Substitution of cysteines in the yeast viral killer toxin K1 precursor reveals novel insights in heterodimer formation and immunity

Killer yeasts: expanding frontiers in the age of synthetic biology

Killer yeasts secrete protein toxins that are selectively lethal to other yeast and filamentous fungi. These exhibit exceptional genetic and functional diversity, and have several biotechnological applications. However, despite decades of research, several limitations hinder their widespread adoption. In this perspective we contend that technical advances in synthetic biology present an unprecedented opportunity to unlock the full potential of yeast killer systems across a spectrum of applications. By leveraging these new technologies, engineered killer toxins may emerge as a pivotal new tool to address antifungal resistance and food security. Finally, we speculate on the biotechnological potential of re-engineering host double-stranded (ds) RNA mycoviruses, from which many toxins derive, as a safe and noninfectious system to produce designer RNA.

The evolutionary ecology of fungal killer phenotypes

Ecological interactions influence evolutionary dynamics by selecting upon fitness variation within species. Antagonistic interactions often promote genetic and species diversity, despite the inherently suppressive effect they can have on the species experiencing them. A central aim of evolutionary ecology is to understand how diversity is maintained in systems experiencing antagonism. In this review, we address how certain single-celled and dimorphic fungi have evolved allelopathic killer phenotypes that engage in antagonistic interactions. We discuss the evolutionary pathways to the production of lethal toxins, the functions of killer phenotypes and the consequences of competition for toxin producers, their competitors and toxin-encoding endosymbionts. Killer phenotypes are powerful models because many appear to have evolved independently, enabling across-phylogeny comparisons of the origins, functions and consequences of allelopathic antagonism. Killer phenotypes can eliminate host competitors and influence evolutionary dynamics, yet the evolutionary ecology of killer phenotypes remains largely unknown. We discuss what is known and what remains to be ascertained about killer phenotype ecology and evolution, while bringing their model system properties to the reader's attention.

Expression of the K74 Killer Toxin from Saccharomyces paradoxus Is Modulated by the Toxin-Encoding M74 Double-Stranded RNA 5' Untranslated Terminal Region

Yeast killer toxins are widely distributed in nature, conferring a competitive advantage to the producer yeasts over nonkiller ones when nutrients are scarce. Most of these toxins are encoded on double-stranded RNAs (dsRNAs) generically called M. L-A members of the viral family Totiviridae act as helper viruses to maintain M, providing the virion proteins that separately encapsidate and replicate L-A and M genomes. M genomes are organized in three regions, a 5' region coding the preprotoxin, followed by an internal poly(A) stretch and a 3' noncoding region. In this work, we report the characterization of K74 toxin encoded on M74 dsRNA from Saccharomyces paradoxus Q74.4. In M74, there is a 5' upstream sequence of 141 nucleotides (nt), which contains regulatory signals for internal translation of the preprotoxin open reading frame (ORF) at the second AUG codon. The first AUG close to the 5' end is not functional. For K74 analysis, M74 viruses were first introduced into laboratory strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We show here that the mature toxin is an α/β heterodimer linked by disulfide bonds. Though the toxin (or preprotoxin) confers immunity to the carrier, cells with increased K74 loads have a sick phenotype that may lead to cell death. Thus, a fine-tuning of K74 production by the upstream regulatory sequence is essential for the host cell to benefit from the toxin it produces and, at the same time, to safely avoid damage by an excess of toxin. IMPORTANCE Killer yeasts produce toxins to which they are immune by mechanisms not well understood. This self-immunity, however, is compromised in certain strains, which secrete an excess of toxin, leading to sick cells or suicidal phenotypes. Thus, a fine-tuning of toxin production has to be achieved to reach a balance between the beneficial effect of toxin production and the stress imposed on the host metabolism. K74 toxin from S. paradoxus is very active against Saccharomyces uvarum, among other yeasts, but an excess of toxin production is deleterious for the host. Here, we report that the presence of a 5' 141-nt upstream sequence downregulates K74 toxin precursor translation, decreasing toxin levels 3- to 5-fold. Thus, this is a special case of translation regulation performed by sequences on the M74 genome itself, which have been presumably incorporated into the viral RNA during evolution for that purpose.

The Species-Specific Acquisition and Diversification of a K1-like Family of Killer Toxins in Budding Yeasts of the Saccharomycotina

Killer toxins are extracellular antifungal proteins that are produced by a wide variety of fungi, including Saccharomyces yeasts. Although many Saccharomyces killer toxins have been previously identified, their evolutionary origins remain uncertain given that many of these genes have been mobilized by double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) viruses. A survey of yeasts from the Saccharomyces genus has identified a novel killer toxin with a unique spectrum of activity produced by Saccharomyces paradoxus. The expression of this killer toxin is associated with the presence of a dsRNA totivirus and a satellite dsRNA. Genetic sequencing of the satellite dsRNA confirmed that it encodes a killer toxin with homology to the canonical ionophoric K1 toxin from Saccharomyces cerevisiae and has been named K1-like (K1L). Genomic homologs of K1L were identified in six non-Saccharomyces yeast species of the Saccharomycotina subphylum, predominantly in subtelomeric regions of the genome. When ectopically expressed in S. cerevisiae from cloned cDNAs, both K1L and its homologs can inhibit the growth of competing yeast species, confirming the discovery of a family of biologically active K1-like killer toxins. The sporadic distribution of these genes supports their acquisition by horizontal gene transfer followed by diversification. The phylogenetic relationship between K1L and its genomic homologs suggests a common ancestry and gene flow via dsRNAs and DNAs across taxonomic divisions. This appears to enable the acquisition of a diverse arsenal of killer toxins by different yeast species for potential use in niche competition.

Analysis of Yeast Killer Toxin K1 Precursor Processing via Site-Directed Mutagenesis: Implications for Toxicity and Immunity

The killer phenotype in the baker’s yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae relies on two double-stranded RNA viruses that are persistently present in the cytoplasm. As they carry the same receptor populations as sensitive cells, killer yeast cells need—in contrast to various bacterial toxin producers—a specialized immunity mechanism. The ionophoric killer toxin K1 leads to the formation of cation-specific pores in the plasma membrane of sensitive yeast cells. Based on the data generated in this study, we were able to update the current model of toxin processing, validating the temporary inactivation of the toxic α subunit during maturation in the secretory pathway of the killer yeast.

K1 represents a heterodimeric A/B toxin secreted by virus-infected Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. In a two-staged receptor-mediated process, the ionophoric activity of K1 leads to an uncontrolled influx of protons, culminating in the breakdown of the cellular transmembrane potential of sensitive cells. K1 killer yeast necessitate not only an immunity mechanism saving the toxin-producing cell from its own toxin but, additionally, a molecular system inactivating the toxic α subunit within the secretory pathway. In this study, different derivatives of the K1 precursor were constructed to analyze the biological function of particular structural components and their influence on toxin activity as well as the formation of protective immunity. Our data implicate an inactivation of the α subunit during toxin maturation and provide the basis for an updated model of K1 maturation within the host cell’s secretory pathway.

IMPORTANCE The killer phenotype in the baker’s yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae relies on two double-stranded RNA viruses that are persistently present in the cytoplasm. As they carry the same receptor populations as sensitive cells, killer yeast cells need—in contrast to various bacterial toxin producers—a specialized immunity mechanism. The ionophoric killer toxin K1 leads to the formation of cation-specific pores in the plasma membrane of sensitive yeast cells. Based on the data generated in this study, we were able to update the current model of toxin processing, validating the temporary inactivation of the toxic α subunit during maturation in the secretory pathway of the killer yeast.