1
|
Tataranu LG, Turliuc S, Rizea RE, Dricu A, Alexandru O, Staicu GA, Kamel A. A Synopsis of Biomarkers in Glioblastoma: Past and Present. Curr Issues Mol Biol 2024; 46:6903-6939. [PMID: 39057054 PMCID: PMC11275428 DOI: 10.3390/cimb46070412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2024] [Revised: 06/27/2024] [Accepted: 07/01/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Accounting for 48% of malignant brain tumors in adults, glioblastoma has been of great interest in the last decades, especially in the biomolecular and neurosurgical fields, due to its incurable nature and notable neurological morbidity. The major advancements in neurosurgical technologies have positively influenced the extent of safe tumoral resection, while the latest progress in the biomolecular field of GBM has uncovered new potential therapeutical targets. Although GBM currently has no curative therapy, recent progress has been made in the management of this disease, both from surgical and molecular perspectives. The main current therapeutic approach is multimodal and consists of neurosurgical intervention, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, mostly with temozolomide. Although most patients will develop treatment resistance and tumor recurrence after surgical removal, biomolecular advancements regarding GBM have contributed to a better understanding of this pathology and its therapeutic management. Over the past few decades, specific biomarkers have been discovered that have helped predict prognosis and treatment responses and contributed to improvements in survival rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ligia Gabriela Tataranu
- Neurosurgical Department, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Carol Davila”, 020022 Bucharest, Romania;
- Neurosurgical Department, Clinical Emergency Hospital “Bagdasar-Arseni”, 041915 Bucharest, Romania;
| | - Serban Turliuc
- Medical Department, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “G. T. Popa”, 700115 Iasi, Romania;
| | - Radu Eugen Rizea
- Neurosurgical Department, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Carol Davila”, 020022 Bucharest, Romania;
- Neurosurgical Department, Clinical Emergency Hospital “Bagdasar-Arseni”, 041915 Bucharest, Romania;
| | - Anica Dricu
- Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 200349 Craiova, Romania (O.A.); (G.-A.S.)
| | - Oana Alexandru
- Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 200349 Craiova, Romania (O.A.); (G.-A.S.)
| | - Georgiana-Adeline Staicu
- Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 200349 Craiova, Romania (O.A.); (G.-A.S.)
| | - Amira Kamel
- Neurosurgical Department, Clinical Emergency Hospital “Bagdasar-Arseni”, 041915 Bucharest, Romania;
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cuccia F, Jafari F, D’Alessandro S, Carruba G, Craparo G, Tringali G, Blasi L, Ferrera G. Preferred Imaging for Target Volume Delineation for Radiotherapy of Recurrent Glioblastoma: A Literature Review of the Available Evidence. J Pers Med 2024; 14:538. [PMID: 38793120 PMCID: PMC11122491 DOI: 10.3390/jpm14050538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2024] [Revised: 04/29/2024] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recurrence in glioblastoma lacks a standardized treatment, prompting an exploration of re-irradiation's efficacy. METHODS A comprehensive systematic review from January 2005 to May 2023 assessed the role of MRI sequences in recurrent glioblastoma re-irradiation. The search criteria, employing MeSH terms, targeted English-language, peer-reviewed articles. The inclusion criteria comprised both retrospective and prospective studies, excluding certain types and populations for specificity. The PICO methodology guided data extraction, and the statistical analysis employed Chi-squared tests via MedCalc v22.009. RESULTS Out of the 355 identified studies, 81 met the criteria, involving 3280 patients across 65 retrospective and 16 prospective studies. The key findings indicate diverse treatment modalities, with linac-based photons predominating. The median age at re-irradiation was 54 years, and the median time interval between radiation courses was 15.5 months. Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted sequences were favored for target delineation, with PET-imaging used in fewer studies. Re-irradiation was generally well tolerated (median G3 adverse events: 3.5%). The clinical outcomes varied, with a median 1-year local control rate of 61% and a median overall survival of 11 months. No significant differences were noted in the G3 toxicity and clinical outcomes based on the MRI sequence preference or PET-based delineation. CONCLUSIONS In the setting of recurrent glioblastoma, contrast-enhanced T1-weighted sequences were preferred for target delineation, allowing clinicians to deliver a safe and effective therapeutic option; amino acid PET imaging may represent a useful device to discriminate radionecrosis from recurrent disease. Future investigations, including the ongoing GLIAA, NOA-10, ARO 2013/1 trial, will aim to refine approaches and standardize methodologies for improved outcomes in recurrent glioblastoma re-irradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Cuccia
- Radiation Oncology, ARNAS Civico Hospital, 90100 Palermo, Italy (G.F.)
