1
|
Parihar AK, Gupta S, Hazra KK, Lamichaney A, Sen Gupta D, Singh D, Kumar R, Singh AK, Vaishnavi R, Jaberson MS, Das SP, Dev J, Yadav RK, Jamwal BS, Choudhary BR, Khedar OP, Prakash V, Dikshit HK, Panwar RK, Katiyar M, Kumar P, Mahto CS, Borah HK, Singh MN, Das A, Patil AN, Nanda HC, Kumar V, Rajput SD, Chauhan DA, Patel MH, Kanwar RR, Kumar J, Mishra SP, Kumar H, Swarup I, Mogali S, Kumaresan D, Manivannan N, Gowda MB, Pandiyan M, Rao PJ, Shivani D, Prusti AM, Mahadevu P, Iyanar K, Das S. Multi-location evaluation of mungbean ( Vigna radiata L.) in Indian climates: Ecophenological dynamics, yield relation, and characterization of locations. FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE 2022; 13:984912. [PMID: 36204050 PMCID: PMC9530336 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.984912] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2022] [Accepted: 08/18/2022] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
Crop yield varies considerably within agroecology depending on the genetic potential of crop cultivars and various edaphic and climatic variables. Understanding site-specific changes in crop yield and genotype × environment interaction are crucial and needs exceptional consideration in strategic breeding programs. Further, genotypic response to diverse agro-ecologies offers identification of strategic locations for evaluating traits of interest to strengthen and accelerate the national variety release program. In this study, multi-location field trial data have been used to investigate the impact of environmental conditions on crop phenological dynamics and their influence on the yield of mungbean in different agroecological regions of the Indian subcontinent. The present attempt is also intended to identify the strategic location(s) favoring higher yield and distinctiveness within mungbean genotypes. In the field trial, a total of 34 different mungbean genotypes were grown in 39 locations covering the north hill zone (n = 4), northeastern plain zone (n = 6), northwestern plain zone (n = 7), central zone (n = 11) and south zone (n = 11). The results revealed that the effect of the environment was prominent on both the phenological dynamics and productivity of the mungbean. Noticeable variations (expressed as coefficient of variation) were observed for the parameters of days to 50% flowering (13%), days to maturity (12%), reproductive period (21%), grain yield (33%), and 1000-grain weight (14%) across the environments. The genotype, environment, and genotype × environment accounted for 3.0, 54.2, and 29.7% of the total variation in mungbean yield, respectively (p < 0.001), suggesting an oversized significance of site-specific responses of the genotypes. Results demonstrated that a lower ambient temperature extended both flowering time and the crop period. Linear mixed model results revealed that the changes in phenological events (days to 50 % flowering, days to maturity, and reproductive period) with response to contrasting environments had no direct influence on crop yields (p > 0.05) for all the genotypes except PM 14-11. Results revealed that the south zone environment initiated early flowering and an extended reproductive period, thus sustaining yield with good seed size. While in low rainfall areas viz., Sriganganagar, New Delhi, Durgapura, and Sagar, the yield was comparatively low irrespective of genotypes. Correlation results and PCA indicated that rainfall during the crop season and relative humidity significantly and positively influenced grain yield. Hence, the present study suggests that the yield potential of mungbean is independent of crop phenological dynamics; rather, climatic variables like rainfall and relative humidity have considerable influence on yield. Further, HA-GGE biplot analysis identified Sagar, New Delhi, Sriganganagar, Durgapura, Warangal, Srinagar, Kanpur, and Mohanpur as the ideal testing environments, which demonstrated high efficiency in the selection of new genotypes with wider adaptability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sanjeev Gupta
- Indian Council of Agricultural Research, Krishi Bhawan, New Delhi, India
| | - Kali K. Hazra
- ICAR-Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur, India
| | | | | | - Deepak Singh
- ICAR-Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute, New Delhi, India
| | - Raju Kumar
- ICAR-Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute, New Delhi, India
