1
|
Rapley M, Freitas V, Weinberg IN, Baldassi B, Poladyan H, Waterston M, Ghai S, Taeb S, Bubon O, Reznik A, Mulligan AM. Case report: Possible role of low-dose PEM for avoiding unneeded procedures associated with false-positive or equivocal breast MRI results. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1405404. [PMID: 39091907 PMCID: PMC11291220 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1405404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2024] [Accepted: 07/05/2024] [Indexed: 08/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is currently recommended as a screening tool for high-risk women and has been advocated for women with radiologically dense breast tissue. While breast MRI is acknowledged for its high sensitivity (with an exception for lower-grade ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) where emerging techniques like diffusion-weighted imaging offer improvement), its limitations include sensitivity to hormonal changes and a relatively high false-positive rate, potentially leading to overdiagnosis, increased imaging uncertainty, and unnecessary biopsies. These factors can exacerbate patient anxiety and impose additional costs. Molecular imaging with breast-targeted Positron Emission Tomography (PET) has shown the capability to detect malignancy independent of breast density and hormonal changes. Furthermore, breast-targeted PET has shown higher specificity when compared with MRI. However, traditional PET technology is associated with high radiation dose, which can limit its widespread use particularly in repeated studies or for undiagnosed patients. In this case report, we present a clinical application of low-dose breast imaging utilizing a breast-targeted PET camera (Radialis PET imager, Radialis Inc). The case involves a 33-year-old female patient who had multiple enhanced lesions detected on breast MRI after surgical removal of a malignant phyllodes tumor from the right breast. A benign core biopsy was obtained from the largest lesion seen in the left breast. One month after the MRI, 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET imaging session was performed using the Radialis PET Imager. Although the Radialis PET Imager has proven high count sensitivity and the capability to detect breast lesions with low metabolic activity (at a dose similar to mammography), no areas of increased 18F-FDG uptake were visualized in this particular case. The patient underwent a right-sided nipple-sparing mastectomy and left-sided lumpectomy, with bilateral reconstruction. The excised left breast tissue was completely benign, as suggested by both core biopsy and the PET results. The case presented highlights a promising clinical application of low-dose breast-targeted PET imaging to mitigate the uncertainty associated with MRI while keeping radiation doses within the safe range typically used in X-ray mammography.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madeline Rapley
- Department of Physics, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada
| | - Vivianne Freitas
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | - Sandeep Ghai
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Samira Taeb
- Department of Research, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Oleksandr Bubon
- Department of Physics, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada
- Radialis Inc., Thunder Bay, ON, Canada
| | - Alla Reznik
- Department of Physics, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada
- Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada
| | - Anna Marie Mulligan
- Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network – Toronto General Hospital Site, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Diwanji D, Onishi N, Hathi DK, Lawhn-Heath C, Kornak J, Li W, Guo R, Molina-Vega J, Seo Y, Flavell RR, Heditsian D, Brain S, Esserman LJ, Joe BN, Hylton NM, Jones EF, Ray KM. 18F-FDG Dedicated Breast PET Complementary to Breast MRI for Evaluating Early Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. Radiol Imaging Cancer 2024; 6:e230082. [PMID: 38551406 PMCID: PMC10988337 DOI: 10.1148/rycan.230082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2023] [Revised: 12/30/2023] [Accepted: 02/16/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024]
Abstract
