Adjusting ventilator settings to relieve dyspnoea modifies brain activity in critically ill patients: an electroencephalogram pilot study

How to prevent and how to treat dyspnea in critically ill patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To summarize current data regarding the prevalence, risk factors, consequences, assessment and treatment of dyspnea in critically ill patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation.

RECENT FINDINGS

In intubated patients, dyspnea is frequent, perceived as intense, and associated with unfavorable outcomes such as immediate and unbearable distress (e.g. fear of dying), prolonged weaning, and delayed severe psychological consequences ( i.e. posttraumatic stress disorders). In noncommunicative patients, dyspnea is named respiratory-related brain suffering (RRBS) and can be detected using dyspnea observations scales. Before initiating pharmacological treatments, nonpharmacological interventions may be tried as they are efficient to alleviate dyspnea.

SUMMARY

As opposed to pain, dyspnea has often been overlooked in terms of detection and management, resulting in its significant underestimation in daily practice. When it is diagnosed, dyspnea can be relieved through straightforward interventions, such as adjusting ventilator settings. Assessing dyspnea in patients undergoing invasive mechanically ventilated may be challenging, especially in noncommunicative patients (RRBS). Implementing a systematic dyspnea assessment in routine, akin to pain, could serve as a first step to reduce RRBS and prevent potential severe psychological consequences. In addition to pharmacological treatments like opioids, a promising approach is to modulate both the sensory (air on the face, trigeminal nerve stimulation) and the affective (relaxing music, hypnosis, directed empathy) components of dyspnea.

Challenges in Transitioning from Controlled to Assisted Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Management

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) presents significant challenges in critical care, primarily due to its inflammatory nature, which leads to impaired gas exchange and respiratory mechanics. While mechanical ventilation (MV) is essential for patient support, the transition from controlled to assisted ventilation is complex and may be associated with intensive care unit-acquired weakness, ventilator-induced diaphragmatic dysfunction and patient self-inflicted lung injury. This paper explores the multifaceted challenges encountered during this transition, with a focus on respiratory effort, sedation management, and monitoring techniques, and investigates innovative approaches to enhance patient outcomes. The key strategies include optimizing sedation protocols, employing advanced monitoring methods like esophageal pressure measurements, and implementing partial neuromuscular blockade to prevent excessive respiratory effort. We also emphasize the importance of personalized treatment plans and the integration of artificial intelligence to facilitate timely transitions. By highlighting early rehabilitation techniques, continuously assessing the respiratory drive, and fostering collaboration among multidisciplinary teams, clinicians can improve the transition from controlled to assisted MV, ultimately enhancing recovery and long-term respiratory health in patients with ARDS.

Effects of Positive Expiratory Pressure Device on Gas Exchange, Atelectasis, Hemodynamics, and Dyspnea in Spontaneously Breathing Critically Ill Subjects

BACKGROUND

EzPAP Positive Airway Pressure System (EzPAP) is a noninvasive positive expiratory pressure (PEP) device designed to promote lung expansion. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of PEP on gas exchange. Secondary objectives included assessing the early effects of PEP on radiological atelectasis score (RAS), hemodynamics, and dyspnea. These outcomes were compared between spontaneously breathing subjects with and without tracheostomy.

METHODS

This observational single-center study was conducted at a university hospital. Inclusion criteria were spontaneously breathing adult subjects with RAS ≥ 2 and a worsened PaO2 /FIO2 . Exclusion criteria included life-threatening conditions, intracranial hypertension, hemodynamic instability, and pneumothorax. Gas-exchange, hemodynamic parameters, and dyspnea measured with the Respiratory Distress Observation Scale (RDOS) were assessed at 3 time points: T0 (before PEP), T1 (immediately after PEP), and T2 (2 h after PEP). RAS was assessed at T0 and 1-week post treatment (T3).

