1
|
Létang JM, Allegrini O, Testa É. Prompt-gamma track-length estimator with time tagging from proton tracking. Phys Med Biol 2024; 69:115052. [PMID: 38729180 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad4a01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2023] [Accepted: 05/10/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024]
Abstract
The design of prompt-gamma detectors necessitates numerous Monte Carlo simulations to precisely develop and optimize the detection stages in proton therapy. Alongside the advancement of MC simulations, various variance reduction methods have been explored to speed-up calculations. Among these techniques, track-length estimators are interesting scoring methods for achieving both speed and accuracy in Monte Carlo simulations of rare events. This paper introduces an extension of the GATE vpgTLE module that incorporates the prompt-gamma emission time, which is tagged from the proton tracking, enhancing its utility for studies focused on detector design and optimization that rely on time measurements. The results obtained from a clinical radiotherapy plan are presented. We demonstrate that the new vpgTLE tally with time tagging is accurate, except for certain prompt-gamma lines corresponding to long mean-life nuclei.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean M Létang
- INSA-Lyon, Universite Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS UMR5220, Inserm U1294, Centre Léon Bérard, CREATIS, F-69373 Lyon, France
| | - Oreste Allegrini
- Universite Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS/IN2P3 UMR5822, IP2I, F-69622 Villeurbanne, France
| | - Étienne Testa
- Universite Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS/IN2P3 UMR5822, IP2I, F-69622 Villeurbanne, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kasanda E, Bildstein V, Hymers D, Easter J, Richard AL, Baumann T, Spyrou A, Höhr C, Mücher D. Range verification in heavy-ion therapy using a hadron tumour marker. Phys Med Biol 2023; 68:195018. [PMID: 37747082 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/acf557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023]
Abstract
Objective.A new method to estimate the range of an ion beam in a patient during heavy-ion therapy was investigated, which was previously verified for application in proton therapy.Approach.The method consists of placing a hadron tumour marker (HTM) close to the tumour. As the treatment beam impinges on the HTM, the marker undergoes nuclear reactions. When the HTM material is carefully chosen, the activation results in the emission of several delayed, characteristicγrays, whose intensities are correlated with the remaining range inside the patient. When not just one but two reaction channels are investigated, the ratio between these twoγray emissions can be measured, and the ratio is independent of any beam delivery uncertainties.Main results.A proof-of-principle experiment with an16O ion beam and Ag foils as HTM was successfully executed. The107Ag(16O,x)112Sb and the107Ag(16O,x)114Sb reaction channels were identified as suitable for the HTM technique. When only oneγ-ray emission is measured, the resulting range-uncertainty estimation is at the 0.5 mm scale. When both channels are considered, a theoretical limit on the range uncertainty of a clinical fiducal marker was found to be ±290μm.Significance.Range uncertainty of a heavy-ion beam limits the prescribed treatment plan for cancer patients, especially the direction of the ion beam in relation to any organ at risk. An easy to implement range-verification technique which can be utilized during clinical treatment would allow treatment plans to take full advantage of the sharp fall-off of the Bragg peak without the risk of depositing excessive dose into healthy tissue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Kasanda
- Department of Physics, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Rd E, Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1, Canada
- Laboratory for High Energy Physics, Universität Bern, Sidlerstrasse 5, 3012 Bern, Switzerland
| | - V Bildstein
- Department of Physics, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Rd E, Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1, Canada
| | - D Hymers
- Department of Physics, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Rd E, Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1, Canada
- Institut für Kernphysik der Universität zu Köln, Zülpicher Strasse 77, D-50937 Köln, Germany
| | - J Easter
- Department of Physics, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Rd E, Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1, Canada
| | - A L Richard
- Facility for Rare Isotope Beams, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, United States of America
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, United States of America
| | - T Baumann
- Facility for Rare Isotope Beams, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, United States of America
| | - A Spyrou
- Facility for Rare Isotope Beams, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, United States of America
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, United States of America
| | - C Höhr
- TRIUMF, 4004 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 2A3, Canada
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria, 3800 Finnerty Road, Victoria, British Columbia, V8P 5C2, Canada
| | - D Mücher
- Department of Physics, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Rd E, Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1, Canada
- Institut für Kernphysik der Universität zu Köln, Zülpicher Strasse 77, D-50937 Köln, Germany
