1
|
Rivas D, de la Torre-Luque A, Moreno-Olmedo E, Moreno P, Suárez V, Serradilla A, Arregui G, Álvarez D, Sallabanda M, Lazo A, Núñez MI, López E. Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy: is less fractionation more effective in adrenal and renal malignant lesions? World J Urol 2024; 42:435. [PMID: 39046532 PMCID: PMC11269452 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-05140-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2024] [Indexed: 07/25/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has become an excellent non-invasive alternative for many patients with primary renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and adrenal malignancies (AM). The aims of this study were to analyse how tumor-, patient- and treatment-related factors may influence the outcomes and side effects of SBRT and to assess its benefits as an alternative to surgery. METHODS This retrospective, multicenter study included 25 lesions in 23 patients treated with SBRT using different devices (LINAC, CyberKnife® and Tomotherapy®). A multivariate linear regression was used for the statistical study. RESULTS Local control time was higher than six months in more than 87% of patients and treatment response was complete for 73.68%. There was an overall 2-year survival of 40% and none of the deaths were secondary to renal or adrenal local progression. Patients treated with lower total radiation dose (mean [m] = 55 Gy) but less fractions with more dose per fraction (> 8.5 Gy) showed better outcome. Patients with previous chemotherapy and surgery treatments also showed higher complete response and disease-free survival (> 6 months). CONCLUSIONS This study highlights the importance of ultra-hypofractionated regimens with higher doses per session. Thus, the referral of patients with RCC and AM to Radiotherapy and Oncology departments should be encouraged supporting the role of SBRT as a minimally invasive and outpatient treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Rivas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, GenesisCare, Málaga, Spain
- Clinical Medicine and Public Health, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
| | - Alejandro de la Torre-Luque
- Department of Legal Medicine, Psychiatry and Pathology, School of Medicine, Complutense University of Madrid. CIBERSAM ISCIII, Madrid, Spain
| | - Elena Moreno-Olmedo
- Department of Stereotactic and MR-guided Radiotherapy, Department of Oncology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Genesiscare, Oxford, UK
| | - Paloma Moreno
- Department of Radiation Oncology, GenesisCare, Málaga, Spain
| | | | - Ana Serradilla
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Complejo Hospitalario de Jaen, Jaen, Spain
| | | | | | - Morena Sallabanda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Instituto de Radiocirugía Avanzada y Centro de Protonterapia Quironsalud, Madrid, Spain
| | - Antonio Lazo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Virgen de la Victoria Clinical University Hospital, Málaga, Spain
| | - María Isabel Núñez
- Department of Radiology and Physical Medicine, Granada University, Granada, Spain.
- Biopathology and Regenerative Medicine Institute (IBIMER), Centre for Biomedical Research, Granada University, Granada, Spain.
- Biosanitary Research Institute, ibs. Granada, Spain.
| | - Escarlata López
- GenesisCare South Spain Chief Medical Officer, Málaga, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hoegen-Saßmannshausen P, Jessen I, Buchele C, Schlüter F, Rippke C, Renkamp CK, Weykamp F, Regnery S, Liermann J, Meixner E, Hoeltgen L, Eichkorn T, König L, Debus J, Klüter S, Hörner-Rieber J. Clinical Outcomes of Online Adaptive Magnetic Resonance-Guided Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy of Adrenal Metastases from a Single Institution. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2273. [PMID: 38927978 PMCID: PMC11201609 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16122273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2024] [Revised: 06/07/2024] [Accepted: 06/14/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Recent publications foster stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in patients with adrenal oligometastases or oligoprogression. However, local control (LC) after non-adaptive SBRT shows the potential for improvement. Online adaptive MR-guided SBRT (MRgSBRT) improves tumor coverage and organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing. Long-term results of adaptive MRgSBRT are still sparse. (2) Methods: Adaptive MRgSBRT was performed on a 0.35 T MR-Linac. LC, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and toxicity were assessed. (3) Results: 35 patients with 40 adrenal metastases were analyzed. The median gross tumor volume was 30.6 cc. The most common regimen was 10 fractions at 5 Gy. The median biologically effective dose (BED10) was 75.0 Gy. Plan adaptation was performed in 98% of all fractions. The median follow-up was 7.9 months. One local failure occurred after 16.6 months, resulting in estimated LC rates of 100% at one year and 90% at two years. ORR was 67.5%. The median OS was 22.4 months, and the median PFS was 5.1 months. No toxicity > CTCAE grade 2 occurred. (4) Conclusions: LC and ORR after adrenal adaptive MRgSBRT were excellent, even in a cohort with comparably large metastases. A BED10 of 75 Gy seems sufficient for improved LC in comparison to non-adaptive SBRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Hoegen-Saßmannshausen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Inga Jessen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carolin Buchele
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Fabian Schlüter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carolin Rippke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Claudia Katharina Renkamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Fabian Weykamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Regnery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jakob Liermann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eva Meixner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Line Hoeltgen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tanja Eichkorn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Laila König