RESULTS

Of 213 patients assessed for eligibility, 186 were excluded for various reasons, leaving 27 subjects (19 without and 8 with tracheostomy) enrolled in the study. The median [interquartile range] age was 65 [58-74] y, with 66.7% being male. In the overall sample and in subjects without tracheostomy, PaO2 /FIO2 did not differ significantly between T1 and T0 (P = .52 and P = .54, respectively) or between T2 and T0 (P = .47 and P = .85, respectively). In subjects with tracheostomy, PaO2 /FIO2 was higher at T1 compared to T0 (P = .039) but not between T2 and T0 (P = .58). Arterial PaO2 and hemodynamic parameters remained unchanged in the overall cohort. The RAS improved within 1 week of treatment in the overall cohort (T3 vs T0, P < .001) and in subjects without tracheostomy (T3 vs T0, P = .001). However, PEP therapy did not improve RDOS.

CONCLUSIONS

In critically ill, spontaneously breathing subjects, PEP therapy significantly improved RAS without affecting hemodynamic stability or respiratory symptoms.

Restoring brain connectivity by phrenic nerve stimulation in sedated and mechanically ventilated patients

BACKGROUND

In critically ill patients, deep sedation and mechanical ventilation suppress the brain-diaphragm-lung axis and are associated with cognitive issues in survivors.

METHODS

This exploratory crossover design study investigates whether phrenic nerve stimulation can enhance brain activity and connectivity in six deeply sedated, mechanically ventilated patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

RESULTS

Our findings indicate that adding phrenic stimulation on top of invasive mechanical ventilation in deeply sedated, critically ill, moderate acute respiratory distress syndrome patients increases cortical activity, connectivity, and synchronization in the frontal-temporal-parietal cortices.

CONCLUSIONS

Adding phrenic stimulation on top of invasive mechanical ventilation in deeply sedated, critically ill, moderate acute respiratory distress syndrome patients increases cortical activity, connectivity, and synchronization. The observed changes resemble those during diaphragmatic breathing in awake humans. These results suggest that phrenic nerve stimulation has the potential to restore the brain-diaphragm-lung crosstalk when it has been shut down or impaired by mechanical ventilation and sedation. Further research should evaluate the clinical significance of these results.

Medical hypnosis mitigates laboratory dyspnoea in healthy humans: a randomised, controlled experimental trial

QUESTION

Dyspnoea persisting despite treatments of underlying causes requires symptomatic approaches. Medical hypnosis could provide relief without the untoward effects of pharmacological approaches. We addressed this question through experimentally induced dyspnoea in healthy humans (inspiratory threshold loading (excessive inspiratory effort) and carbon dioxide stimulation (air hunger)).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

20 volunteers (10 women, aged 21-40 years) were studied on four separate days. The order of the visits was randomised in two steps: firstly, the "inspiratory threshold loading first" versus "carbon dioxide first" group (n=10 in each group); secondly, the "medical hypnosis first" versus "visual distraction first" subgroup (n=5 in each subgroup). Each visit comprised three 5-min periods (reference, intervention, washout) during which participants used visual analogue scales (VAS) to rate the sensory and affective dimensions of dyspnoea, and after which they completed the Multidimensional Dyspnea Profile.

RESULTS

Medical hypnosis reduced both dimensions of dyspnoea significantly more than visual distraction (inspiratory threshold loading: sensory reduction after 5 min 34% of full VAS versus 8% (p=0.0042), affective reduction 17.6% versus 2.4% (p=0.044); carbon dioxide: sensory reduction after 5 min 36.9% versus 3% (p=0.0015), affective reduction 29.1% versus 8.7% (p=0.0023)). The Multidimensional Dyspnea Profile showed more marked sensory effects during inspiratory threshold loading and more marked affective effects during carbon dioxide stimulation.

ANSWER TO THE QUESTION

Medical hypnosis was more effective than visual distraction at attenuating the sensory and affective dimensions of experimentally induced dyspnoea. This provides a strong rationale for clinical studies of hypnosis in persistent dyspnoea patients.

