Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion: Treatment Outcomes According to the Retinal Nonperfusion Area, Clinical Subtype, and Crossing Pattern

Visual Prognostic Factors in Eyes with Subretinal Fluid Associated with Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion

We investigated whether foveal ellipsoid zone (EZ) status affects visual prognosis in eyes with subretinal fluid (SRF) associated with branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). We included 38 eyes retrospectively and classified those with or without a continuous EZ on the SRF of the central foveola on the vertical optical coherence tomography (OCT) image at the initial visit as intact (n = 26) and disruptive EZ (n = 12) groups, respectively. In addition, we classified the intact EZ eyes into clear (n = 15) and blurred (n = 11) EZ groups according to whether EZ on the SRF was observed distinctly or not. Multiple regression analyses showed that baseline EZ status significantly correlated (p = 0.0028) with the 12-months logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), indicating that baseline intact EZ significantly improves visual prognosis. The 12-months logMAR BCVA of the intact EZ group was significantly better (p < 0.001) than that of the disruptive EZ group, and did not differ significantly between the clear and blurred EZ groups. Thus, baseline foveal EZ status on vertical OCT images can be a novel biomarker for visual prognosis in eyes with SRF associated with BRVO.

Healing rate of macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion in two years after initiation of intravitreal ranibizumab later combined with other treatment as needed and characteristics of refractory cases

PURPOSE

To investigate the 2-year healing rate of macular edema (ME) secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) treated initially with intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) and later combined with other treatment as needed, and the characteristics of refractory cases.

METHODS

130 patients (130 eyes) with BRVO-ME who received IVR initially were studied. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drug was additionally administered when ME relapsed or persisted. Photocoagulation was performed when the non-perfusion area (NPA) was ≥5 disc diameter (DD), and/or when ME relapsed due to microaneurysm. Patients were classified into a healed group [ME resolved in <2 years or mild ME remained without best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) loss for ≥6 months] or refractory group (ME persisted for ≥2 years).

RESULTS

110 eyes were classified into the healed group, and 20 eyes into the refractory group. The healed group and refractory group had, respectively, mean follow-up periods of 21.2 and 37.4 months, and frequencies of NPA ≥5 DD of 55.5 and 25.0% (p = 0.015). In the healed group, mean BCVA (logMAR) improved significantly compared to baseline in all the periods until 24 months after treatment initiation and at the last visit (p<0.001). In the refractory group, mean BCVA improved significantly compared to baseline until 12 months after treatment initiation (p<0.05 for all periods), but was not significantly different at 18 or 24 months or at the last visit.

CONCLUSION

In patients with BRVO-ME treated initially with IVR and later given additional treatments as needed, the healing rate was 84.6%. In eyes that healed within 2 years, BCVA improved relative to baseline throughout 24 months and at the last visit. In refractory eyes, BCVA improved only until 12 months, and thereafter deteriorated to baseline level at the last examination.

Which Explanatory Variables Contribute to the Classification of Good Visual Acuity over Time in Patients with Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion with Macular Edema Using Machine Learning?

This study’s goal is to determine the accuracy of a linear classifier that predicts the prognosis of patients with macular edema (ME) due to a branch retinal vein occlusion during the maintenance phase of antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy. The classifier was created using the clinical information and optical coherence tomographic (OCT) findings obtained up to the time of the first resolution of ME. In total, 66 eyes of 66 patients received an initial intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF followed by repeated injections with the pro re nata (PRN) regimen for 12 months. The patients were divided into two groups: those with and those without good vision during the PRN phase. The mean AUC of the classifier was 0.93, and the coefficients of the explanatory variables were: best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at baseline was 0.66, BCVA at first resolution of ME was 0.51, age was 0.21, the average brightness of the ellipsoid zone (EZ) was −0.12, the intactness of the external limiting membrane (ELM) was −0.14, the average brightness of the ELM was −0.17, the brightness value of EZ was −0.17, the area of the outer segments of the photoreceptors was −0.20, and the intactness of the EZ was −0.24. This algorithm predicted the prognosis over time for individual patients during the PRN phase.

