Individually distinctive features facilitate numerical discrimination of sets of objects in domestic chicks

Passive Grouping Enhances Proto-Arithmetic Calculation for Leftward Correct Responses

Baby chicks and other animals including human infants master simple arithmetic. They discriminate 2 vs. 3 (1 + 1 vs. 1 + 1 + 1) but fail with 3 vs. 4 (1 + 1 + 1 vs. 1 + 1 + 1 + 1). Performance is restored when elements are grouped as 2 + 1 vs. 2 + 2. Here, we address whether grouping could lead to asymmetric response bias. We recoded behavioural data from a previous study, in which separate groups of four-day-old domestic chicks underwent an arithmetic task: when the objects were presented one-by-one (1 + 1 + 1 vs. 1 + 1 + 1 + 1), chicks failed in locating the larger group irrespective of its position and did not show any side bias; Experiment 1. When the objects were presented as grouped (2 + 1 vs. 2 + 2), chicks succeeded, performing better when the larger set was on their left; Experiment 2. A similar leftward bias was also observed with harder discriminations (4 vs. 5: 3  +  1 vs. 3  +  2), with baby chicks succeeding in the task only when the larger set was on the left (Experiments 3 and 4). A previous study showed a rightward bias, with tasks enhancing individual processing. Despite a similar effect in boosting proto-arithmetic calculations, individual processing (eliciting a right bias) and grouping (eliciting a left bias) seem to depend on distinct cognitive mechanisms.

Large-scale study of the precision of the approximate number system: Differences between formats, heterogeneity and congruency effects

The study used a large sample of elementary schoolchildren in Russia (N = 3,448, 51.6% were girls, with a mean age of 8.70 years, ranging 6-11 years) to investigate the congruency, format and heterogeneity effects in a nonsymbolic comparison test and between-individual differences in these effects with generalized linear mixed effects models (GLMMs). The participants were asked to compare two arrays of figures of different colours in spatially separated or spatially intermixed formats. In addition, the figures could be similar or different for the two arrays. The results revealed that congruency (difference between congruent and incongruent items), format (difference between mixed and separated formats) and heterogeneity (difference between homogeneous and heterogeneous conditions) interacted. The heterogeneity effect was higher in the separated format, while the format effect was higher for the homogeneous condition. The separated format produced a greater congruency effect than the mixed format. In addition, the congruency effect was lower in the heterogeneous condition than in the homogeneous condition. Analysis of between-individual differences revealed that there was significant between-individual variance in the format and congruency effects. Analysis of between-grade differences revealed that accuracy improved from grade 1 to grade 4 only for congruent trials in separated formats. Consequently, the congruency effect increased in separated/homogeneous and separated/heterogeneous conditions. In general, the study demonstrated that the test format and heterogeneity affected accuracy and that this effect varied for congruent and incongruent items.

Processing Individually Distinctive Schematic-Faces Supports Proto-Arithmetical Counting in the Young Domestic Chicken

Simple Summary

Baby chicks, like infants and other animals, are unable to distinguish 3 vs. 4 identical objects. Because infants and chicks discriminate among larger sets (e.g., 4 vs. 12; 6 vs. 9), the 3 vs. 4 limitation has been considered the key-signature of the counting cognitive system that processes small numerosities. Here, we explored if the experience with different bird-like faces as objects—which naturally trigger chicks’ attention—could make the 3 vs. 4 task easier. Chicks reared with seven different faces, characterized by two “eyes” and a “beak” as features, succeeded in the 1 + 1 + 1 vs. 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 operation (Exp. 1); while birds, reared and tested with seven identical copies of a same face, failed (Exp. 2). Processing different individuals, and not experience with copies of one single individual per se, increased proto-arithmetic performance. Surprisingly, chicks, after being reared with seven identical faces, succeeded in the proto-arithmetic task when presented with seven completely novel faces (Exp. 3). On the contrary, similar experience with seven identical and featureless faces did not allow discrimination of novel faces (Exp. 4). Experience of one face probably helps to focus on the facial features which are later used to individually process new faces. In turn, individual processing enhances proto-arithmetical calculation.