- TRIUMF, 4004 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 2A3, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Khezripour S, Rezaie M, Hassanpour M, Hassanpour M, Rashed Iqbal Faruque M, Uddin Khandaker M. Investigating the hard X-ray production via proton spallation on different materials to detect elements. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0288287. [PMID: 37594963 PMCID: PMC10438009 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2022] [Accepted: 06/25/2023] [Indexed: 08/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Various atomic and nuclear methods use hard (high-energy) X-rays to detect elements. The current study aims to investigate the hard X-ray production rate via high-energy proton beam irradiation of various materials. For which, appropriate conditions for producing X-rays were established. The MCNPX code, based on the Monte Carlo method, was used for simulation. Protons with energies up to 1650 MeV were irradiated on various materials such as carbon, lithium, lead, nickel, salt, and soil, where the resulting X-ray spectra were extracted. The production of X-rays in lead was observed to increase 16 times, with the gain reaching 0.18 as the proton energy increases from 100 MeV to 1650 MeV. Comparatively, salt is a good candidate among the lightweight elements to produce X-rays at a low proton energy of 30 MeV with a production gain of 0.03. Therefore, it is suggested to irradiate the NaCl target with 30 MeV proton to produce X-rays in the 0-2 MeV range.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saeedeh Khezripour
- Department of Molecular and Atomic Physics, Faculty of Modern Science and Technology, Graduate University of Advanced Technology, Kerman, Iran
| | - Mohammadreza Rezaie
- Department of Nuclear Engineering, Faculty of Modern Sciences and Technologies, Graduate University of Advanced Technology, Kerman, Iran
| | - Mehdi Hassanpour
- Space Science Centre (ANGKASA), Institute of Climate Change (IPI), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia, Malaysia
| | - Marzieh Hassanpour
- Space Science Centre (ANGKASA), Institute of Climate Change (IPI), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia, Malaysia
| | - Mohammad Rashed Iqbal Faruque
- Space Science Centre (ANGKASA), Institute of Climate Change (IPI), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia, Malaysia
| | - Mayeen Uddin Khandaker
- Centre for Applied Physics and Radiation Technologies, School of Engineering and Technology, Sunway University, Selangor, Malaysia
- Department of General Educational Development, Faculty of Science and Information Technology, Daffodil International University, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mairani A, Mein S, Blakely E, Debus J, Durante M, Ferrari A, Fuchs H, Georg D, Grosshans DR, Guan F, Haberer T, Harrabi S, Horst F, Inaniwa T, Karger CP, Mohan R, Paganetti H, Parodi K, Sala P, Schuy C, Tessonnier T, Titt U, Weber U. Roadmap: helium ion therapy. Phys Med Biol 2022; 67. [PMID: 35395649 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac65d3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2021] [Accepted: 04/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Helium ion beam therapy for the treatment of cancer was one of several developed and studied particle treatments in the 1950s, leading to clinical trials beginning in 1975 at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. The trial shutdown was followed by decades of research and clinical silence on the topic while proton and carbon ion therapy made debuts at research facilities and academic hospitals worldwide. The lack of progression in understanding the principle facets of helium ion beam therapy in terms of physics, biological and clinical findings persists today, mainly attributable to its highly limited availability. Despite this major setback, there is an increasing focus on evaluating and establishing clinical and research programs using helium ion beams, with both therapy and imaging initiatives to supplement the clinical palette of radiotherapy in the treatment of aggressive disease and sensitive clinical cases. Moreover, due its intermediate physical and radio-biological properties between proton and carbon ion beams, helium ions may provide a streamlined economic steppingstone towards an era of widespread use of different particle species in light and heavy ion therapy. With respect to the clinical proton beams, helium ions exhibit superior physical properties such as reduced lateral scattering and range straggling with higher relative biological effectiveness (RBE) and dose-weighted linear energy transfer (LETd) ranging from ∼4 keVμm-1to ∼40 keVμm-1. In the frame of heavy ion therapy using carbon, oxygen or neon ions, where LETdincreases beyond 100 keVμm-1, helium ions exhibit similar physical attributes such as a sharp lateral penumbra, however, with reduced radio-biological uncertainties and without potentially spoiling dose distributions due to excess fragmentation of heavier ion beams, particularly for higher penetration depths. This roadmap presents an overview of the current state-of-the-art and future directions of helium ion therapy: understanding physics and improving modeling, understanding biology and improving modeling, imaging techniques using helium ions and refining and establishing clinical approaches and aims from learned experience with protons. These topics are organized and presented into three main sections, outlining current and future tasks in establishing clinical and research programs using helium ion beams-A. Physics B. Biological and C. Clinical Perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Mairani
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Centre of Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Medical Physics, Pavia, Italy.,Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stewart Mein
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eleanor Blakely
- Biological Systems and Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, United States of America
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg University and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marco Durante
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, D-64291 Darmstadt, Germany.,Technische Universität Darmstadt, Institut für Physik Kondensierter Materie, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Alfredo Ferrari
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hermann Fuchs
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.,MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | - Dietmar Georg
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.,MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | - David R Grosshans
- The University of Texas MD Anderson cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America
| | - Fada Guan
- The University of Texas MD Anderson cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America.,Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 06510, United States of America
| | - Thomas Haberer
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Semi Harrabi
