1
|
Stewart JD, Joyce TW, Durban JW, Calambokidis J, Fauquier D, Fearnbach H, Grebmeier JM, Lynn M, Manizza M, Perryman WL, Tinker MT, Weller DW. Boom-bust cycles in gray whales associated with dynamic and changing Arctic conditions. Science 2023; 382:207-211. [PMID: 37824633 DOI: 10.1126/science.adi1847] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2023] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 10/14/2023]
Abstract
Climate change is affecting a wide range of global systems, with polar ecosystems experiencing the most rapid change. Although climate impacts affect lower-trophic-level and short-lived species most directly, it is less clear how long-lived and mobile species will respond to rapid polar warming because they may have the short-term ability to accommodate ecological disruptions while adapting to new conditions. We found that the population dynamics of an iconic and highly mobile polar-associated species are tightly coupled to Arctic prey availability and access to feeding areas. When low prey biomass coincided with high ice cover, gray whales experienced major mortality events, each reducing the population by 15 to 25%. This suggests that even mobile, long-lived species are sensitive to dynamic and changing conditions as the Arctic warms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua D Stewart
- Ocean Ecology Lab, Marine Mammal Institute, Department of Fisheries, Wildlife and Conservation Sciences, Oregon State University, Newport, OR, USA
| | - Trevor W Joyce
- Ocean Associates, Arlington, VA, USA
- Marine Mammal and Turtle Division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Southwest Fisheries Science Center, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - John W Durban
- Marine Mammal and Turtle Division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Southwest Fisheries Science Center, La Jolla, CA, USA
- Sealife Response, Rehabilitation and Research (SR3), Des Moines, WA, USA
| | | | - Deborah Fauquier
- Office of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Holly Fearnbach
- Sealife Response, Rehabilitation and Research (SR3), Des Moines, WA, USA
| | - Jacqueline M Grebmeier
- Chesapeake Biological Laboratory, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Solomons, MD, USA
| | - Morgan Lynn
- Marine Mammal and Turtle Division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Southwest Fisheries Science Center, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Manfredi Manizza
- Geosciences Research Division, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Wayne L Perryman
- Marine Mammal and Turtle Division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Southwest Fisheries Science Center, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - M Tim Tinker
- Nhydra Consulting, Halifax, NS, Canada
- Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA
| | - David W Weller
- Marine Mammal and Turtle Division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Southwest Fisheries Science Center, La Jolla, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
|
3
|
McHuron EA, Adamczak S, Costa DP, Booth C. Estimating reproductive costs in marine mammal bioenergetic models: a review of current knowledge and data availability. CONSERVATION PHYSIOLOGY 2023; 11:coac080. [PMID: 36685328 PMCID: PMC9845964 DOI: 10.1093/conphys/coac080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2022] [Revised: 11/26/2022] [Accepted: 12/09/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
Reproductive costs represent a significant proportion of a mammalian female's energy budget. Estimates of reproductive costs are needed for understanding how alterations to energy budgets, such as those from environmental variation or human activities, impact maternal body condition, vital rates and population dynamics. Such questions are increasingly important for marine mammals, as many populations are faced with rapidly changing and increasingly disturbed environments. Here we review the different energetic costs that marine mammals incur during gestation and lactation and how those costs are typically estimated in bioenergetic models. We compiled data availability on key model parameters for each species across all six marine mammal taxonomic groups (mysticetes, odontocetes, pinnipeds, sirenians, mustelids and ursids). Pinnipeds were the best-represented group regarding data availability, including estimates of milk intake, milk composition, lactation duration, birth mass, body composition at birth and growth. There were still considerable data gaps, particularly for polar species, and good data were only available across all parameters in 45% of pinniped species. Cetaceans and sirenians were comparatively data-poor, with some species having little or no data for any parameters, particularly beaked whales. Even for species with moderate data coverage, many parameter estimates were tentative or based on indirect approaches, necessitating reevaluation of these estimates. We discuss mechanisms and factors that affect maternal energy investment or prey requirements during reproduction, such as prey supplementation by offspring, metabolic compensation, environmental conditions and maternal characteristics. Filling the existing data gaps highlighted in this review, particularly for parameters that are influential on bioenergetic model outputs, will help refine reproductive costs estimated from bioenergetic models and better address how and when energy imbalances are likely to affect marine mammal populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth A McHuron
- Corresponding author: Cooperative Institute for Climate, Ocean, and Ecosystem Studies, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98105, USA.
