Implementation of the asparaginase activity assessment technique for clinical use: experience of a Brazilian Center

Nonclinical Evaluation of Single-Mutant E. coli Asparaginases Obtained by Double-Mutant Deconvolution: Improving Toxicological, Immune and Inflammatory Responses

Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia is currently treated with bacterial L-asparaginase; however, its side effects raise the need for the development of improved and efficient novel enzymes. Previously, we obtained low anti-asparaginase antibody production and high serum enzyme half-life in mice treated with the P40S/S206C mutant; however, its specific activity was significantly reduced. Thus, our aim was to test single mutants, S206C and P40S, through in vitro and in vivo assays. Our results showed that the drop in specific activity was caused by P40S substitution. In addition, our single mutants were highly stable in biological environment simulation, unlike the double-mutant P40S/S206C. The in vitro cell viability assay demonstrated that mutant enzymes have a higher cytotoxic effect than WT on T-cell-derived ALL and on some solid cancer cell lines. The in vivo assays were performed in mice to identify toxicological effects, to evoke immunological responses and to study the enzymes' pharmacokinetics. From these tests, none of the enzymes was toxic; however, S206C elicited lower physiological changes and immune/allergenic responses. In relation to the pharmacokinetic profile, S206C exhibited twofold higher activity than WT and P40S two hours after injection. In conclusion, we present bioengineered E. coli asparaginases with high specific enzyme activity and fewer side effects.

Mutations in asparaginase II from E. coli and implications for inactivation and PEGylation

All clinically-used asparaginases convert L-asparagine (L-Asn) to l-aspartate (L-Asp) and l-glutamine (L-Gln) to L-glutamate (L-Glu), which has been useful in reducing bioavailable asparagine and glutamine in patients under treatment for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. The E. coli type 2 L-asparaginase (EcA2) can present different sequences among varying bacterial strains, which we hypothesized that might affect their biological function, stability and interchangeability. Here we report the analysis of two EcA2 provided by the public health system of a middle-income country. These enzymes were reported to have similar specific activity in vitro, whereas they differ in vivo. Protein sequencing by LC-MS-MS and peptide mapping by MALDI-ToF-MS of their tryptic digests revealed that Aginasa™ share similar sequence to EcA2 from E. coli strain BL21(DE3), while Leuginase™ has sequence equivalent to EcA2 from E. coli strain AS1.357. The two amino acid differences between Aginasa™ (64D and 252 T) and Leuginase™ (64 N and 252S) resulted in structural divergences in solution as accessed by small-angle X-ray scattering and molecular dynamics simulation trajectories. The conformational variability further results in dissimilar surface accessibility with major consequences for PEGylation, as well as different susceptibility to degradation by limited proteolysis. The present results reveal that the sequence variations between these two EcA2 variants results in conformational changes associated with differential conformational plasticity, potentially affecting physico-chemical and biological properties, including proteolytic and immunogenic silent inactivation.

An acute lymphoblastic leukemia cell-based preclinical assay revealed functional differences between commercial brands of L-asparaginase administered in Colombia

BACKGROUND

L-asparaginase (L-ASNase) is an essential component of chemotherapy strategies due to its differential action between normal and leukemic cells. Recently, concerns about the efficiency of commercial formulations administered in developing countries have been reported, and available methods have limitations for directly determining the quality of the formulation of the medications.

PROCEDURE

We developed a cell-based protocol to analyze the activity of different L-ASNase formulations used in Colombia to induce apoptosis of the NALM-6 cell line after 24, 48, and 72 hours, using flow cytometry. Then we compared results and determined the statistically significant differences.

RESULTS

Three statistically different groups, ranging from full to no activity against leukemic cells, using 0.05, 0.5, and 5.0 IU/ml concentrations, were identified. Group 1 (asparaginase codified [ASA]2-4) exhibited very low to no activity against B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) cells. Group 2 (ASA6) exhibited intermediate-level activity, and group 3 (ASA1 and ASA5) exhibited high activity.

