Quantitative background parenchymal enhancement to predict recurrence after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer

Automated rating of background parenchymal enhancement in MRI of extremely dense breasts without compromising the association with breast cancer in the DENSE trial

OBJECTIVES

Background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) as rated by radiologists is subject to inter- and intrareader variability. We aim to automate BPE category from DCE-MRI.

METHODS

This study represents a secondary analysis of the Dense Tissue and Early Breast Neoplasm Screening trial. 4553 women with extremely dense breasts who received supplemental breast MRI screening in eight hospitals were included. Minimal, mild, moderate and marked BPE rated by radiologists were used as reference. Fifteen quantitative MRI features of the fibroglandular tissue were extracted to predict BPE using Random Forest, Naïve Bayes, and KNN classifiers. Majority voting was used to combine the predictions. Internal-external validation was used for training and validation. The inverse-variance weighted mean accuracy was used to express mean performance across the eight hospitals. Cox regression was used to verify non inferiority of the association between automated rating and breast cancer occurrence compared to the association for manual rating.

RESULTS

The accuracy of majority voting ranged between 0.56 and 0.84 across the eight hospitals. The weighted mean prediction accuracy for the four BPE categories was 0.76. The hazard ratio (HR) of BPE for breast cancer occurrence was comparable between automated rating and manual rating (HR = 2.12 versus HR = 1.97, P = 0.65 for mild/moderate/marked BPE relative to minimal BPE).

CONCLUSION

It is feasible to rate BPE automatically in DCE-MRI of women with extremely dense breasts without compromising the underlying association between BPE and breast cancer occurrence. The accuracy for minimal BPE is superior to that for other BPE categories.

Predictive value of background parenchymal enhancement on breast magnetic resonance imaging for pathological tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancers: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES

This review aimed to assess the predictive value of background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) on breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as an imaging biomarker for pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).

METHODS

Two reviewers independently performed a systemic literature search using the PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase databases for studies published up to 11 June 2022. Data from relevant articles were extracted to assess the relationship between BPE and pCR.

RESULTS

This systematic review included 13 studies with extensive heterogeneity in population characteristics, MRI follow-up points, MRI protocol, NACT protocol, pCR definition, and BPE assessment. Baseline BPE levels were not associated with pCR, except in 1 study that reported higher baseline BPE of the younger participants (< 55 years) in the pCR group than the non-pCR group. A total of 5 studies qualitatively assessed BPE levels and indicated a correlation between reduced BPE after NACT and pCR; however, among the studies that quantitatively measured BPE, the same association was observed only in the subgroup analysis of 2 articles that assessed the status of hormone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2. In addition, the predictive ability of early BPE changes for pCR was reported in several articles and remains controversial.

CONCLUSIONS

Changes in BPE may be a promising imaging biomarker for predicting pCR in breast cancer. Because current studies remain insufficient, particularly those that quantitatively measure BPE, prospective and multicenter large-sample studies are needed to confirm this relationship.

A background parenchymal enhancement quantification framework of breast magnetic resonance imaging

Background

Background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) is defined as the enhanced proportion of normal fibroglandular tissue on enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. BPE shows promise as a quantitative imaging biomarker (QIB). However, the lack of consensus among radiologists in their semi-quantitative grading of BPE limits its clinical utility.

Methods

The main objective of this study was to develop a BPE quantification model according to clinical expertise, with the BPE integral being used as a QIB to incorporate both the volume and intensity of the enhancement metrics. The model was applied to 2,786 cases to compare our quantitative results with radiologists' semi-quantitative BPE grading to evaluate the effectiveness of using the BPE integral as a QIB for analyzing BPE. Comparisons between multiple groups of nonnormally distributed BPE integrals were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test.

Results

Our study found a considerable degree of concordance between our BPE quantitative integral and radiologists' semi-quantitative assessments. Specifically, our research results revealed significant variability in BPE integral attained through the BPE quantification framework among all semi-quantitative BPE grading groups labeled by experienced radiologists, including mild-moderate (P<0.001), mild-marked (P<0.001), and moderate-marked (P<0.001). Furthermore, there was an apparent correlation between BPE integral and BPE grades, with marked BPE displaying the highest BPE integral, followed by moderate BPE, with mild BPE exhibiting the lowest BPE integral value.

Conclusions

The study developed and implemented a BPE quantification framework, which incorporated both the volume and intensity of enhancement and which could serve as a QIB for BPE.

