1
|
Akongte PN, Park BS, Kim DW, Choi YS. Honey Bee Colonies ( Apis mellifera L.) Perform Orientation Defensiveness That Varies among Bred Lines. INSECTS 2023; 14:546. [PMID: 37367362 DOI: 10.3390/insects14060546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Revised: 06/09/2023] [Accepted: 06/09/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023]
Abstract
Honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) express complex behavioral patterns (aggressiveness) in defensive mechanisms for their survival. Their phenotypic expression of defensive behavior is influenced by internal and external stimuli. Knowledge of this behavior has recently become increasingly important, though beekeepers are still faced with the challenges of selecting defensive and less-defensive bred lines. Field evaluation of defensive behavior among bred lines of honey bees is required to overcome the challenges. Chemical cues (alarm pheromone and isopentyl acetate mixed with paraffin oil) and physical and visual stimuli (dark leather suede, colony marbling, and suede jiggling) were used to evaluate defensiveness and orientation among five bred lines of honeybee colonies. Our results showed that both chemical assays recruited bees, but the time of recruitment was significantly faster for alarm pheromone. Honeybees' response to both assays culminated in stings that differed among bred lines for alarm pheromone and paraffin when colonies were marbled. Honeybee orientation defensiveness varied among bred lines and was higher in more defensive bred lines compared to less-defensive bred lines. Our findings suggest that it is crucial to repeatedly evaluate orientation defensiveness at the colony level and among bred lines when selecting breeding colonies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Njukang Akongte
- Department of Agricultural Biology, National Institute of Agricultural Science, Wanju 55365, Republic of Korea
- Institute of Agricultural Research for Development (IRAD), Yaounde 2123, Cameroon
| | - Bo-Sun Park
- Department of Agricultural Biology, National Institute of Agricultural Science, Wanju 55365, Republic of Korea
| | - Dong-Won Kim
- Department of Agricultural Biology, National Institute of Agricultural Science, Wanju 55365, Republic of Korea
| | - Yong-Soo Choi
- Department of Agricultural Biology, National Institute of Agricultural Science, Wanju 55365, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Liu Y, Francis RA, Wooster MJ, Grosvenor MJ, Yan S, Roberts G. Systematic Mapping and Review of Landscape Fire Smoke (LFS) Exposure Impacts on Insects. ENVIRONMENTAL ENTOMOLOGY 2022; 51:871-884. [PMID: 36130330 PMCID: PMC9585373 DOI: 10.1093/ee/nvac069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Landscape fire activity is changing in many regions because of climate change. Smoke emissions from landscape fires contain many harmful air pollutants, and beyond the potential hazard posed to human health, these also have ecological impacts. Insects play essential roles in most ecosystems worldwide, and some work suggests they may also be sensitive to smoke exposure. There is therefore a need for a comprehensive review of smoke impacts on insects. We systematically reviewed the scientific literature from 1930 to 2022 to synthesize the current state of knowledge of the impacts of smoke exposure from landscape fires on the development, behavior, and mortality of insects. We found: (1) 42 relevant studies that met our criteria, with 29% focused on the United States of America and 19% on Canada; (2) of these, 40 insect species were discussed, all of which were sensitive to smoke pollution; (3) most of the existing research focuses on how insect behavior responds to landscape fire smoke (LFS); (4) species react differently to smoke exposure, with for example some species being attracted to the smoke (e.g., some beetles) while others are repelled (e.g., some bees). This review consolidates the current state of knowledge on how smoke impacts insects and highlights areas that may need further investigation. This is particularly relevant since smoke impacts on insect communities will likely worsen in some areas due to increasing levels of biomass burning resulting from the joint pressures of climate change, land use change, and more intense land management involving fire.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanan Liu
- Department of Geography, King’s College London, Bush House, 40 Aldwych, London, WC2B 4BG, UK
- Leverhulme Centre for Wildfires, Environment and Society, King’s College London, London WC2R 2LS, UK
| | - Robert A Francis
- Department of Geography, King’s College London, Bush House, 40 Aldwych, London, WC2B 4BG, UK
| | - Martin J Wooster
