Sagittal en bloc resection of primary tumors in the thoracic and lumbar spine: feasibility, safety and outcome

EnBloc Resection of a Chordoma of the Thoracic Spine by "L"-Shaped Osteotomy for Spinal Canal Preservation

Background/Objectives: EnBloc resections of bone tumors of the spine are very demanding as the target to achieve a tumor-free margin specimen (sometimes impossible due to the extracompartimental tumor extension) is sometimes conflicting with the integrity of neurological functions and spine stability. Methods: The surgical treatment of a huge multi-level chordoma of the thoracic spine with unusual extension is reported. Anteriorly, the tumor widely invaded the mediastinum and displaced the aorta; on the left side, it expanded in the subpleuric region; posteriorly, it was uncommonly distant 13 mm from the posterior wall. Results: EnBloc resection is largely performed for primary bone tumors of the spine and many reports have been published concerning brilliant solutions to difficult issues of surgical anatomy. One of the major challenges is still the compatibility between oncological and functional requirements. Conclusions: Oncological staging, careful imaging analysis, a multidisciplinary surgical team, and utilization of the most recent technologies like navigation and robotics have made an oncologically appropriate EnBloc resection of a multi-level chordoma of the thoracic spine possible without affecting the continuity of the spinal canal and without any involvement of its content by an original "L"-shaped osteotomy.

Single-Stage Combined Approach Sagittal En Bloc Spondylectomy for L3 Vertebral Chondrosarcoma: A Technical Note

BACKGROUND

Primary malignant tumors of the spine are rare and most commonly occur in lumbar and thoracic vertebrae. We report a rare case of retroperitoneal chondrosarcoma of L3 that was managed with sagittal en bloc spondylectomy following chemoradiation.

CASE DESCRIPTION

A 26-year-old woman was evaluated for abdominal pain with contrast-enhanced computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis, which revealed a soft tissue retroperitoneal mass arising from L3. She underwent laparotomy and biopsy, which revealed chondrosarcoma, and she received chemoradiation over a period of 28 weeks 6 days. After repeat imaging, she underwent single-stage combined approach sagittal en bloc spondylectomy of retroperitoneal chondrosarcoma of L3 with right nephrectomy and spine reconstruction. At 3-year follow-up, there was no evidence of recurrence on contrast-enhanced computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis. She demonstrated no gait abnormality or spinal deformity.

CONCLUSIONS

Sagittal en bloc spondylectomy is a preferred surgical approach for eccentrically placed spinal tumors that offers better oncological and functional outcomes.

Sagittal en bloc resection of thoracolumbar tumours: a report of thirty one cases

PURPOSE

To develop a novel classification of sagittal en bloc resection (SEBR) based on anatomical locations for thoracolumbar spine tumors and assess the clinical outcomes of this surgical procedure.

METHODS

31 patients with thoracolumbar tumours treated with SEBR were enrolled in this study. The individualized surgical strategy was adopted based on our surgical classification. Demographics, perioperative outcomes, complications and postoperative outcomes were assessed.

RESULTS

Based on our surgical classifications, patients were divided into four types. All bony resection margins were negative, wide resection was achieved in 25 patients, marginal resection in four, and intralesional resection in two. 18 patients underwent anterior reconstruction. Complications were encountered in five patients, and instrumentation failure occurred in one patient. The median follow-up was 24 (range, 6-72) months and recurrence was found in only one patient.

CONCLUSION

SEBR is a safe and effective surgical procedure for patients with thoracolumbar spinal tumours in specific anatomical locations. The proposed surgical classification covers all SEBR types and is easy to apply, it may assist surgical decision-making in patients with spinal tumours.

Perioperative complications of en bloc resection and anterior column reconstruction for thoracic and lumbar spinal tumors

PURPOSE

To evaluate the perioperative clinical outcomes of en bloc resection and anterior column reconstruction for thoracolumbar spinal tumors.

