The suitability of NONO-TFE3 dual-fusion FISH assay as a diagnostic tool for NONO-TFE3 renal cell carcinoma

MiT/TFE Family Renal Cell Carcinoma

The microphthalmia-associated transcription factor/transcription factor E (MiT/TFE) family of transcription factors are evolutionarily conserved, basic helix-loop-helix leucine zipper (bHLH-Zip) transcription factors, consisting of MITF, TFEB, TFE3, and TFEC. MiT/TFE proteins, with the exception of TFEC, are involved in the development of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Most of the MiT/TFE transcription factor alterations seen in sporadic RCC cases of MiT family translocation renal cell carcinoma (tRCC) are chimeric proteins generated by chromosomal rearrangements. These chimeric MiT/TFE proteins retain the bHLH-Zip structures and act as oncogenic transcription factors. The germline variant of MITF p.E318K has been reported as a risk factor for RCC. E 318 is present at the SUMOylation consensus site of MITF. The p.E318K variant abrogates SUMOylation on K 316, which results in alteration of MITF transcriptional activity. Only a few cases of MITF p.E318K RCC have been reported, and their clinical features have not yet been fully described. It would be important for clinicians to recognize MITF p.E318K RCC and consider MITF germline testing for undiagnosed familial RCC cases. This review outlines the involvement of the MiT/TFE transcription factors in RCC, both in sporadic and hereditary cases. Further elucidation of the molecular function of the MiT/TFE family is necessary for better diagnosis and treatment of these rare diseases.

Clinicopathological features and prognosis of TFE3-positive renal cell carcinoma

Background

This study aimed to investigate the expression profile of TFE3 in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and the clinicopathological features as well as prognosis of TFE3-positive RCC.

Methods

Tissue sections from 796 patients with RCC were collected for immunohistochemical staining of TFE3. Molecular TFE3 rearrangement tests were also carried out on the TFE3-positive RCCs using fluorescence in situ hybridization and RNA-sequencing assays. Both clinicopathological features and follow-up information were collected for further analysis.

Results

The present study showed that 91 patients with RCC (91/796, 11.4%) were TFE3 positive expression but only 31 (31/91, 34.1%) of the patients were diagnosed with Xp11.2 translocation RCC. Further, it was found that the patients with TFE3-positive RCCs were more likely to develop lymph node and distant metastasis at diagnosis as well as presented a significantly higher WHO/ISUP nuclear grade and AJCC stage as compared with patients with TFE3-negative RCCs (p<0.01). Results of univariate and multivariate analyses showed that TFE3 positive expression was an independent prognostic factor associated with poor progression-free survival. Further, the findings of survival analysis showed that patients with positive TFE3 expression showed a shorter progression-free survival as compared with the patients with negative expression of TFE3 (p<0.001). In addition, results of the survival analysis found that there was no significant difference in progression-free survival between the Xp11.2 translocation RCC and TFE3-positive non-Xp11.2 translocation RCC groups (p=0.9607).

Conclusion

This study found that nuclear TFE3 expression is not specific to the Xp11.2 translocation RCC. Moreover, the positive TFE3 expression is associated with tumor progression and poor prognosis in patients with RCC irrespective of the presence of TFE3 translocation.

Kidney cancer: from genes to therapy

Renal cell carcinoma incidence is rising worldwide with increasing subtype stratification by the World Health Organization. Each subtype has unique genetic alterations, cell biology changes and clinical findings. Such genetic alterations offer the potential for individualized therapeutic approaches that are rapidly progressing. This review highlights the most common subtypes of renal cell carcinoma, including both hereditary and sporadic forms, with a focus on genetic changes, clinical findings and ongoing clinical trials.

NONO-TFE3 fusion promotes aerobic glycolysis and angiogenesis by targeting HIF1A in NONO-TFE3 translocation renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

NONO-TFE3 translocation renal cell carcinoma (tRCC), one of RCCs associated with Xp11.2 translocation/TFE3 gene fusion (Xp11.2 tRCCs), involves an X chromosome inversion between NONO and TFE3 with the characteristics of endonuclear aggregation of NONO-TFE3 fusion protein. Nowadays, the oncogenic mechanisms of NONO-TFE3 fusion have not been fully elucidated.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed at investigating the mechanism of NONO-TFE3 fusion regulating HIF1A as well as the role of HIF-1α in the progression of NONO-TFE3 tRCC under hypoxia.

METHODS

Immunohistochemistry and Western Blotting assays were performed to profile HIF-1α expression in renal clear cell carcinoma (ccRCC) or in Xp11.2 tRCC. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP), luciferase reporter assay and real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) were used to evaluate the regulation of HIF1A expression by NONO-TFE3 fusion. Then, flow cytometry analysis, tube formation assays and cell migration assays were used as well as glucose or lactic acid levels were measured to establish the impact of HIF-1α on the progression of NONO-TFE3 tRCC. Besides, the effect of HIF-1α inhibitor (PX-478) on UOK109 cells was analyzed.

RESULTS

We found that HIF1A was targeting gene of NONO-TFE3 fusion. In UOK109 cells, which were isolated from NONO-TFE3 tRCC samples, NONO-TFE3 fusion promoted aerobic glycolysis and angiogenesis by up-regulating the expression of HIF-1α under hypoxia. Furthermore, inhibition of HIF-1α mediated by PX-478 suppressed the development of NONO-TFE3 tRCC under hypoxia.

CONCLUSION

HIF-1α is a potential target for therapy of NONO-TFE3 tRCC under hypoxia.