Comparison of combined compression and surgery with high ligation-endovenous laser ablation-foam sclerotherapy with compression alone for active venous leg ulcers

Comparison of the effect of combination therapies in the treatment of large varicose ulcers: A real-world cohort study

OBJECTIVES

The primary treatment for varicose ulcers is to address the underlying cause of venous hypertension, additionally, split-thickness skin transplantation (ST) is an effective option for large ulcers. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of venous surgery with or without split-thickness ST in the management of varicose ulcers (diameter ≥6 cm).

METHODS

Patients with varicose ulcers between 2013 and 2023 were included in the real-world retrospective cohort study. The endovenous microwave ablation/endovenous laser ablation-high ligation-foam sclerotherapy-compression therapy + ST group (EMA/EVLA-CT-HL-FS + ST) consisted of 32 patients, while the EMA/EVLA-CT-HL-FS group consisted of 48 patients.

RESULTS

A difference in ulcer healing time was found between the two groups (the hazard ratio [HR] was 4.4, 95% CI [2.3-8.2], P < 0.0001). However, the healing rate did not differ between the two groups at 6 and 12 months postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

ST has been shown to expedite ulcer healing and ameliorate the symptoms of VVs in the early stages of treatment, while its intermediate to long-term efficacy for ulcer healing and overall patient quality of life may be limited.

Clinical outcomes of radiofrequency ablation using a radiofrequency needle device for varicose ulcer: A non-randomized controlled prospective study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the short-term clinical outcomes of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) using a radiofrequency (RF) needle device for varicose ulcers.

METHODS

From September 2020 to September 2021, a total of 80 patients with varicose ulcers were included in this study. Based on the different surgical methods, the patients were divided into RF group and control groups, with 40 cases in each group. In the RF group, RFA was performed using an RF needle device and foam sclerotherapy was used for superficial veins. The control group was treated with conventional high-ligation stripping. The surgical data, hospitalization data, clinical efficacy, and postoperative complications of two groups were compared. Meanwhile, the correlation between RBC, HB, HCT, and ulcer healing time was analyzed.

RESULTS

Compared to the control group, RF group had shorter surgery time, duration in the hospital, and less intraoperative bleeding (p < .05). The VCSS and CIVIQ scores in RF group were significantly higher than that in control group (p < .05). The healing time of ulcers was shorter in the RF group (x2 = 19.766, p = .000). The RF group had fewer postoperative complications. There was a positive correlation between RBC, HB, and HCT, and ulcer healing time (p < .05).

CONCLUSION

The use of the RF needle device for RFA to treat patients with varicose ulcers showed acceptable short-term clinical outcomes with less incidence of trauma, faster recovery, and fewer complications.

Comparison of two ablation procedures combined with high ligation and foam sclerotherapy and compression therapy for patients with venous leg ulcers

AIM

To compare the ablation techniques' efficacy of endovenous microwave ablation (EMA) combined with high ligation (HL), foam sclerotherapy (FS) and compression therapy (CT) and endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) combined with HL-FS-CT in the treatment of VLUs.

METHOD

301 consecutive patients with VLUs from 2013 to 2022 in a 3200-bed hospital were intervened by EMA combined with HL-FS-CT and EVLA combined with HL-FS-CT were retrospectively compared.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-four patients underwent EMA+HL-FS-CT and 167 patients underwent EVLA+HL-FS-CT. The primary outcome of the ulcer healing time was 1.45(0.75-1.5) months and 1.86(0.5-2.5) months, respectively, in the two groups (HR for ulcer healing was 1.26, 95% CI [0.96-1.66], p = 0.097). Secondary outcomes included that no significant difference was found in ulcer recurrence and GSV recanalization and complications between the two groups, and the postoperative VCSS and AVVQ were significantly lower than the baseline values in the respective groups (p = 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

EMA+HL-FS-CT and EVLA+HL-FS-CT are both effective at treating VLUs. Both of the two comprehensive treatments were beneficial to the healing of ulcers, but no evidence showed which one was superior in the ulcer healing time.

Daily Duration of Compression Treatment in Chronic Venous Disease Patients: A Systematic Review

Background: There are no data on the daily regimen of compression therapy in patients with chronic venous disease. This systematic review aimed to establish the optimal daily duration of compression treatment. Methods: A systematic search of CENTRAL and MEDLINE was performed to identify RCTs, non-RCTs, reviews, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and guidelines evaluating the use of compression regimens in the treatment of varicose veins. Results: Thirty-two RCTs, three non-RCTs, four observational studies, and two crossover trials reporting the duration and regimes of compression treatment fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The daily duration of compression was reported in patients after invasive treatment, for venous ulcer treatment, in patients with venous symptoms. The quality of the studies varied. We could not conduct a meta-analysis due to the heterogeneity of the research data and their quality. Twenty-three studies reported results of compression usage after invasive procedures. Eight studies reported daily duration regimens in patients with venous ulcers. Nine studies reported the impact of compression on venous symptoms and/or edema or limb volume change. One study was conducted to assess if compression improves QoL in venous patients. While there was a clear difference found in the daily duration depending on the clinical scenario, no data in support of exact regimens were found. Conclusions: There are no reliable data supporting exact daily regimens of compression treatment in various cohorts of CVD patients.

Combined Management of Wound Ulcers With Focus on Interventional Techniques

This review provides a summary of current practice patterns in managing venous ulcers. The authors will describe the workup for venous ulcers, including differentiation of symptoms, physical examination, and imaging to guide the most effective treatment course for each patient. An overview of conservative management and minimally invasive treatment options for venous ulcers will be provided with a specific focus on periulcer foam sclerotherapy to aid in preventing ulcer recurrence and promoting healing. We will give interventional troubleshooting techniques for challenging patient presentations.

Challenges of treating mixed arterial-venous disease of lower extremities

INTRODUCTION

Mixed arterial-venous lower extremity disease (AVLED) poses a unique challenge for clinicians. This review will outline the impact mixed AVLED has on patients and the healthcare system, by reviewing its epidemiology, diagnosis, current treatment, and the challenges encountered implementing therapies.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

An extensive search of current literature from online sources, journals and book chapters identified the current challenges facing the treatment of mixed arterial venous ulcers of the lower extremities and potential solutions to these challenges.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

The challenges that are identified in the search are the time to heal AVLED, patient education and motivation, early detection of AVLED, wound care center development, treatment consensus from multidisciplinary team members, and cost of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

AVLED ulcers are a challenging problem, but over time we have continued and will continue to improve patient care and tackle these difficult challenges as we have throughout the last century. A diagnostic algorithm to address how we approach these patients in terms of conservative care with wound care and compression and treat arterial and venous insufficiency is crucial. In looking to the future, continued standardization of wound care centers will overcome the social and financial challenges faced by patients and continued clinical research will improve targeted therapies and treatment challenges faced by physicians.