METHODS

This study conducted a retrospective analysis of prospective data collection of 86 consecutive patients, including 40 males and 46 females, with an average age of 39 years (ranged from 10 to 71 years). There were 35 cases of a malignant primary tumor,42 cases of an aggressive benign tumor, and nine cases of metastases. The main lesions were located in 65 cases of thoracic spine, 17 cases of lumbar spine, and 4 cases of thoracolumbar spine. Tumors involved one level in 45 patients, two levels in 12 patients, three levels in 21 patients, four levels in five patients, five levels in two patients, and six levels in one patient.

RESULTS

According to the Weinstein-Boriani-Biagini surgical staging system, all patients achieved en bloc resections, including 74 cases of total en bloc spondylectomy and 12 cases of sagittal resections. The mean surgical time was 559 min (210-1208 min), and the mean total blood loss was 1528 ml (260-5500 ml). A total of 122 complications were observed in 62(72.1%) patients, of which 18(20.9%) patients had 25 major complications and one patient (1.2%) died of complications. The combined approach (P = 0.002), total blood loss (P = 0.003), staged surgery (P = 0.004), previous surgical history (P = 0.045), the number of involved vertebrae (P = 0.021) and lumbar location (P = 0.012) were statistically significant risk factors for major complication. When all above risk factors were incorporated in multivariate analysis, only the combined approach (P = 0.052) still remained significant.

CONCLUSIONS

En bloc resection and anterior column reconstruction is accompanied by a high incidence of complications, especially when a combined approach is necessary.

A new era in the management of spinal metastasis

Despite the recent advances in cancer treatment, the incidence of patients with spinal metastases continues to grow along with the total number of cancer patients. Spinal metastases can significantly impair activities of daily living (ADL) and quality of life (QOL), compared with other types of bone metastases, as they are characterized with severe pain and paralysis caused by skeletal-related events. Reduced ADL can also lead to treatment limitations as certain anticancer agents and radiation therapy are not compatible treatments; thus, leading to a shorter life expectancy. Consequently, maintaining ADLs in patients with spinal metastases is paramount, and spine surgeons have an integral role to play in this regard. However, neurosurgeon, orthopedic and spinal surgeons in Japan do not have a proactive treatment approach to spinal metastases, which may prevent them from providing appropriate treatment when needed (clinical inertia). To overcome such endemic inertia, it is essential for 1) spine surgeons to understand and be more actively involved with patients with musculoskeletal disorders (cancer locomo) and cancer patients; 2) the adoption of a multidisciplinary approach (coordination and meetings not only with the attending oncologist but also with spine surgeons, radiologists, rehabilitation specialists, and other professionals) to preemptive treatment such as medication, radiotherapy, and surgical treatment; and 3) the integration of the latest findings associated with minimally invasive spinal treatments that have expanded the indications for treatment of spinal metastases and improved treatment outcomes. This heralds a new era in the management of spinal metastases.

Surgical outcomes and risk factors for surgical complications after en bloc resection following reconstruction with 3D-printed artificial vertebral body for thoracolumbar tumors

BACKGROUND

The outcomes of patients with tumors of the thoracolumbar spine treated with en bloc resection (EBR) using three-dimensional (3D)-printed endoprostheses are underreported.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated patients with thoracolumbar tumors who underwent surgery at our institution. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the potential risk factors for surgical complications. Nomograms to predict complications were constructed and validated.

RESULTS

A total of 53 patients with spinal tumors underwent EBR at our hospital; of these, 2 were lost to follow-up, 45 underwent total en bloc spondylectomy, and 6 were treated with sagittal en bloc spondylectomy. The anterior reconstruction materials included a customized 3D-printed artificial vertebral body (AVB) in 10 cases and an off-the-shelf 3D-printed AVB in 41 cases, and prosthesis mismatch occurred in 2 patients reconstructed with the off-the-shelf 3D-printed AVB. The median follow-up period was 21 months (range, 7-57 months). Three patients experienced local recurrence, and 5 patients died at the final follow-up. A total of 50 perioperative complications were encountered in 29 patients, including 25 major and 25 minor complications. Instrumentation failure occurred in 1 patient, and no prosthesis subsidence was observed. Using a combined surgical approach was a dependent predictor of overall complications, while Karnofsky performance status score, lumbar spine lesion, and intraoperative blood loss ≥ 2000 mL were predictors of major complications. Nomograms for the overall and major complications were constructed using these factors, with C-indices of 0.850 and 0.891, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

EBR is essential for the management of thoracolumbar tumors; however, EBR has a steep learning curve and a high complication rate. A 3D-printed AVB is an effective and feasible reconstruction option for patients treated with EBR.