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg University and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Felix Horst
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, D-64291 Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Taku Inaniwa
- Department of Accelerator and Medical Physics, Institute for Quantum Medical Science, QST, 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba 263-8555, Japan.,Medical Physics Laboratory, Division of Health Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 1-7 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
| | - Christian P Karger
- National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Radhe Mohan
- The University of Texas MD Anderson cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America
| | - Harald Paganetti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, United States of America.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States of America
| | - Katia Parodi
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Department of Experimental Physics-Medical Physics, Munich, Germany
| | - Paola Sala
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Department of Experimental Physics-Medical Physics, Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph Schuy
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, D-64291 Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Thomas Tessonnier
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Uwe Titt
- The University of Texas MD Anderson cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America
| | - Ulrich Weber
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, D-64291 Darmstadt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hymers D, Kasanda E, Bildstein V, Easter J, Richard A, Spyrou A, Höhr C, Mücher D. Intra- and inter-fraction relative range verification in heavy-ion therapy using filtered interaction vertex imaging. Phys Med Biol 2021; 66. [PMID: 34794127 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac3b33] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2021] [Accepted: 11/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
Heavy-ion therapy, particularly using scanned (active) beam delivery, provides a precise and highly conformal dose distribution, with maximum dose deposition for each pencil beam at its endpoint (Bragg peak), and low entrance and exit dose. To take full advantage of this precision, robust range verification methods are required; these methods ensure that the Bragg peak is positioned correctly in the patient and the dose is delivered as prescribed. Relative range verification allows intra-fraction monitoring of Bragg peak spacing to ensure full coverage with each fraction, as well as inter-fraction monitoring to ensure all fractions are delivered consistently. To validate the proposed filtered interaction vertex imaging (IVI) method for relative range verification, a16O beam was used to deliver 12 Bragg peak positions in a 40 mm poly-(methyl methacrylate) phantom. Secondary particles produced in the phantom were monitored using position-sensitive silicon detectors. Events recorded on these detectors, along with a measurement of the treatment beam axis, were used to reconstruct the sites of origin of these secondary particles in the phantom. The distal edge of the depth distribution of these reconstructed points was determined with logistic fits, and the translation in depth required to minimize theχ2statistic between these fits was used to compute the range shift between any two Bragg peak positions. In all cases, the range shift was determined with sub-millimeter precision, to a standard deviation of the mean of 220(10)μm. This result validates filtered IVI as a reliable relative range verification method, which should be capable of monitoring each energy step in each fraction of a scanned heavy-ion treatment plan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Devin Hymers
- Department of Physics, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada
| | - Eva Kasanda
- Department of Physics, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada
| | | | - Joelle Easter
- Department of Physics, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada
| | - Andrea Richard
- National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States of America.,Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, United States of America
| | - Artemis Spyrou
- National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States of America
| | | | - Dennis Mücher
- Department of Physics, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.,TRIUMF, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Freitas H, Magalhaes Martins P, Tessonnier T, Ackermann B, Brons S, Seco J. Dataset for predicting single-spot proton ranges in proton therapy of prostate cancer. Sci Data 2021; 8:252. [PMID: 34588458 PMCID: PMC8481263 DOI: 10.1038/s41597-021-01028-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2020] [Accepted: 08/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
The number of radiotherapy patients treated with protons has increased from less than 60,000 in 2007 to more than 220,000 in 2019. However, the considerable uncertainty in the positioning of the Bragg peak deeper in the patient raised new challenges in the proton therapy of prostate cancer (PCPT). Here, we describe and share a dataset where 43 single-spot anterior beams with defined proton energies were delivered to a prostate phantom with an inserted endorectal balloon (ERB) filled either with water only or with a silicon-water mixture. The nuclear reactions between the protons and the silicon yield a distinct prompt gamma energy line of 1.78 MeV. Such energy peak could be identified by means of prompt gamma spectroscopy (PGS) for the protons hitting the ERB with a three-sigma threshold. The application of a background-suppression technique showed an increased rejection capability for protons hitting the prostate and the ERB with water only. We describe each dataset, document the full processing chain, and provide the scripts for the statistical analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hugo Freitas
- German Cancer Research Center - DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany
- Departamento de Física e Astronomia, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Paulo Magalhaes Martins
- German Cancer Research Center - DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany.
