Torra J, Alcántara-de la Cruz R, de Figueiredo MRA, Gaines TA, Jugulam M, Merotto A, Palma-Bautista C, Rojano-Delgado AM, Riechers DE. Metabolism of 2,4-D in plants: comparative analysis of metabolic detoxification pathways in tolerant crops and resistant weeds.
PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE 2024. [PMID:
39132883 DOI:
10.1002/ps.8373]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2024] [Revised: 07/15/2024] [Accepted: 08/01/2024] [Indexed: 08/13/2024]
Abstract
The commercialization of 2,4-D (2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid) latifolicide in 1945 marked the beginning of the selective herbicide market, with this active ingredient playing a pivotal role among commercial herbicides due to the natural tolerance of monocots compared with dicots. Due to its intricate mode of action, involving interactions within endogenous auxin signaling networks, 2,4-D was initially considered a low-risk herbicide to evolve weed resistance. However, the intensification of 2,4-D use has contributed to the emergence of 2,4-D-resistant broadleaf weeds, challenging earlier beliefs. This review explores 2,4-D tolerance in crops and evolved resistance in weeds, emphasizing an in-depth understanding of 2,4-D metabolic detoxification. Nine confirmed 2,4-D-resistant weed species, driven by rapid metabolism, highlight cytochrome P450 monooxygenases in Phase I and glycosyltransferases in Phase II as key enzymes. Resistance to 2,4-D may also involve impaired translocation associated with mutations in auxin/indole-3-acetic acid (Aux/IAA) co-receptor genes. Moreover, temperature variations affect 2,4-D efficacy, with high temperatures increasing herbicide metabolism rates and reducing weed control, while drought stress did not affect 2,4-D efficacy. Research on 2,4-D resistance has primarily focused on non-target-site resistance (NTSR) mechanisms, including 2,4-D metabolic detoxification, with limited exploration of the inheritance and genetic basis underlying these traits. Resistance to 2,4-D in weeds is typically governed by a single gene, either dominant or incompletely dominant, raising questions about gain-of-function or loss-of-function mutations that confer resistance. Future research should unravel the physiological and molecular-genetic basis of 2,4-D NTSR, exploring potential cross-resistance patterns and assessing fitness costs that may affect future evolution of auxin-resistant weeds. © 2024 Society of Chemical Industry.
Collapse