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Klüter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Patil S, Shaghaghian E, Yuan L, Shah A, Marianayagam NJ, Park DJ, Soltys SG, Veeravagu A, Gibbs IC, Li G, Chang SD. CyberKnife stereotactic radiosurgery for extramedullary plasmacytoma in the external auditory canal: illustrative case. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY. CASE LESSONS 2024; 7:CASE2479. [PMID: 38710109 PMCID: PMC11076403 DOI: 10.3171/case2479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2024] [Accepted: 03/28/2024] [Indexed: 05/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Plasmacytoma, a rare plasma cell disorder, often presents as a solitary or multiple tumors within the bone marrow or soft tissues, typically associated with multiple myeloma. Extramedullary plasmacytomas (EMPs), particularly those located in the external auditory canal (EAC), are exceedingly rare and pose significant treatment challenges given their location, anatomical complexity, and high risk of recurrence. OBSERVATIONS The authors report the case of a 72-year-old male with a history of multiple myeloma, presenting with recurrent left EAC plasmacytoma. After initial conventional radiotherapy for the lesion, a recurrence was documented in 7 years. The patient subsequently underwent stereotactic radiosurgery, which proved successful, leading to complete resolution of the lesion without any long-term adverse effects or radiation-related complications over a 45-month period. LESSONS This case is a unique instance of utilizing stereotactic radiosurgery for recurrent EMP in the EAC, highlighting its potential as an effective approach in managing complex plasmacytomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Surya Patil
- 1Neurosurgery Artificial Intelligence Lab, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; and
| | - Elaheh Shaghaghian
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Lorenzo Yuan
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Aaryan Shah
- 1Neurosurgery Artificial Intelligence Lab, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; and
| | - Neelan J Marianayagam
- 1Neurosurgery Artificial Intelligence Lab, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; and
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - David J Park
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Scott G Soltys
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Anand Veeravagu
- 1Neurosurgery Artificial Intelligence Lab, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; and
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Iris C Gibbs
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Gordon Li
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Steven D Chang
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ugurluer G, Schneiders FL, Corradini S, Boldrini L, Kotecha R, Kelly P, Portelance L, Camilleri P, Ben-David MA, Poiset S, Marschner SN, Panza G, Kutuk T, Palacios MA, Castelluccia A, Zoto Mustafayev T, Atalar B, Senan S, Ozyar E. Factors influencing local control after MR-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy (MRgSBRT) for adrenal metastases. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 46:100756. [PMID: 38450219 PMCID: PMC10915494 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100756] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Revised: 02/27/2024] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 03/08/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an effective treatment for adrenal gland metastases, but it is technically challenging and there are concerns about toxicity. We performed a multi-institutional pooled retrospective analysis to study clinical outcomes and toxicities after MR-guided SBRT (MRgSBRT) using for adrenal gland metastases. Methods and Materials Clinical and dosimetric data of patients treated with MRgSBRT on a 0.35 T MR-Linac at 11 institutions between 2016 and 2022 were analyzed. Local control (LC), local progression-free survival (LPFS), distant progression-free survival (DPFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Results A total of 255 patients (269 adrenal metastases) were included. Metastatic pattern was solitary in 25.9 % and oligometastatic in 58.0 % of patients. Median total dose was 45 Gy (range, 16-60 Gy) in a median of 5 fractions, and the median BED10 was 100 Gy (range, 37.5-132.0 Gy). Adaptation was done in 87.4 % of delivered fractions based on the individual clinicians' judgement. The 1- and 2- year LPFS rates were 94.0 % (95 % CI: 90.7-97.3 %) and 88.3 % (95 % CI: 82.4-94.2 %), respectively and only 2 patients (0.8 %) experienced grade 3 + toxicity. No local recurrences were observed after treatment to a total dose of BED10 > 100 Gy, with single fraction or fractional dose of > 10 Gy. Conclusions This is a large retrospective multi-institutional study to evaluate the treatment outcomes and toxicities with MRgSBRT in over 250 patients, demonstrating the need for frequent adaptation in 87.4 % of delivered fractions to achieve a 1- year LPFS rate of 94 % and less than 1 % rate of grade 3 + toxicity. Outcomes analysis in 269 adrenal lesions revealed improved outcomes with delivery of a BED10 > 100 Gy, use of single fraction SBRT and with fraction doses > 10 Gy, providing benchmarks for future clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gamze Ugurluer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Acibadem MAA University, School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Famke L. Schneiders
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Stefanie Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Germany
| | - Luca Boldrini
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Oncological Radiotherapy and Hematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, Rome, Italy
| | - Rupesh Kotecha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Patrick Kelly
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Orlando Health Cancer Institute, Orlando, FL, USA
| | | | | | - Merav A. Ben-David