Bilateral asymmetry of quantitative parenchymal kinetics at ultrafast DCE-MRI predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with HER2+ breast cancer

PURPOSE

To assess whether measurement of the bilateral asymmetry of semiquantitative and quantitative perfusion parameters from ultrafast dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI), allows early prediction of pathologic response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with HER2+ breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-eight female patients with HER2+ breast cancer treated with NAC who underwent pre-NAC ultrafast DCE-MRI (3-9 s/phase) were enrolled for this study. Four semiquantitative and two quantitative parenchymal parameters were calculated for each patient. Ipsilateral/contralateral (I/C) ratio (for four parameters) and the difference between (for two parameters) ipsi- and contra-lateral parenchymal kinetic parameters (kBPE) were compared for patients with pathologic complete response (pCR) and those having residual disease. Lasso regression with leave-one-out cross validation was used to determine the optimal combination of parameters for a regression model and multivariable logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors for pCR. Chi-squared test, two-sided t-test and Kruskal-Wallis test were used.

RESULTS

The Ktrans I/C ratio cutoff value of 1.11 had a sensitivity of 83.3% and specificity of 75% for pCR. The ve I/C ratio cutoff value of 1.1 had a sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 81.3% for pCR. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the three-kBPE parameter model, including initial area under the enhancement curve (AUC30) I/C ratio, KtransI/C ratio and ve I/C ratio, was 0.89 with sensitivity of 91.7% at specificity of 81.3%.

CONCLUSION

Quantitative assessment of bilateral asymmetry kBPE from pre-NAC ultrafast DCE-MRI can predict pCR in patients with HER2+ breast cancer.

Mammographic density in relation to breast cancer recurrence and survival in women receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Objective

The association between mammographic density (MD) and breast cancer (BC) recurrence and survival remains unclear. Patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) are in a vulnerable situation with the tumor within the breast during treatment. This study evaluated the association between MD and recurrence/survival in BC patients treated with NACT.

Methods

Patients with BC treated with NACT in Sweden (2005-2016) were retrospectively included (N=302). Associations between MD (Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 5^th Edition) and recurrence-free/BC-specific survival at follow-up (Q1 2022) were addressed. Hazard ratios (HRs) for recurrence/BC-specific survival (BI-RADS a/b/c vs. d) were estimated using Cox regression analysis and adjusted for age, estrogen receptor status, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status, axillary lymph node status, tumor size, and complete pathological response.

Results

A total of 86 recurrences and 64 deaths were recorded. The adjusted models showed that patients with BI-RADS d vs. BI-RADS a/b/c had an increased risk of recurrence (HR 1.96 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.98-3.92)) and an increased risk of BC-specific death (HR 2.94 (95% CI 1.43-6.06)).

Conclusion

These findings raise questions regarding personalized follow-up for BC patients with extremely dense breasts (BI-RADS d) pre-NACT. More extensive studies are required to confirm our findings.

Differences Between Ipsilateral and Contralateral Early Parenchymal Enhancement Kinetics Predict Response of Breast Cancer to Neoadjuvant Therapy

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To determine whether kinetics measured with ultrafast dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in tumor and normal parenchyma pre- and post-neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) can predict the response of breast cancer to NAT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-four patients with histologically confirmed invasive breast cancer were enrolled. They were scanned with ultrafast dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (3-7 seconds/frame) pre- and post-NAT. Four kinetic parameters were calculated in the segmented tumors, and ipsi- and contra-lateral normal parenchyma: (1) tumor (tSE30) or background parenchymal relative enhancement at 30 seconds (BPE30), (2) maximum relative enhancement slope (MaxSlope), (3) bolus arrival time (BAT), and (4) area under relative signal enhancement curve for the initial 30 seconds (AUC30). The tumor kinetics and the differences between ipsi- and contra-lateral parenchymal kinetics were compared for patients achieving pathologic complete response (pCR) vs those who had residual disease after NAT. The chi-squared test and two-sided t-test were used for baseline demographics. The Wilcoxon rank sum test and one-way analysis of variance were used for differential responses to therapy.

RESULTS

Patients with similar pre-NAT mean BPE30, median BAT and mean AUC30 in the ipsi- and contralateral normal parenchyma were more likely to achieve pCR following NAT (p < 0.02). Patients classified as having residual cancer burden (RCB) II after NAT showed higher post-NAT tSE30 and tumor AUC30 and higher post-NAT MaxSlope in ipsilateral normal parenchyma compared to those classified as RCB I or pCR (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Bilateral asymmetry in normal parenchyma could predict treatment outcome prior to NAT. Post-NAT tumor kinetics could evaluate the aggressiveness of residual tumor.