| | - Stephanie Adamczak
- Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Department, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, 95064, USA
| | - Daniel P Costa
- Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Department, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, 95064, USA
| | - Cormac Booth
- SMRU Consulting, Scottish Oceans Institute, St Andrews, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gailey G, Zykov M, Sychenko O, Rutenko A, Blanchard AL, Aerts L, Melton RH. Gray whale density during seismic surveys near their Sakhalin feeding ground. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT 2022; 194:739. [PMID: 36255495 PMCID: PMC9579086 DOI: 10.1007/s10661-022-10025-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2021] [Accepted: 04/04/2022] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
Oil and gas development off northeastern Sakhalin Island, Russia, has exposed the western gray whale population on their summer-fall foraging grounds to a range of anthropogenic activities, such as pile driving, dredging, pipeline installation, and seismic surveys. In 2015, the number of seismic surveys within a feeding season surpassed the level of the number and duration of previous seismic survey activities known to have occurred close to the gray whales' feeding ground, with the potential to cause disturbance to their feeding activity. To examine the extent that gray whales were potentially avoiding areas when exposed to seismic and vessel sounds, shore-based teams monitored the abundance and distribution of gray whales from 13 stations that encompassed the known nearshore feeding area. Gray whale density was examined in relation to natural (spatial, temporal, and prey energy) and anthropogenic (cumulative sound exposure from vessel and seismic sounds) explanatory variables using Generalized Additive Models (GAM). Distance from shore, water depth, date, and northing explained a significant amount of variation in gray whale densities. Prey energy from crustaceans, specifically amphipods, isopods, and cumaceans also significantly influenced gray whale densities in the nearshore feeding area. Increasing cumulative exposure to vessel and seismic sounds resulted in both a short- and longer-term decline in gray whale density in an area. This study provides further insights about western gray whale responses to anthropogenic activity in proximity to and within the nearshore feeding area. As the frequency of seismic surveys and other non-oil and gas anthropogenic activity are expected to increase off Sakhalin Island, it is critical to continue to monitor and assess potential impacts on this endangered population of gray whales.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Glenn Gailey
- Cetacean EcoSystem Research, Olympia, WA, 98512, USA.
| | - Mikhail Zykov
- JASCO Applied Sciences Ltd, Dartmouth, NS, B3B 1Z1, Canada
| | - Olga Sychenko
- Cetacean EcoSystem Research, Olympia, WA, 98512, USA
| | - Alexander Rutenko
- Far East Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, V.I. Il'ichev Pacific Oceanological Institute, Vladivostok, 690041, Russia
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gailey G, Sychenko O, Zykov M, Rutenko A, Blanchard A, Melton RH. Western gray whale behavioral response to seismic surveys during their foraging season. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT 2022; 194:740. [PMID: 36255529 PMCID: PMC9579098 DOI: 10.1007/s10661-022-10023-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2020] [Accepted: 10/08/2021] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
Gray whales utilizing their foraging grounds off northeastern Sakhalin Island, Russia, have been increasingly exposed to anthropogenic activities related to oil and gas development over the past two decades. In 2015, four seismic vessels, contracted by two operators, conducted surveys near and within the gray whale feeding grounds. Mitigation and monitoring plans were developed prior to the survey and implemented in the field, with real-time data transfers to assist the implementation of measures aimed at minimizing impacts of acoustic exposure. This study examined the behavioral response of gray whales relative to vessel proximities and sounds generated during seismic exploration. Five shore-based teams monitored gray whale behavior from 1 June to 30 September using theodolite tracking and focal follow methodologies. Behavioral data were combined with acoustic and benthic information from studies conducted during the same period. A total of 1270 tracks (mean duration = 0.9 h) and 401 focal follows (1.1 h) were collected with gray whales exposed to sounds ranging from 59 to 172 dB re 1 μPa2 SPL. Mixed models were used to examine 13 movement and 10 respiration response variables relative to "natural," acoustic, and non-acoustic explanatory variables. Water depth and behavioral state were the largest predictors of gray whale movement and respiration patterns. As vessels approached whales with increasing seismic/vessel sound exposure levels and decreasing distances, several gray whale movement and respiration response variables significantly changed (increasing speed, directionality, surface time, respiration intervals, etc.). Although the mitigation measures employed could have reduced larger/long-term responses and sensitization to the seismic activities, this study illustrates that mitigation measures did not eliminate behavioral responses, at least in the short-term, of feeding gray whales to the activities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Mikhail Zykov
