HER2, chromosome 17 polysomy and DNA ploidy status in breast cancer; a translational study

Breast Cancer With HER2 Immunohistochemical Score 2 and Average HER2 Signals/Cell 6 or More and HER2/CEP17 Ratio Less Than 2 ('ISH Group 3'): A Multiinstitutional Cohort Analysis Emphasizing Outcome and Molecular Subtype

Breast cancer (BC) with average human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) signals/cell ≥6 and HER2/chromosome enumeration probe 17 (CEP17) ratio <2 (in situ hybridization [ISH] group 3) is very rare, accounting for 0.4% to 3.0% of cases sent for the dual-probe ISH assay. Although such patients are currently eligible for treatment with HER2-targeted therapy, their characteristics and outcomes remain poorly understood. Sixty-two BCs with equivocal HER2 immunohistochemical score (2+) and reflex ISH group 3 results were identified across 4 institutions. Available clinicopathologic characteristics, MammaPrint and BluePrint molecular results, and follow-up information were retrospectively analyzed. Most BCs with HER2 equivocal immunohistochemical and ISH group 3 results were histologic grade 2 or 3 (100%), estrogen receptor (ER) positive (90.3%), with an average HER2 signals/cell of 7.3. Molecular profiles revealed that 80% (16/20) of tumors were luminal subtypes, and HER2 molecular subtype was identified in 10% of tumors (2/20). Twelve (19.4%) out of 62 patients developed local recurrence and/or distant metastasis with a median follow-up of 50 months. One (10%) of 10 patients achieved pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Forty-nine (79%) out of 62 patients completed anti-HER2 agents, and exploratory analysis showed no statistically significant difference in disease outcomes between patients who completed anti-HER2 treatment and those who did not. Univariate analysis revealed advanced clinical stage, and ER/progesterone receptor negativity was associated with unfavorable disease outcomes, and exploratory multivariate analysis demonstrated that clinical stage was the most significant factor associated with disease outcomes in the studied population. These findings increase our understanding of this rare, but clinically important HER2 category. Large-scale prospective randomized studies are needed to further evaluate the role of perioperative HER2-targeted therapy in this patient population.

HER2 Low Breast Cancer: A New Subtype or a Trojan for Cytotoxic Drug Delivery?

Despite the great progress made in the understanding of the biological behavior of certain types of invasive breast cancer, there is still no single histological or molecular classification that encompasses such diversity and accurately predicts the clinical course of distinct breast cancer subtypes. The long-lasting classification of breast cancer as HER2-positive vs. HER2-negative has recently come into question with the discovery of new antibody drug conjugates (ADC), which are proven to be remarkably efficient in treating HER2-low breast cancer. The HER2-low paradigm has challenged the traditional understanding of HER2 overexpression and emphasized the need for more robust HER2 testing in order to encompass HER2 intratumoral heterogeneity and spatial distribution more accurately. It is yet to be seen if low HER2 will remain merely a marker of HER2-equipped tumors targetable with ADCs or if distinctive molecular and phenotypic groups within HER2-low tumors will eventually be discerned.

"A Review of HER2 overexpression and somatic mutations in cancers"

The Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (HER) proteins family, which includes HER2, are membrane-bound receptors that activate many intracellular pathways associated with growth and development. When there are mutations in HER2, or when it becomes overexpressed, it can cause oncogenesis and offer differential prognosis and treatment across almost all cancer types. Both mutations in HER2 and its overexpression have distinct mechanisms by which they can cause these effects in cancers. This review outlines how HER2's normal pathway is altered in both overexpression and mutation and compiles all the well-known mechanisms by which HER2 can cause oncogenesis. Finally, this review briefly outlines how HER2 mutants and HER2 overexpression is detected, and how their detection can lead to different prognosis and treatment in cancers.

Resistance to antibody-drug conjugates in breast cancer: mechanisms and solutions

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are a rapidly developing therapeutic approach in cancer treatment that has shown remarkable activity in breast cancer. Currently, there are two ADCs approved for the treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer, one for triple-negative breast cancer, and multiple investigational ADCs in clinical trials. However, drug resistance has been noticed in clinical use, especially in trastuzumab emtansine. Here, the mechanisms of ADC resistance are summarized into four categories: antibody-mediated resistance, impaired drug trafficking, disrupted lysosomal function, and payload-related resistance. To overcome or prevent resistance to ADCs, innovative development strategies and combination therapy options are being investigated. Analyzing predictive biomarkers for optimal therapy selection may also help to prevent drug resistance.

