Hyperreflective Walls in Foveal Cystoid Spaces as a Biomarker of Diabetic Macular Edema Refractory to Anti-VEGF Treatment

Ultrastructural imaging biomarkers in diabetic macular edema: A major review

Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a vision-threatening complication of diabetic retinopathy and causes significant morbidity in patients. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents are the mainstay of treatment for DME, with steroid implants being used for the treatment of anti-VEGF resistant eyes. Over the years, several classification systems have been devised to describe the patterns of DME using optical coherence tomography (OCT). With the advent of effective treatments, it has become imperative that imaging cues are not merely used for classifying the disease but also as biomarkers for prognostication of disease activity and treatment response. In this aspect, newer imaging findings such as hyperreflective dots, photoreceptor integrity, and disorganization of retinal inner layers have been characterized in detail by several authors. Macular perfusion analysis using OCT angiography is the latest in the armamentarium for imaging DME. In this narrative review, we have summarized all relevant literature related to the ultrastructural imaging-based biomarkers of DME and their correlation to treatment.

Role of Systemic Factors in Improving the Prognosis of Diabetic Retinal Disease and Predicting Response to Diabetic Retinopathy Treatment

Topic

To review clinical evidence on systemic factors that might be relevant to update diabetic retinal disease (DRD) staging systems, including prediction of DRD onset, progression, and response to treatment.

Clinical relevance

Systemic factors may improve new staging systems for DRD to better assess risk of disease worsening and predict response to therapy.

Methods

The Systemic Health Working Group of the Mary Tyler Moore Vision Initiative reviewed systemic factors individually and in multivariate models for prediction of DRD onset or progression (i.e., prognosis) or response to treatments (prediction).

Results

There was consistent evidence for associations of longer diabetes duration, higher glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), and male sex with DRD onset and progression. There is strong trial evidence for the effect of reducing HbA1c and reducing DRD progression. There is strong evidence that higher blood pressure (BP) is a risk factor for DRD incidence and for progression. Pregnancy has been consistently reported to be associated with worsening of DRD but recent studies reflecting modern care standards are lacking. In studies examining multivariate prognostic models of DRD onset, HbA1c and diabetes duration were consistently retained as significant predictors of DRD onset. There was evidence of associations of BP and sex with DRD onset. In multivariate prognostic models examining DRD progression, retinal measures were consistently found to be a significant predictor of DRD with little evidence of any useful marginal increment in prognostic information with the inclusion of systemic risk factor data apart from retinal image data in multivariate models. For predicting the impact of treatment, although there are small studies that quantify prognostic information based on imaging data alone or systemic factors alone, there are currently no large studies that quantify marginal prognostic information within a multivariate model, including both imaging and systemic factors.

Conclusion

With standard imaging techniques and ways of processing images rapidly evolving, an international network of centers is needed to routinely capture systemic health factors simultaneously to retinal images so that gains in prediction increment may be precisely quantified to determine the usefulness of various health factors in the prognosis of DRD and prediction of response to treatment.

Financial Disclosures

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Switching to an Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant after Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Therapy for Diabetic Macular Edema: A Review

Among working-age people, diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema are currently considered the main causes of blindness. Nowadays, intravitreal injections are widely acknowledged as a significant milestone in ophthalmology, especially for the treatment of several retinal diseases, including diabetic macular edema. In particular, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents are typically the first line of treatment; however, monthly injections are required, at least, during the loading dosage. Notably, an intravitreal 0.7 mg dexamethasone (DEX) implant (Ozurdex®, AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL, USA) is considered a legitimate substitute treatment for diabetic eyes that have not responded to anti-VEGF treatment. In fact, clinical trials and real-life studies have demonstrated the effectiveness and safety of an intravitreal DEX implant in treating such conditions over a period of three to six months. For this reason, wisely selecting diabetic patients might be crucial to decreasing the load of injections in clinics and hospitals. The purpose of this review is to analyze the available scientific literature to highlight the benefits, efficacy, and clinical criteria for choosing whether to switch from intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy to an intravitreal DEX implant in diabetic macular edema.