- JASCO Applied Sciences (Canada) Ltd, Victoria, BC, Canada
| | - Alexander Rutenko
- V.I. Il'ichev Pacific Oceanological Institute FEB RAS, Vladivostok, Russia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Blanchard AL, Ainsworth L, Gailey G, Demchenko NL, Shcherbakov IA. Benthic studies adjacent to Sakhalin Island, Russia 2015 III: benthic energy density spatial models in the nearshore gray whale feeding area. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT 2022; 194:741. [PMID: 36255557 PMCID: PMC9579071 DOI: 10.1007/s10661-022-10018-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2020] [Accepted: 05/25/2021] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
Energy densities of six dominant benthic groups (Actinopterygii, Amphipoda, Bivalvia, Cumacea, Isopoda, and Polychaeta) and total prey energy were modeled for the nearshore western gray whale feeding area, Sakhalin Island, Russia, as part of a multi-disciplinary research program in the summer of 2015. Energy was modeled using generalized additive mixed models (GAMM) with accommodations for zero-inflation (logistic regression and hurdle models) and regression predictions combined with kriging to interpolate energy densities across the nearshore feeding area. Amphipoda energy density was the highest nearshore and in the south whereas Bivalvia energy density was the highest offshore and in the northern portion of the study area. Total energy was the highest in mid-range distances from shore and in the north. Amphipoda energy density was higher than minimum energy estimates defining gray whale feeding habitats (312-442 kJ/m2) in 13% of the nearshore feeding area whereas total prey energy density was higher than the minimum energy requirement in 49% of the habitat. Inverse distance-weighted interpolations of Amphipoda energy provided a broader scale representation of the data whereas kriging estimates were spatially limited but more representative of higher density in the southern portion of the study area. Both methods represented the general trend of higher Amphipoda energy density nearshore but with significant differences that highlight the value of using multiple methods to model patterns in highly complex environments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Glenn Gailey
- Cetacean EcoSystem Research, Lacey, WA, 98512, USA
| | - Natalia L Demchenko
- A.V. Zhirmunsky National Science Center of Marine Biology, Far East Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok, Russia
| | - Ilya A Shcherbakov
- A.V. Zhirmunsky National Science Center of Marine Biology, Far East Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Schwarz L, McHuron E, Mangel M, Gailey G, Sychenko O. Gray whale habitat use and reproductive success during seismic surveys near their feeding grounds: comparing state-dependent life history models and field data. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT 2022; 194:733. [PMID: 36255497 PMCID: PMC9579109 DOI: 10.1007/s10661-022-10024-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2021] [Accepted: 02/05/2022] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
We used a stochastic dynamic programming (SDP) model to quantify the consequences of disturbance on pregnant western gray whales during one foraging season. The SDP model has a firm basis in bioenergetics, but detailed knowledge of minimum reproductive length of females (Lmin) and the relationship between length and reproductive success (Rfit) was lacking. We varied model assumptions to determine their effects on predictions of habitat use, proportion of animals disturbed, reproductive success, and the effects of disturbance. Smaller Lmin values led to higher predicted nearshore habitat use. Changes in Lmin and Rfit had little effect on predictions of the effect of disturbance. Reproductive success increased with increased Lmin and with higher probability of reproductive success by length. Multiple seismic surveys were conducted in 2015 off the northeast coast of Sakhalin Island, with concomitant benthic prey surveys, photo-identification studies, and whale distribution sampling, thus providing a unique opportunity to compare output from SDP models with empirical observations. SDP model predictions of reproductive success and habitat use were similar with and without acoustic disturbance, and SDP predictions of reproductive success and large-scale habitat use were generally similar to values and trends in the data. However, empirical estimates of the proportion of pregnant females nearshore were much higher than SDP model predictions (a large effect, measured by Cohen's d) during the first week, and the SDP model overestimated whale density in the south and underestimated density around the mouth of Piltun Bay. Such differences in nearshore habitat use would not affect SDP predictions of reproductive success or survival under the current seismic air gun disturbance scenario.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Schwarz
- Institute of Marine Sciences, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, 95064, USA.
