820 S. State St., Ste. 200, Draper, UT 84020, USA
| | - Courtney R. Webster
- Michigan State University College of Osteopathic Medicine, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
| | - Majid Moshirfar
- Hoopes Vision Research Center, Hoopes Vision, 11820 S. State St., Ste. 200, Draper, UT 84020, USA
- John A. Moran Eye Center, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA
- Utah Lions Eye Bank, Murray, UT 84107, USA
| | - Jaiden J. Handlon
- Hoopes Vision Research Center, Hoopes Vision, 11820 S. State St., Ste. 200, Draper, UT 84020, USA
| | - Yasmyne C. Ronquillo
- Hoopes Vision Research Center, Hoopes Vision, 11820 S. State St., Ste. 200, Draper, UT 84020, USA
| | - Phillip C. Hoopes
- Hoopes Vision Research Center, Hoopes Vision, 11820 S. State St., Ste. 200, Draper, UT 84020, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Reinstein DZ, Carp GI, Archer TJ, Vida RS, Yammouni R. Large Population Outcomes of Small Incision Lenticule Extraction in Young Myopic Patients. J Refract Surg 2022; 38:488-496. [PMID: 35947004 DOI: 10.3928/1081597x-20220623-01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for myopia in a large population of young adults. METHODS In this retrospective case series, the patient population consisted of the first 4,138 consecutive SMILE treatments using the VisuMax femtosecond laser (Carl Zeiss Meditec) between 2012 and 2018 at the London Vision Clinic. Inclusion criteria were myopic spherical equivalent up to -9.00 diopters (D), cylinder up to 6.00 D, corrected distance visual acuity of 20/20 or better, age younger than 40 years, and follow-up of 12 months. Outcomes analysis was performed using the Standard Graphs for Reporting Refractive Surgery. RESULTS Data were available at 12 months in 3,722 eyes (90%), and 416 eyes (10%) were lost to follow-up. Mean attempted spherical equivalent refraction (SEQ) was -4.61 ± 1.84 D (range: -1.12 to -9.00 D). Mean cylinder was -0.78 ± 0.66 D (range: 0.00 to -6.00 D). Postoperatively, the mean SEQ relative to target was -0.13 ± 0.30 D (range: -1.35 to +1.25 D) and was within ±0.50 D in 88.1% and ±1.00 D in 99.6% of eyes. Uncorrected distance visual acuity was 20/20 or better in 95.4% of eyes and 20/25 or better in 98.7% of eyes. One line of CDVA was lost in 3.0% of eyes, and 0.08% (n = 3) lost two or more lines of CDVA, for which CDVA was restored following phototherapeutic keratectomy treatment. There was a statistically significant improvement of 0.05, 0.06, 0.07, and 0.07 log units for contrast sensitivity at 3, 6, 12, and 18 cycles per degree, respectively (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS SMILE achieved excellent outcomes for myopia up to -9.00 D with cylinder up to -5.50 D for a large population in patients without presbyopia. [J Refract Surg. 2022;38(8):488-496.].
Collapse
|
5
|
Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Vida RS, Carp GI, Reinstein JFR, McAlinden C. Objective and Subjective Quality of Vision After SMILE for High Myopia and Astigmatism. J Refract Surg 2022; 38:404-413. [PMID: 35858192 DOI: 10.3928/1081597x-20220516-03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To report subjective and objective quality of vision (QoV) results for high myopic small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) between -9.00 and -13.00 diopters (D). METHODS This was a prospective study recruiting 114 patients undergoing SMILE with attempted spherical equivalent refraction (SEQ) correction from -9.00 to -13.00 D, and cylinder up to 5.00 D. Patients were informed before surgery of the increased risk of QoV symptoms. Patients completed the Rasch validated QoV questionnaire. Objective QoV was assessed by corneal and whole eye aberrations, HD Analyzer Objective Scatter Index (OSI) (Keeler), and contrast sensitivity. Patient satisfaction was assessed on a scale from 0 (very dissatisfied) to 10 (very satisfied). Individual item and total Rasch-scaled scores for the three subscales (frequency, severity, and bothersomeness) of the QoV questionnaire were calculated before and 12 months after surgery. RESULTS The mean patient satisfaction score was 9.27 ± 1.18 (range: 2 to 10), 8 or higher in 93%, and 7 or higher in 98% of patients. One patient with a satisfaction score of 2 had a simple refractive error re-treatment and then reported a satisfaction score of 10. The total mean ± standard deviation Rasch-scaled QoV score for the frequency, severity, and bothersomeness subscales before surgery was 24 ± 19, 20 ± 16, and 19 ± 18, respectively. Scores increased after surgery to 41 ± 18, 32 ± 16, and 30 ± 21, respectively (P < .001). Corneal aberrations (6 mm, OSI) increased on average by 0.39 µm for spherical aberration, 0.41 µm for coma, and 0.56 µm for higher order aberrations root mean square. OSI increased on average by 0.58. There was a small but statistically significant improvement in contrast sensitivity at 3, 6, 12, and 18 cycles per degree. There were no statistically significant correlations found between subjective scores for starbursts and objective measurements. CONCLUSIONS Satisfaction was high following SMILE for high myopia. As expected, there was an increase in QoV symptoms, mainly glare and starbursts. The acceptance of QoV symptoms for high myopic SMILE was high, indicating that residual refractive error and visual acuity are the major drivers for patient satisfaction with appropriate preoperative informed consent. [J Refract Surg. 2022;38(7):404-413.].