Breathlessness assessment, management and impact in the intensive care unit: a rapid review and narrative synthesis

BACKGROUND

Adults in the intensive care unit (ICU) commonly experience distressing symptoms and other concerns such as pain, delirium, and breathlessness. Breathlessness management is not supported by any ICU guidelines, unlike other symptoms.

AIM

To review the literature relating to (i) prevalence, intensity, assessment, and management of breathlessness in critically ill adults in the ICU receiving invasive and non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIV) and high-flow oxygen therapy, (HFOT), (ii) the impact of breathlessness on ICU patients with regard to engagement with rehabilitation.

METHODS

A rapid review and narrative synthesis using the Cochrane Methods Group Recommendations was conducted and reported in accordance with PRISMA. All study designs investigating breathlessness in adult ICU patients receiving either invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), NIV or HFOT were eligible. PubMed, MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library and CINAHL databased were searched from June 2013 to June 2023. Studies were quality appraised.

RESULTS

19 studies representing 2822 ICU patients were included (participants mean age 48 years to 71 years; proportion of males 43-100%). The weighted mean prevalence of breathlessness in ICU patients receiving IMV was 49% (range 34-66%). The proportion of patients receiving NIV self-reporting moderate to severe dyspnoea was 55% prior to initiation. Breathlessness assessment tools included visual analogue scale, (VAS), numerical rating scale, (NRS) and modified BORG scale, (mBORG). In patients receiving NIV the highest reported median (interquartile range [IQR]) VAS, NRS and mBORG scores were 6.2cm (0-10 cm), 5 (2-7) and 6 (2.3-7) respectively (moderate to severe breathlessness). In patients receiving either NIV or HFOT the highest reported median (IQR) VAS, NRS and mBORG scores were 3 cm (0-6 cm), 8 (5-10) and 4 (3-5) respectively.

CONCLUSION

Breathlessness in adults receiving IMV, NIV or HFOT in the ICU is prevalent and clinically important with median intensity ratings indicating the presence of moderate to severe symptoms.

Dyspnoea in acutely ill mechanically ventilated adult patients: an ERS/ESICM statement

This statement outlines a review of the literature and current practice concerning the prevalence, clinical significance, diagnosis and management of dyspnoea in critically ill, mechanically ventilated adult patients. It covers the definition, pathophysiology, epidemiology, short- and middle-term impact, detection and quantification, and prevention and treatment of dyspnoea. It represents a collaboration of the European Respiratory Society and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Dyspnoea ranks among the most distressing experiences that human beings can endure. Approximately 40% of patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit (ICU) report dyspnoea, with an average intensity of 45 mm on a visual analogue scale from 0 to 100 mm. Although it shares many similarities with pain, dyspnoea can be far worse than pain in that it summons a primal fear response. As such, it merits universal and specific consideration. Dyspnoea must be identified, prevented and relieved in every patient. In the ICU, mechanically ventilated patients are at high risk of experiencing breathing difficulties because of their physiological status and, in some instances, because of mechanical ventilation itself. At the same time, mechanically ventilated patients have barriers to signalling their distress. Addressing this major clinical challenge mandates teaching and training, and involves ICU caregivers and patients. This is even more important because, as opposed to pain which has become a universal healthcare concern, very little attention has been paid to the identification and management of respiratory suffering in mechanically ventilated ICU patients.