- Instituto de Biofísica e Engenharia Biomédica, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
| | - Thomas Tessonnier
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Benjamin Ackermann
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stephan Brons
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Joao Seco
- German Cancer Research Center - DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany.
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Magalhaes Martins P, Freitas H, Tessonnier T, Ackermann B, Brons S, Seco J. Towards real-time PGS range monitoring in proton therapy of prostate cancer. Sci Rep 2021; 11:15331. [PMID: 34321492 PMCID: PMC8319377 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-93612-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2020] [Accepted: 06/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Proton therapy of prostate cancer (PCPT) was linked with increased levels of gastrointestinal toxicity in its early use compared to intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). The higher radiation dose to the rectum by proton beams is mainly due to anatomical variations. Here, we demonstrate an approach to monitor rectal radiation exposure in PCPT based on prompt gamma spectroscopy (PGS). Endorectal balloons (ERBs) are used to stabilize prostate movement during radiotherapy. These ERBs are usually filled with water. However, other water solutions containing elements with higher atomic numbers, such as silicon, may enable the use of PGS to monitor the radiation exposure of the rectum. Protons hitting silicon atoms emit prompt gamma rays with a specific energy of 1.78 MeV, which can be used to monitor whether the ERB is being hit. In a binary approach, we search the silicon energy peaks for every irradiated prostate region. We demonstrate this technique for both single-spot irradiation and real treatment plans. Real-time feedback based on the ERB being hit column-wise is feasible and would allow clinicians to decide whether to adapt or continue treatment. This technique may be extended to other cancer types and organs at risk, such as the oesophagus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paulo Magalhaes Martins
- German Cancer Research Center - DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany.
- Instituto de Biofísica e Engenharia Biomédica, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
| | - Hugo Freitas
- German Cancer Research Center - DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany
- Departamento de Física e Astronomia, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Thomas Tessonnier
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Benjamin Ackermann
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stephan Brons
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Joao Seco
- German Cancer Research Center - DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany.
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Paganetti H, Beltran C, Both S, Dong L, Flanz J, Furutani K, Grassberger C, Grosshans DR, Knopf AC, Langendijk JA, Nystrom H, Parodi K, Raaymakers BW, Richter C, Sawakuchi GO, Schippers M, Shaitelman SF, Teo BKK, Unkelbach J, Wohlfahrt P, Lomax T. Roadmap: proton therapy physics and biology. Phys Med Biol 2021; 66. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/abcd16] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2020] [Accepted: 11/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
9
|
Kasanda E, Burbadge C, Bildstein V, Turko J, Spyrou A, Höhr C, Mücher D. GEANT4 simulation of a range verification method using delayed γ spectroscopy of a 92Mo marker. Phys Med Biol 2020; 65:245047. [PMID: 33331299 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/abbd15] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
In this work, we propose a novel technique for in-vivo proton therapy range verification. This technique makes use of a molybdenum hadron tumour marker, implanted at a short distance from the clinical treatment volume. Signals emitted from the marker during treatment can provide a direct measurement of the proton beam energy at the marker's position. Fusion-evaporation reactions between the proton beam and marker nucleus result in the emission of delayed characteristic γ rays, which are detected off-beam for an improved signal-to-noise ratio. In order to determine the viability of this technique and to establish an experimental setup for future work, the Monte Carlo package GEANT4 was used in combination with ROOT to simulate a treatment scenario with the new method outlined in this work. These simulations show that the intensity of delayed γ rays produced from competing reactions yields a precise measurement of the range of the proton beam relative to the marker, with sub-millimetre uncertainty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Kasanda
- Department of Physics, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Rd E, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|