| | - Elizabeth McHuron
- Institute of Marine Sciences, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, 95064, USA
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, 95064, USA
- Ocean, and Ecosystem Studies, Cooperative Institute for Climate, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Marc Mangel
- Institute of Marine Sciences, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, 95064, USA
- Theoretical Ecology Group, Department of Biology, University of Bergen, 9020, Bergen, Norway
- Puget Sound Institute, University of Washington, Tacoma, WA, 98402, USA
| | - Glenn Gailey
- Cetacean EcoSystem Research, Lacey, WA, 98516, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Blanchard AL, Demchenko NL, Aerts LAM, Yazvenko SB, Ivin VV, Shcherbakov IA. Benthic studies adjacent to Sakhalin Island, Russia, 2015 I: benthic biomass and community structure in the nearshore gray whale feeding area. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT 2022; 194:743. [PMID: 36255552 PMCID: PMC9579072 DOI: 10.1007/s10661-022-10017-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2019] [Accepted: 05/17/2021] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
Okhotsk or western gray whales feed in summer along the northeastern coast of Sakhalin Island, Russia, a region with oil and gas extraction facilities. Seismic surveys increased sound levels in the nearshore feeding area in 2015 for part of the summer, potentially displacing whales from preferred foraging habitat or reducing foraging efficiency. Since lost foraging opportunities might lead to vital rate effects on this endangered species, detailed benthic surveys were conducted to characterize benthic community biomass patterns and spatial and temporal differences. Benthic biomass demonstrated strong spatial-temporal interactions indicating that prey biomass differences among locations were dependent on sampling period. Of greatest interest, Amphipoda biomass declined from June to October in the northern and southern portions of the nearshore study area but increased in the middle and Actinopterygii biomass increased in the northern area in mid-summer. Water depth and sediment type were significant covariates with community structure, and water depth strongly covaried with bivalve biomass. Total average prey biomass was ~ 100 g/m2 within the nearshore feeding area with no evidence of reduced biomass among sampling periods or locations, although there were fewer amphipods in the south. Multi-prey investigations provide a stronger basis for inferences than single-prey studies of amphipods when gray whales feed on diverse prey. Benthic community-level variability was moderate to high as would be expected for a shallow-water nearshore area. Overall, spatial and temporal changes in dominant macrofauna biomass reflected small to medium-sized effects that were well within the natural boundaries expected for benthic communities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Natalia L Demchenko
- A.V. Zhirmunsky National Science Center of Marine Biology, Far East Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok, Russia
| | | | | | - Victor V Ivin
- L.S. Berg State Research Institute On Lake and River Fisheries, Saint Petersburg, Russia
| | - Ilya A Shcherbakov
- A.V. Zhirmunsky National Science Center of Marine Biology, Far East Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
McHuron EA, Adamczak S, Arnould JPY, Ashe E, Booth C, Bowen WD, Christiansen F, Chudzinska M, Costa DP, Fahlman A, Farmer NA, Fortune SME, Gallagher CA, Keen KA, Madsen PT, McMahon CR, Nabe-Nielsen J, Noren DP, Noren SR, Pirotta E, Rosen DAS, Speakman CN, Villegas-Amtmann S, Williams R. Key questions in marine mammal bioenergetics. CONSERVATION PHYSIOLOGY 2022; 10:coac055. [PMID: 35949259 PMCID: PMC9358695 DOI: 10.1093/conphys/coac055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2022] [Revised: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 07/20/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Bioenergetic approaches are increasingly used to understand how marine mammal populations could be affected by a changing and disturbed aquatic environment. There remain considerable gaps in our knowledge of marine mammal bioenergetics, which hinder the application of bioenergetic studies to inform policy decisions. We conducted a priority-setting exercise to identify high-priority unanswered questions in marine mammal bioenergetics, with an emphasis on questions relevant to conservation and management. Electronic communication and a virtual workshop were used to solicit and collate potential research questions from the marine mammal bioenergetic community. From a final list of 39 questions, 11 were identified as 'key' questions because they received votes from at least 50% of survey participants. Key questions included those related to energy intake (prey landscapes, exposure to human activities) and expenditure (field metabolic rate, exposure to human activities, lactation, time-activity budgets), energy allocation priorities, metrics of body condition and relationships with survival and reproductive success and extrapolation of data from one species to another. Existing tools to address key questions include labelled water, animal-borne sensors, mark-resight data from long-term research programs, environmental DNA and unmanned vehicles. Further validation of existing approaches and development of new methodologies are needed to comprehensively address some key questions, particularly for cetaceans. The identification of these key questions can provide a guiding framework to set research priorities, which ultimately may yield more accurate information to inform policies and better conserve marine mammal populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth A McHuron
- Corresponding author: Cooperative Institute for Climate, Ocean, and Ecosystem Studies, University of Washington, WA, 98195, USA.
