Visual assessment of causality in the Poisson effect

Perceptual plausibility of exaggerated realistic motion

The informal heuristic practices of the fine arts have much to offer to our understanding of the appearance of phenomenological reality. One interesting example is the use of exaggeration to enhance the illusion of liveliness in both living and nonliving subjects. This further eases the uncomfortable sense that the motion is somehow uncanny - especially with inanimate objects. We performed a series of experiments to test the effects of exaggeration on the phenomenological perception of simple animated objects - bouncing balls. A physically plausible model of a bouncing ball was augmented with a frequently used form of exaggeration known as squash and stretch. Observers were shown a series of animated balls, depicted using systematic parameterizations of the exaggeration model, and asked to rate their plausibility. A range of rendering styles provided varying levels of information as to the type of ball. In all cases, balls with small amounts of exaggeration were seen as plausible as those without any exaggeration (e.g., with veridical motion). Furthermore, when the type of ball was not specified, observers tolerated a large amount of exaggeration before judging them as implausible. When the type of ball was indicated, observers narrowed the range of acceptable exaggeration somewhat but still tolerated exaggeration well beyond that which would be physically possible. We contend that, in this case, exaggeration acts to bridge the so-called uncanny valley for artificial depictions of physical reality.

Perceptual judgments for the softness of materials under indentation

Humans can judge the softness of elastic materials through only visual cues. However, factors contributing to the judgment of visual softness are not yet fully understood. We conducted a psychophysical experiment to determine which factors and motion features contribute to the apparent softness of materials. Observers watched video clips in which materials were indented from the top surface to a certain depth, and reported the apparent softness of the materials. The depth and speed of indentation were systematically manipulated. As physical characteristics of materials, compliance was also controlled. It was found that higher indentation speeds resulted in larger softness rating scores and the variation with the indentation speed was successfully explained by the image motion speed. The indentation depth had a powerful effect on the softness rating scores and the variation with the indentation depth was consistently explained by motion features related to overall deformation. Higher material compliance resulted in higher softness rating scores and these variation with the material compliance can be explained also by overall deformation. We conclude that the brain makes visual judgments about the softness of materials under indentation on the basis of the motion speed and deformation magnitude.

Perceptual Properties of the Poisson Effect

When an elastic material (e.g., fabric) is horizontally stretched (or compressed), the material is compressed (or extended) vertically – so-called the Poisson effect. In the different case of the Poisson effect, when an elastic material (e.g., rubber) is vertically squashed, the material is horizontally extended. In both cases, the visual system receives image deformations involving horizontal expansion and vertical compression. How does the brain disentangle the two cases and accurately distinguish stretching from squashing events? Manipulating the relative magnitude of the deformation of a square between horizontal and vertical dimensions in the two-dimensional stimuli, we asked observers to judge the force direction in the stimuli. Specifically, the participants reported whether the square was stretched or squashed. In general, the participant’s judgment was dependent on the relative deformation magnitude. We also checked the anisotropic effect of deformation direction [i.e., horizontal vs. vertical stretching (or squashing)] and found that the participant’s judgment was strongly biased toward horizontal stretching. We also observed that the asymmetric deformation pattern, which indicated the specific context of force direction, was also a strong cue to the force direction judgment. We suggest that the brain judges the force direction in the Poisson effect on the basis of assumptions about the relationship between image deformation and force direction, in addition to the relative image deformation magnitudes between horizontal and vertical dimensions.

Mid-Air Action Contributes to Pseudo-Haptic Stiffness Effects

Pseudo-haptic feedback takes advantage of a cross-modal integration between vision and haptics. Previous studies have shown that object stiffness can be rendered with pseudo-haptic feedback with external haptic inputs. This article explored whether the pseudo-haptic feedback was feasible with a mid-air action wherein no external haptic input was given. On each trial of the experiments, participants conduced a mid-air action to laterally move their hands as if they horizontally stretched an object in the display. In synchronized with the hands' motion, the object horizontally deformed. The magnitude of the object deformation varied with the horizontal distance between participants' hands (i.e., a hand distance). The ratio of deformation magnitudes to the hand distance (i.e., a deformation-to-distance ratio) was controlled; With a larger ratio, a smaller hand distance produced the maximum level of object deformation. The Poisson's ratio was also controlled; a higher Poisson's ratio produced a larger magnitude of vertical deformation. The participants were asked to report the stiffness of the objects with a five-point rating scale. Consequently, the stiffness rating decreased with the deformation-distance ratio and with the Poisson's ratio. The results indicate that pseudo-haptic stiffness can be rendered with mid-air action by manipulating the deformation-distance ratio and Poisson's ratio.