Effect of food on the pharmacokinetics and therapeutic efficacy of 4-phenylbutyrate in progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis

The effect of 4-phenylbutyrate and sodium 4-phenylbutyrate on genetic mutation diseases: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To determine the efficacy of 4-phenylbutyrate (4-PB) or sodium 4-phenylbutyrate (SPB) in treating diseases caused by genetic mutations.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE for studies of patients with genetic mutations treated with 4-PB or SPB. All data were tested using RStudio software.

RESULTS

4-PB or SPB corrected the "functional" production of mutant genes (0.88 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 0.73-1.00], P = .45, I2 = 0%), restored mRNA transcription of mutant genes (0.50 [95% CI: 0.18-0.82], P = .13, I² = 47%), and improved symptoms (0.89 [95% CI: 0.78-1.00], P = .99, I² = 0%) and biochemical laboratory values (1.00 [95% CI: 0.89-1.00], P = .11, I² = 33%) in patients with inherited genetic diseases.

CONCLUSION

4-PB or SPB can be used to treat genetic diseases. However, they must be validated in high-quality randomized controlled trials before clinical use.

Emerging drugs for the treatment of progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis: a focus on phase II and III trials

INTRODUCTION

Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis (PFIC) is a group of disorders characterized by inappropriate bile formation, causing hepatic accumulation of bile acids and, subsequently, liver injury. Until recently, no approved treatments were available for these patients.

AREAS COVERED

Recent clinical trials for PFIC treatment have focused on intestine-restricted ileal bile acid transporter (IBAT) inhibitors. These compounds aim to reduce the pool size of bile acids by interrupting their enterohepatic circulation. Other emerging treatments in the pipeline include systemic IBAT inhibitors, synthetic bile acid derivatives, compounds targeting bile acid synthesis via the FXR/FGF axis, and chaperones/potentiators that aim to enhance the residual activity of the mutated transporters.

EXPERT OPINION

Substantial progress has been made in drug development for PFIC patients during the last couple of years. Although data concerning long-term efficacy are as yet only scarcely available, new therapies have demonstrated robust efficacy in a considerable fraction of patients at least on the shorter term. However, a substantial fraction of PFIC patients do not respond to these novel therapies and thus still requires surgical treatment, including liver transplantation before adulthood. Hence, there is still an unmet medical need for long-term effective medical, preferably non-surgical, treatment for all PFIC patients.

EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on genetic cholestatic liver diseases

Genetic cholestatic liver diseases are caused by (often rare) mutations in a multitude of different genes. While these diseases differ in pathobiology, clinical presentation and prognosis, they do have several commonalities due to their cholestatic nature. These Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) offer a general approach to genetic testing and management of cholestatic pruritus, while exploring diagnostic and treatment approaches for a subset of genetic cholestatic liver diseases in depth. An expert panel appointed by the European Association for the Study of the Liver has created recommendations regarding diagnosis and treatment, based on the best evidence currently available in the fields of paediatric and adult hepatology, as well as genetics. The management of these diseases generally takes place in a tertiary referral centre, in order to provide up-to-date approaches and expertise. These CPGs are intended to support hepatologists (for paediatric and adult patients), residents and other healthcare professionals involved in the management of these patients with concrete recommendations based on currently available evidence or, if not available, on expert opinion.

Clinical symptoms, biochemistry, and liver histology during the native liver period of progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 2

BACKGROUND

Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 2 (PFIC2) is an ultra-rare disease caused by mutations in the ABCB11 gene. This study aimed to understand the course of PFIC2 during the native liver period.

METHODS

From November 2014 to October 2015, a survey to identify PFIC2 patients was conducted in 207 hospitals registered with the Japanese Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition. Investigators retrospectively collected clinical data at each facility in November 2018 using pre-specified forms.

RESULTS

Based on the biallelic pathogenic variants in ABCB11 and/or no hepatic immunohistochemical detection of BSEP, 14 Japanese PFIC2 patients were enrolled at seven facilities. The median follow-up was 63.2 [47.7-123.3] months. The median age of disease onset was 2.5 [1-4] months. Twelve patients underwent living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), with a median age at LDLT of 9 [4-57] months. Two other patients received sodium 4-phenylbutyrate (NaPB) therapy and survived over 60 months with the native liver. No patients received biliary diversion. The cases that resulted in LDLT had gradually deteriorated growth retardation, biochemical tests, and liver histology since the initial visit. In the other two patients, jaundice, growth retardation, and most of the biochemical tests improved after NaPB therapy was started, but pruritus and liver fibrosis did not.