Neurophysiological basis of respiratory discomfort improvement by mandibular advancement in awake OSA patients

Patients with obstructive sleep apneas (OSA) do not complain from dyspnea during resting breathing. Placement of a mandibular advancement device (MAD) can lead to a sense of improved respiratory comfort ("pseudo-relief") ascribed to a habituation phenomenon. To substantiate this conjecture, we hypothesized that, in non-dyspneic awake OSA patients, respiratory-related electroencephalographic figures, abnormally present during awake resting breathing, would disappear or change in parallel with MAD-associated pseudo-relief. In 20 patients, we compared natural breathing and breathing with MAD on: breathing discomfort (transitional visual analog scale, VAS-2); upper airway mechanics, assessed in terms of pressure peak/time to peak (TTP) ratio respiratory-related electroencephalography (EEG) signatures, including slow event-related preinspiratory potentials; and a between-state discrimination based on continuous connectivity evaluation. MAD improved breathing and upper airway mechanics. The 8 patients in whom the EEG between-state discrimination was considered effective exhibited higher Peak/TTP improvement and transitional VAS ratings while wearing MAD than the 12 patients where it was not. These results support the notion of habituation to abnormal respiratory-related afferents in OSA patients and fuel the causative nature of the relationship between dyspnea, respiratory-related motor cortical activity and impaired upper airway mechanics in this setting.

Dyspnoea in acutely ill mechanically ventilated adult patients: an ERS/ESICM statement

This statement outlines a review of the literature and current practice concerning the prevalence, clinical significance, diagnosis and management of dyspnoea in critically ill, mechanically ventilated adult patients. It covers the definition, pathophysiology, epidemiology, short- and middle-term impact, detection and quantification, and prevention and treatment of dyspnoea. It represents a collaboration of the European Respiratory Society (ERS) and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM). Dyspnoea ranks among the most distressing experiences that human beings can endure. Approximately 40% of patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit (ICU) report dyspnoea, with an average intensity of 45 mm on a visual analogue scale from 0 to 100 mm. Although it shares many similarities with pain, dyspnoea can be far worse than pain in that it summons a primal fear response. As such, it merits universal and specific consideration. Dyspnoea must be identified, prevented and relieved in every patient. In the ICU, mechanically ventilated patients are at high risk of experiencing breathing difficulties because of their physiological status and, in some instances, because of mechanical ventilation itself. At the same time, mechanically ventilated patients have barriers to signalling their distress. Addressing this major clinical challenge mandates teaching and training, and involves ICU caregivers and patients. This is even more important because, as opposed to pain which has become a universal healthcare concern, very little attention has been paid to the identification and management of respiratory suffering in mechanically ventilated ICU patients.

Sensory interventions to relieve dyspnoea in critically ill mechanically ventilated patients

BACKGROUND

In critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation, dyspnoea is frequent, severe and associated with an increased risk of neuropsychological sequelae. We evaluated the efficacy of sensory interventions targeting the brain rather than the respiratory system to relieve dyspnoea in mechanically ventilated patients.

METHODS

Patients receiving mechanical ventilation for ≥48 h and reporting dyspnoea (unidimensional dyspnoea visual analogue scale (Dyspnoea-VAS)) first underwent increased pressure support and then, in random order, auditory stimulation (relaxing music versus pink noise) and air flux stimulation (facial versus lower limb). Treatment responses were assessed using Dyspnoea-VAS, the Multidimensional Dyspnea Profile and measures of the neural drive to breathe (airway occlusion pressure (P 0.1) and electromyography of inspiratory muscles).

RESULTS

We included 46 patients (tracheotomy or intubation n=37; noninvasive ventilation n=9). Increasing pressure support decreased Dyspnoea-VAS by median 40 mm (p<0.001). Exposure to music decreased Dyspnoea-VAS compared with exposure to pink noise by median 40 mm (p<0.001). Exposure to facial air flux decreased Dyspnoea-VAS compared with limb air flux by median 30 mm (p<0.001). Increasing pressure support, but not music exposure and facial air flux, reduced P 0.1 by median 3.3 cmH2O (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In mechanically ventilated patients, sensory interventions can modulate the processing of respiratory signals by the brain irrespective of the intensity of the neural drive to breathe. It should therefore be possible to alleviate dyspnoea without resorting to pharmacological interventions or having to infringe the constraints of mechanical ventilation lung protection strategies by increasing ventilatory support.

