1
|
Lines R, Juggernauth M, Peverley G, Keating J, Simpson T, Mousavi-Derazmahalleh M, Bunce M, Berry TE, Taysom A, Bernardino AF, Whittle P. A large scale temporal and spatial environmental DNA biodiversity survey of marine vertebrates in Brazil following the Fundão tailings dam failure. MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH 2023; 192:106239. [PMID: 37926039 DOI: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2023.106239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2023] [Revised: 10/19/2023] [Accepted: 10/22/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023]
Abstract
Seawater contains a wealth of genetic information, representing the biodiversity of numerous species residing within a particular marine habitat. Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding offers a cost effective, non-destructive method for large scale monitoring of environments, as diverse taxonomic groups are detected using metabarcoding assays. A large-scale eDNA monitoring program of marine vertebrates was conducted across three sampling seasons (Spring 2018, Autumn 2019; Spring 2019) in coastal waters of Brazil. The program was designed to investigate eDNA as a testing method for long term monitoring of marine vertebrates following the Fundão tailings dam failure in November 2015. While no baseline samples were available prior to the dam failure there is still value in profiling the taxa that use the impacted area and the trajectory of recovery. A total of 40 sites were sampled around the mouths of eight river systems, covering approximately 500 km of coastline. Metabarcoding assays targeting the mitochondrial genes 16S rRNA and COI were used to detect fish, marine mammals and elasmobranchs. We detected temporal differences between seasons and spatial differences between rivers/estuaries sampled. Overall, the largest eDNA survey in Brazil to date revealed 69 families from Class Actinopterygii (fish), 15 species from Class Chondrichthyes (sharks and rays), 4 species of marine and estuarine mammals and 23 species of conservation significance including 2 species of endangered dolphin. Our large-scale study reinforces the value eDNA metabarcoding can bring when monitoring the biodiversity of coastal environments and demonstrates the importance of collection of time-stamped environmental samples to better understand the impacts of anthropogenic activities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rose Lines
- eDNA frontiers, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia; Trace and Environmental DNA laboratory, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
| | | | - Georgia Peverley
- eDNA frontiers, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | | | - Tiffany Simpson
- eDNA frontiers, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia; Trace and Environmental DNA laboratory, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Mahsa Mousavi-Derazmahalleh
- eDNA frontiers, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia; Trace and Environmental DNA laboratory, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Michael Bunce
- Trace and Environmental DNA laboratory, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Tina E Berry
- eDNA frontiers, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | | | - Angelo F Bernardino
- Grupo de Ecologia Bentônica, Universidade Federal do Espirito Santo, Vitória, ES, Brazil
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Merten Cruz M, Sauvage T, Chariton A, de Freitas TRO. The challenge of implementing environmental DNA metabarcoding to detect elasmobranchs in a resource-limited marine protected area. JOURNAL OF FISH BIOLOGY 2023. [PMID: 37060349 DOI: 10.1111/jfb.15406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2022] [Accepted: 04/13/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
Elasmobranchs are threatened and eDNA metabarcoding is a powerful tool that can help efforts to better understand and conserve them. Nevertheless, the inter-calibration between optimal methodological practices and its implementation in resource-limited situations is still an issue. Based on promising results from recent studies, the authors applied a cost-effective protocol with parameters that could be easily replicated by any conservationist. Nonetheless, the results with fewer elasmobranchs detected than expected reveal that endorsed primers and sampling strategies still require further optimization, especially for applications in resource-limited conservation programmes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcelo Merten Cruz
- Programa de Pós-graduação em Genética e Biologia Molecular, Departamento de Genética, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Thomas Sauvage
- Programa de Pós-graduação em Ecologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Anthony Chariton
- School of Life Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Thales Renato Ochotorena de Freitas
- Programa de Pós-graduação em Genética e Biologia Molecular, Departamento de Genética, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Patin NV, Goodwin KD. Capturing marine microbiomes and environmental DNA: A field sampling guide. Front Microbiol 2023; 13:1026596. [PMID: 36713215 PMCID: PMC9877356 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1026596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2022] [Accepted: 11/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