CONCLUSIONS

Japanese PFIC2 patients had gradually worsening clinical findings since the initial visit, resulting in LDLT during infancy. NaPB therapy improved jaundice and growth retardation but was insufficient to treat pruritus and liver fibrosis.

Opinion paper on the diagnosis and treatment of progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis

Background & Aims

Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis (PFIC) relates to a group of rare, debilitating, liver disorders which typically present in early childhood, but have also been reported in adults. Without early detection and effective treatment, PFIC can result in end-stage liver disease. The aim of the paper was to put forward recommendations that promote standardisation of the management of PFIC in clinical practice.

Methods

A committee of six specialists came together to discuss the challenges faced by physicians in the management of PFIC. The committee agreed on two key areas where expert guidance is required to optimise care: (1) how to diagnose and treat patients with a clinical presentation of PFIC in the absence of clear genetic test results/whilst awaiting results, and (2) how to monitor disease progression and response to treatment. A systematic literature review was undertaken to contextualise and inform the recommendations.

Results

An algorithm was developed for the diagnosis and treatment of children with suspected PFIC. The algorithm recommends the use of licensed inhibitors of ileal bile acid transporters as the first-line treatment for patients with PFIC and suggests that genetic testing be used to confirm genotype whilst treatment is initiated in patients in whom PFIC is suspected. The authors recommend referring patients to an experienced centre, and ensuring that monitoring includes measurements of pruritus, serum bile acid levels, growth, and quality of life following diagnosis and during treatment.

Conclusions

The algorithm presented within this paper offers guidance to optimise the management of paediatric PFIC. The authors hope that these recommendations will help to standardise the management of PFIC in the absence of clear clinical guidelines.

Impact and implications

This opinion paper outlines a consistent approach to the contemporaneous diagnosis, monitoring, referral and management of children with progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis. This should assist physicians given the recent developments in genetic diagnosis and the availability of effective drug therapy. This manuscript will also help to raise awareness of current developments and educate health planners on the place for new drug therapies in progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis.

Cholestatic Pruritus in Children: Conventional Therapies and Beyond

Pruritus in the setting of cholestatic liver disease is difficult to treat and occurs in patients ranging in age from infancy to adulthood. Likely multifactorial in etiology, this symptom often involves multimodal therapy targeting several pathways and mechanisms proposed in the underlying etiology of cholestatic pruritus. Many patients in both the pediatric and adult populations continue to experience unrelenting pruritus despite maximal conventional therapy. Options are further limited in treating pediatric patients due to sparse data regarding medication safety and efficacy in younger patients. Conventional therapies for the treatment of cholestatic pruritus in children include ursodeoxycholic acid, cholestyramine, hydroxyzine, and rifampin. Certain therapies are more routinely used in the adult populations but with limited data available for use in child and adolescent patients, including opioid antagonists and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Recently, ileal bile acid transport inhibitors have been shown to alleviate pruritus in many children with Alagille syndrome and progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis and is an additional therapy available for consideration for these patients. Ultimately, surgical options such as biliary diversion or liver transplantation are considered in specific circumstances when medical therapies have been exhausted and pruritus remains debilitating. While further investigation regarding underlying etiologies and effective therapies are needed to better understand itch pathogenesis and treatment in pediatric cholestasis, current considerations beyond conventional management include the use of opioid antagonists, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, ileal bile acid transport inhibitors, and surgical intervention.

Influence of food on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of 4-phenylbutyrate in patients with urea cycle disorders

Urea cycle disorders (UCDs), inborn errors of hepatocyte metabolism, cause hyperammonemia and lead to neurocognitive deficits, coma, and even death. Sodium 4-phenylbutyrate (NaPB), a standard adjunctive therapy for UCDs, generates an alternative pathway of nitrogen deposition through glutamine consumption. Administration during or immediately after a meal is the approved usage of NaPB. However, we previously found that preprandial oral administration enhanced its potency in healthy adults and pediatric patients with intrahepatic cholestasis. The present study evaluated the effect of food on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of NaPB in five patients with UCDs. Following an overnight fast, NaPB was administered orally at 75 mg/kg/dose (high dose, HD) or 25 mg/kg/dose (low dose, LD) either 15 min before or immediately after breakfast. Each patient was treated with these four treatment regimens with NaPB. With either dose, pre-breakfast administration rather than post-breakfast administration significantly increased plasma PB levels and decreased plasma glutamine availability. Pre-breakfast LD administration resulted in a greater attenuation in plasma glutamine availability than post-breakfast HD administration. Plasma levels of branched-chain amino acids decreased to the same extent in all tested regimens. No severe adverse events occurred during this study. In conclusion, preprandial oral administration of NaPB maximized systemic exposure of PB and thereby its efficacy on glutamine consumption in patients with UCDs.