| | - Fatemeh Jafari
- Radiation Oncology Department, Imam-Khomeini Hospital Complex, Teheran University of Medical Sciences, Teheran 1416634793, Iran
| | | | - Giuseppe Carruba
- Division of Internationalization and Health Research (SIRS), ARNAS Civico Hospital, 90100 Palermo, Italy
| | | | | | - Livio Blasi
- Medical Oncology, ARNAS Civico Hospital, 90100 Palermo, Italy;
| | - Giuseppe Ferrera
- Radiation Oncology, ARNAS Civico Hospital, 90100 Palermo, Italy (G.F.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tong E, Horsley P, Wheeler H, Wong M, Venkatesha V, Chan J, Kastelan M, Back M. Hypofractionated re-irradiation with bevacizumab for relapsed chemorefractory glioblastoma after prior high dose radiotherapy: a feasible option for patients with large-volume relapse. J Neurooncol 2024; 168:69-76. [PMID: 38551747 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-024-04643-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 05/15/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE There remains no standard of care for patients with recurrent and chemorefractory glioblastoma. Re-irradiation (reRT) provides an additional management option. However, published series predominantly focus on small reRT volumes utilizing stereotactic hypofractionated regimens. Concerns regarding toxicity have limited utilisation of reRT for larger recurrences, however this may be mitigated with use of bevacizumab (BEV). METHODS AND MATERIALS A prospective database of patients managed with the EORTC-NCIC (Stupp) protocol 60 Gy chemoradiotherapy protocol for glioblastoma between 2007 and 2021 was reviewed for those patients receiving reRT for chemorefractory relapse. Serial MRI and PET were used to establish true progression and exclude patients with pseudoprogression or radionecrosis from reRT. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) from date of reRT. Prognostic factors were also assessed. RESULTS 447 patients managed for glioblastoma under the Stupp protocol were identified, of which 372 had relapsed and were thus eligible for reRT. 71 patients underwent reRT. Median relapse-free survival from diagnosis for the reRT and overall cohorts were similar at 11.6 months (95%CI:9.4-14.2) and 11.8 months (95%CI:9.4-14.2) respectively. 60/71 (85%) reRT patients had received BEV prior to reRT and continued concurrent BEV during reRT. Of the 11 patients not managed with BEV during reRT, 10 required subsequent salvage BEV. ReRT patients were younger (median 53 vs. 59 years, p < 0.001), had better performance status (86% vs. 69% ECOG 0-1, p = 0.002) and more commonly had MGMT promoter-methylated tumours (54% vs. 40%, p = 0.083) compared to non-reRT patients. Median reRT PTV volume was 135cm3 (IQR: 69-207cm3). Median OS from reRT to death was 7.1 months (95%CI:6.3-7.9). Patients aged < 50, 50-70 and > 70 years had post-reRT median OS of 7.7, 6.4 and 6.0 months respectively (p = 0.021). Median post-reRT survival was longer for patients with ECOG performance status 0-1 compared to 2-3 (8.1 vs. 6.3 months, p = 0.039). PTV volume, site of relapse, MGMT promoter-methylation status and extent of initial surgical resection were not associated with post-reRT survival. ReRT was well-tolerated. Out of the 6 patients (8%) admitted to hospital after reRT, only one was for reRT toxicity. This was a CTCAE grade 3 radiation necrosis event in a patient managed without prior BEV. CONCLUSION Patients with recurrent glioblastoma who have been previously treated with 60 Gy radiotherapy have a meaningful survival benefit from large volume re-irradiation which is well tolerated. ReRT should not be ignored as a salvage treatment option in patients with chemorefractory progressive disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elissa Tong
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Reserve Rd, St Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia.