Chinese expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of HER2-altered non-small cell lung cancer

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) possesses tyrosine kinase activity and participates in cell growth, differentiation and migration, and survival. Its alterations, mainly including mutations, amplifications, and overexpression are associated with poor prognosis and are one of the major drivers in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Several clinical trials had been investigating on the treatments of HER2-altered NSCLC, including conventional chemotherapy, programmed death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), however, the results were either disappointing or encouraging, but inconsistent. Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) was recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration as the first targeted agent for treating HER2-mutant NSCLC. Effective screening of patients is the key to the clinical application of HER2-targeted agents such as TKIs and ADCs. Various testing methods are nowadays available, including polymerase chain reaction (PCR), next-generation sequencing (NGS), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), immunohistochemistry (IHC), etc. Each method has its pros and cons and should be reasonably assigned to appropriate patients for diagnosis and guiding treatment decisions. To help standardize the clinical workflow, our expert group reached a consensus on the clinical management of HER2-altered NSCLC, focusing on the diagnosis and treatment strategies.

The frequency and clinical significance of centromere enumeration probe 17 alterations in HER2 immunohistochemistry-equivocal invasive breast cancer

Background and aims

Chromosome 17 alterations affect the assessment of HER2 gene amplification in breast cancer (BC), but its clinical significance remains unclear. This study aimed to identify the prevalence of centromere enumeration probe 17 (CEP17) alterations, and its correlation with response to neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in BC patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) immunohistochemistry‐equivocal score.

Methods and results

A large BC cohort (n = 6049) with HER2 immunohistochemistry score 2+ and florescent in‐situ hybridisation (FISH) results was included to assess the prevalence of CEP17 alterations. Another cohort (n = 885) with available clinicopathological data was used to evaluate the effect of CEP17 in the setting of NAT. HER2‐amplified tumours with monosomy 17 (CEP17 copy number < 1.5 per nucleus), normal 17 (CEP17 1.5–< 3.0) and polysomy 17 (CEP17 ≥ 3.0) were observed in 16, 59 and 25%, respectively, compared with 3, 74 and 23%, respectively, in HER2‐non‐amplified tumours. There was no significant relationship between CEP17 alterations and pathological complete response (pCR) rate in both HER2‐amplified and HER2‐non‐amplified tumours. The independent predictors of pCR were oestrogen (ER) negativity in HER2‐amplified tumours [ER negative versus positive; odds ratio (OR) = 11.80; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.37–102.00; P = 0.02], and histological grade 3 in HER2 non‐amplified tumours (3 versus 1, 2; OR = 5.54; 95% CI = 1.61–19.00; P = 0.007).

Conclusion

The impacts of CEP17 alterations are not as strong as those of HER2/CEP17 ratio and HER2 copy number. The hormonal receptors status and tumour histological grade are more useful to identify BC patients with a HER2 immunohistochemistry‐equivocal score who would benefit from NAT.

Consensus for HER2 alterations testing in non-small-cell lung cancer

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is a transmembrane glycoprotein receptor with intracellular tyrosine kinase activity. Its alterations, including mutation, amplification and overexpression, could result in oncogenic potential and have been detected in many cancers such as non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Such alterations are, in general, considered markers of poor prognosis. Anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugates, e.g. trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd, DS-8201) and disitamab vedotin (RC48), were recently approved for HER2-positive breast and gastric cancers. Meanwhile, several HER2-targeted drugs, such as T-DXd, neratinib, afatinib, poziotinib and pyrotinib, have been evaluated in patients with advanced NSCLC, with several of them demonstrating clinical benefit. Therefore, identifying HER2 alterations is pivotal for NSCLC patients to benefit from these targeted therapies. Recent guidelines on HER2 testing were developed for breast and gastric cancer, however, and have not been fully established for NSCLC. The expert group here reached a consensus on HER2 alteration testing in NSCLC with the focus on clinicopathologic characteristics, therapies, detection methods and diagnostic criteria for HER2-altered NSCLC patients. We hope this consensus could improve the clinical management of NSCLC patients with HER2 alterations.

•

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) alterations lead to poor prognosis in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

•

Identifying HER2 alterations is pivotal to guide the anti-HER2-targeted therapies in NSCLC.

•

The requirements for HER2 mutation, amplification or expression testing are distinct in NSCLC.

•

This consensus fills the gap in the criteria for HER2 alteration testing in NSCLC.