Purpose To compare quantitative measures of tumor metabolism and perfusion using fluorine 18 (18F) fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) dedicated breast PET (dbPET) and breast dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI during early treatment with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Materials and Methods Prospectively collected DCE MRI and 18F-FDG dbPET examinations were analyzed at baseline (T0) and after 3 weeks (T1) of NAC in 20 participants with 22 invasive breast cancers. FDG dbPET-derived standardized uptake value (SUV), metabolic tumor volume, and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) and MRI-derived percent enhancement (PE), signal enhancement ratio (SER), and functional tumor volume (FTV) were calculated at both time points. Differences between FDG dbPET and MRI parameters were evaluated after stratifying by receptor status, Ki-67 index, and residual cancer burden. Parameters were compared using Wilcoxon signed rank and Mann-Whitney U tests. Results High Ki-67 tumors had higher baseline SUVmean (difference, 5.1; P = .01) and SUVpeak (difference, 5.5; P = .04). At T1, decreases were observed in FDG dbPET measures (pseudo-median difference T0 minus T1 value [95% CI]) of SUVmax (-6.2 [-10.2, -2.6]; P < .001), SUVmean (-2.6 [-4.9, -1.3]; P < .001), SUVpeak (-4.2 [-6.9, -2.3]; P < .001), and TLG (-29.1 mL3 [-71.4, -6.8]; P = .005) and MRI measures of SERpeak (-1.0 [-1.3, -0.2]; P = .02) and FTV (-11.6 mL3 [-22.2, -1.7]; P = .009). Relative to nonresponsive tumors, responsive tumors showed a difference (95% CI) in percent change in SUVmax of -34.3% (-55.9%, 1.5%; P = .06) and in PEpeak of -42.4% (95% CI: -110.5%, 8.5%; P = .08). Conclusion 18F-FDG dbPET was sensitive to early changes during NAC and provided complementary information to DCE MRI that may be useful for treatment response evaluation. Keywords: Breast, PET, Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRI Clinical trial registration no. NCT01042379 Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2024.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Devan Diwanji
- From the Departments of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (D.D., N.O.,
D.K.H., C.L.H., W.L., R.G., Y.S., R.R.F., B.N.J., N.M.H., E.F.J., K.M.R.),
Epidemiology and Biostatistics (J.K.), and Surgery (J.M.V., L.J.E.), University
of California San Francisco, 550 16th St, San Francisco, CA 94158; and
I-SPY 2 Advocacy Group, San Francisco, Calif (D.H., S.B.)
| | - Natsuko Onishi
- From the Departments of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (D.D., N.O.,
D.K.H., C.L.H., W.L., R.G., Y.S., R.R.F., B.N.J., N.M.H., E.F.J., K.M.R.),
Epidemiology and Biostatistics (J.K.), and Surgery (J.M.V., L.J.E.), University
of California San Francisco, 550 16th St, San Francisco, CA 94158; and
I-SPY 2 Advocacy Group, San Francisco, Calif (D.H., S.B.)
| | - Deep K. Hathi
- From the Departments of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (D.D., N.O.,
D.K.H., C.L.H., W.L., R.G., Y.S., R.R.F., B.N.J., N.M.H., E.F.J., K.M.R.),
Epidemiology and Biostatistics (J.K.), and Surgery (J.M.V., L.J.E.), University
of California San Francisco, 550 16th St, San Francisco, CA 94158; and
I-SPY 2 Advocacy Group, San Francisco, Calif (D.H., S.B.)
| | - Courtney Lawhn-Heath
- From the Departments of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (D.D., N.O.,
D.K.H., C.L.H., W.L., R.G., Y.S., R.R.F., B.N.J., N.M.H., E.F.J., K.M.R.),
Epidemiology and Biostatistics (J.K.), and Surgery (J.M.V., L.J.E.), University
of California San Francisco, 550 16th St, San Francisco, CA 94158; and
I-SPY 2 Advocacy Group, San Francisco, Calif (D.H., S.B.)
| | - John Kornak
- From the Departments of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (D.D., N.O.,
D.K.H., C.L.H., W.L., R.G., Y.S., R.R.F., B.N.J., N.M.H., E.F.J., K.M.R.),
Epidemiology and Biostatistics (J.K.), and Surgery (J.M.V., L.J.E.), University
of California San Francisco, 550 16th St, San Francisco, CA 94158; and
I-SPY 2 Advocacy Group, San Francisco, Calif (D.H., S.B.)
| | - Wen Li
- From the Departments of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (D.D., N.O.,
D.K.H., C.L.H., W.L., R.G., Y.S., R.R.F., B.N.J., N.M.H., E.F.J., K.M.R.),
Epidemiology and Biostatistics (J.K.), and Surgery (J.M.V., L.J.E.), University
of California San Francisco, 550 16th St, San Francisco, CA 94158; and
I-SPY 2 Advocacy Group, San Francisco, Calif (D.H., S.B.)