CONCLUSIONS

Differences found between the therapeutic formulations of L-ASNase distributed in Colombia raise concerns about the quality of the treatment administered to patients in low- and middle-income countries. Therefore, we recommend a preclinical evaluation of formulations of L-ASNase in order to prevent therapeutical impacts on the outcome of ALL patients.

Follow our path with asparaginase activity: one technique, but different uses in clinical practice

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia is the most common childhood malignancy. One of the drugs used in the treatment is Asparaginase, and monitoring of its activity levels enables better outcomes. Since 2018, our laboratory has been working to establish a regular analysis of activity. This implementation allowed to qualify care by detecting silent inactivation and also establishing desensitization as a safe way to overcome the lack of Erwinia. We were able to monitor children aged 0 to 18 years who were being treated with PEG-ASNase. The activity was assessed on days 7 (90 samples) and 14 (52 samples) after ASNase infusions. 142 samples were analyzed. 95.7% reached an adequate activity level (≥ 0.1 IU/mL). Patients treated with ASNase can develop allergic reactions. With the activity monitoring, is possible to circumvent situations like these and implement desensitization protocols for patients who had clinical hypersensitivity without inactivation. Desensitization induces temporary unresponsiveness to drug antigens, allowing the patients to proceed with the prescribed chemotherapy. We have received samples from four patients being treated with different desensitization protocols. Patients tolerated the protocols well. Only one had a grade 2 reaction during the infusion and activity < 0.1 IU/mL, which resulted in the switch to Erwinia. The dose adaptation is a possible and more recent use of ASNase monitoring and we were able to confirm the feasibility of PEG-ASNase desensitization protocols.

L-asparaginase mediated therapy in L-asparagine auxotrophic cancers: A review

Microbial L-asparaginase is the most effective first-line therapeutic used in the treatment protocols of paediatric and adult leukemia. Leukemic cell's auxotrophy for L-asparagine is exploited as a therapeutic strategy to mediate cell death through metabolic blockade of L-asparagine using L-asparaginase. Escherichia coli and Erwinia chrysanthemi serve as the major enzyme deriving sources accepted in clinical practise and the enzyme has bestowed improvements in patient outcomes over the last 40 years. However, an array of side effects generated by the native enzymes due to glutamine co-catalysis and short serum stays augmenting frequent dosages, intended a therapeutic switch towards the development of biobetter alternatives for the enzyme including the formulations resulting in sustained local depletion of L-asparagine. In addition, the treatment with L-asparaginase in few cancer types has proven to elicit drug-induced cytoprotective autophagy mechanisms and therefore warrants concern. Although the off-target glutamine hydrolysis has been viewed in contributing the drug-induced secondary responses in cells deficient with asparagine synthetase machinery, the beneficial role of glutaminase-asparaginase in proliferative regulation of asparagine prototrophic cells has been looked forward. The current review provides an overview on the enzyme's clinical applications in leukemia and possible therapeutic implications in other solid tumours, recent advancements in drug formulations, and discusses the aspects of two-sided roles of glutaminase-asparaginases and drug-induced cytoprotective autophagy mechanisms.

Influence of different asparaginase formulations in the prognosis of children with acute lymphocytic leukaemia in Brazil: a multicentre, retrospective controlled study

Our group recently showed that the (ASNase) formulation available in Brazil from 2017 to 2018 when used at the same dose and frequency as the formulation provided previously did not reach the activity considered therapeutic. Based on these, our goal was to assess the impact of these facts on the prognosis of children with ALL at different oncology centers. A multicentre retrospective observational study followed by a prospective follow-up. Patients aged >1 and <18 years in first-line treatment followed up at 10 referral centres, between 2014 and 2018 who received the formulation Leuginase^® were identified (Group B). For each patient, the centre registered 2 patients who received ASNase in the presentation of Aginasa^® exclusively (Group A). Data collection was registered using (Redcap^® ). A total of 419 patients were included; 282 in Group A and 137 in B. Group A had a 3-year OS and EFS of 91·8% and 84·8% respectively, while Group B had a 3-year OS of 83·8% (P = 0·003) and EFS of 76·1% (P = 0·008). There was an impact on 3-year OS and EFS of children who received a formulation. This result highlights the importance of evaluating ASNase and monitoring its activity.