| | - Stephanie Adamczak
- Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Department, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, 95064, USA
| | - John P Y Arnould
- School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC 3125, Australia
| | - Erin Ashe
- Oceans Initiative, Seattle, WA, 98102, USA
| | - Cormac Booth
- SMRU Consulting, Scottish Oceans Institute, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews KY16 8LB, UK
| | - W Don Bowen
- Biology Department, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada
- Population Ecology Division, Bedford Institute of Oceanography, Dartmouth, NS B2Y 4A2, Canada
| | - Fredrik Christiansen
- Aarhus Institute of Advanced Studies, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
- Zoophysiology, Department of Biology, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
- Center for Sustainable Aquatic Ecosystems, Harry Butler Institute, Murdoch, Murdoch University, WA 6150, Australia
| | - Magda Chudzinska
- SMRU Consulting, Scottish Oceans Institute, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews KY16 8LB, UK
- Sea Mammal Research Unit, Scottish Oceans Institute, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews KY16 9XL, UK
| | - Daniel P Costa
- Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Department, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, 95064, USA
| | - Andreas Fahlman
- Fundación Oceanogràfic de la Comunitat Valenciana, 46005 Valencia, Spain
- Kolmården Wildlife Park, 618 92 Kolmården, Sweden
| | - Nicholas A Farmer
- NOAA/National Marine Fisheries Service, Southeast Regional Office, St. Petersburg, FL, 33701, USA
| | - Sarah M E Fortune
- Department of Oceanography, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada
| | - Cara A Gallagher
- Plant Ecology and Nature Conservation, University of Potsdam, 14476 Potsdam, Germany
| | - Kelly A Keen
- Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Department, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, 95064, USA
| | - Peter T Madsen
- Zoophysiology, Department of Biology, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
| | - Clive R McMahon
- IMOS Animal Tagging, Sydney Institute of Marine Science, Mosman, NSW 2088, Australia
| | | | - Dawn P Noren
- Conservation Biology Division, Northwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Seattle, WA, 98112, USA
| | - Shawn R Noren
- Institute of Marine Science, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, 95060, USA
| | - Enrico Pirotta
- Centre for Research into Ecological and Environmental Modelling, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews KY16 9LZ, UK
| | - David A S Rosen
- Institute for Oceans and Fisheries, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1ZA, Canada
| | - Cassie N Speakman
- School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC 3125, Australia
| | - Stella Villegas-Amtmann
- Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Department, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, 95064, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ingeman KE, Zhao LZ, Wolf C, Williams DR, Ritger AL, Ripple WJ, Kopecky KL, Dillon EM, DiFiore BP, Curtis JS, Csik SR, Bui A, Stier AC. Glimmers of hope in large carnivore recoveries. Sci Rep 2022; 12:10005. [PMID: 35864129 PMCID: PMC9304400 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-13671-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2021] [Accepted: 05/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
In the face of an accelerating extinction crisis, scientists must draw insights from successful conservation interventions to uncover promising strategies for reversing broader declines. Here, we synthesize cases of recovery from a list of 362 species of large carnivores, ecologically important species that function as terminal consumers in many ecological contexts. Large carnivores represent critical conservation targets that have experienced historical declines as a result of direct exploitation and habitat loss. We examine taxonomic and geographic variation in current extinction risk and recovery indices, identify conservation actions associated with positive outcomes, and reveal anthropogenic threats linked to ongoing declines. We find that fewer than 10% of global large carnivore populations are increasing, and only 12 species (3.3%) have experienced genuine improvement in extinction risk, mostly limited to recoveries among marine mammals. Recovery is associated with species legislation enacted at national and international levels, and with management of direct exploitation. Conversely, ongoing declines are robustly linked to threats that include habitat modification and human conflict. Applying lessons from cases of large carnivore recovery will be crucial for restoring intact ecosystems and maintaining the services they provide to humans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kurt E Ingeman
- Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, 2018 Noble Hall, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, USA. .,David H. Smith Conservation Research Program, Society for Conservation Biology, Washington, DC, USA.