| | - Ruby Guo
- From the Departments of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (D.D., N.O.,
D.K.H., C.L.H., W.L., R.G., Y.S., R.R.F., B.N.J., N.M.H., E.F.J., K.M.R.),
Epidemiology and Biostatistics (J.K.), and Surgery (J.M.V., L.J.E.), University
of California San Francisco, 550 16th St, San Francisco, CA 94158; and
I-SPY 2 Advocacy Group, San Francisco, Calif (D.H., S.B.)
| | - Julissa Molina-Vega
- From the Departments of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (D.D., N.O.,
D.K.H., C.L.H., W.L., R.G., Y.S., R.R.F., B.N.J., N.M.H., E.F.J., K.M.R.),
Epidemiology and Biostatistics (J.K.), and Surgery (J.M.V., L.J.E.), University
of California San Francisco, 550 16th St, San Francisco, CA 94158; and
I-SPY 2 Advocacy Group, San Francisco, Calif (D.H., S.B.)
| | - Youngho Seo
- From the Departments of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (D.D., N.O.,
D.K.H., C.L.H., W.L., R.G., Y.S., R.R.F., B.N.J., N.M.H., E.F.J., K.M.R.),
Epidemiology and Biostatistics (J.K.), and Surgery (J.M.V., L.J.E.), University
of California San Francisco, 550 16th St, San Francisco, CA 94158; and
I-SPY 2 Advocacy Group, San Francisco, Calif (D.H., S.B.)
| | - Robert R. Flavell
- From the Departments of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (D.D., N.O.,
D.K.H., C.L.H., W.L., R.G., Y.S., R.R.F., B.N.J., N.M.H., E.F.J., K.M.R.),
Epidemiology and Biostatistics (J.K.), and Surgery (J.M.V., L.J.E.), University
of California San Francisco, 550 16th St, San Francisco, CA 94158; and
I-SPY 2 Advocacy Group, San Francisco, Calif (D.H., S.B.)
| | - Diane Heditsian
- From the Departments of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (D.D., N.O.,
D.K.H., C.L.H., W.L., R.G., Y.S., R.R.F., B.N.J., N.M.H., E.F.J., K.M.R.),
Epidemiology and Biostatistics (J.K.), and Surgery (J.M.V., L.J.E.), University
of California San Francisco, 550 16th St, San Francisco, CA 94158; and
I-SPY 2 Advocacy Group, San Francisco, Calif (D.H., S.B.)
| | - Susie Brain
- From the Departments of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (D.D., N.O.,
D.K.H., C.L.H., W.L., R.G., Y.S., R.R.F., B.N.J., N.M.H., E.F.J., K.M.R.),
Epidemiology and Biostatistics (J.K.), and Surgery (J.M.V., L.J.E.), University
of California San Francisco, 550 16th St, San Francisco, CA 94158; and
I-SPY 2 Advocacy Group, San Francisco, Calif (D.H., S.B.)
| | - Laura J. Esserman
- From the Departments of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (D.D., N.O.,
D.K.H., C.L.H., W.L., R.G., Y.S., R.R.F., B.N.J., N.M.H., E.F.J., K.M.R.),
Epidemiology and Biostatistics (J.K.), and Surgery (J.M.V., L.J.E.), University
of California San Francisco, 550 16th St, San Francisco, CA 94158; and
I-SPY 2 Advocacy Group, San Francisco, Calif (D.H., S.B.)
| | - Bonnie N. Joe
- From the Departments of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (D.D., N.O.,
D.K.H., C.L.H., W.L., R.G., Y.S., R.R.F., B.N.J., N.M.H., E.F.J., K.M.R.),
Epidemiology and Biostatistics (J.K.), and Surgery (J.M.V., L.J.E.), University
of California San Francisco, 550 16th St, San Francisco, CA 94158; and
I-SPY 2 Advocacy Group, San Francisco, Calif (D.H., S.B.)
| | - Nola M. Hylton
- From the Departments of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (D.D., N.O.,
D.K.H., C.L.H., W.L., R.G., Y.S., R.R.F., B.N.J., N.M.H., E.F.J., K.M.R.),
Epidemiology and Biostatistics (J.K.), and Surgery (J.M.V., L.J.E.), University
of California San Francisco, 550 16th St, San Francisco, CA 94158; and
I-SPY 2 Advocacy Group, San Francisco, Calif (D.H., S.B.)