The Treatment of Diabetic Retinal Edema with Intravitreal Steroids: How and When

Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a common complication of diabetes mellitus and a leading cause of visual impairment worldwide. It is defined as the diabetes-related accumulation of fluid, proteins, and lipids, with retinal thickening, within the macular area. DME affects a significant proportion of individuals with diabetes, with the prevalence increasing with disease duration and severity. It is estimated that approximately 25-30% of diabetic patients will develop DME during their lifetime. Poor glycemic control, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes duration, and genetic predisposition are recognized as risk factors for the development and progression of DME. Although the exact pathophysiology is still not completely understood, it has been demonstrated that chronic hyperglycemia triggers a cascade of biochemical processes, including increased oxidative stress, inflammation, activation of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), cellular dysfunction, and apoptosis, with breakdown of the blood-retinal barriers and fluid accumulation within the macular area. Early diagnosis and appropriate management of DME are crucial for improving visual outcomes. Although the control of systemic risk factors still remains the most important strategy in DME treatment, intravitreal pharmacotherapy with anti-VEGF molecules or steroids is currently considered the first-line approach in DME patients, whereas macular laser photocoagulation and pars plana vitrectomy may be useful in selected cases. Available intravitreal steroids, including triamcinolone acetonide injections and dexamethasone and fluocinolone acetonide implants, exert their therapeutic effect by reducing inflammation, inhibiting VEGF expression, stabilizing the blood-retinal barrier and thus reducing vascular permeability. They have been demonstrated to be effective in reducing macular edema and improving visual outcomes in DME patients but are associated with a high risk of intraocular pressure elevation and cataract development, so their use requires an accurate patient selection. This manuscript aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the pathology, epidemiology, risk factors, physiopathology, clinical features, treatment mechanisms of actions, treatment options, prognosis, and ongoing clinical studies related to the treatment of DME, with particular consideration of intravitreal steroids therapy.

Association of OCT biomarkers and visual impairment in patients with diabetic macular oedema with vitreomacular adhesion

BACKGROUND

To analyse the distribution of spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) biomarkers in different types of vitreomacular adhesion (VMA) associated visual impairment in diabetic macular oedema.

METHODS

A total of 317 eyes of 202 patients were enrolled. Cases were divided into two groups focal VMA and broad VMA and subjects with no VMA were enrolled as controls. A grading platform was used for evaluating the morphology of diabetic macular oedema (DME), using good-quality SD-OCT images. Grading was done for VMA and the biomarkers. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT) and central subfield thickness (CSFT) was also recorded.

RESULTS

The CRT (p = <0.001) and CSFT (p = <0.001) values were statistically significant between the groups. Except for Inner Nuclear Layer Cysts (p = <0.001), absence of Bridging Tissue that is composed of muller cell fibers and bipolar cells (p<0.001), and Hyper Reflective Dots (HRD) in cyst (p = 0.006) there were no significant differences in the distribution of OCT biomarkers among the 3 groups (focal VMA, broad VMA and no VMA). Only Disorganization of Retinal Inner Layers (DRIL) (p = 0.044) showed significant association with vision impairment in all the 3 groups.

CONCLUSION

The distribution of OCT biomarkers was similar across all eyes of cases and controls. However, they were more likely to be associated with visual impairment in the presence of VMA than no VMA.