A randomized trial to examine the impact of food on pharmacokinetics of 4-phenylbutyrate and change in amino acid availability after a single oral administration of sodium 4-phenylbutyrarte in healthy volunteers

Urea cycle disorders (UCDs), inborn errors of hepatocyte metabolism, result in the systemic accumulation of ammonia to toxic levels. Sodium 4-phenylbutyrate (NaPB), a standard therapy for UCDs for over 20 years, generates an alternative pathway of nitrogen deposition through glutamine consumption. Administration during or immediately after a meal is the accepted use of NaPB. However, this regimen is not based on clinical evidence. Here, an open-label, single-dose, five-period crossover study was conducted in healthy adults to investigate the effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of NaPB and determine any subsequent change in amino acid availability. Twenty subjects were randomized to one of four treatment groups. Following an overnight fast, NaPB was administered orally at 4.3 g/m² (high dose, HD) or 1.4 g/m² (low dose, LD) either 30 min before or just after breakfast. At both doses, compared with post-breakfast administration, pre-breakfast administration significantly increased systemic exposure of PB and decreased plasma glutamine availability. Pre-breakfast LD administration attenuated plasma glutamine availability to the same extent as post-breakfast HD administration. Regardless of the regimen, plasma levels of branched-chain amino acids (BCAA) were decreased below baseline in a dose-dependent manner. In conclusion, preprandial oral administration of NaPB maximized systemic exposure of the drug and thereby its potency to consume plasma glutamine. This finding may improve poor medication compliance because of the issues with odor, taste, and pill burden of NaPB and reduce the risk of BCAA deficiency in NaPB therapy.

Variants in ABCB4 (MDR3) across the spectrum of cholestatic liver diseases in adults

The ATP binding cassette subfamily B member 4 (ABCB4) gene on chromosome 7 encodes the ABCB4 protein (alias multidrug resistance protein 3 [MDR3]), a P-glycoprotein in the canalicular membrane of the hepatocytes that acts as a translocator of phospholipids into bile. Several variants in ABCB4 have been shown to cause ABCB4 deficiency, accounting for a disease spectrum ranging from progressive familial cholestasis type 3 to less severe conditions like low phospholipid-associated cholelithiasis, intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy or drug-induced liver injury. Furthermore, whole genome sequencing has shown that ABCB4 variants are associated with an increased incidence of gallstone disease, gallbladder and bile duct carcinoma, liver cirrhosis or elevated liver function tests. Diagnosis of ABCB4 deficiency-related diseases is based on clinical presentation, serum biomarkers, imaging techniques, liver histology and genetic testing. Nevertheless, the clinical presentation can vary widely and clear genotype-phenotype correlations are currently lacking. Ursodeoxycholic acid is the most commonly used medical treatment, but its efficacy has yet to be proven in large controlled clinical studies. Future pharmacological options may include stimulation/restoration of residual function by chaperones (e.g. 4-phenyl butyric acid, curcumin) or induction of ABCB4 transcription by FXR (farnesoid X receptor) agonists or PPARα (peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α)-ligands/fibrates. Orthotopic liver transplantation remains the last and often only therapeutic option in cirrhotic patients with end-stage liver disease or patients with intractable pruritus.

Proposal of a liver histology-based scoring system for bile salt export pump deficiency

AIM

Bile salt export pump (BSEP) deficiency manifests a form of progressive intrahepatic cholestasis. This study aimed to establish a scoring system of liver histology for the uncommon genetic condition.

METHODS

After a roundtable discussion and histology review, a scoring system for BSEP deficiency was established. Eleven tissue samples were independently evaluated by three pathologists based on the proposed standard for an interobserver agreement analysis. In four cases with serial tissue samples available, correlation between changes in histology scores and clinical outcome was examined.

RESULTS

Of 14 initially listed histopathological findings, 12 were selected for scoring and grouped into the following four categories: cholestasis, parenchymal changes, portal tract changes and fibrosis. Each category consisted of two to four microscopic findings that were further divided into three to six scores; therefore, each category had a maximum score of 8-11. Interobserver agreement was highest for pericellular fibrosis (κ = 0.849) and lowest for hepatocellular cholestasis (κ = 0.241) with the mean and median κ values of the 12 parameters being 0.561 and 0.602, respectively. For two patients whose clinical features worsened, score changes between two time points were interpreted as deteriorated. In two patients, who showed a good clinical response to preprandial treatment with sodium 4-phenylbutyrate, histological changes were evaluated as improved or unchanged.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed histology-based scoring system for BSEP deficiency with moderate interobserver agreement may be useful not only for monitoring microscopic changes in clinical practice but also for a surrogate endpoint in clinical trials.