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Assuta Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Faculty of Health Science, Ben-Gurion University, Beer Sheva, Israel
| | - Spencer Poiset
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Sebastian N. Marschner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Germany
| | - Giulia Panza
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Oncological Radiotherapy and Hematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, Rome, Italy
| | - Tugce Kutuk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Miguel A. Palacios
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Banu Atalar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Acibadem MAA University, School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Suresh Senan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Enis Ozyar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Acibadem MAA University, School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mills M, Kotecha R, Herrera R, Kutuk T, Fahey M, Wuthrick E, Grass GD, Hoffe S, Frakes J, Chuong MD, Rosenberg SA. Multi-institutional experience of MR-guided stereotactic body radiation therapy for adrenal gland metastases. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 45:100719. [PMID: 38292332 PMCID: PMC10824679 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100719] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2023] [Revised: 12/14/2023] [Accepted: 12/30/2023] [Indexed: 02/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose While dose escalation is associated with improved local control (LC) for adrenal gland metastases (AGMs), the proximity of gastrointestinal (GI) organs-at-risk (OARs) limits the dose that can be safely prescribed via CT-based stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). The advantages of magnetic resonance-guided SBRT (MRgSBRT), including tumor tracking and online plan adaptation, facilitate safe dose escalation. Methods This is a multi-institutional review of 57 consecutive patients who received MRgSBRT on a 0.35-T MR linac to 61 AGMs from 2019 to 2021. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and LC, and the Cox proportional hazards model was utilized for univariate analysis (UVA). Results Median follow up from MRgSBRT was 16.4 months (range [R]: 1.1-39 months). Median age was 67 years (R: 28-84 years). Primary histologies included non-small cell lung cancer (N = 38), renal cell carcinoma (N = 6), and melanoma (N = 5), amongst others. The median maximum diameter was 2.7 cm (R: 0.6-7.6 cm), and most AGMs were left-sided (N = 32). The median dose was 50 Gy (R: 30-60 Gy) in 5-10 fractions with a median BED10 of 100 Gy (R: 48-132 Gy). 45 cases (74 %) required adaptation for at least 1 fraction (median: 4 fractions, R: 0-10). Left-sided AGMs required adaptation in at least 1 fraction more frequently than right-sided AGMs (88 % vs 59 %, p = 0.018). There were 3 cases of reirradiation, including 60 Gy in 10 fractions (N = 1) and 40 Gy in 5 fractions (N = 2). One-year LC, PFS, and OS were 92 %, 52 %, and 78 %, respectively. On UVA, melanoma histology predicted for inferior 1-year LC (80 % vs 93 %, p = 0.012). There were no instances of grade 3+ toxicity. Conclusions We demonstrate that MRgSBRT achieves favorable early LC and no grade 3 + toxicity despite prescribing a median BED10 of 100 Gy to targets near GI OARs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Mills
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, United States
| | - Rupesh Kotecha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Roberto Herrera
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Tugce Kutuk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Matthew Fahey
- University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, United States
| | - Evan Wuthrick
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, United States
| | - G. Daniel Grass
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, United States
| | - Sarah Hoffe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, United States
| | - Jessica Frakes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, United States
| | - Michael D. Chuong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Stephen A. Rosenberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Liao X, Kishi K, Du K, Komaki R, Mizoe J, Aikawa G, Zheng W, Pan C. Risk factors of local control in adrenal metastases treated by stereotactic body radiation therapy - a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1193574. [PMID: 38045003 PMCID: PMC10691549 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1193574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2023] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 12/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study is aimed to explore risk factors affect the therapy outcomes of adrenal metastases (AM) for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and guide clinical dose selection. Methods and materials PubMed, Embase and Web of Science were searched in September 22, 2022 in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines (PRISMA). Subgroup analysis and meta-regression were used to search for sources of heterogeneity and identify risky outcomes factors. Publication bias test and sensitivity analysis were also conducted. Results Thirty-three studies with full text from 2009 to 2022 about AM with SBRT on 1483 patients were included. Pooled 1- and 2-year local control (LC) and overall survival(OS) were 81.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 75.6%-86.5%), 62.8% (95% CI, 53.8%-71.8%), 67.4% (95%CI, 61.8%-73.1%) and 46.5% (95%CI, 40.4%-52.6%), respectively. Biological effective dose (BED, α/β=10Gy) and dose per fraction affected 1-year LC (Qm=23.89, 15.10; P<0.0001, 0.0001). In the range of 60-80Gy (BED10), the group of dose per fraction ≥ 9Gy achieved the excellent 1-year LC (< 9Gy: ≥ 9Gy =78%, 91%; χ2 = 10.16, P = 0.001). Tracking technology significantly affected 1- and 2-year OS (Qm = 5.73, 8.75; P = 0.017, 0.003) and high tracking adoption group showed excellent 1- and 2- year OS (78.7% [95%CI, 68.6%- 88.9%]; and 62.9% [95%CI, 53.1%-72.7%]). Conclusion Increasing the dose per fraction appropriately may help control locally AM lesious. Tracking technology might contribute to improve survival of advanced patients with AM. But these results need prospective studies to verify them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xuehong Liao