Pathological Neurovascular Unit Mapping onto Multimodal Imaging in Diabetic Macular Edema

Diabetic retinopathy is a form of diabetic microangiopathy, and vascular hyperpermeability in the macula leads to retinal thickening and concomitant reduction of visual acuity in diabetic macular edema (DME). In this review, we discuss multimodal fundus imaging, comparing the pathogenesis and interventions. Clinicians diagnose DME using two major criteria, clinically significant macular edema by fundus examination and center-involving diabetic macular edema using optical coherence tomography (OCT), to determine the appropriate treatment. In addition to fundus photography, fluorescein angiography (FA) is a classical modality to evaluate morphological and functional changes in retinal capillaries, e.g., microaneurysms, capillary nonperfusion, and fluorescein leakage. Recently, optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) has allowed us to evaluate the three-dimensional structure of the retinal vasculature and newly demonstrated that lamellar capillary nonperfusion in the deep layer is associated with retinal edema. The clinical application of OCT has accelerated our understanding of various neuronal damages in DME. Retinal thickness measured by OCT enables us to quantitatively assess therapeutic effects. Sectional OCT images depict the deformation of neural tissues, e.g., cystoid macular edema, serous retinal detachment, and sponge-like retinal swelling. The disorganization of retinal inner layers (DRIL) and foveal photoreceptor damage, biomarkers of neurodegeneration, are associated with visual impairment. Fundus autofluorescence derives from the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and its qualitative and quantitative changes suggest that the RPE damage contributes to the neuronal changes in DME. These clinical findings on multimodal imaging help to elucidate the pathology in the neurovascular units and lead to the next generation of clinical and translational research in DME.

Persistent diabetic macular edema: Definition, incidence, biomarkers, and treatment methods

Intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatment has drastically improved the visual and anatomical outcomes in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME); however, success is not always guaranteed, and a proportion of these eyes demonstrate persistent DME (pDME) despite intensive treatment. While standardized criteria to define these treatment-resistant eyes have not yet been established, many studies refer to eyes with no clinical response or an unsatisfactory partial response as having pDME. A patient is considered to have pDME if the retinal thickness improves less than 10-25% after 6 months of treatment. A range of treatment options have been recommended for eyes with pDME, including switching anti-VEGF agents, using corticosteroids and/or antioxidant drugs in adjunct with anti-VEGF therapy, and vitrectomy. In addition, multimodal imaging of DME eyes may be advantageous in predicting the responsiveness to treatment; this is beneficial when initiating alternative therapies. We explore the literature on persistent DME regarding its defining criteria, incidence, the baseline biological markers that may be useful in anticipating the response to treatment, and the available treatment options.

Short-term outcomes in patients with center-involving diabetic macular edema after a single dose of intravitreal bevacizumab

Background

A significant portion of diabetic macular edema (DME) is refractory to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents. This study investigates morphological and functional outcomes to a single intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) injection in patients with center-involving DME (ciDME) at 4–6 weeks and compares treatment responders and non-responders based on spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) features.

Methods

IRB approved observational, retrospective chart review of patients with ciDME, identified by ICD-10 code, who received IVB and underwent baseline and 4–6 weeks follow-up SD-OCT imaging between January 1, 2016 and January 19, 2021. Patients who had received previous treatment with anti-VEGF or intraocular steroids within 1 year were excluded. Variables included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central subfield thickness (CST) and total macular volume (TMV). Eyes were classified as responders if CST reduction was greater than 10%. OCT scans were graded qualitatively by two masked graders using Imagivault software. Paired Student’s t-tests, Wilcoxon signed rank tests and Chi-Square tests were used for analysis.

Results

A total of 334 prospective subjects were identified, and after applying exclusion criteria 52 eyes from 46 patients (mean age 64.22 ± 8.12 years, 58.7% male) were included. Mean BCVA did not significantly change with treatment, 63.9 ETDRS letters (~ 20/50) at baseline and 65.9 ETDRS letters (~ 20/50) post-treatment (p = 0.07). Mean CST decreased from 466 ± 123 μm at baseline to 402 ± 86 μm post-treatment (p < 0.001). 22 (42.3%) of eyes were categorized as responders and 30 (57.7%) as non-responders. Average change in CST from baseline in responders was -164 μm (p < 0.001) and + 9 μm in non-responders (p = 0.47). Vitreomacular adhesion (VMA) was more prevalent in non-responders (28.7% vs. 4.8%, p = 0.03). In addition, cyst location in the inner nuclear layer (INL) was present more frequently in responders (95.5% vs. 73.3%, p = 0.037) as was subretinal fluid (45.5% vs. 13.3%, p = 0.01).

