Rapid Pyrazinamide Drug Susceptibility Testing using a Closed-Tube PCR Assay of the Entire pncA gene

Recent Advances in Closed-Tube Barcoding for FastFish-ID

FastFish-ID for rapid and accurate identification of fish species was conceived at Brandeis University based on pioneering work on Closed-Tube Barcoding (Rice et al., Mitochondrial DNA Part A 27(2):1358-1363, 2016; Sirianni et al., Genome 59:1049-1061, 2016). FastFish-ID was subsequently validated and commercialized at Thermagenix, Inc. using a portable device and high-precision PCR (Naaum et al., Food Res Int 141:110035, 2021). The motivation for these efforts was the pressing need for a technology that could be widely used throughout the seafood supply chain to combat IUU Fishing (Helyar et al., PLOS ONE 9, 2014) and overfishing (FAO, State of the World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2018. http://www.fao.org/documents/card/en/c/I9540EN/ , 2018), along with seafood fraud and mislabeling (Watson et al., Fish Fish 17:585-595, 2015). These destructive practices are wasting fish stocks, frustrating attempts to achieve seafood sustainability, endangering oceanic ecosystems, and causing consumers billions of dollars each year (Porterfield et al., Oceana: February, 2022). During the past three Covid19 pandemic years, EcologeniX, LLC has taken over further development and optimization of FastFish-ID. The present chapter provides an overview of the improvements introduced throughout the FastFish-ID process.

Global status of phenotypic pyrazinamide resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Pyrazinamide (PZA) is an essential first-line tuberculosis drug for its unique mechanism of action active against multidrug-resistant-TB (MDR-TB). Thus, the aim of updated meta-analysis was to estimate the PZA weighted pooled resistance (WPR) rate in M. tuberculosis isolates based on publication date and WHO regions. We systematically searched the related reports in PubMed, Scopus, and Embase (from January 2015 to July 2022). Statistical analyses were performed using STATA software. The 115 final reports in the analysis investigated phenotypic PZA resistance data. The WPR of PZA was 57% (95% CI 48-65%) in MDR-TB cases. According to the WHO regions, the higher WPRs of PZA were reported in the Western Pacific (32%; 95% CI 18-46%), South East Asian region (37%; 95% CI 31-43%), and the Eastern Mediterranean (78%; 95% CI 54-95%) among any-TB patients, high risk of MDR-TB patients, and MDR-TB patients, respectively. A negligible increase in the rate of PZA resistance were showed in MDR-TB cases (55% to 58%). The rate of PZA resistance has been rising in recent years among MDR-TB cases, underlines the essential for both standard and novel drug regimens development.

In silico evaluation of WHO-endorsed molecular methods to detect drug resistant tuberculosis

Universal drug susceptibility testing (DST) for tuberculosis is a major goal of the END TB strategy. PCR-based molecular diagnostic tests have been instrumental in increasing DST globally and several assays have now been endorsed by the World Health Organization (WHO) for use in the diagnosis of drug resistance. These endorsed assays, however, each interrogate a limited number of mutations associated with resistance, potentially limiting their sensitivity compared to sequencing-based methods. We applied an in silico method to compare the sensitivity and specificity of WHO-endorsed molecular based diagnostics to the mutation set identified by the WHO mutations catalogue using phenotypic DST as the reference. We found that, in silico, the mutation sets used by probe-based molecular diagnostic tests to identify rifampicin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, amikacin, capreomycin and kanamycin resistance produced similar sensitivities and specificities to the WHO mutation catalogue. PCR-based diagnostic tests were most sensitive for drugs where mechanisms of resistance are well established and localised to small genetic regions or a few prevalent mutations. Approaches using sequencing technologies can provide advantages for drugs where our knowledge of resistance is limited, or where complex resistance signatures exist.

Comparative Performance of Genomic Methods for the Detection of Pyrazinamide Resistance and Heteroresistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Pyrazinamide is an important component of both drug-susceptible and drug-resistant tuberculosis treatment regimens. Although approximately 50% of rifampin-resistant isolates are also resistant to pyrazinamide, pyrazinamide susceptibility testing is not routinely performed due to the challenging nature of the assay. We investigated the diagnostic accuracy of genotypic and phenotypic methods and explored the occurrence of pyrazinamide heteroresistance. We assessed pyrazinamide susceptibility among 358 individuals enrolled in the South African EXIT-RIF cohort using Sanger and targeted deep sequencing (TDS) of the pncA gene, whole-genome sequencing (WGS), and phenotypic drug susceptibility testing. We calculated the diagnostic accuracy of the different methods and investigated the prevalence and clinical impact of pncA heteroresistance. True pyrazinamide susceptibility status was assigned to each isolate using the Köser classification and expert rules. We observed 100% agreement across genotypic methods for detection of pncA fixed mutations; only TDS confidently identified three isolates (0.8%) with minor variants. For the 355 (99.2%) isolates that could be assigned true pyrazinamide status with confidence, phenotypic DST had a sensitivity of 96.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 93.8 to 99.3%) and specificity of 100% (95% CI, 100 to 100%), both Sanger sequencing and WGS had a sensitivity of 97.1% (95% CI, 94.6 to 99.6%) and specificity of 97.8% (95% CI, 95.7 to 99.9%), and TDS had sensitivity of 98.8% (95% CI, 97.2 to 100%) and specificity of 97.8% (95% CI, 95.7 to 99.9%). We demonstrate high sensitivity and specificity for pyrazinamide susceptibility testing among all assessed genotypic methods. The prevalence of pyrazinamide heteroresistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates was lower than that identified for other first-line drugs.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Pyrazinamide Susceptibility Testing in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis

Introduction: Pyrazinamide (PZA) susceptibility testing plays a critical role in determining the appropriate treatment regimens for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of sequencing PZA susceptibility tests against culture-based susceptibility testing methods as the reference standard. Methods: We searched the MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases for the relevant records. The QUADAS-2 tool was used to assess the quality of the studies. Diagnostic accuracy measures (i.e., sensitivity and specificity) were pooled with a random-effects model. All statistical analyses were performed with Meta-DiSc (version 1.4, Cochrane Colloquium, Barcelona, Spain), STATA (version 14, Stata Corporation, College Station, TX), and RevMan (version 5.3, The Nordic Cochrane Centre, the Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen, Denmark) software. Results: A total of 72 articles, published between 2000 and 2019, comprising data for 8,701 isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis were included in the final analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of the PZA sequencing test against all reference tests (the combination of BACTEC mycobacteria growth indicator tube 960 (MGIT 960), BACTEC 460, and proportion method) were 87% (95% CI: 85-88) and 94.7% (95% CI: 94-95). The positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio, and the area under the curve estimates were found to be 12.0 (95% CI: 9.0-16.0), 0.17 (95% CI: 0.13-0.21), 106 (95% CI: 71-158), and 96%, respectively. Deek's test result indicated a low likelihood for publication bias (p = 0.01). Conclusions: Our analysis indicated that PZA sequencing may be used in combination with conventional tests due to the advantage of the time to result and in scenarios where culture tests are not feasible. Further work to improve molecular tests would benefit from the availability of standardized reference standards and improvements to the methodology.