- Department of Pathology, Zhongshan Hospital, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
- Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Kazushi Kishi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Disaster Medical Center, National Hospital Organization (NHO), Incorporated Administrative Agency 3256 Tachitawa City, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kaixin Du
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xiamen Humanity Hospital Fujian Medical University, Xiamen, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Ritsuko Komaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emeritus of The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Junetsu Mizoe
- Department of Sapporo High Functioning Radiotherapy Center, Hokkaido Ohno Memorial Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Gosuke Aikawa
- Department of Sapporo High Functioning Radiotherapy Center, Hokkaido Ohno Memorial Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Wei Zheng
- Department of Pathology, Zhongshan Hospital, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Chao Pan
- Department of Pathology, Zhongshan Hospital, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Herndon J, Hallemeier C, Jethwa K, Shariff A, Bancos I. Radiation of bilateral adrenal metastases is associated with a high risk of primary adrenal insufficiency. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2023; 99:35-42. [PMID: 36905107 PMCID: PMC10247529 DOI: 10.1111/cen.14911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Revised: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/08/2023] [Indexed: 03/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adrenal metastasis is the most common adrenal malignancy and can be bilateral in up to 43% of patients. Radiotherapy (RT) is one option available to treat adrenal metastases. The risk of primary adrenal insufficiency (PAI) after adrenal RT is unclear. OBJECTIVE Determine the incidence and the timeline of PAI in patients undergoing adrenal RT. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Single-centre longitudinal retrospective cohort study of adult patients with adrenal metastases treated with RT between 2010 and 2021. RESULTS Of 56 patients with adrenal metastases treated with adrenal RT, eight (14.3%) patients developed PAI at a median of 6.1 months (interquartile range [IQR]: 3.9-13.8) after RT All patients developing PAI had either unilateral RT in the setting of contralateral adrenalectomy or bilateral adrenal RT. Patients who developed PAI received a median RT dose of 50 Gy (IQR: 44-50 Gy), administered in a median of five fractions (IQR: 5-6). Treated metastases decreased in size and/or metabolic activity on positron emission tomography in seven patients (87.5%). Patients were initiated on hydrocortisone (median daily dose of 20 mg, IQR: 18-40) and fludrocortisone (median daily dose of 0.05 mg, IQR: 0.05-0.05 mg). At the end of the study period, five patients died, all due to extra-adrenal malignancy, at a median time of 19.7 months (IQR: 16-21.1 months) since RT and median time of 7.7 months (IQR: 2.9-12.5 months) since the diagnosis of PAI. CONCLUSION Patients receiving unilateral adrenal RT with two intact adrenal glands have a low risk of PAI. Patients receiving bilateral adrenal RT have a high risk of PAI and require close monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justine Herndon
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Nutrition, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | | | - Krishan Jethwa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Afreen Shariff
- Division of Endocrinology, Duke Health, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Irina Bancos
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Nutrition, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kekilli E, Demirkasımoğlu T. The efficacy and outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy in adrenal gland metastases. J Cancer Res Ther 2023; 19:S47-S51. [PMID: 37147982 DOI: 10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_891_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/07/2023]
Abstract
Aim This retrospective study presents our single-institutional experience with stereotactic body radiotherapy for adrenal gland metastases. Materials and Methods We evaluated patients with adrenal metastases treated by stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) from 2014 to 2020. We performed an analysis of 35 patients. The median age of the patients was 62.2. Dosimetric parameters and treatment outcomes were evaluated. Results The primary diagnosis of the majority of patients was non-small cell lung cancer (94.3%). Treatment was performed in a median of 3 fractions, and the median prescribed dose was 24 Gy (range 22,5-27). The median follow-up was 17 months. Treatment response according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours was categorized as complete response in 11 patients, partial response in nine patients, stable disease in 7, and progressive disease in eight patients. Twenty seven patients had oligometastatic disease and treatment response. Patients with oligometastatic disease had a significantly higher rate of complete response and partial response to treatment than patients with common disease (P = 0,011). The 6-month and 1-year local control rates were 68.4% and 43%, respectively. In general, SBRT was well tolerated and no acute toxicities were observed. Conclusion Our retrospective study shows that SBRT can be applied safely in adrenal metastases with good results especially in patients with oligometastatic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esra Kekilli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Taciser Demirkasımoğlu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ehret F, Kaul D, Kufeld M, Endt CV, Budach V, Senger C, Fürweger C, Haidenberger A, Muacevic A. Robotic stereotactic body radiotherapy for the management of adrenal gland metastases: a bi-institutional analysis. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023; 149:1095-1101. [PMID: 35290521 PMCID: PMC9984319 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-022-03943-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2021] [Accepted: 02/02/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Adrenal gland metastases (AGMs) are a common manifestation of metastatic tumor spread, especially in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC). In patients with a limited systemic tumor burden, effective treatments for AGMs are needed. Due to varying fractionation schemes and limited reports, short-course treatment results for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for AGMs are lacking. This work analyzes the outcomes of short-course SBRT for AGMs. METHODS Patients who underwent robotic SBRT for AGMs with one to five fractions were eligible for analysis. RESULTS In total, data from 55 patients with 72 AGMs from two institutions were analyzed. Most AGMs originated from renal cell carcinoma (38%) and NSCLC (35%). The median follow-up was 16.4 months. The median prescription dose and isodose line were 24 Gy and 70%, respectively. Most patients (85%) received SBRT with just one fraction. The median biologically effective dose assuming an α/β ratio of 10 (BED10) was 80.4 Gy. The local control and progression-free survival after 1 and 2 years were 92.9%, 67.8%, and 46.2%, as well as 24.3%, respectively. Thirteen patients (24%) suffered from grade 1 or 2 toxicities. The BED10 showed a significant impact on LC (p < 0.01). Treatments with a BED10 equal to or above the median were associated with a better LC (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION Robotic SBRT is an efficient and safe treatment modality for AGM. Treatment-associated side effects are sporadic and manageable. Results suggest short-course SBRT to be a preferable and time-saving treatment option for the management of AGMs if an adequate BED10 can be safely applied.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Ehret
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117, Berlin, Germany. .,Department of Radiation Oncology, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353, Berlin, Germany. .,European Radiosurgery Center, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| | - David Kaul
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353, Berlin, Germany.,Charité CyberKnife Center, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353, Berlin, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Partner Site Berlin, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus Kufeld
- European Radiosurgery Center, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Clara Vom Endt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Volker Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353, Berlin, Germany.,Charité CyberKnife Center, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carolin Senger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353, Berlin, Germany.,Charité CyberKnife Center, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christoph Fürweger
- European Radiosurgery Center, 81377, Munich, Germany.,Department of Stereotaxy and Functional Neurosurgery, University Hospital Cologne, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
McCann B, Higgins M, Kok DL, Hong W, Alipour R, Chua MST. Long-term control of melanoma adrenal metastasis treated with radiotherapy. Melanoma Res 2022; 32:166-172. [PMID: 35256569 DOI: 10.1097/cmr.0000000000000813] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Melanoma remains a large global burden with a significant proportion of patients succumbing to metastatic disease. The adrenal gland is a common area for metastasis with surgical treatment as the main modality. Radiotherapy is less utilised in this setting with uncertainty over deliverability and efficacy. Here, we present the details and outcomes of 20 patients treated with radiotherapy, with or without systemic therapy, for melanoma adrenal metastasis in a single institute. Twenty patients were identified from radiation treatment and medical records from between 2015 and 2019 at our institution. Three patients had bilateral radiotherapy treatments and therefore 23 adrenal lesions were analysed. Demographics, indications for treatment, radiotherapy methodology and outcomes were recorded. Outcomes were based on serial 18F FDG PET/computerized tomography scans reporting using the PERCIST criteria. The most common indication for radiotherapy was oligo-progressive disease (70%) followed by symptom palliation. Eight (35%) of the treatments were delivered by stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy. Twelve (60%) patients had concurrent immunotherapy. Twenty of twenty-three (87%) adrenal lesions had an initial response to treatment with 12 (60%) maintaining local control until death or end of follow-up. Median adrenal-specific progression-free survival was 13 months. Four patients (17%) required salvage adrenalectomy. Symptom palliation was achieved in the majority of patients for which it was indicated and there were no grade three toxicities. The median time from radiotherapy to change of immunotherapy treatment was 4 months. Radiotherapy for melanoma adrenal metastasis is effective and deliverable. With the majority of patients achieving a palliative and clinically relevant durable response, adrenalectomy can be reserved as a salvage option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brendan McCann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Martin Higgins
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - David L Kok
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Wei Hong
- St. Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy
- Department of Cancer Research, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville
| | - Ramin Alipour
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Margaret S T Chua