Collapse
|
6
|
Comparative study of small-incision lenticule extraction with and without prophylactic corneal crosslinking: 1-year outcomes. J Cataract Refract Surg 2021; 47:1196-1204. [PMID: 34468458 DOI: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2020] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare myopia and astigmatic correction after small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) with or without prophylactic crosslinking (SMILE Xtra). SETTING Shenyang Aier Eye Hospital, Central South University, China. DESIGN Retrospective study. METHODS Patients with comparable manifest sphere and cylinder undergoing SMILE Xtra or SMILE were enrolled. The crosslinking (CXL) energy was 2.7 J/cm2. Only right eyes were selected. Visual and refractive changes were evaluated for 1 year. Astigmatic correction was analyzed using Alpins method. RESULTS Thirty-six eyes undergoing SMILE Xtra and 40 eyes undergoing SMILE were enrolled. The uncorrected distance visual acuity at 1-day visit was lower after SMILE Xtra than that after SMILE (P = .01). At 12 months, the mean manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) and manifest cylinder were 0.08 ± 0.32 diopters (D) and -0.29 ± 0.23 D in SMILE Xtra group, whereas -0.25 ± 0.29 D and -0.22 ± 0.19 D in SMILE group (P < .01 and P = .135), respectively. Thirty-four eyes (94%) and 32 eyes (89%) in SMILE Xtra group and 36 eyes (91%) and 39 eyes (98%) in SMILE group exhibited target MRSE and manifest cylinder within ±0.50 D (P = .771 and P = .294), respectively. Compared with SMILE group, spherical correction index (SCI), correction index (CI), and difference vector were higher in SMILE Xtra group since 1-week follow-up (all P < .05). SCI and CI were slightly more than 1.0 after SMILE Xtra even at postoperative 12-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS With CXL protocol of 30 mW/cm2 for 90 seconds, SMILE Xtra exhibited comparable astigmatic correction with SMILE up to 1-year follow-up, although slight spherical equivalent and astigmatic overcorrection were evident after SMILE Xtra.
Collapse
|
7
|
Hou X, Du K, Wen D, Hu S, Hu T, Li C, Tang Y, Wu X. Early visual quality outcomes after small-incision lenticule extraction surgery for correcting high myopic astigmatism. BMC Ophthalmol 2021; 21:48. [PMID: 33468105 PMCID: PMC7816348 DOI: 10.1186/s12886-021-01807-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2020] [Accepted: 01/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To evaluate early optical quality outcomes after small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) surgery for correcting high myopic astigmatism. Methods This retrospective study enrolled 55 eyes from 37 patients who had preoperative myopic astigmatism of ≥2.00 diopters (D) who had been treated with SMILE surgery. Preoperatively, the mean cylinder was − 2.41 ± 0.54 D (range, − 2.00 D to − 4.50 D). The preoperative and postoperative visual outcomes, refraction, and higher-order aberration (HOA) at 1 and 3 months were compared. Refractive astigmatism changes were analyzed by the Alpins vector method. Results Three months after SMILE surgery, the average cylinder was − 0.14 ± 0.31 D, and the average astigmatism vector was − 0.09 D × 6.34°. The angle of error (AofE) was limited to within ±10°, and the magnitude of error was limited to within ±1.0 D in all patients. The correction index (CI) was 0.98 ± 0.07, the index of success (IOS) was 0.08 ± 0.13, and the flattening index (FI) was 0.97 ± 0.07. Significant positive correlations were found between IOS and |AofE| (P = 0.000); negative correlations were found between FI and |AofE| (P = 0.000). The postoperative total HOA, spherical aberration, vertical coma aberration, and trefoil 30° were increased significantly compared with preoperative measurements, and the increase in HOA was closely related to preoperative astigmatism (P < 0.05). Conclusions SMILE has preferable outcomes for correcting high myopic astigmatism. Axis rotation during the surgery might influence the undercorrection of astigmatism. The increase of HOA after surgery is related to preoperative astigmatism.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiangtao Hou
- Eye Center of Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China.,Hunan Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China
| | - Kaixuan Du
- Eye Center of Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China.,Hunan Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China
| | - Dan Wen
- Eye Center of Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China.,Hunan Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China
| | - Shengfa Hu
- Eye Center of Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China.,Hunan Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China
| | - Tu Hu
- Eye Center of Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China.,Hunan Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China
| | - Chenling Li
- Eye Center of Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China.,Hunan Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China
| | - Yanhui Tang
- Eye Center of Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China.,Hunan Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China
| | - Xiaoying Wu