| | - Lily Z Zhao
- Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, 2018 Noble Hall, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, USA
| | - Christopher Wolf
- Global Trophic Cascades Program, Forest Ecosystems and Society, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA
| | - David R Williams
- School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.,Bren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA
| | - Amelia L Ritger
- Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, 2018 Noble Hall, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, USA
| | - William J Ripple
- Global Trophic Cascades Program, Forest Ecosystems and Society, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA
| | - Kai L Kopecky
- Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, 2018 Noble Hall, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, USA
| | - Erin M Dillon
- Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, 2018 Noble Hall, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, USA
| | - Bartholomew P DiFiore
- Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, 2018 Noble Hall, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, USA
| | - Joseph S Curtis
- Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, 2018 Noble Hall, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, USA
| | - Samantha R Csik
- Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, 2018 Noble Hall, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, USA
| | - An Bui
- Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, 2018 Noble Hall, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, USA
| | - Adrian C Stier
- Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, 2018 Noble Hall, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
McHuron EA, Aerts L, Gailey G, Sychenko O, Costa DP, Mangel M, Schwarz LK. Predicting the population consequences of acoustic disturbance, with application to an endangered gray whale population. ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS : A PUBLICATION OF THE ECOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2021; 31:e02440. [PMID: 34374143 DOI: 10.1002/eap.2440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2020] [Revised: 02/05/2021] [Accepted: 03/22/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Acoustic disturbance is a growing conservation concern for wildlife populations because it can elicit physiological and behavioral responses that can have cascading impacts on population dynamics. State-dependent behavioral and life history models implemented via Stochastic Dynamic Programming (SDP) provide a natural framework for quantifying biologically meaningful population changes resulting from disturbance by linking environment, physiology, and metrics of fitness. We developed an SDP model using the endangered western gray whale (Eschrichtius robustus) as a case study because they experience acoustic disturbance on their summer foraging grounds. We modeled the behavior and physiological dynamics of pregnant females as they arrived on the feeding grounds and predicted the probability of female and offspring survival, with and without acoustic disturbance and in the presence/absence of high prey availability. Upon arrival in mid-May, pregnant females initially exhibited relatively random behavior before they transitioned to intensive feeding that resulted in continual fat mass gain until departure. This shift in behavior co-occurred with a change in spatial distribution; early in the season, whales were more equally distributed among foraging areas with moderate to high energy availability, whereas by mid-July whales transitioned to predominate use of the location that had the highest energy availability. Exclusion from energy-rich offshore areas led to reproductive failure and in extreme cases, mortality of adult females that had lasting impacts on population dynamics. Simulated disturbances in nearshore foraging areas had little to no impact on female survival or reproductive success at the population level. At the individual level, the impact of disturbance was unequally distributed across females of different lengths, both with respect to the number of times an individual was disturbed and the impact of disturbance on vital rates. Our results highlight the susceptibility of large capital breeders to reductions in prey availability, and indicate that who, where, and when individuals are disturbed are likely to be important considerations when assessing the impacts of acoustic activities. This model provides a framework to inform planned acoustic disturbances and assess the effectiveness of mitigation strategies for large capital breeders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth A McHuron
- Institute of Marine Sciences, University of California, Santa Cruz, California, 95064, USA
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, California, 95064, USA
| | | | - Glenn Gailey
- Cetacean EcoSystem Research, Lacey, Washington, 98516, USA
| | - Olga Sychenko
- Cetacean EcoSystem Research, Lacey, Washington, 98516, USA
| | - Daniel P Costa
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, California, 95064, USA
| | - Marc Mangel
- Institute of Marine Sciences, University of California, Santa Cruz, California, 95064, USA
- Theoretical Ecology Group, Department of Biology, University of Bergen, Bergen, 9020, Norway
- Puget Sound Institute, University of Washington, Tacoma, Washington, 98402, USA
| | - Lisa K Schwarz