The Role of 3D Printing in Treatment Planning of Spine and Sacral Tumors

Three-dimensional (3D) printing technology has proven to have many advantages in spine and sacrum surgery. 3D printing allows the manufacturing of life-size patient-specific anatomic and pathologic models to improve preoperative understanding of patient anatomy and pathology. Additionally, virtual surgical planning using medical computer-aided design software has enabled surgeons to create patient-specific surgical plans and simulate procedures in a virtual environment. This has resulted in reduced operative times, decreased complications, and improved patient outcomes. Combined with new surgical techniques, 3D-printed custom medical devices and instruments using titanium and biocompatible resins and polyamides have allowed innovative reconstructions.

A Systematic Review of Perioperative Complications in en Bloc Resection for Spinal Tumors

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

OBJECTIVE

En bloc resection is a major, invasive surgical procedure designed to completely resect a vertebral tumor with a sufficient margin. It is technically demanding and potentially poses risks of perioperative complications. In this systematic review, we investigated the incidence of complications after en bloc resection for spinal tumors.

METHODS

We screened PubMed and Embase databases for relevant English publications, from 1980 to 2020, using the following terms: spine OR spinal AND en bloc AND tumor. Using a standard PRISMA template, after the initial screening, full-text articles of interest were evaluated.

RESULTS

Thirty-six studies with 961 patients were included. The overall mean age of patients was 49.6 years, and the mean follow-up time was 33.5 months. There were 560 complications, and an overall complication rate of 58.3% (560/961). The 5 most frequent complications were neurological damage (12.7%), hardware failure (12.1%), dural tear and cerebrospinal fluid leakage (10.6%), wound-related complications (7.6%) and vascular injury and bleeding (7.3%). The complication-related revision rate was 10.7% (103/961). The average incidence of complication-related death was 1.2% (12/961).

CONCLUSIONS

En bloc resection is a surgical procedure that is very invasive and technically challenging, and the possible risks of perioperative complications should not be neglected. The overall complication rate is high. However, complication-related death was rare. The advantages of surgery should be weighed against the serious perioperative morbidity associated with this technique.

Reconstruction after resection of C2 vertebral tumors: A comparative study of 3D-printed vertebral body versus titanium mesh

Background

Surgical resection of C2 vertebral tumors is challenging owing to the complex anatomy of C2 vertebrae and the challenges to surgical exposure. Various surgical approaches are available, but some are associated with excessively high risks of complications. An additional challenge is reconstruction of the upper cervical spine following surgery. In the last decade, additive-manufacturing personalized artificial vertebral bodies (AVBs) have been introduced for the repair of large, irregular bony defects; however, their use and efficacy in upper cervical surgery have not been well addressed. Therefore, in this study, we compared instrumented fixation status between patients who underwent conventional titanium mesh reconstruction and those who underwent the same resection but with personalized AVBs.

Methods

We performed a retrospective comparative study and recruited a single-institution cohort of patients with C2 vertebral tumors. Clinical data and imaging findings were reviewed. Through data processing and comparative analysis, we described and discussed the feasibility and safety of surgical resection and the outcomes of hardware implants. The primary outcome of this study was instrumented fixation status.

Results

The 31 recruited patients were divided into two groups. There were 13 patients in group A who underwent conventional titanium mesh reconstruction and 18 group B patients who underwent personalized AVBs. All patients underwent staged posterior and anterior surgical procedures. In the cohort, 9.7% achieved total en bloc resection of the tumor, while gross total resection was achieved in the remaining 90.3%. The perioperative complication and mortality rates were 45.2% and 6.5%, respectively. The occurrence of perioperative complications was related to the choice of anterior approach (p < 0.05). Group A had a higher complication rate than group B (p < 0.05). Four patients (4/13, 30.8%) developed hardware problems during the follow-up period; however, this rate was marginally higher than that of group B (1/18, 5.6%).