Validation of HER2 Status in Whole Genome Sequencing Data of Breast Cancers with the Ploidy-Corrected Copy Number Approach

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) protein overexpression is one of the most significant biomarkers for breast cancer diagnostics, treatment prediction, and prognostics. The high accessibility of HER2 inhibitors in routine clinical practice directly translates into the diagnostic need for precise and robust marker identification. Even though multigene next-generation sequencing methodologies have slowly taken over the field of single-biomarker molecular tests, the copy number alterations such as amplification of the HER2-coding ERBB2 gene are hard to validate on next-generation sequencing platforms as they are characterized by chromosomal structural heterogeneity, polysomy, and genomic context of ploidy. In our study, we tested the approach of using whole genome sequencing instead of next-generation sequencing panels to determine HER2 status in the clinical set-up.

METHODS

We used a large dataset of 876 patients with breast cancer whole genomes with curated clinical data and an additional set of 551 patients' external genomic data. We used the decision-tree-based algorithm for optimization of the diagnostic tool for HER2 status assessment by whole genome sequencing.

RESULTS

The most efficient approach to assess HER2 status in whole genome sequencing data was the ploidy-corrected copy number, utilizing ERBB2 copy number and mean tumor ploidy. The classifier achieved sensitivity of 91.18% and specificity of 98.69% on the internal validation dataset and 89.86% and 96.06% on the external data, which is similar to other next-generation sequencing methods, currently tested in the clinic.

CONCLUSIONS

We provide evidence that the HER2 status may be reliably determined by whole genome sequencing and is applicable across different laboratory protocols and pipelines. We suggest using the ploidy-corrected copy number for diagnostic purposes.

[2021 update of the GEFPICS' recommendations for HER2 status assessment in invasive breast cancer in France]

The last international guidelines on HER2 determination in breast cancer have been updated in 2018 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologists, on the basis of a twenty-year practice and results of numerous clinical trials. Moreover, the emerging HER2-low concept for 1+ and 2+ non amplified breast cancers lead to refine French practices for HER2 status assessment. The GEFPICS group, composed of expert pathologists, herein presents the latest French recommendations for HER2 status evaluation in breast cancer, taking into account the ASCO/CAP guidelines and introducing the HER2-low concept. In the era of personalized medicine, HER2 status assessment remains one of the most important biomarkers in breast cancer and its quality guaranties the optimal patients' care. French pathologists' commitment in theranostic biomarker quality is more than ever required to provide the most efficient cares in oncology.

The Landscape of Chromosome Instability in Breast Cancers and Associations with the Tumor Mutation Burden: An Analysis of Data from TCGA

BACKGROUND

Chromosomal instability (CIN) is a defining characteristic of cancer and is part of the genetic instability of cancer. CIN results in both numeric alterations of chromosomes also called aneuploidy and in gains or losses of parts of chromosome arms but both usually coexist. The frequency and distribution of CIN varies between cancer types and even in the same cancer and breast cancer is no exception. Its presence may provide prognostic and therapeutic opportunities.

METHODS

CIN as measured with a score named Aneuploidy Score (AS) derived from single nucleotide polymorphism array studies was examined using the breast cancer study from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Correlations of the AS with sub-types of breast cancer and with the tumor mutation burden (TMB) were examined. Specific copy number alterations contributing to the AS and their associations with sub-types were also investigated.

RESULTS

Most breast cancers (about 75% in the series) present some degree of CIN, having an AS of above 5. The remaining 25% have AS of 5 or below. Luminal A sub-type is over-represented in cancers with low AS while the reverse is true for cancers with high AS where the percentage of the three other sub-types, luminal B, Her2 positive and basal is higher. Common gains of chromosomal arms are observed in 1q, 8q and 16p and losses are commonly present in 16q, 17p and 8p but with variability among sub-types. A chromosome loss characterizing basal cancers is observed at 5q. No association of AS with TMB is observed in breast cancer. AS was not predictive for survival outcomes in the entire cohort of breast cancers, but PFS was significant worse in luminal B cancers with high AS.

CONCLUSION

The copy number alterations landscape of breast cancer reveals specific abnormalities in each sub-type and may help further characterize these sub-types in order to refine classification of these cancers and promote prognostic and therapeutic advancements in the clinic.

Rapid HER2 cytologic fluorescence in situ hybridization for breast cancer using noncontact alternating current electric field mixing

BACKGROUND

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-in situ hybridization (HER2-ISH) is widely approved for diagnostic, prognostic biomarker testing of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue blocks. However, cytologic ISH analysis has a potential advantage in tumor samples such as pleural effusion and ascites that are difficult to obtain the histological specimens. Our aim was to evaluate the clinical reliability of a novel rapid cytologic HER2 fluorescence ISH protocol (rapid-CytoFISH).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using a new device, we applied a high-voltage/frequency, noncontact alternating current electric field to tissue imprints and needle rinses, which mixed the probe within microdroplets as the voltage was switched on and off (AC mixing). Cytologic samples (n = 143) were collected from patients with immunohistochemically identified HER2 breast cancers. The specimens were then tested using standard dual-color ISH using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue (FFPE-tissue DISH) for HER2-targeted therapies, CytoFISH, and rapid-CytoFISH (completed within 4 h).