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Buergy D, Würschmidt F, Gkika E, Hörner-Rieber J, Knippen S, Gerum S, Balermpas P, Henkenberens C, Voglhuber T, Kornhuber C, Barczyk S, Röper B, Rashid A, Blanck O, Wittig A, Herold HU, Brunner TB, Sweeney RA, Kahl KH, Ciernik FI, Ottinger A, Izaguirre V, Putz F, König L, Hoffmann M, Combs SE, Guckenberger M, Boda-Heggemann J. Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy of adrenal metastases - A dose-finding study. Int J Cancer 2022; 151:412-421. [PMID: 35383919 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2022] [Revised: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Optimal doses for the treatment of adrenal metastases with stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT) are unknown. We aimed to identify dose-volume cut-points associated with decreased local recurrence rates (LRR). A multicenter database of patients with adrenal metastases of any histology treated with SBRT (biologically effective dose, BED10 ≥ 50Gy, ≤ 12 fractions) was analyzed. Details on dose-volume parameters were required (planning target volume: PTV-D98%, PTV-D50%, PTV-D2%; gross tumor volume: GTV-D50%, GTV-mean). Cut-points for LRR were optimized using the R maxstat package. 196 patients with 218 lesions were included, the largest histopathological subgroup was adenocarcinoma (n = 101). Cut-point optimization resulted in significant cut-points for PTV-D50% (BED10: 73.2Gy; p = 0.003), GTV-D50% (BED10: 74.2Gy; p = 0.006), GTV-mean (BED10: 73.0Gy; p = 0.007), and PTV-D2% (BED10: 78.0Gy; p = 0.02) but not for the PTV-D98% (p = 0.06). Differences in LRR were clinically relevant (LRR ≥ doubled for cut-points that were not achieved). Further dose-escalation was not associated with further improved LRR. PTV-D50%, GTV-D50%, and GTV-mean cut-points were also associated with significantly improved LRR in the adenocarcinoma subgroup. Separate dose optimizations indicated a lower cut-point for the PTV-D50% (BED10: 69.1Gy) in adenocarcinoma lesions, other values were similar (< 2% difference). Associations of cut-points with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival were not significant but durable freedom from local recurrence was associated with OS in a landmark model (p < 0.001). To achieve a significant improvement of LRR for adrenal SBRT, a moderate escalation of PTV-D50% BED10 > 73.2Gy (adenocarcinoma: 69.1Gy) should be considered. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Buergy
- Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Mannheim, Deutschland
| | | | - Eleni Gkika
- Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Strahlenheilkunde, Freiburg, Deutschland
| | - Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Klinik für Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie, Heidelberg, Deutschland
| | - Stefan Knippen
- Universitätsklinikum Jena, Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Jena, Deutschland.,Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Strahlenklinik, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - Sabine Gerum
- Radioonkologie LMU München, Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, München, Deutschland.,Klinik für Radiotherapie und Radioonkologie, Paracelsus Universität Salzburg, Landeskrankenhaus, Salzburg, Österreich
| | - Panagiotis Balermpas
- Universitätsspital Zürich, Universität Zürich, Klinik für Radio-Onkologie, Zürich, Schweiz
| | - Christoph Henkenberens
- Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Spezielle Onkologie, Hannover, Deutschland
| | - Theresa Voglhuber
- Technische Universität München (TUM), Department of Radiation Oncology, Ismaninger Straße 22, Munich
| | - Christine Kornhuber
- Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale), Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Halle (Saale), Deutschland
| | - Steffen Barczyk
- Zentrum für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Belegklinik am St. Agnes-Hospital, Bocholt, Deutschland
| | - Barbara Röper
- DIE RADIOLOGIE, MVZ Strahlentherapie Bogenhausen - Harlaching - Neuperlach, München, Deutschland
| | - Ali Rashid
- MediClin Robert Janker Klinik, Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Bonn, Deutschland
| | - Oliver Blanck
- Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Kiel, Deutschland
| | - Andrea Wittig
- Universitätsklinikum Jena, Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Jena, Deutschland
| | - Hans-Ulrich Herold
- Cyberknife Centrum Mitteldeutschland GmbH, Institut für Radiochirurgie und Präzisionsbestrahlung, Erfurt, Deutschland
| | - Thomas B Brunner
- Universitätsklinikum Magdeburg, Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Magdeburg, Deutschland
| | - Reinhart A Sweeney
- Leopoldina Krankenhaus Schweinfurt, Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Schweinfurt, Deutschland
| | - Klaus Henning Kahl
- Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Augsburg, Deutschland
| | - F Ilja Ciernik
- Städtisches Klinikum Dessau, Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Dessau, Deutschland
| | - Annette Ottinger
- Klinikum Darmstadt GmbH, Institut für Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie, Darmstadt, Deutschland
| | - Victor Izaguirre
- Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale), Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Halle (Saale), Deutschland
| | - Florian Putz
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Strahlenklinik, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - Laila König
- Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Klinik für Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie, Heidelberg, Deutschland
| | - Michael Hoffmann
- Radioonkologie LMU München, Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, München, Deutschland
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Technische Universität München (TUM), Department of Radiation Oncology, Ismaninger Straße 22, Munich.,Helmholtz Zentrum München (HMGU), Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, Neuherberg, Deutschland.,Deutsches Zentrum für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK) Partner Site Munich
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Universitätsspital Zürich, Universität Zürich, Klinik für Radio-Onkologie, Zürich, Schweiz
| | - Judit Boda-Heggemann
- Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Mannheim, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Franzese C, Stefanini S, Massaro M, Comito T, Navarria P, Clerici E, Teriaca A, Franceschini D, Reggiori G, Tomatis S, Lania A, Scorsetti M. Phase II trial of stereotactic body radiation therapy on adrenal gland metastases: evaluation of efficacy and impact on hormonal production. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2021; 147:3619-3625. [PMID: 34537907 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-021-03807-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2021] [Accepted: 09/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to assess prospectively the efficacy and safety of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for adrenal gland metastasis, with a focus on the assessment of the irradiated subjects' endocrinological function. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 36 patients were enrolled from 2017 to 2020 in this prospective phase II trial. Patients were treated with Linac-based SBRT, with a dose of 45 Gy in 3 consecutive fractions. Primary end-point was local control (LC) of the treated lesions and secondary end-points included evaluation of acute and late toxicity, progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and the impact on the hormonal production of adrenal glands. RESULTS With a median follow-up of 9.5 months, LC rates at 1 and 2 years were 94.7% and 88.4%, respectively. Rates of PFS at 1 and 2 years were 50.5% and 29.8%, with a median PFS of 14.7 months. Rates of OS at 1 and 2 years were 62.9% and 44.1%. At univariate analysis, oligorecurrence was associated with better OS compared to oligoprogressive or synchronous metastatic disease. No grade 3 or greater toxicities were registered and only a minority of patients (22.2%) reported mild treatment-related side effects. Hormonal and electrolytes production was assessed before and after treatment, showing only a slight and transient variation within the reference ranges. CONCLUSION SBRT on adrenal metastases has been confirmed to be a feasible and effective treatment. With an excellent disease control and the preservation of the endocrine function, SBRT with ablative dose can be considered a viable alternative to more invasive approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ciro Franzese
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Humanitas Research Hospital IRCCS, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20090, Pieve Emanuele, MI, Italy. .,Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089, Rozzano, MI, Italy.
| | - Sara Stefanini
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089, Rozzano, MI, Italy
| | - Maria Massaro
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089, Rozzano, MI, Italy
| | - Tiziana Comito
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089, Rozzano, MI, Italy
| | - Pierina Navarria
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089, Rozzano, MI, Italy
| | - Elena Clerici
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089, Rozzano, MI, Italy
| | - Ausilia Teriaca
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089, Rozzano, MI, Italy
| | - Davide Franceschini
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089, Rozzano, MI, Italy
| | - Giacomo Reggiori
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089, Rozzano, MI, Italy
| | - Stefano Tomatis
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089, Rozzano, MI, Italy
| | - Andrea Lania
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089, Rozzano, MI, Italy.,Endocrinology, Diabetology and Medical Andrology Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089, Rozzano, MI, Italy
| | - Marta Scorsetti
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Humanitas Research Hospital IRCCS, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20090, Pieve Emanuele, MI, Italy.,Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089, Rozzano, MI, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Reshko LB, Gaskins JT, Silverman CL, Dunlap NE. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) of adrenal gland metastases in oligometastatic and oligoprogressive disease. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2021; 26:325-340. [PMID: 34277086 PMCID: PMC8281902 DOI: 10.5603/rpor.a2021.0055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2020] [Accepted: 02/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) as a form of noninvasive treatment that is becoming increasingly used to manage cancers with adrenal gland metastases. There is a paucity of data on safety and efficacy of this modality. The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of adrenal gland SBRT in oligometastatic and oligoprogressive disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this retrospective study, we performed a single-institution analysis of 26 adrenal lesions from 23 patients with oligometastatic or oligoprogressive disease treated from 2013 to 2019 with the goal of achieving durable local control. Palliative cases were excluded. Radiation dosimetry data was collected. Kaplan Meier product estimator and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS The median dose was 36 Gy in 3 fractions (range: 24-50 Gy and 3-6 fractions) with a median biologically effective dose (BED10) of 72 (range: 40-100). 1-year local control rate was 80% and median local control was not achieved due to a low number of failures. 1- and 2-year overall survival rates were 66% and 32%. Toxicity was mild with only one case of grade 2 nausea and no grade 3-5 toxicity. Higher neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio was associated with worse overall survival and a trend toward worse progression-free survival. In addition, worse performance status and lower BED10 were associated with worse survival. No such association could be shown for primary tumor location, histology, size or stage. CONCLUSION Adrenal SBRT for oligometastatic or oligoprogressive disease is a safe and effective form of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonid B Reshko
- Department of Radiation Oncology, James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, United States of America
| | - Jeremy T Gaskins
- Department of Bioinformatics & Biostatistics, University of Louisville School of Public Health and Information Sciences, Louisville, United States of America