| | - Anil K. Singh
- ICAR-Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur, India
| | - Rakesh Vaishnavi
- Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology (SKUAST), Srinagar, India
| | | | - Sankar P. Das
- ICAR Research Complex for North Eastern Hilly Region, Agartala, India
| | - Jai Dev
- Chaudhary Sarwan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur, India
| | - Rajesh K. Yadav
- Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, India
| | - B. S. Jamwal
- Pulses Research Sub-Station, SKUAST-Jammu, Srinagar, India
| | | | - O. P. Khedar
- Rajasthan Agricultural Research Institute, Jaipur, India
| | | | | | - R. K. Panwar
- Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, India
| | - Manoj Katiyar
- Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture and Technology, Kanpur, India
| | - Pankaj Kumar
- Acharya Narendra Deva University of Agriculture and Technology, Ayodhya, India
| | - C. S. Mahto
- Birsa Agricultural University, Ranchi, India
| | - H. K. Borah
- Regional Agricultural Research Station, Shillongani, India
| | - M. N. Singh
- Institute of Agricultural Science, BHU, Varanasi, India
| | - Arpita Das
- Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Mohanpur, India
| | - A. N. Patil
- Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Pulses Research Unit, Akola, India
| | - H. C. Nanda
- Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Raipur, India
| | - Vinod Kumar
- Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Regional Agricultural Research Station, Sagar, India
| | | | | | - M. H. Patel
- Sardarkrushinagar Dantiwada Agricultural University, Sardarkrushi Nagar, India
| | - Raja R. Kanwar
- S.G. College of Agriculture and Research Station, Jagdalpur, India
| | - Jitendra Kumar
- Rajmohni Devi College of Agriculture and Research Station, Ambikapur, India
| | - S. P. Mishra
- Mahatma Gandhi Chitrakoot Gramodaya Vishwavidyalaya, Chitrakoot, India
| | - Hitesh Kumar
- Banda University of Agriculture and Technology, Banda, India
| | - Indu Swarup
- Regional Research Centre on Pulses, College of Agriculture, Indore, India
| | - Suma Mogali
- University of Agricultural Sciences (UAS), Dharwad, India
| | - D. Kumaresan
- Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (TNAU), Coimbatore, India
| | | | - M. Byre Gowda
- University of Agricultural Sciences, Gandhi Krishi Vigyana Kendra (GKVK), Bangalore, India
| | | | - Polneni J. Rao
- Regional Agricultural Research Station (PJTSAU), Warangal, India
| | - D. Shivani
- PJTSA-Agricultural Research Station, Madhira, India
| | - A. M. Prusti
- Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, Bhubaneswar, India
| | - P. Mahadevu
- College of Agriculture, UAS, GKVK, Mandya, India
| | - K. Iyanar
- Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (TNAU), Coimbatore, India
| | - Sujata Das
- Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, Bhubaneswar, India
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mladenov V, Fotopoulos V, Kaiserli E, Karalija E, Maury S, Baranek M, Segal N, Testillano PS, Vassileva V, Pinto G, Nagel M, Hoenicka H, Miladinović D, Gallusci P, Vergata C, Kapazoglou A, Abraham E, Tani E, Gerakari M, Sarri E, Avramidou E, Gašparović M, Martinelli F. Deciphering the Epigenetic Alphabet Involved in Transgenerational Stress Memory in Crops. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:7118. [PMID: 34281171 PMCID: PMC8268041 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22137118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2021] [Revised: 06/16/2021] [Accepted: 06/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Although epigenetic modifications have been intensely investigated over the last decade due to their role in crop adaptation to rapid climate change, it is unclear which epigenetic changes are heritable and therefore transmitted to their progeny. The identification of epigenetic marks that are transmitted to the next generations is of primary importance for their use in breeding and for the development of new cultivars with a broad-spectrum of tolerance/resistance to abiotic and biotic stresses. In this review, we discuss general aspects of plant responses to environmental stresses and provide an overview of recent findings on the role of transgenerational epigenetic modifications in crops. In addition, we take the opportunity to describe the aims of EPI-CATCH, an international COST action consortium composed by researchers from 28 countries. The aim of this COST action launched in 2020 is: (1) to define standardized pipelines and methods used in the study of epigenetic mechanisms in plants, (2) update, share, and exchange findings in epigenetic responses to environmental stresses in plants, (3) develop new concepts and frontiers in plant epigenetics and epigenomics, (4) enhance dissemination, communication, and transfer of knowledge in plant epigenetics and epigenomics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Velimir Mladenov