Conclusion

The short-term response to a single IVB was sub-optimal with structural but no functional improvements. Greater baseline CST, presence of INL cysts and subretinal fluid may represent factors indicative of a better treatment response.

Real-World Evidence in the Management of Diabetic Macular Edema with Intravitreal Anti-VEGFs in Asia: A Systematic Literature Review

Purpose

To evaluate the visual outcomes and safety profile of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy in the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME) in real-world studies in Asian countries.

Methods

A systematic review of electronic literature databases (Embase, Medline, and the Cochrane Library from January 1, 2010, to March 16, 2021) was conducted to identify observational studies that reported clinical and safety outcomes of anti-VEGF treatments for DME in Asia. We analyzed baseline patient characteristics, treatment patterns, mean number of injections, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), retinal thickness, and safety outcomes.

Results

Seventy-one studies were included in this review. Most studies reported treatment of DME with ranibizumab (n = 33), followed by aflibercept (n = 13), bevacizumab (n = 28), and conbercept (n = 9). At 12 months, the cumulative mean number of injections for ranibizumab, aflibercept, and conbercept was 5.2, 4.6, and 6, respectively. At the 12-month follow-up, the cumulative mean BCVA gain was 6.8 letters (ranibizumab), 4.6 letters (aflibercept), 4.9 letters (bevacizumab), and 8.3 letters (conbercept). The cumulative mean reduction in retinal thickness at 12 months was 116.9 μm (ranibizumab), 105.9 μm (aflibercept), 81.7 μm (bevacizumab), and 135.2 μm (conbercept). A strong positive correlation (r = 0.78) was observed between mean number of injections and change in BCVA at 12 months. A moderate positive correlation (r = 0.54) was observed between mean number of injections and mean reduction in retinal thickness at 12 months. A weak positive correlation was observed between baseline retinal thickness and visual acuity at 12 months. Baseline BCVA and mean number of injections were predictors of BCVA at 12 months.

Conclusion

All anti-VEGFs were effective in the treatment of DME in Asia. The data suggest that a greater number of anti-VEGF injections was associated with better improvement in BCVA and moderate reduction in retinal thickness at the 1-year follow-up.

The Role of Intravitreal Corticosteroids in the Treatment of DME: Predictive OCT Biomarkers

This work aims to summarize predictive biomarkers to guide treatment choice in DME. Intravitreal anti-VEGF is considered the gold standard treatment for centers involving DME, while intravitreal steroid treatment has been established as a second-line treatment in DME. However, more than 1/3 of the patients do not adequately respond to anti-VEGF treatment despite up to 4-weekly injections. Not surprisingly, insufficient response to anti-VEGF therapy has been linked to low-normal VEGF levels in the serum and aqueous humor. These patients may well benefit from an early switch to intravitreal steroid treatment. In these patients, morphological biomarkers visible in OCT may predict treatment response and guide treatment decisions. Namely, the presence of a large amount of retinal and choroidal hyperreflective foci, disruption of the outer retinal layers and other signs of chronicity such as intraretinal cysts extending into the outer retina and a lower choroidal vascular index are all signs suggestive of a favorable treatment response of steroids compared to anti-VEGF. This paper summarizes predictive biomarkers in DME in order to assist individual treatment decisions in DME. These markers will help to identify DME patients who may benefit from primary dexamethasone treatment or an early switch.

Factors predicting the treatment frequency of ranibizumab injections during the second year in diabetic macular edema

PURPOSE

To investigate the predictors of annual treatment frequency in the second year of pro re nata (PRN) intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) injections for diabetic macular edema (DME).