- Department of Geography, King’s College London, Bush House, 40 Aldwych, London, WC2B 4BG, UK
- Leverhulme Centre for Wildfires, Environment and Society, King’s College London, London WC2R 2LS, UK
- NERC National Centre for Earth Observation, King’s College London, London WC2R 2LS, UK
| | - Mark J Grosvenor
- Department of Geography, King’s College London, Bush House, 40 Aldwych, London, WC2B 4BG, UK
- Leverhulme Centre for Wildfires, Environment and Society, King’s College London, London WC2R 2LS, UK
- NERC National Centre for Earth Observation, King’s College London, London WC2R 2LS, UK
| | - Su Yan
- Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Imperial CollegeLondon, London SW7 2BX, UK
| | - Gareth Roberts
- Geography and Environmental Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Increased complexity of worker CHC profiles in Apis dorsata correlates with nesting ecology. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0271745. [PMID: 35901097 PMCID: PMC9333238 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271745] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2022] [Accepted: 07/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Cuticular hydrocarbons (CHC) are known to serve as discrimination cues and will trigger defence behaviour in a plethora of eusocial insects. However, little is known how about nestmate recognition ability selects for CHC diversification. In this study we investigate differences in CHC composition of four major honey bee species with respect to the differences in their nesting behavior. In contrast to A. mellifera, A. cerana and A. florea, the giant honey bee A. dorsata prefers to build their nests in aggregations with very small spatial distances between nests, which increases the probability of intrusions. Thus, A. dorsata exhibits a particularly challenging nesting behavior which we hypothesize should be accompanied with an improved nestmate recognition system. Comparative analyses of the worker CHC profiles indicate that A. dorsata workers exhibit a unique and more complex CHC profile than the other three honey bee species. This increased complexity is likely based on a developmental process that retains the capability to synthesize methyl-branched hydrocarbons as adults. Furthermore, two sets of behavioral experiments provide evidence that A. dorsata shows an improved nestmate discrimination ability compared to the phylogenetically ancestral A. florea, which is also open-nesting but does not form nest aggregations. The results of our study suggest that ecological traits like nesting in aggregation might be able to drive CHC profile diversification even in closely related insect species.
Collapse
|
4
|
Kannan K, Galizia CG, Nouvian M. Olfactory Strategies in the Defensive Behaviour of Insects. INSECTS 2022; 13:470. [PMID: 35621804 PMCID: PMC9145661 DOI: 10.3390/insects13050470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2022] [Revised: 05/06/2022] [Accepted: 05/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Most animals must defend themselves in order to survive. Defensive behaviour includes detecting predators or intruders, avoiding them by staying low-key or escaping or deterring them away by means of aggressive behaviour, i.e., attacking them. Responses vary across insect species, ranging from individual responses to coordinated group attacks in group-living species. Among different modalities of sensory perception, insects predominantly use the sense of smell to detect predators, intruders, and other threats. Furthermore, social insects, such as honeybees and ants, communicate about danger by means of alarm pheromones. In this review, we focus on how olfaction is put to use by insects in defensive behaviour. We review the knowledge of how chemical signals such as the alarm pheromone are processed in the insect brain. We further discuss future studies for understanding defensive behaviour and the role of olfaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kavitha Kannan
- Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, 78457 Konstanz, Germany;
- Centre for the Advanced Study of Collective Behaviour, University of Konstanz, 78457 Konstanz, Germany
| | - C. Giovanni Galizia
- Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, 78457 Konstanz, Germany;
- Centre for the Advanced Study of Collective Behaviour, University of Konstanz, 78457 Konstanz, Germany
- Zukunftskolleg, University of Konstanz, 78457 Konstanz, Germany
| | - Morgane Nouvian
- Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, 78457 Konstanz, Germany;
- Centre for the Advanced Study of Collective Behaviour, University of Konstanz, 78457 Konstanz, Germany
- Zukunftskolleg, University of Konstanz, 78457 Konstanz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|