Abstract

A key signature of small-number processing is the difficulty in discriminating between three and four objects, as reported in infants and animals. Five-day-old chicks overcome this limit if individually distinctive features characterize each object. In this study, we have investigated whether processing individually different face-like objects can also support discrimination between three and four objects. Chicks were reared with seven face-like stimuli and tested in the proto-arithmetic comparison 1 + 1 + 1 vs. 1 + 1 + 1 + 1. Birds reared and tested with all different faces discriminated and approached the larger group (Exp. 1), whereas new birds reared and tested with seven identical copies of one same face failed (Exp. 2). The presence at test of individually different faces allowed discrimination even when chicks were reared with copies of one face (Exp. 3). To clarify the role of the previous experience of at least one specific arrangement of facial features, in Experiment 4, featureless faces were employed during rearing. During testing, chicks were unable to discriminate between three and four individually distinct faces. Results highlight the importance of having experienced at least one “face” in prompting individual processing and proto-arithmetical calculation later during testing. We speculate that mechanisms effective at the non-symbolic level may positively affect numerical performance.

The Prevalence of Integument Injuries and Associated Risk Factors Among Canadian Turkeys

Injurious pecking can cause a wide range of damage and is an important welfare and economic issue in turkey production. Aggressive pecking typically targets the head/neck (HN) area, and feather pecking typically targets the back/tail (BT) area; injuries in these separate areas could be used as a proxy for the level of aggressive and feather pecking in a flock. The objective of this study was to identify risk factors for integument injuries in Canadian turkey flocks. A survey containing a questionnaire about housing and management practices and a scoring guide was distributed to 500 turkey farmers across Canada. The farmer scored pecking injuries in two different body areas (HN and BT) on a 0-2 scale on a subset of birds within each flock. Multivariable logistic regression modeling was used to identify factors associated with the presence of HN and BT injuries. The prevalence of birds with integument injuries ranged widely between the flock subsets (HN = 0-40%, BT = 0-97%), however the mean prevalence was low (HN = 6%, BT = 10%). The presence of injuries for logistic regression was defined as flocks with an injury prevalence greater than the median level of injury prevalence in the dataset (3.3% HN and 6.6% BT). The final logistic regression model for HN injuries contained five variables: flock sex, flock age, number of daily inspections, number of different people during inspections, and picking up birds during inspections (N = 62, pR2 = 0.23, α = 0.05). The final logistic regression model for BT injuries contained six variables: flock sex, flock age, litter depth, litter condition, inspection duration, and use of hospital pens for sick/injured birds (N = 59, pR2 = 0.29, α = 0.05). Flock age, and to a lesser extent, sex was associated with both types of injuries. From a management perspective, aggressive pecking injuries appear to be influenced by variables related to human interaction, namely during inspections. On the other hand, the presence of feather pecking injuries, was associated with litter condition and other management factors like separating sick birds. Future research on injurious pecking in turkeys should focus on these aspects of housing and management to better describe the relationship between the identified variables and the prevalence and severity of these conditions.

Space-luminance crossmodal correspondences in domestic chicks

Crossmodal correspondences are spontaneous associations of non-redundant information across different modalities. Infants and some non-human animals (i.e., chimpanzees, rhesus monkeys, and dogs) showed crossmodal correspondences like adult humans, suggesting a shared origin (at least among mammals) of such a phenomenon. Here we investigate visual-spatial crossmodal correspondences in a precocial avian species, i.e., the domestic chicken. Three-day-old chicks (n = 40) were presented with two (one in the left and one in the right hemispace of an arena) identical panels, either dyed black (low luminance) or white (high luminance). Chicks could circumnavigate either panel to obtain a food reward. Akin to humans, they preferentially chose the left side when presented with black panels and the right side when presented with white panels. The control group (n = 39), tested with grey panels, showed no spatial preference. In light of our results, we discuss crossmodal correspondences in terms of an early available mechanism widespread across different species.

Response of male and female domestic chicks to change in the number (quantity) of imprinting objects

When facing two sets of imprinting objects of different numerousness, domestic chicks prefer to approach the larger one. Given that choice for familiar and novel stimuli in imprinting situations is known to be affected by the sex of the animals, we investigated how male and female domestic chicks divide the time spent in the proximity of a familiar versus an unfamiliar number of objects, and how animals interact (by pecking) with these objects. We confirmed that chicks discriminate among the different numerousnesses, but we also showed that females and males behave differently, depending on the degree of familiarity of the objects. When objects in the testing sets were all familiar, females equally explored both sets and pecked at all objects individually. Males instead selectively approached the familiar numerousness and pecked more at it. When both testing sets comprised familiar as well as novel objects, both males and females approached the larger numerousness of familiar objects. However, chicks directed all their pecks toward the novel object within the set. Differences in the behavior of males and females can be accounted for in terms of sex difference in the motivation to reinstate social contact with the familiar objects and to explore novel ones, likely associated with the ecology and the social structure of the species before domestication.