| | - Craig L Silverman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, United States of America
| | - Neal E Dunlap
- Department of Radiation Oncology, James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Buergy D, Würschmidt F, Gkika E, Hörner-Rieber J, Knippen S, Gerum S, Balermpas P, Henkenberens C, Voglhuber T, Kornhuber C, Barczyk S, Röper B, Rashid A, Blanck O, Wittig A, Herold HU, Brunner TB, Klement RJ, Kahl KH, Ciernik IF, Ottinger A, Izaguirre V, Putz F, König L, Hoffmann M, Combs SE, Guckenberger M, Boda-Heggemann J. Stereotactic or conformal radiotherapy for adrenal metastases: Patient characteristics and outcomes in a multicenter analysis. Int J Cancer 2021; 149:358-370. [PMID: 33682927 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2020] [Revised: 02/01/2021] [Accepted: 02/11/2021] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
To report outcome (freedom from local progression [FFLP], overall survival [OS] and toxicity) after stereotactic, palliative or highly conformal fractionated (>12) radiotherapy (SBRT, Pall-RT, 3DCRT/IMRT) for adrenal metastases in a retrospective multicenter cohort within the framework of the German Society for Radiation Oncology (DEGRO). Adrenal metastases treated with SBRT (≤12 fractions, biologically effective dose [BED10] ≥ 50 Gy), 3DCRT/IMRT (>12 fractions, BED10 ≥ 50 Gy) or Pall-RT (BED10 < 50 Gy) were eligible for this analysis. In addition to unadjusted FFLP (Kaplan-Meier/log-rank), we calculated the competing-risk-adjusted local recurrence rate (CRA-LRR). Three hundred twenty-six patients with 366 metastases were included by 21 centers (median follow-up: 11.7 months). Treatment was SBRT, 3DCRT/IMRT and Pall-RT in 260, 27 and 79 cases, respectively. Most frequent primary tumors were non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC; 52.5%), SCLC (16.3%) and melanoma (6.7%). Unadjusted FFLP was higher after SBRT vs Pall-RT (P = .026) while numerical differences in CRA-LRR between groups did not reach statistical significance (1-year CRA-LRR: 13.8%, 17.4% and 27.7%). OS was longer after SBRT vs other groups (P < .05) and increased in patients with locally controlled metastases in a landmark analysis (P < .0001). Toxicity was mostly mild; notably, four cases of adrenal insufficiency occurred, two of which were likely caused by immunotherapy or tumor progression. Radiotherapy for adrenal metastases was associated with a mild toxicity profile in all groups and a favorable 1-year CRA-LRR after SBRT or 3DCRT/IMRT. One-year FFLP was associated with longer OS. Dose-response analyses for the dataset are underway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Buergy
- Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Mannheim, Germany
| | | | - Eleni Gkika
- Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Strahlenheilkunde, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Klinik für Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan Knippen
- Universitätsklinikum Jena, Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Jena, Germany.,Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Strahlenklinik, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Sabine Gerum
- Radioonkologie LMU München, Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Munich, Germany.,Klinik für Radiotherapie und Radioonkologie, Paracelsus Universität Salzburg, Landeskrankenhaus, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Panagiotis Balermpas
- Universitätsspital Zürich, Universität Zürich, Klinik für Radio-Onkologie, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Christoph Henkenberens
- Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Spezielle Onkologie, Hannover, Germany
| | - Theresa Voglhuber
- Technische Universität München (TUM), Department of Radiation Oncology, Munich, Germany
| | - Christine Kornhuber
- Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale), Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Steffen Barczyk
- Zentrum für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Belegklinik am St. Agnes-Hospital, Bocholt, Germany
| | - Barbara Röper
- Gemeinschaftspraxis für Strahlentherapie, Bogenhausen - Harlaching - Neuperlach, Munich, Germany
| | - Ali Rashid
- MediClin Robert Janker Klinik, Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Bonn, Germany
| | - Oliver Blanck
- Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Kiel, Germany
| | - Andrea Wittig
- Universitätsklinikum Jena, Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Jena, Germany
| | - Hans-Ulrich Herold
- Cyberknife Centrum Mitteldeutschland GmbH, Institut für Radiochirurgie und Präzisionsbestrahlung, Erfurt, Germany
| | - Thomas B Brunner
- Universitätsklinikum Magdeburg, Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Rainer J Klement
- Universitätsspital Zürich, Universität Zürich, Klinik für Radio-Onkologie, Zürich, Switzerland.,Leopoldina Krankenhaus Schweinfurt, Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Schweinfurt, Germany
| | - Klaus Henning Kahl
- Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Ilja F Ciernik
- Städtisches Klinikum Dessau, Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Dessau, Germany
| | - Annette Ottinger
- Klinikum Darmstadt GmbH, Institut für Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Victor Izaguirre
- Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale), Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Florian Putz
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Strahlenklinik, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Laila König
- Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Klinik für Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Hoffmann
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Klinikum der Universität München, LMU, Munich, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Technische Universität München (TUM), Department of Radiation Oncology, Munich, Germany.,Helmholtz Zentrum München (HMGU), Neuherberg, Germany.,Deutsches Zentrum für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Universitätsspital Zürich, Universität Zürich, Klinik für Radio-Onkologie, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Judit Boda-Heggemann
- Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|