Interventions Relieving Dyspnea in Intubated Patients Show Responsiveness of the Mechanical Ventilation-Respiratory Distress Observation Scale

Rationale: Breathing difficulties are highly stressful. In critically ill patients, they are associated with an increased risk of posttraumatic manifestations. Dyspnea, the corresponding symptom, cannot be directly assessed in noncommunicative patients. This difficulty can be circumvented using observation scales such as the mechanical ventilation-respiratory distress observation scale (MV-RDOS). Objective: To investigate the performance and responsiveness of the MV-RDOS to infer dyspnea in noncommunicative intubated patients. Methods: Communicative and noncommunicative patients exhibiting breathing difficulties under mechanical ventilation were prospectively included and assessed using a dyspnea visual analog scale, MV-RDOS, EMG activity of alae nasi and parasternal intercostals, and EEG signatures of respiratory-related cortical activation (preinspiratory potentials). Inspiratory-muscle EMG and preinspiratory cortical activities are surrogates of dyspnea. Assessments were conducted at baseline, after adjustment of ventilator settings, and, in some cases, after morphine administration. Measurements and Main Results: Fifty patients (age, 67 [(interquartile interval [IQR]), 61-76] yr; Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, 52 [IQR, 35-62]) were included, 25 of whom were noncommunicative. Relief occurred in 25 (50%) patients after ventilator adjustments and in 21 additional patients after morphine administration. In noncommunicative patients, MV-RDOS score decreased from 5.5 (IQR, 4.2-6.6) at baseline to 4.2 (IQR, 2.1-4.7; P < 0.001) after ventilator adjustments and 2.5 (IQR, 2.1-4.2; P = 0.024) after morphine administration. MV-RDOS and alae nasi/parasternal EMG activities were positively correlated (ρ = 0.41 and 0.37, respectively). MV-RDOS scores were higher in patients with EEG preinspiratory potentials (4.9 [IQR, 4.2-6.3] vs. 4.0 [IQR, 2.1-4.9]; P = 0.002). Conclusions: The MV-RDOS seems able to detect and monitor respiratory symptoms reasonably well in noncommunicative intubated patients. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02801838).

Short-term cognitive loading deteriorates breathing pattern and gas exchange in adult patients with congenital central hypoventilation syndrome

Question

Human PHOX2B mutations result in life-threatening sleep-related hypoventilation (congenital central hypoventilation syndrome, CCHS). Most patients retain ventilatory activity when awake through a respiratory-related cortical network. We hypothesised that this need to mobilise cortical resources to breathe would lead to breathing-cognition interferences during cognitive loading.

Patients and methods

Seven adult CCHS patients (five women; median age 21) performed standard neuropsychological tests (paced auditory serial addition test - calculation capacity, working memory, sustained and divided attention; trail making test - visuospatial exploration capacity, cognitive processing speed, attentional flexibility; Corsi block-tapping test - visuospatial memory, short-term memory, working memory) during unassisted breathing and under ventilatory support. Ventilatory variables and transcutaneous haemoglobin oxygen saturation were recorded. Cortical connectivity changes between unassisted breathing and ventilatory support were assessed using electroencephalographic recordings (EEG).

Results

Baseline performances were lower than expected in individuals of this age. During unassisted breathing, cognitive loading coincided with increased breathing variability, and decreases in oxygen saturation inversely correlated with an increasing number of apnoeic cycles per minute (rho -0.46, 95% CI -0.76 to -0.06, p=0.01). During ventilatory support, cognitive tasks did not disrupt breathing pattern and were not associated with decreased oxygen saturation. Ventilatory support was associated with changes in EEG cortical connectivity but not with improved test performances.

Conclusions

Acute cognitive loads induce oxygen desaturation in adult CCHS patients during unassisted breathing, but not under ventilatory support. This justifies considering the use of ventilatory support during mental tasks in CCHS patients to avoid repeated episodes of hypoxia.