The expanding interest in marine microbiome and eDNA sequence data has led to a demand for sample collection and preservation standard practices to enable comparative assessments of results across studies and facilitate meta-analyses. We support this effort by providing guidelines based on a review of published methods and field sampling experiences. The major components considered here are environmental and resource considerations, sample processing strategies, sample storage options, and eDNA extraction protocols. It is impossible to provide universal recommendations considering the wide range of eDNA applications; rather, we provide information to design fit-for-purpose protocols. To manage scope, the focus here is on sampling collection and preservation of prokaryotic and microeukaryotic eDNA. Even with a focused view, the practical utility of any approach depends on multiple factors, including habitat type, available resources, and experimental goals. We broadly recommend enacting rigorous decontamination protocols, pilot studies to guide the filtration volume needed to characterize the target(s) of interest and minimize PCR inhibitor collection, and prioritizing sample freezing over (only) the addition of preservation buffer. An annotated list of studies that test these parameters is included for more detailed investigation on specific steps. To illustrate an approach that demonstrates fit-for-purpose methodologies, we provide a protocol for eDNA sampling aboard an oceanographic vessel. These guidelines can aid the decision-making process for scientists interested in sampling and sequencing marine microbiomes and/or eDNA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nastassia Virginia Patin
- Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory, Ocean Chemistry and Ecosystems Division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Miami, FL, United States,Cooperative Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Studies, Rosenstiel School of Marine, Atmospheric, and Earth Science, University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States,Stationed at Southwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, La Jolla, CA, United States,*Correspondence: Nastassia Virginia Patin,
| | - Kelly D. Goodwin
- Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory, Ocean Chemistry and Ecosystems Division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Miami, FL, United States,Stationed at Southwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, La Jolla, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gold Z, Wall AR, Schweizer TM, Pentcheff ND, Curd EE, Barber PH, Meyer RS, Wayne R, Stolzenbach K, Prickett K, Luedy J, Wetzer R. A manager's guide to using eDNA metabarcoding in marine ecosystems. PeerJ 2022; 10:e14071. [PMID: 36405018 PMCID: PMC9673773 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.14071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2022] [Accepted: 08/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding is a powerful tool that can enhance marine ecosystem/biodiversity monitoring programs. Here we outline five important steps managers and researchers should consider when developing eDNA monitoring program: (1) select genes and primers to target taxa; (2) assemble or develop comprehensive barcode reference databases; (3) apply rigorous site occupancy based decontamination pipelines; (4) conduct pilot studies to define spatial and temporal variance of eDNA; and (5) archive samples, extracts, and raw sequence data. We demonstrate the importance of each of these considerations using a case study of eDNA metabarcoding in the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach. eDNA metabarcoding approaches detected 94.1% (16/17) of species observed in paired trawl surveys while identifying an additional 55 native fishes, providing more comprehensive biodiversity inventories. Rigorous benchmarking of eDNA metabarcoding results improved ecological interpretation and confidence in species detections while providing archived genetic resources for future analyses. Well designed and validated eDNA metabarcoding approaches are ideally suited for biomonitoring applications that rely on the detection of species, including mapping invasive species fronts and endangered species habitats as well as tracking range shifts in response to climate change. Incorporating these considerations will enhance the utility and efficacy of eDNA metabarcoding for routine biomonitoring applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary Gold
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Adam R. Wall
- Diversity Initiative for the Southern California Ocean (DISCO), Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Teia M. Schweizer
- Department of Fish and Wildlife Conservation Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, United States of America
| | - N. Dean Pentcheff
- Diversity Initiative for the Southern California Ocean (DISCO), Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Emily E. Curd
- Department of Natural Sciences, Landmark College, Putney, VT, United States of America
| | - Paul H. Barber
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Rachel S. Meyer
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America,Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, United States of America
| | - Robert Wayne
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Kevin Stolzenbach
- Wood Environment and Infrastructure, Inc., San Diego, CA, United States of America
| | - Kat Prickett
- Port of Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Justin Luedy
- Port of Long Beach, Long Beach, CA, United States of America
| | - Regina Wetzer
- Diversity Initiative for the Southern California Ocean (DISCO), Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mariani S, Fernandez C, Baillie C, Magalon H, Jaquemet S. Shark and ray diversity, abundance and temporal variation around an Indian Ocean Island, inferred by eDNA metabarcoding. CONSERVATION SCIENCE AND PRACTICE 2021. [DOI: 10.1111/csp2.407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Mariani
- School of Biological & Environmental Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University Liverpool UK
| | | | - Charles Baillie
- School of Science, Engineering & Environment, University of Salford Salford UK
| | - Helene Magalon
- UMR Entropie, Université de La Réunion Saint‐Denis France
- Laboratoire d'Excellence CORAIL Perpignan France
| | | |
Collapse
|