RESULTS

All 143 collected cytologic specimens (50 imprinted cytology specimens from resected tumors and 93 liquid-based cytology specimens from needle rinses) were suitable for FISH analysis. The HER2/chromosome enumeration probe (CEP) 17 ratios did not significantly differ between FFPE-tissue DISH and either CytoFISH protocol. Based on HER2 scoring criteria, we found 95.1% agreement between FFPE-tissue DISH and CytoFISH (Cohen's kappa coefficient = 0.771 and 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.614-0.927).

CONCLUSION

CytoFISH could potentially serve as a clinical tool for prompt determination of HER2 status in breast cancer cytology. Rapid-CytoFISH with AC mixing will enable cancer diagnoses and HER2 status to be determined on the same day a patient comes to a clinic or hospital.

Towards personalized treatment for early stage HER2-positive breast cancer

Advances in HER2-targeted therapies have improved the survival of patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. The standard-of-care treatment for localized disease has been chemotherapy and 1 year of adjuvant HER2-targeted therapy, typically with the anti-HER2 antibody trastuzumab. Despite the effectiveness of this treatment, disease relapse occurs in a subset of patients; thus, focus has been placed on escalating treatment by either combining different HER2-targeted agents or extending the duration of HER2-targeted therapy. Indeed, dual HER2-targeted therapies and extended-duration anti-HER2 therapy, as well as adjuvant therapy with the anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugate T-DM1, have all been approved for clinical use. Emerging evidence suggests, however, that some patients do not derive sufficient benefit from these additional therapies to offset the associated toxicities and/or costs. Similarly, the universal use of chemotherapy might not benefit all patients, and treatment de-escalation through omission of chemotherapy has shown promise in clinical trials and is currently being explored further. The future of precision medicine should therefore involve tailoring of therapy based on the genetics and biology of each tumour and the clinical characteristics of each patient. Predictive biomarkers that enable the identification of patients who will benefit from either escalated or de-escalated treatment will be crucial to this approach. In this Review, we summarize the available HER2-targeted agents and associated mechanisms of resistance, and describe the current therapeutic landscape of early stage HER2-positive breast cancer, focusing on strategies for treatment escalation or de-escalation.

Amplification of Chromosome 17 Centromere (CEP17) in Breast Cancer Patients with a Result of HER2 2± by Immunohistochemistry

Background: Amplification of the centromeric region of chromosome 17 (CEP17) as measured by In Situ Hybridization (ISH) of the CEP17 probe is used clinically as part of the ISH assay for HER2 status determination in breast cancer. The value of amplification of CEP17 beyond its use in the HER2 ISH test has not been fully explored.Methods: A retrospective review of patients with breast cancer that had a dual probe HER2/CEP17 FISH test during an eight-year period was performed. Data on demographic and cancer-specific characteristics of the included patients were extracted. The group of patients with an amplified CEP17 defined as mean copy number of ≥3 per nucleus was compared with the group without amplification.Results: Two hundred and twelve patients were eligible and included in the analysis. Amplification of CEP17 was observed in 39 patients (18.4%). All patients in the amplified group had a concomitant amplification of HER2 (mean copy number ≥3 per nucleus). In the CEP17 non-amplified group 82 of 172 patients (47.7%) had an amplified HER2 status. More patients in the amplified group had a clinical HER2+ status according to the 3-protein classifier (30.8% versus 12.3% in the non-amplified group) and fewer patients in the amplified group had a clinical ER+/HER2- status (66.7% versus 81.3% in the non-amplified group, x² p = .01). Other significant differences between the amplified and CEP17 non-amplified groups were observed in their lymph node (LN) status (56.4% of patients in the amplified group versus 38.8% in the non-amplified group were lymph node positive, p = .04) and in the nuclear heterogeneity component of grade (91.2% of patients in the amplified group were nuclear grade 3 versus 67.1% in the non-amplified group, p = .005). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in overall stage, grade, menopause status or histology. Recurrence Free Survival (RFS) was shorter in stage I to III patients with an amplified CEP17 compared with the non-amplified group.Conclusion: Patients with amplification of CEP17 had a co-amplified HER2 and were more commonly HER2+, LN positive and grade 3 in the nuclear component of grade.