- Eye Center of Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China. .,Hunan Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hamilton DR, Chen AC, Khorrami R, Nutkiewicz M, Nejad M. Comparison of early visual outcomes after low-energy SMILE, high-energy SMILE, and LASIK for myopia and myopic astigmatism in the United States. J Cataract Refract Surg 2021; 47:18-26. [PMID: 32769749 DOI: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2020] [Accepted: 07/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare uncorrected distance visual acuities (UDVAs) and induced higher-order aberrations (HOAs) in the early postoperative period between low-energy (LE) small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE), high-energy (HE) SMILE, and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) procedures. SETTING University based refractive surgery center. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. METHODS Records of patients who underwent SMILE or FS-LASIK were retrospectively reviewed. SMILE patients were separated into 2 groups: HE settings (125 nJ, 3.0 μm spot spacing) and LE settings (125-130 nJ, 4.5 μm spot spacing). UDVA was measured at postoperative day (POD) 1. Corneal HOAs and UDVA were measured at postoperative month (POM) 1. Induced spherical aberration, vertical coma, horizontal coma, total coma, and total HOAs were calculated. RESULTS The study included 147 eyes of 106 patients, 49 in each group. For SMILE patients, the difference in mean UDVA at POD1 was highly statistically significant in favor of the LE group (-0.003 vs 0.141, P < .0001). No significant difference in mean UDVA at POD1 was noted between the LE group and FS-LASIK group (-0.003 vs -0.011, P = .498). Induced change in spherical aberration was less in LE SMILE than that in FS-LASIK (0.136 vs 0.186 μm, P = .02) at POM1. No significant differences in POM1 mean UDVA (-0.033 vs -0.036) or induced change in all other HOAs were noted between LE SMILE and FS-LASIK. CONCLUSIONS LE settings were associated with significantly improved POD1 UDVA. POD1 and POM1 UDVA were comparable with those of FS-LASIK. Spherical aberration induction was less with LE SMILE than that with FS-LASIK, whereas all other induced HOAs were comparable with FS-LASIK.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Rex Hamilton
- From the Stein Eye Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (Chen, Khorrami, Nejad), Los Angeles, and Hamilton Eye Institute (Hamilton, Nutkiewicz), Los Angeles, California, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Chong JK, Hamilton DR. SMILE for Myopic Astigmatism: Early Experience in the USA and International Advances. CURRENT OPHTHALMOLOGY REPORTS 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/s40135-020-00250-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
|
10
|
Yesilkaya C, Arıcı M, Yıldırım Y, Agca A, Demircan A, Taskapılı M. Short and long term outcomes after small-incision lenticule extraction: A tertiary referral centre experience. J Fr Ophtalmol 2020; 43:753-760. [PMID: 32620412 DOI: 10.1016/j.jfo.2019.11.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2019] [Revised: 09/29/2019] [Accepted: 11/13/2019] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The objective of this study is to evaluate the preoperative and short- and long-term postoperative results in terms of visual acuity, refractive error, and corneal wavefront aberrations in patients with myopia and myopic astigmatism undergoing small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). METHODS Seventy-nine eyes of 52 myopes with or without astigmatism (41 right and 38 left) were enrolled in this retrospective study. The measurements included uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), spherical equivalent (SE) and wavefront aberrations. All the measurements before and after SMILE surgery were systematically recorded. RESULTS Mean preoperative UDVA was 1.19±0.24 logMAR and improved to 0.06±0.17 logMAR at the 3-year postoperative follow-up. At the conclusion of the 3-year follow-up, UDVA was better than or equal to 20/20 and 20/25 in 73% and 84% of eyes, respectively. At 1 month postoperatively, CDVA was 0.05±0.23 logMAR and significantly lower than the preoperative CDVA, 0.02±0.04 log MAR (P>0.05). However, at 1 year and 3 years after surgery, CDVA showed a significant increase compared to preoperative CDVA. At the conclusion of the 3-year follow-up, SE was -0.47 D, and 69.6% and 83.5% of the eyes were within±0.50 D and±1.00 D, respectively, of the intended correction. HOA's, coma, and spherical aberration increased significantly. No significant change in trefoil was detected. CONCLUSION This study showed that SMILE produces a stable, safe outcome for surgical treatment of myopia and myopic astigmatism.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Yesilkaya
- Department of Ophthalmology, Health Sciences University, Beyoğlu Eye Research and Training Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
| | - M Arıcı
- Department of Ophthalmology, Health Sciences University, Beyoğlu Eye Research and Training Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Y Yıldırım
- Department of Ophthalmology, Health Sciences University, Beyoğlu Eye Research and Training Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - A Agca
- Department of Ophthalmology, Health Sciences University, Beyoğlu Eye Research and Training Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - A Demircan
- Department of Ophthalmology, Health Sciences University, Beyoğlu Eye Research and Training Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - M Taskapılı
- Department of Ophthalmology, Health Sciences University, Beyoğlu Eye Research and Training Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|