| | - Patrick Horsley
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Reserve Rd, St Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia
| | - Helen Wheeler
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Reserve Rd, St Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia
- The Brain Cancer Group, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
- Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Matthew Wong
- Central Coast Cancer Centre, Gosford Hospital, Gosford, NSW, Australia
| | - Venkatesha Venkatesha
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Reserve Rd, St Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia
| | - Joseph Chan
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Reserve Rd, St Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia
| | - Marina Kastelan
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Reserve Rd, St Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia
- The Brain Cancer Group, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
| | - Michael Back
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Reserve Rd, St Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia
- The Brain Cancer Group, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
- Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Central Coast Cancer Centre, Gosford Hospital, Gosford, NSW, Australia
- GenesisCare, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Arpa D, Parisi E, Ghigi G, Cortesi A, Longobardi P, Cenni P, Pieri M, Tontini L, Neri E, Micheletti S, Ghetti F, Monti M, Foca F, Tesei A, Arienti C, Sarnelli A, Martinelli G, Romeo A. Role of Hyperbaric Oxygenation Plus Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy in Recurrent High-Grade Glioma. Front Oncol 2021; 11:643469. [PMID: 33859944 PMCID: PMC8042328 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.643469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2020] [Accepted: 03/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The presence of hypoxic cells in high-grade glioma (HGG) is one of major reasons for failure of local tumour control with radiotherapy (RT). The use of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBO) could help to overcome the problem of oxygen deficiency in poorly oxygenated regions of the tumour. We propose an innovative approach to improve the efficacy of hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HSRT) after HBO (HBO-RT) for the treatment of recurrent HGG (rHGG) and herein report the results of an ad interim analysis. METHODS We enrolled a preliminary cohort of 9 adult patients (aged >18 years) with a diagnosis of rHGG. HSRT was administered in daily 5-Gy fractions for 3-5 consecutive days a week. Each fraction was delivered up to maximum of 60 minutes after HBO. RESULTS Median follow-up from re-irradiation was 11.6 months (range: 3.2-11.6 months). The disease control rate (DCR) 3 months after HBO-RT was 55.5% (5 patients). Median progression-free survival (mPFS) for all patients was 5.2 months (95%CI: 1.34-NE), while 3-month and 6-month PFS was 55.5% (95%CI: 20.4-80.4) and 27.7% (95%CI: 4.4-59.1), respectively. Median overall survival (mOS) of HBO-RT was 10.7 months (95% CI: 7.7-NE). No acute or late neurologic toxicity >grade (G)2 was observed in 88.88% of patients. One patient developed G3 radionecrosis. CONCLUSIONS HSRT delivered after HBO appears to be effective for the treatment of rHGG, it could represent an alternative, with low toxicity, to systemic therapies for patients who cannot or refuse to undergo such treatments. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT03411408.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donatella Arpa
- Radiotherapy Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Parisi
- Radiotherapy Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Italy
| | - Giulia Ghigi
- Radiotherapy Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Italy
| | - Annalisa Cortesi
- Radiotherapy Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Italy
| | | | - Patrizia Cenni
- Neuroradiology Unit, “Santa Maria delle Croci” Hospital, Ravenna, Italy
| | - Martina Pieri
- Radiotherapy Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Italy
| | - Luca Tontini
- Radiotherapy Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Italy
| | - Elisa Neri
- Radiotherapy Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Italy
| | - Simona Micheletti
- Radiotherapy Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Italy
| | - Francesca Ghetti
- Radiotherapy Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Italy
| | - Manuela Monti
- Unit of Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Italy
| | - Flavia Foca
- Unit of Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Italy
| | - Anna Tesei
- Biosciences Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Italy
| | - Chiara Arienti
- Biosciences Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Italy
| | - Anna Sarnelli
- Medical Physics Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Italy
| | - Giovanni Martinelli
- Scientific Directorate, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Italy
| | - Antonio Romeo
- Radiotherapy Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Italy
| |
Collapse
|