- Institute of Marine Sciences, University of California, Santa Cruz, California, 95064, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Brüniche-Olsen A, Bickham JW, Godard-Codding CA, Brykov VA, Kellner KF, Urban J, DeWoody JA. Influence of Holocene habitat availability on Pacific gray whale ( Eschrichtius robustus) population dynamics as inferred from whole mitochondrial genome sequences and environmental niche modeling. J Mammal 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/jmammal/gyab032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Environmental changes since the Pleistocene and commercial whaling in the last few centuries have drastically reduced many whale populations, including gray whales in the North Pacific. Herein we use complete mitogenome sequences from 74 individuals to evaluate gray whale phylogeography and historical demography, then use environmental niche modeling to assess how habitat availability has changed through time for Pacific gray whales. We identify a large degree of haplotype sharing between gray whales sampled in Russian and Mexican waters, coupled with very limited matrilineal population structure. Confirming previous studies, our environmental niche models showed a decrease in available habitat during the Last Glacial Maximum, but we find no genetic signals of recent population declines in mitochondrial genomes despite both sustained habitat loss and a commercial whaling bottleneck. Our results illustrate the complex dynamics of baleen whale biogeography since the Holocene as well as the difficulty in detecting recent demographic bottlenecks from mitochondrial DNA sequences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Brüniche-Olsen
- Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
| | - John W Bickham
- Department of Ecology and Conservation Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
| | - Celine A Godard-Codding
- Institute of Environmental and Human Health, Texas Tech University (TTU) and TTU Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX, USA
| | - Vladimir A Brykov
- National Scientific Center for Marine Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Far Eastern Branch, Vladivostok, Russia
| | - Kenneth F Kellner
- Global Wildlife Conservation Center, State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, NY, USA
| | - Jorge Urban
- Departamento Academico de Ciencias Marinas y Costeras, Universidad Autonoma de Baja California Sur, Km 5.5 Carretera al Sur, Mezquitito, La Paz, BCS, Mexico
| | - J Andrew DeWoody
- Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bröker KCA, Gailey G, Tyurneva OY, Yakovlev YM, Sychenko O, Dupont JM, Vertyankin VV, Shevtsov E, Drozdov KA. Site-fidelity and spatial movements of western North Pacific gray whales on their summer range off Sakhalin, Russia. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0236649. [PMID: 32797058 PMCID: PMC7428188 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236649] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2020] [Accepted: 07/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The Western North-Pacific (WNP) gray whale feeding grounds are off the northeastern coast of Sakhalin Island, Russia and is comprised of a nearshore and offshore component that can be distinguished by both depth and location. Spatial movements of gray whales within their foraging grounds were examined based on 13 years of opportunistic vessel and shore-based photo-identification surveys. Site fidelity was assessed by examining annual return and resighting rates. Lagged Identification Rates (LIR) analyses were conducted to estimate the residency and transitional movement patterns within the two components of their feeding grounds. In total 243 individuals were identified from 2002-2014, among these were 94 calves. The annual return rate over the period 2002-2014 was 72%, excluding 35 calves only seen one year. Approximately 20% of the individuals identified from 2002-2010 were seen every year after their initial sighting (including eight individuals that returned for 13 consecutive years). The majority (239) of the WNP whales were observed in the nearshore area while only half (122) were found in the deeper offshore area. Within a foraging season, there was a significantly higher probability of gray whales moving from the nearshore to the offshore area. No mother-calf pairs, calves or yearlings were observed in the offshore area, which was increasingly used by mature animals. The annual return rates, and population growth rates that are primarily a result of calf production with little evidence of immigration, suggest that this population is demographically self-contained and that both the nearshore and offshore Sakhalin feeding grounds are critically important areas for their summer annual foraging activities. The nearshore habitat is also important for mother-calf pairs, younger individuals, and recently weaned calves. Nearshore feeding could also be energetically less costly compared to foraging in the deeper offshore habitat and provide more protection from predators, such as killer whales.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koen C. A. Bröker
- Marine Evolution and Conservation, Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
- Shell Global Solutions International B.V., the Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Glenn Gailey
- Cetacean EcoSystem Research, Washington, Olympia, United States of America
| | - Olga Yu. Tyurneva
- A.V. Zhirmunsky National Scientific Center of Marine Biology of the Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (NSCMB FEB RAS), Vladivostok, Russian Federation
| | - Yuri M. Yakovlev
- A.V. Zhirmunsky National Scientific Center of Marine Biology of the Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (NSCMB FEB RAS), Vladivostok, Russian Federation
| | - Olga Sychenko
- Cetacean EcoSystem Research, Washington, Olympia, United States of America
| | - Jennifer M. Dupont
- ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company, Houston, Texas, United States of America
| | | | - Evgeny Shevtsov
- A.V. Zhirmunsky National Scientific Center of Marine Biology of the Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (NSCMB FEB RAS), Vladivostok, Russian Federation
| | - Konstantin A. Drozdov
- G.B. Elyakov Pacific Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry of the Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (PIBOC FEB RAS), Vladivostok, Russian Federation
| |
Collapse
|