- Faculty of Agriculture, University of Novi Sad, Sq. Dositeja Obradovića 8, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia;
| | - Vasileios Fotopoulos
- Department of Agricultural Sciences, Biotechnology & Food Science, Cyprus University of Technology, Lemesos 3036, Cyprus;
| | - Eirini Kaiserli
- Institute of Molecular, Cell and Systems Biology, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK;
| | - Erna Karalija
- Laboratory for Plant Physiology, Department for Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Sarajevo, 71000 Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina;
| | - Stephane Maury
- INRAe, EA1207 USC1328 Laboratoire de Biologie des Ligneux et des Grandes Cultures, Université d’Orléans, 45067 Orléans, France;
| | - Miroslav Baranek
- Mendeleum—Insitute of Genetics, Faculty of Horticulture, Mendel University in Brno, Valtická 334, 69144 Lednice, Czech Republic;
| | - Naama Segal
- Israel Oceanographic and Limnological Research, The National Center for Mariculture (NCM), P.O.B. 1212, Eilat 88112, Israel;
| | - Pilar S. Testillano
- Center of Biological Research Margarita Salas, CIB-CSIC, Ramiro de Maeztu 9, 28040 Madrid, Spain;
| | - Valya Vassileva
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Institute of Plant Physiology and Genetics, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Acad. Georgi Bonchev Str., Bldg. 21, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria;
| | - Glória Pinto
- Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies (CESAM), Biology Department, Campus de Santiago, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal;
| | - Manuela Nagel
- Genebank Department, Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK) Gatersleben, 06466 Seeland, Germany;
| | - Hans Hoenicka
- Genomic Research Department, Thünen Institute of Forest Genetics, 22927 Grosshansdorf, Germany;
| | - Dragana Miladinović
- Laboratory for Biotechnology, Institute of Field and Vegetable Crops, Maksima Gorkog 30, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia;
| | - Philippe Gallusci
- UMR Ecophysiologie et Génomique Fonctionnelle de la Vigne, Université de Bordeaux, INRAE, Bordeaux Science Agro, 210 Chemin de Leysotte—CS5000833882 Villenave d’Ornon, 33076 Bordeaux, France;
| | - Chiara Vergata
- Department of Biology, University of Florence, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Italy;
| | - Aliki Kapazoglou
- Department of Vitis, Institute of Olive Tree, Subtropical Crops and Viticulture (IOSV), Hellenic Agricultural Organization-Dimitra (HAO-Dimitra), Sofokli Venizelou 1, Lykovrysi, 14123 Athens, Greece;
| | - Eleni Abraham
- Laboratory of Range Science, School of Agriculture, Forestry and Natural Environment, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece;
| | - Eleni Tani
- Laboratory of Plant Breeding and Biometry, Department of Crop Science, Agricultural University of Athens, Iera Odos 75, 11855 Athens, Greece; (E.T.); (M.G.); (E.S.); (E.A.)
| | - Maria Gerakari
- Laboratory of Plant Breeding and Biometry, Department of Crop Science, Agricultural University of Athens, Iera Odos 75, 11855 Athens, Greece; (E.T.); (M.G.); (E.S.); (E.A.)
| | - Efi Sarri
- Laboratory of Plant Breeding and Biometry, Department of Crop Science, Agricultural University of Athens, Iera Odos 75, 11855 Athens, Greece; (E.T.); (M.G.); (E.S.); (E.A.)
| | - Evaggelia Avramidou
- Laboratory of Plant Breeding and Biometry, Department of Crop Science, Agricultural University of Athens, Iera Odos 75, 11855 Athens, Greece; (E.T.); (M.G.); (E.S.); (E.A.)
| | - Mateo Gašparović
- Chair of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Faculty of Geodesy, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia;
| | - Federico Martinelli
- Department of Biology, University of Florence, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|