Foveal Intraretinal Fluid Localization Affects the Visual Prognosis of Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion

We investigated whether baseline foveal intraretinal fluid (IRF) localization affects the visual prognosis of branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). Fifty eyes from 50 patients were included in this retrospective study. We classified the eyes with IRF involving and not involving the central foveola on the vertical optical coherence tomography (OCT) image at the initial visit into both-sides (n = 17) and one-side IRF (n = 33) groups, respectively. Multiple regression analyses demonstrated that not only the baseline logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) but also the IRF localization significantly correlated with the 12-month logMAR BCVA (p = 0.04 and p = 0.001, respectively), indicating that eyes with better baseline logMAR BCVA and one-side IRF have a significantly better visual prognosis in BRVO. The foveal ellipsoid zone band was significantly more disrupted (p < 0.001) in the both-sides IRF (47.1%) group than in the one-side IRF (3.0%) group. No eyes with decimal BCVA less than 0.5 were detected in the one-side IRF group at 12 months. Thus, baseline foveal IRF localization on vertical OCT images can be considered a novel biomarker for the visual prognosis of BRVO.

Foveal Thickness Fluctuation in Anti-vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment for Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion: A Long-term Study

OBJECTIVE OR PURPOSE

Branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) causes macular edema (ME) that can be controlled with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatments. However, these treatments are not curative, necessitating additional anti-VEGF treatments at recurrences. Long-term results, optimal anti-VEGF treatment regimens, and the comprehensive effects of ME recurrences are largely unknown. Thus, we aimed to examine the effects of foveal thickness (FT) fluctuation (FTF) on visual and morphologic outcomes following anti-VEGF treatments for BRVO-ME administered via a pro re nata regimen.

DESIGN

A retrospective, observational case series SUBJECTS, PARTICIPANTS AND/OR CONTROLS: This study analyzed 309 treatment-naïve patients (309 eyes) with BRVO-ME between 2012 and 2021 at a multi-center retinal practice.

METHODS, INTERVENTION, OR TESTING

FT was assessed via optical coherence tomography (OCT) at each study visit.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

We evaluated the logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution best corrected visual acuity (logMAR BCVA) and the defect length of the foveal ellipsoid zone (EZ) band measured via OCT.

RESULTS

At baseline, the mean logMAR BCVA was 0.30±0.30 and the mean FT was 503±162 μm. The number of anti-VEGF injections for BRVO-ME was 5.8±4.6 during the mean follow-up period (50.6±22.2 months). At the final examination, the mean logMAR BCVA and FT values were significantly improved compared with the baseline. Multiple regression analyses showed that age, baseline logMAR BCVA, and FTF were significantly associated with the final logMAR BCVA (β=0.20, 0.35, and 0.30, respectively). FTF (divided into Groups 0-3 in ascending order of FTF) was significantly associated with the logMAR BCVA and the defect length of the foveal EZ band at the final examination. The defect lengths of the foveal EZ band were longitudinally shortened in Groups 0-1 and were slightly prolonged in Groups 2-3. The logMAR BCVA maintained improvements in Groups 0-1, and worsened slightly in Groups 2-3.

CONCLUSIONS

FTF was significantly associated with visual acuity and foveal photoreceptor status. Thus, may improve the morphologic and functional prognoses of eyes with BRVO by identifying the characteristics of eyes with a larger FTF, and consequently controlling the FTF more strictly.

Classification of good visual acuity over time in patients with branch retinal vein occlusion with macular edema using support vector machine

PURPOSE

To identify the eyes with macular edema (ME) due to a branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) that have good visual acuity during the continuous anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatment based on the patients' clinical information and optical coherence tomography (OCT) images by using machine learning.

METHODS

Sixty-six eyes of 66 patients received 1 anti-VEGF injection followed by repeated injections in the pro re nata (PRN) regimen for 12 months. The patients were divided into two groups: those with and those without good vision during the 1-year experimental period. Handcraft features were defined from the OCT images at the time of the first resolution of the ME. Variables with a significant difference between the groups were used as explanatory variables. A classifier was created with handcrafted features based on a support vector machine (SVM) that adjusted parameters for increasing maximal precision.

RESULTS

The age, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at the baseline, BCVA at the first resolution of the ME, integrity and reflectivity of the external limiting membrane (ELM), the ellipsoid zone (EZ), and area of the outer segments of the photoreceptors were selected as explanatory variables. The classification performance was 0.806 for accuracy, 0.768 for precision, 0.772 for recall, and 0.752 for the F-measure.

CONCLUSION

The use of the SVM of the patient's clinical information and OCT images can be helpful for determining the prognosis of the BCVA during continued pro re nata anti-VEGF treatment in eyes with ME associated with BRVO.