DYSPNEA AND MECHANICAL VENTILATION: APPLYING PHYSIOLOGY TO GUIDE THERAPY

While advances in our understanding of mechanical ventilation have improved mortality from acute respiratory distress syndrome, recent studies indicate a rising incidence of post-ventilation mental health sequelae, including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Concurrent research on the physiology of dyspnea provides insights about the role of multiple sources of sensory information underlying respiratory discomfort along with the contribution of efferent-afferent dissociation to dyspnea, and the subsequent relationship of dyspnea to a range of affective responses, including fear and anxiety. An understanding of the mechanisms of dyspnea may provide holistic approaches to managing acute respiratory failure that can achieve the best physical and emotional outcomes for patients requiring mechanical ventilation.

Combined head accelerometry and EEG improves the detection of respiratory-related cortical activity during inspiratory loading in healthy participants

Mechanical ventilation is a highly utilized life-saving tool, particularly in the current era. The use of EEG in a brain-ventilator interface (BVI) to detect respiratory discomfort (due to sub-optimal ventilator settings) would improve treatment in mechanically ventilated patients. This concept has been realized via development of an EEG covariance-based classifier that detects respiratory-related cortical activity associated with respiratory discomfort. The aim of this study was to determine if head movement, detected by an accelerometer, can detect and/or improve the detection of respiratory-related cortical activity compared to EEG alone. In 25 healthy participants, EEG and acceleration of the head were recorded during loaded and quiet breathing in the seated and lying postures. Detection of respiratory-related cortical activity using an EEG covariance-based classifier was improved by inclusion of data from an Accelerometer-based classifier, i.e. classifier 'Fusion'. In addition, 'smoothed' data over 50s, rather than one 5 s window of EEG/Accelerometer signals, improved detection. Waveform averages of EEG and head acceleration showed the incidence of pre-inspiratory potentials did not differ between loaded and quiet breathing, but head movement was greater in loaded breathing. This study confirms that compared to event-related analysis with >5 min of signal acquisition, an EEG-based classifier is a clinically valuable tool with rapid processing, detection times, and accuracy. Data smoothing would introduce a small delay (<1 min) but improves detection results. As head acceleration improved detection compared to EEG alone, the number of EEG signals required to detect respiratory discomfort with future BVIs could be reduced if head acceleration is included.

Lung and diaphragm protective ventilation: a synthesis of recent data

INTRODUCTION

: To adhere to the Hippocratic Oath, to "first, do no harm", we need to make every effort to minimize the adverse effects of mechanical ventilation. Our understanding of the mechanisms of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) and ventilator-induced diaphragm dysfunction (VIDD) has increased in recent years. Research focuses now on methods to monitor lung stress and inhomogeneity and targets we should aim for when setting the ventilator. In parallel, efforts to promote early assisted ventilation to prevent VIDD have revealed new challenges, such as titrating inspiratory effort and synchronizing the mechanical with the patients' spontaneous breaths, while at the same time adhering to lung-protective targets.

AREAS COVERED

This is a narrative review of the key mechanisms contributing to VILI and VIDD and the methods currently available to evaluate and mitigate the risk of lung and diaphragm injury.

EXPERT OPINION

Implementing lung and diaphragm protective ventilation requires individualizing the ventilator settings, and this can only be accomplished by exploiting in everyday clinical practice the tools available to monitor lung stress and inhomogeneity, inspiratory effort, and patient-ventilator interaction.