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study.

METHODS

We reviewed 65 eyes of 60 patients with center-involved DME who received PRN IVR injections after 3 monthly loading doses. The central subfield thickness (CST) and qualitative findings were assessed on the spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) images. We then investigated whether the parameters at the baseline or at the 12-month visit were associated with treatment frequency in the second year.

RESULTS

The number of ranibizumab injections decreased from 6 (4-8) during the first year to 2 (0-3) during the second year (P < .001). The injection numbers during the first year (ρ = 0.259, P = .037) but not during the second year (ρ = 0.152, P = .226) were modestly related to the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) improvement at 24 months. Multivariate analyses revealed that the CST (β = 0.336, P = .005) and hyperreflective walls in the foveal cystoid spaces (β = 0.273, P = .020) at baseline were associated with the number of IVR injections during the second year. The treatment frequency during the second year was also related to the CST (β = 0.266, P = .012), hyperreflective walls (β = 0.394, P = .002), and cumulative doses of ranibizumab injections (β = 0.294, P = .006) at the 12-month visit.

CONCLUSIONS

The cumulative doses of ranibizumab injections, CST, and hyperreflective walls in the foveal cystoid spaces at the 12-month visit are designated predictors of the treatment frequency of ranibizumab injections during the second year in DME.

Monoclonal antibodies in diabetic retinopathy

INTRODUCTION

Diabetic retinopathy (DR), as one of the main complications of diabetes, is among the leading causes of blindness and visual impairment worldwide.

AREAS COVERED

Current clinical therapies include photocoagulation, vitrectomy, and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapies. Bevacizumab and ranibizumab are two monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) inhibiting angiogenesis. Intravitreal ranibizumab and bevacizumab can decrease the rate of blindness and retinal thickness, and improve visual acuity whether as monotherapy or combined with other treatments. They can increase the efficacy of other treatments and decrease their adverse events. Although administered intravitreally, they also might enter the circulation and cause systemic effects. This study is aimed to review our current knowledge about mAbs, bevacizumab and ranibizumab, in DR including superiorities, challenges, and limitations. Meanwhile, we tried to shed light on new ideas to overcome these limitations. Our latest search was done in April 2021 mainly through PubMed and Google Scholar. Relevant clinical studies were imported.

EXPERT OPINION

Future direction includes detection of more therapeutic targets considering other components of DR pathophysiology and shared pathogenesis of DR and neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson's disease and Alzheimer's disease, the treat-and-extend regimen, and new ways of drug delivery and other routes of ocular drug administration.

Intravitreal Tissue Plasminogen Activator Injection for Treatment-Resistant Diabetic Macular Edema of the Vitrectomized Eye

Diabetic macular edema (DME) is the main cause of visual loss in patients with diabetic retinopathy. DME has been treated using intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drugs, steroids, laser photocoagulation, vitreoretinal surgery, and their combinations. These modalities are generally effective in preserving vision, but they sometimes produce only limited responses in patients with persistent or refractory DME. The levels of various inflammatory factors, including cytokines, chemokines, and extracellular matrices, as well as VEGF in the vitreous fluid, are increased in patients with DME. Excessive fibrinogen/fibrin levels in the vitreous fluid or fibrin deposition in the retina also contribute to DME pathogenesis. Tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) promotes the degradation of fibrinogen or fibrin. Intravitreal t-PA injection is a commonly used treatment for subretinal hemorrhage secondary to age-related macular degeneration. Intravitreal t-PA injections have previously been used to restore vision by inducing posterior vitreous detachment in patients with DME. Herein, we describe the visual outcomes of intravitreal t-PA injection in a 78-year-old woman with treatment-resistant DME in her vitrectomized eye after several previous treatments. Before the injection, her best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 0.7 logMAR and central foveal retinal thickness (CRT) was 735 μm. At 1 month after the injection, her BCVA was 0.8 logMAR and CRT was 558 μm, and 3 months later, her BCVA was 0.8 logMAR and CRT was 207 μm. Her BCVA was sustained, and CRT showed gradual improvements. These findings suggested the effectiveness of intravitreal t-PA injections for DME in the vitrectomized eye.