| | - Ella F. Jones
- From the Departments of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (D.D., N.O.,
D.K.H., C.L.H., W.L., R.G., Y.S., R.R.F., B.N.J., N.M.H., E.F.J., K.M.R.),
Epidemiology and Biostatistics (J.K.), and Surgery (J.M.V., L.J.E.), University
of California San Francisco, 550 16th St, San Francisco, CA 94158; and
I-SPY 2 Advocacy Group, San Francisco, Calif (D.H., S.B.)
| | - Kimberly M. Ray
- From the Departments of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (D.D., N.O.,
D.K.H., C.L.H., W.L., R.G., Y.S., R.R.F., B.N.J., N.M.H., E.F.J., K.M.R.),
Epidemiology and Biostatistics (J.K.), and Surgery (J.M.V., L.J.E.), University
of California San Francisco, 550 16th St, San Francisco, CA 94158; and
I-SPY 2 Advocacy Group, San Francisco, Calif (D.H., S.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Cheng J, Ren C, Liu G, Shui R, Zhang Y, Li J, Shao Z. Development of High-Resolution Dedicated PET-Based Radiomics Machine Learning Model to Predict Axillary Lymph Node Status in Early-Stage Breast Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14040950. [PMID: 35205699 PMCID: PMC8870230 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14040950] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2021] [Revised: 01/26/2022] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Accurate clinical axillary evaluation plays an important role in the diagnosis of and treatment planning for breast cancer (BC). This study aimed to develop a machine learning model integrating dedicated breast PET and clinical characteristics for prediction of axillary lymph node status in cT1-2N0-1M0 BC non-invasively. The performance of this integrating model in identifying pN0 and pN1 with the AUC was 0.94. We achieved an NPV of 96.88% in the cN0 and PPV of 92.73% in the cN1 subgroup. The higher true positive and true negative rate could delineate clinical subtypes and apply more precise treatment for patients with early-stage BC. Abstract Purpose of the Report: Accurate clinical axillary evaluation plays an important role in the diagnosis and treatment planning for early-stage breast cancer (BC). This study aimed to develop a scalable, non-invasive and robust machine learning model for predicting of the pathological node status using dedicated-PET integrating the clinical characteristics in early-stage BC. Materials and Methods: A total of 420 BC patients confirmed by postoperative pathology were retrospectively analyzed. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) Mammi-PET, ultrasound, physical examination, Lymph-PET, and clinical characteristics were analyzed. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis were used in developing prediction models. The characteristic curve (ROC) of the area under receiver-operator (AUC) and DeLong test were used to evaluate and compare the performance of the models. The clinical utility of the models was determined via decision curve analysis (DCA). Then, a nomogram was developed based on the model with the best predictive efficiency and clinical utility and was validated using the calibration plots. Results: A total of 290 patients were enrolled in this study. The AUC of the integrated model diagnosed performance was 0.94 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.91–0.97) in the training set (n = 203) and 0.93 (95% CI, 0.88–0.99) in the validation set (n = 87) (both p < 0.05). In clinical N0 subgroup, the negative predictive value reached 96.88%, and in clinical N1 subgroup, the positive predictive value reached 92.73%. Conclusions: The use of a machine learning integrated model can greatly improve the true positive and true negative rate of identifying clinical axillary lymph node status in early-stage BC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingyi Cheng
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China; (J.C.); (Y.Z.)
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai 201321, China
| | - Caiyue Ren
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai 201321, China;
| | - Guangyu Liu
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China;
- Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer in Shanghai, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Ruohong Shui
- Department of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China;
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Yingjian Zhang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China; (J.C.); (Y.Z.)
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai 201321, China
| | - Junjie Li
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China;
- Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer in Shanghai, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
- Correspondence: (J.L.); (Z.S.); Tel.: +86-021-64175590 (ext. 88809) (J.L. & Z.S.); Fax: +86-021-64176650 (J.L. & Z.S.)
| | - Zhimin Shao
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China;
- Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer in Shanghai, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
- Correspondence: (J.L.); (Z.S.); Tel.: +86-021-64175590 (ext. 88809) (J.L. & Z.S.); Fax: +86-021-64176650 (J.L. & Z.S.)
| |
Collapse
|