Conclusions

Total resection of C2 vertebral tumors was associated with a high risk of perioperative complications. The staged posterior and retropharyngeal approaches are better surgical strategies for C2 tumors. Personalized AVBs can provide a reliable reconstruction outcome, yet minor pitfalls remain that call for further modification.

Treatment of spinal deformity with diastematomyelia type I: one-stage, two-stage surgery and new technique (vertebral column resection through wide bony septum)

STUDY DESIGN

Case series, literature review, and technical note.

OBJECTIVES

To compare two different approaches to treat the spinal deformity with split cord malformation type I (SCM I). To present a new method of one-stage surgical treatment of congenital spinal deformity with wide bony septum (SCM I).

METHODS

Analysis of the literature on the different types of combined surgical treatment of spinal deformities with SCM I was performed. We have provided our own data on 27 patients treated for congenital spinal deformity and SCM I, one of which underwent Schwab IV type osteotomy at the apex of the deformity through the bony septum and pedicles. Inclusion criteria were presence of spinal deformity in combination with SCM 1, performed surgery to correct spinal deformity, and follow-up period of at least 2 years.

RESULTS

The result of the literature review was controversial and requires additional research. The average age of patients was 8.8 ± 6.6 years old. One-stage treatment of SCM I and spinal deformity was performed in 10 patients (group I) and two-stage in 14 patients (group II). Three patients with severe myelodysplasia, SCM I, and congenital kyphoscoliosis underwent correction of spinal deformity without SCM I removing (group III). The group I had the longest surgery duration (mean 289 ± 75 min) and largest blood loss (mean 560 ± 386 ml), a high percentage of deformity correction (mean 69.6%), and the highest rate of complications (60%). The most optimal was the two-stage treatment with the mean surgery duration 191 ± 137 min, mean blood loss 339 ± 436 ml, mean correction rate 63%, and frequency of complications 21%. The average follow-up time was 6.0 ± 2.6 years.

CONCLUSIONS

One stage surgery associated with a large surgical invasion and a large number of complications. It can be used in some cases, for example when the wide bony septum (SCM I) is localized at the apex of the congenital scoliosis or kyphosis. In all other cases, it is worth adhering to a two-stage treatment. Many new works demonstrate the relative safety and effectiveness of deformity correction without removing the SCM. In our opinion, indications for treatment of spinal deformity without SCM I removing can be the need to perform a shortening ostetomy outside the SCM zone. The remaining cases require a thorough assessment and a balanced decision.

Feasibility of achieving planned surgical margins in primary spine tumor: a PTRON study

OBJECTIVE

Oncological resection of primary spine tumors is associated with lower recurrence rates. However, even in the most experienced hands, the execution of a meticulously drafted plan sometimes fails. The objectives of this study were to determine how successful surgical teams are at achieving planned surgical margins and how successful surgeons are in intraoperatively assessing tumor margins. The secondary objective was to identify factors associated with successful execution of planned resection.

METHODS

The Primary Tumor Research and Outcomes Network (PTRON) is a multicenter international prospective registry for the management of primary tumors of the spine. Using this registry, the authors compared 1) the planned surgical margin and 2) the intraoperative assessment of the margin by the surgeon with the postoperative assessment of the margin by the pathologist. Univariate analysis was used to assess whether factors such as histology, size, location, previous radiotherapy, and revision surgery were associated with successful execution of the planned margins.

RESULTS

Three hundred patients were included. The surgical plan was successfully achieved in 224 (74.7%) patients. The surgeon correctly assessed the intraoperative margins, as reported in the final assessment by the pathologist, in 239 (79.7%) patients. On univariate analysis, no factor had a statistically significant influence on successful achievement of planned margins.

CONCLUSIONS

In high-volume cancer centers around the world, planned surgical margins can be achieved in approximately 75% of cases. The morbidity of the proposed intervention must be balanced with the expected success rate in order to optimize patient management and surgical decision-making.