Characteristics of Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion in African American Patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To describe the presentation, management, and clinical outcomes of branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) in African American patients compared to patients of other racial or ethnic backgrounds.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included eyes diagnosed with BRVO and macular edema at a tertiary referral center. Presenting features, treatment, and outcomes were compared based on racial or ethnic backgrounds.

RESULTS

The study included 285 eyes: 21.8% African American, 78.2% other. African American patients were more likely to have comorbid diabetes (P = .012), open-angle glaucoma (P < .001), and to present with subretinal fluid (P = .049); multivariate analysis showed race and ethnicity alone may not fully explain presenting subretinal fluid (odds ratio = 2.807; 95% CI, 0.997 to 7.903; P = .051). There was no difference in other comparisons of clinical outcomes or treatment burden, including visual acuity, duration, or treatment method.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite significant differences at presentation, the management and outcomes of BRVO did not differ significantly between African American patients and patients of other racial and ethnic backgrounds. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2021;52:492-497.].

NONPERFUSION AREA QUANTIFICATION IN BRANCH RETINAL VEIN OCCLUSION: A Widefield Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Study

PURPOSE

To precisely quantify retinal nonperfusion areas (NPAs) in branch retinal vein occlusion using widefield optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) and examine their association with neovascular complications.

METHODS

We enrolled 26 patients with treatment-naïve branch retinal vein occlusion and prospectively examined them for 12 months. After 3 monthly ranibizumab injections to treat macular edema, each patient underwent ultra-widefield (UWF) fluorescein angiography (FA) and OCTA. Ultra-widefield FA was additionally performed at Month 12. For UWF FA, the retinal NPA was measured using the equipment's built-in software. For OCTA, we used panoramic image montaged from 5 single 12 × 12 mm2 images and quantified the retinal NPA using a Gullstrand eye with a grid scale at each patient. Measurements were expressed in terms of actual values and disc area units.

RESULTS

The retinal NPAs as measured using single OCTA and panoramic OCTA were significantly associated with that measured using UWF FA (P < 0.001 for both). Retinal neovascularization lesions were observed in 4 (15.4%) of 26 eyes. For patients with accompanying neovascularization, the retinal NPA measured using UWF FA, single OCTA, and panoramic OCTA were 187.9 ± 39.5 mm2 (109.9 ± 21.4 disc area), 34.3 ± 13.7 mm2 (19.9 ± 7.7 disc area), and 106.6 ± 24.5 mm2 (62.4 ± 13.6 disc area), respectively, which were larger than for those without neovascularization (P < 0.001, 0.014, and <0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Using widefield OCTA, we could quantify the retinal NPA of eyes with branch retinal vein occlusion. These could serve as valid references to assess the risk of neovascular complications.

Vitreoretinal Society of India practice pattern survey 2020: Medical retina

Purpose:

The aim of this study was to present the outcomes of the Vitreo-retinal Society of India (VRSI) Practice Pattern Survey 2020 in medical retina.

Methods:

An online survey of members of VRSI was conducted in April 2020 regarding their practice-patterns on varied medical and surgical retina topics concerning imaging and management approach. The results were evaluated by two independent experts in this field and compared with the evidence and other practice patterns in the world.

Results:

A total of 107 VRSI members participated in the online survey. Responses were obtained on management of wide-ranging chorioretinal disorders such as Central Serous Chorioretinopathy (CSCR), Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy (PCV), Neovascular age related macular degeneration (n-AMD), Retinal Vein Occlusions (RVO), and Diabetic Retinopathy (DR). Participants were also surveyed regarding their attitudes and perceptions about anti-VEGF practice patterns and role of imaging in their current practice. Each of the survey question responses were then compared to contemporary literature, including evidence-based guidelines, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), real-world evidence and analogous international surveys. Comprehensive analysis related to this has been put forward in the article.

Conclusion:

This survey represents the contemporary practice patterns amongst vitreoretinal specialists in India. The survey results are vital for fellow practitioners to understand the 'standard of care’ practice in medical retina. This will guide them to devise the best possible individualized treatment strategy for most favorable clinical outcomes.

