Impact of renal dysfunction on the choice of diagnostic imaging, treatment strategy, and outcomes in patients with stable angina

Association of the extent of myocardial ischemia with outcomes in patients with suspected coronary artery disease in Japan

BACKGROUND

There is an ongoing controversy regarding the necessity of single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) for patients with ischemic heart diseases after the publication of the results of the ISCHEMIA trial. We aimed to evaluate the association of the extent of myocardial ischemia with outcomes in patients with suspected coronary artery disease in Japan.

METHODS

From the data of 2780 patients with stable angina who were enrolled prospectively between January 2006 and March 2008 in Japan and had undergone physician-referrednon-invasive imaging tests (Japanese Coronary-Angiography or Myocardial Imaging for Angina Pectoris Study), 1205 patients managed with SPECT were stratified by 10% myocardial ischemia. Major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), including death, myocardial infarction, hospitalization for heart failure, and late revascularization, were followed-up for 1year.

RESULTS

Patients with ≥10% myocardial ischemia (n=173) were less likely to be women than patients with <10% myocardial ischemia (n=1032) and had a significantly higher 1-year cumulative incidence of MACEs (6.9% vs. 1.8%, p<0.0001). After adjusting for confounders, the risk of ≥10% myocardial ischemia relative to <10% myocardial ischemia for MACEs remained significant [adjusted hazard ratio (95% confidence interval), 2.40 (1.09-5.26), p=0.029]. After adjusting including treatments, the risk of MACEs became insignificant between the ≥10% myocardial ischemia group and the <10% myocardial ischemia group [adjusted hazard ratio (95% confidence interval), 1.04 (0.45-2.45), p=0.92].

CONCLUSION

The presence of ≥10% myocardial ischemia at diagnosis was significantly associated with the 1-year risk for MACEs in Japanese patients with suspected coronary artery disease.

Association of coronary revascularisation after physician-referred non-invasive diagnostic imaging tests with outcomes in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: a post hoc subgroup analysis

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the association of the prognostic impact of coronary revascularisation with physician-referred non-invasive diagnostic imaging tests (single photon emission CT (SPECT) vs coronary CT angiography) for coronary artery disease.

DESIGN

A post hoc analysis of a subgroup from the patient cohort recruited for the Japanese Coronary-Angiography or Myocardial Imaging for Angina Pectoris Study.

SETTING

Multiple centres in Japan.

PARTICIPANTS

From the data of 2780 patients with stable angina, enrolled prospectively between January 2006 and March 2008 in Japan, who had undergone physician-referred non-invasive imaging tests, 1205 patients with SPECT as an initial strategy and 625 with CT as an initial strategy were analysed. We assessed the effect of revascularisation (within 90 days) in each diagnostic imaging stratum and the interaction between the two strata.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), including death, myocardial infarction, hospitalisation for heart failure and late revascularisation, were followed up for 1 year. The χ² test, Student's t-test, Kaplan-Meier analysis, log-rank test and multivariable Cox proportional hazard model were used in data analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 210 (17.4%) patients in the SPECT stratum and 149 (23.8%) in the CT stratum underwent revascularisation. Although in each stratum, the cumulative 1 year incidence of MACEs was significantly higher in patients who underwent revascularisation than in those who did not (SPECT stratum: 9.1 vs 1.2%, log-rank p<0.0001; CT stratum: 6.1 vs 0.8%, log-rank p=0.0001), there was no interaction between the risk of revascularisation and the imaging strata (SPECT stratum: adjusted HR (95% CI), 4.25 (1.86-9.72); CT stratum: 4.13 (1.16-14.73); interaction: p=0.97).

CONCLUSION

The association of revascularisation with the outcomes of patients with suspected coronary artery disease was not different between SPECT-first and CT-first strategies in a physician-referred fashion.