Background parenchymal enhancement and uptake as breast cancer imaging biomarkers: A state-of-the-art review

Within the past decade, background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) and background parenchymal uptake (BPU) have emerged as novel imaging-derived biomarkers in the diagnosis and treatment monitoring of breast cancer. Growing evidence supports the role of breast parenchyma vascularity and metabolic activity as probable risk factors for breast cancer development. Furthermore, in the presence of a newly-diagnosed breast cancer, added clinically-relevant data was surprisingly found in the respective imaging properties of the non-affected contralateral breast. Evaluation of the contralateral BPE and BPU have been found to be especially instrumental in predicting the prognosis of a patient with breast cancer and even anticipating their response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Simultaneously, further research has found a link between these two biomarkers, even though they represent different physical properties. The aim of this review is to provide an up to date summary of the current clinical applications of BPE and BPU as breast cancer imaging biomarkers with the hope that it propels their further usage in clinical practice.

Background Parenchymal Enhancement on Breast MRI: Assessment and Clinical Implications

Purpose of Review

To present recent literature regarding the assessment and clinical implications of background parenchymal enhancement on breast MRI.

Recent Findings

The qualitative assessment of BPE remains variable within the literature, as well as in clinical practice. Several different quantitative approaches have been investigated in recent years, most commonly region of interest-based and segmentation-based assessments. However, quantitative assessment has not become standard in clinical practice to date. Numerous studies have demonstrated a clear association between higher BPE and future breast cancer risk. While higher BPE does not appear to significantly impact cancer detection, it may result in a higher abnormal interpretation rate. BPE is also likely a marker of pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with decreases in BPE during and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy correlated with pCR. In contrast, pre-treatment BPE does not appear to be predictive of pCR. The association between BPE and prognosis is less clear, with heterogeneous results in the literature.

Summary

Assessment of BPE continues to evolve, with heterogeneity in approaches to both qualitative and quantitative assessment. The level of BPE has important clinical implications, with associations with future breast cancer risk and treatment response. BPE may also be an imaging marker of prognosis, but future research is needed on this topic.

Response Predictivity to Neoadjuvant Therapies in Breast Cancer: A Qualitative Analysis of Background Parenchymal Enhancement in DCE-MRI

Background: For assessing the predictability of oncology neoadjuvant therapy results, the background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) parameter in breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has acquired increased interest. This work aims to qualitatively evaluate the BPE parameter as a potential predictive marker for neoadjuvant therapy. Method: Three radiologists examined, in triple-blind modality, the MRIs of 80 patients performed before the start of chemotherapy, after three months from the start of treatment, and after surgery. They identified the portion of fibroglandular tissue (FGT) and BPE of the contralateral breast to the tumor in the basal control pre-treatment (baseline). Results: We observed a reduction of BPE classes in serial MRI checks performed during neoadjuvant therapy, as compared to baseline pre-treatment conditions, in 61.3% of patients in the intermediate step, and in 86.7% of patients in the final step. BPE reduction was significantly associated with sequential anthracyclines/taxane administration in the first cycle of neoadjuvant therapy compared to anti-HER2 containing therapies. The therapy response was also significantly related to tumor size. There were no associations with menopausal status, fibroglandular tissue (FGT) amount, age, BPE baseline, BPE in intermediate, and in the final MRI step. Conclusions: The measured variability of this parameter during therapy could predict therapy effectiveness in early stages, improving decision-making in the perspective of personalized medicine. Our preliminary results suggest that BPE may represent a predictive factor in response to neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer, warranting future investigations in conjunction with radiomics.

Background parenchymal enhancement and breast cancer: a review of the emerging evidences about its potential use as imaging biomarker

OBJECTIVES

To conduct a systematic review of evidences about the relationship between background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) of the contralateral healthy breast and breast cancer: its association with clinicopathological breast cancer characteristics, its potential as predictive and prognostic biomarker and the biological linkage between BPE and breast cancer.

METHODS

A computerized literature search using PubMed and Google Scholar was performed up to June 2020. Two authors independently conducted search, screening, quality assessment, and extraction of data from the eligible studies. Studies were assessed for quality and risk of bias using the revised Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool.

RESULTS

Of the 476 articles identified, 22 articles met the inclusion criteria. No significant association was found between BPE and invasiveness, histological cancer type, T- and N-stage, multifocality, lymphatic and vascular invasion and histological tumour grade while the association between BPE and molecular subtypes is still unclear. As predictive biomarker, a greater decrease in BPE during and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy was associated with pathological complete response. Results about the role of BPE as prognostic factor were inconsistent. An association between high BPE and microvessel density, CD34 and VEGF (histological markers of vascularization and angiogenesis) was found.

CONCLUSIONS

BPE of the contralateral breast is associated with breast cancer in several aspects, therefore it has been proposed as a tool to refine breast cancer decision-making process.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Additional researches with standardized BPE assessment are needed to translate this emerging biomarker into clinical practice in the era of personalized medicine.