Factors associated with extremely poor visual outcomes in patients with central retinal vein occlusion

Here, we examined prognostic factors for extremely poor visual outcomes in patients with central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) in actual practices. We included 150 consecutive eyes with treatment-naïve acute CRVO from four different facilities and observed them for over 24 months. Macular edema (ME) was treated with one or three monthly anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections (1 or 3 + pro re nata). According to the final Snellen visual acuity (VA), we divided the patients into very poor VA (< 20/200) and control (≥ 20/200) groups and examined risk factors for poor final visual outcomes. The baseline Snellen VA was hand motion to 20/13. The mean number of anti-VEGF injections for ME was 5.3 ± 3.7 during the follow-up period. In total, 49 (32.7%) patients exhibited a very poor final VA; this group comprised significantly older patients with a significantly poorer baseline VA (P < 0.01 for both) than the control group. Comorbid internal carotid artery disease and diabetic retinopathy were significantly associated with a poor final VA. In actual clinical practice, visual outcomes may be extremely poor despite ME treatment in certain patients with CRVO, with advanced age, poor baseline VA, and comorbid internal carotid artery disease and diabetic retinopathy being significant risk factors.

A comparison of the effect of intravitreal dexamethasone implant on macular and branch retinal vein occlusion. A real life experience

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare the effects of intravitreal dexamethasone (IVDx) implants on branch retinal vein occlusions (BRVOs) and macular vein occlusions (MVOs).

METHODS

Seventeen consecutive patients with MVO and 18 patients with BRVO, whose foveal thicknesses were greater than 300 µm, were recruited for this study. BRVO and MVO patients were diagnosed by means of fundus fluorescein angiography. Patients were treatment-naive. Initially, each patient in both the BRVO and MVO groups received an IVDx implant, and then a pro re nata IVDx regimen was initiated. Primary outcomes included VA gain, intraocular pressure (IOP) changes, macular ischemia, central macular thickness, retinal neovascularization, and number of IVDx injections. Follow-up time was 12 months.

RESULTS

The MVO group initially had significantly lower central macular thickness and a lower percentage of macular ischemia and systemic hypertension than those in the BRVO group (p = 0.001, 0.045, and 0.010, respectively). There was a statistically significant VA gain in both groups (p < 0.001), but the VA gain of the MVO group was greater than that of the BRVO group (p < 0.001). The mean total number of IVDx injections administered throughout the study period was significantly lower in the MVO group than in the BRVO group (1.3 ± 0.4 vs 2.0 ± 0.0; p = 0.001).

DISCUSSION

MVO and BRVO have different disease characteristics, and IVDx implants were more effective on the visual gain in patients with MVO than that of patients with BRVO who had higher numbers of IVDx injections.

Use of Anti-VEGF Drugs in Retinal Vein Occlusions

Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) is one of the most prevalent causes of visual loss in the Western World. Its pathogenesis is still not completely known. Chronic macular edema and ischemia compromise the functional and anatomical status of the retina. Antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections have demonstrated better results than other previous options, including observation or laser therapy. This narrative review aims to analyze the current aspects related to these drugs.

Angiographic Risk Features of Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion Onset as Determined by Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography

Purpose

Examine associations between the vasculature at arteriovenous (AV) crossings and the onset of branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).

Methods

We included 78 patients with major BRVO, 35 patients with macular BRVO, and 110 controls without BRVO and determined the vessel positions at AV crossings, where the first- or second-order branches of the retinal veins associate, using a viewing angle of 12 × 12 mm² in optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA).

Results

We reviewed 1349 and 1276 AV crossings in BRVO patients and control subjects, respectively. The proportions of venous overcrossing were 26.5%, 28.6%, and 26.8% at non-causative crossings in BRVO eyes, non-BRVO fellow eyes, and unaffected control eyes, respectively; however, the rate of venous overcrossings at the causative crossings was 45.1%. In OCTA analyses, we divided the branches into macular- or non-macular veins. The rate of venous overcrossing was 52.5% at causative crossings in major BRVO but was 28.6% in macular BRVO. Odds ratios for whether venous overcrossing was a risk factor for BRVO were 3.09 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.96–4.88) and 0.94 (95% CI, 0.44–2.00) for non-macular veins and macular veins, respectively. The patients with major BRVO caused by venous overcrossing were younger than patients for whom the cause was arterial overcrossing (P < 0.001). The onset of macular BRVO did not differ between crossing patterns at causative crossings (P = 0.60).

Conclusions

In eyes with BRVO, venous overcrossing was a common angiographic feature at causative crossings and might be a risk factor for major BRVO onset.