Behavior of hyperreflective spots noted on optical coherence tomography following intravitreal therapy in diabetic macular edema: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose:

Hyperreflective spots (HRS) are considered as spectral domain optical coherence tomography biomarkers in predicting response to intravitreal therapy (IVT) in diabetic macular edema (DME). We aimed to determine if there was a quantitative reduction in HRS following IVT in DME, if the response to antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) drugs was different from steroids, and if HRS-response was associated with improvement in visual acuity (VA) or reduction in central macular thickness (CMT).

Methods:

PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, ProQuest, CINAHL, Wiley online, and Web of Science were searched (between January 1, 2011 and July 1, 2020). Publication bias and heterogeneity were assessed. Meta-analysis was done using the random-effects model.

Results:

Totally, 1168 eyes from 19 studies were eligible for inclusion. IVT was associated with a reduction in quantitative HRS (z = -6.3, P < 0.0001). Studies, however, showed heterogeneity (I² = 93.2%). There was no difference between anti-VEGF and steroid therapies (P = 0.23). The evidence on predicting VA and CMT outcomes were limited by the number of analyzable studies, owing to the wide variation in individual study designs, and lack of randomized controlled trials.

Conclusion:

We could conclude that there is a definite reduction in quantitative HRS following either form of IVT. We highlight the lacunae in the existing literature on HRS in DME and propose goals for future studies to harness the advantage of this promising biomarker.

Indicators of Visual Prognosis in Diabetic Macular Oedema

Diabetic macular oedema (DMO) is an important cause of moderate vision loss in people with diabetes. Advances in imaging technology have shown that a significant proportion of patients with DMO respond sub-optimally to existing treatment options. Identifying associations and predictors of response before treatment is initiated may help in explaining visual prognosis to patients and aid the development of personalized treatment strategies. Imaging features, such as central subfoveal thickness, photoreceptor integrity, disorganization of retinal inner layers, choroidal changes, and macular perfusion, have been reported to be prognostic factors of visual acuity (VA) in DMO. In this review we evaluated each risk factor to understand their relative importance in visual prognostication of DMO eyes post-treatment. Although individually, some of these factors may not be significant predictors, in combination they may form phenotypes that can inform visual prognosis. Stratification based on these phenotypes needs to be developed to progress to personalized medicine for DMO.

Hyperreflective cystoid spaces in diabetic macular oedema: prevalence and clinical implications

AIMS

To analyse the prevalence and evolution of hyper-reflective cystoid spaces with decorrelation signal detected using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) in diabetic macular oedema (DMO).

METHODS

A retrospective study of consecutive eyes with DMO imaged using OCTA over a 1-year period was conducted. All eyes with hyper-reflective cystoid spaces at baseline and at least 3 months of follow-up were included in a longitudinal analysis.

RESULTS

The prevalence of hyperreflective cystoid spaces with decorrelation signal was of 37% (61/165) in DMO eyes. Hyperreflective foci within hyperreflective cystoid spaces were observed in 85% of eyes. The longitudinal study included 33 eyes (10 observed and 23 treated with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor), with a median follow-up of 15 months. The hyperreflective cystoid spaces resolved in 85% of eyes. The mean best-corrected visual acuity remained stable during the follow-up, even in the eyes achieving a resolution of the hyperreflective cystoid spaces. Hard exudates appeared in the area of resolved hyperreflective cystoid spaces in 33% of eyes.

CONCLUSION

Hyperreflective cystoid spaces detected by OCTA affected more than one-third of the DMO eyes. Their disappearance was not associated with any functional improvement and led to the formation of new hard exudate deposits in about one-third of the eyes.