Dyspnea

The clinical term dyspnea (a.k.a. breathlessness or shortness of breath) encompasses at least three qualitatively distinct sensations that warn of threats to breathing: air hunger, effort to breathe, and chest tightness. Air hunger is a primal homeostatic warning signal of insufficient alveolar ventilation that can produce fear and anxiety and severely impacts the lives of patients with cardiopulmonary, neuromuscular, psychological, and end-stage disease. The sense of effort to breathe informs of increased respiratory muscle activity and warns of potential impediments to breathing. Most frequently associated with bronchoconstriction, chest tightness may warn of airway inflammation and constriction through activation of airway sensory nerves. This chapter reviews human and functional brain imaging studies with comparison to pertinent neurorespiratory studies in animals to propose the interoceptive networks underlying each sensation. The neural origins of their distinct sensory and affective dimensions are discussed, and areas for future research are proposed. Despite dyspnea's clinical prevalence and impact, management of dyspnea languishes decades behind the treatment of pain. The neurophysiological bases of current therapeutic approaches are reviewed; however, a better understanding of the neural mechanisms of dyspnea may lead to development of novel therapies and improved patient care.

Impact of inspiratory threshold loading on brain activity and cognitive performances in healthy humans

In healthy humans, inspiratory threshold loading deteriorates cognitive performances. This can result from motor-cognitive interference (activation of motor respiratory-related cortical networks vs. executive resources allocation), sensory-cognitive interference (dyspnea vs. shift in attentional focus), or both. We hypothesized that inspiratory loading would concomitantly induce dyspnea, activate motor respiratory-related cortical networks, and deteriorate cognitive performance. We reasoned that a concomitant activation of cortical networks and cognitive deterioration would be compatible with motor-cognitive interference, particularly in case of a predominant alteration of executive cognitive performances. Symmetrically, we reasoned that a predominant alteration of attention-depending performances would suggest sensory-cognitive interference. Twenty-five volunteers (12 men; 19.5-51.5 years) performed the Paced Auditory Serial Addition test (PASAT-A and B; calculation capacity, working memory, attention), the Trail Making Test (TMT-A, visuospatial exploration capacity; TMT-B, visuospatial exploration capacity and attention), and the Corsi block-tapping test (visuospatial memory, short-term and working memory) during unloaded breathing and inspiratory threshold loading in random order. Loading consistently induced dyspnea and respiratory-related brain activation. It was associated with deteriorations inPASAT A (52 [45.5;55.5] (median [interquartile range]) to 48 [41;54.5], p=0.01), PASAT B (55 [47.5;58] to 51 [44.5;57.5], p=0.01), and TMT B (44s [36;54.5] to 53s [42;64], p=0.01), but did not affect TMT-A and Corsi. The concomitance of cortical activation and cognitive performance deterioration is compatible with competition for cortical resources (motor-cognitive interference), while the profile of cognitive impairment (PASAT and TMT-B but not TMT-A and Corsi) is compatible with a contribution of attentional distraction (sensory-cognitive interference). Both mechanisms are therefore likely at play.

The breathing brain: The potential of neural oscillations for the understanding of respiratory perception in health and disease

Dyspnea or breathlessness is a symptom occurring in multiple acute and chronic illnesses, however, the understanding of the neural mechanisms underlying its subjective experience is limited. In this topical review, we propose neural oscillatory dynamics and cross-frequency coupling as viable candidates for a neural mechanism underlying respiratory perception, and a technique warranting more attention in respiration research. With the evidence for the potential of neural oscillations in the study of normal and disordered breathing coming from disparate research fields with a limited history of interdisciplinary collaboration, the main objective of the review was to converge the existing research and suggest future directions. The existing findings show that distinct limbic and cortical activations, as measured by hemodynamic responses, underlie dyspnea, however, the time-scale of these activations is not well understood. The recent findings of oscillatory neural activity coupled with the respiratory rhythm could provide the solution to this problem, however, more research with a focus on dyspnea is needed. We also touch on the findings of distinct spectral patterns underlying the changes in breathing due to experimental manipulations, meditation and disease. Subsequently, we suggest general research directions and specific research designs to supplement the current knowledge using neural oscillation techniques. We argue for the benefits of interdisciplinary collaboration and the converging of neuroimaging and behavioral methods to best explain the emergence of the subjective and aversive individual experience of dyspnea.