A pre-operative prognostic score for the selection of patients for salvage surgery after recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinomas

Adjuvant Reirradiation With Proton Therapy in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Purpose

For patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), locoregional failure and second primary tumors are common indications for adjuvant reirradiation (re-RT). Given an absence of clear consensus on the role of adjuvant re-RT, we sought to assess histopathologic risk factors of patients with HNSCC and their resulting outcomes after adjuvant re-RT with proton therapy.

Methods and Materials

We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with HNSCC who underwent salvage surgery at our institution followed by adjuvant re-RT with proton therapy over 1.5 years. All included patients received prior radiation therapy. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to evaluate locoregional recurrence-free survival and overall survival.

Results

The cohort included 22 patients, with disease subsites, including oropharynx, oral cavity, hypopharynx, larynx, and nasopharynx. Depending on adverse pathologic features, adjuvant re-RT to 66 Gy (32% of cohort) or 60 Gy (68%), with (59%) or without (41%) concurrent systemic therapy was administered. The majority (86%) completed re-RT with no reported treatment delay; 3 patients experienced grade ≥3 acute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events toxicity and no patient required enteral feeding tube placement during re-RT. Median follow-up was 21.0 months (IQR, 11.7-25.2 months). Five patients had biopsy-proven disease recurrences a median of 5.9 months (IQR, 3.8-9.7 months) after re-RT. Locoregional recurrence-free survival was 95.2%, 70.2%, 64.8% at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. OS was 100%, 79.2%, and 79.2% at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. Four patients had osteoradionecrosis on imaging a median of 13.2 months (IQR, 8.7-17.4 months) after re-RT, with 2 requiring surgical intervention.

Conclusions

Adjuvant re-RT for patients with HNSCC was well-tolerated and offered reasonable local control in this high-risk cohort but appears to be associated with a risk of osteoradionecrosis. Additional study and longer follow-up could help define optimal patient management in this patient population.

Review of Outcomes after Salvage Surgery for Recurrent Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck

Surgery with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy is the mainstay in treatment for advanced stage head and neck squamous cell carcinoma; however, locoregional recurrences are frequent. Salvage surgery could be proposed in selected patients to improve local control, disease-free, and overall survival. Factors for improved disease-free and overall survival in patients treated with salvage surgery include age, tumor location, the initial T stage, HPV status, resection margins, and the time elapsing from the initial treatment. Clinical trials with adjuvant therapies have shown promise after salvage surgery in terms of tolerance and response, but clinical guidelines for using these adjuvant treatments are currently lacking. The aim of this review is to present current knowledge concerning the incidence and management of recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and current data concerning survival and morbidity after salvage surgery.

Preoperative prediction model to evaluate salvage surgery in patients with recurrent or second primary oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

In approximately 50% of patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC), the disease progresses after curative surgery. However, the role of salvage surgery (SS) is controversial, and life expectancy after SS is unknown.

METHODS

In this study, 262 patients with OCSCC with locoregional recurrence and second primary OCSCC were retrospectively enrolled and divided into a resectable (55.0%, 144/262) and unresectable (45.0%, 118/262) groups. After excluding neck recurrence only, SS had been performed 195 times in the resectable group. The corresponding preoperative clinicopathologic factors and postsurgery survival (PSS) of each SS were pooled for analysis.

RESULTS

Median survival after disease progression was 64.2 and 10.4 months for the resectable and unresectable groups, respectively. In the resectable group, one-fifth (19.5%, 37/190) of the patients died within 1 year of SS (PSS < 1 year), and one-third (32.8%, 64/195) of the patients had undergone SS two or more times. The interval from the last surgery ≤ 12 months, depth of invasion of the last surgery > 1 cm, and clinical evidence of nodal disease at the preoperative evaluation were independent predictors of poor PSS. A scoring prediction model was established with 1 point for each factor. The results revealed 1-year postsurgery death rates of 10.3% in the low-risk group (score: 0-1) and 48.6% in the high-risk group (score: 2 or 3) (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, an effective scoring model predicting life expectancy after SS for patients with OCSCC was established.

Prognostic factors in salvage surgery for recurrent head and neck cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Although salvage surgery (SS) is considered the best curative choice in recurrent head and neck cancer, the identification of patients who can benefit the most from this treatment is challenging.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed the prognostic role of pre- and post-surgery factors in patients undergoing SS for recurrent head and neck cancer (oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, and larynx).

RESULTS

Twenty-five studies met the inclusion criteria out of 1280 screened citations. Pre-surgery factors significantly associated with worse overall survival were age>60 years, advanced initial stage, early recurrence, and regional recurrence; no heterogeneity between study emerged. Among post- surgery factors, worse survival emerged for positive surgical margins, extracapsular extension and perineural invasion.

CONCLUSION

The identification of pre-surgery factors associated with poor outcomes may help the selection of the best candidate to SS; alternative treatments should be considered for high-risk patients. Post-surgery predictors of worse prognosis may guide clinicians in tailoring patients' surveillance.

Incurable locoregional disease is a strong poor prognostic factor in recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

BACKGROUND

Distant metastasis is a poor prognostic factor in recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. However, limited information on the prognostic impact of locoregional disease is available, despite its life-threatening features. We investigated the prognostic impact of incurable locoregional disease and distant metastasis in recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 156 patients with recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck who received palliative chemotherapy between August 2006 and December 2019.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time for all censored patients was 12.1 (range 1.9-63.5) months. The median overall survival was 12.4 (95% confidence interval 10.1-15.1) months. Incurable locoregional disease (hazard ratio: 2.31, P = 0.007), liver metastasis (hazard ratio: 2.84, P = 0.006), disease-free interval > 13 months (hazard ratio: 0.51, P = 0.041), cetuximab use (hazard ratio: 0.59, P = 0.007), and immune checkpoint inhibitor use (hazard ratio: 0.56, P = 0.006) were associated with prognosis. The number of distant metastatic sites was not associated with overall survival (1-2: hazard ratio: 0.60, P = 0.16; 3-4: hazard ratio: 1.34, P = 0.50). Patients with incurable locoregional disease had more life-threatening events than those with curable locoregional disease.

CONCLUSION

The presence of incurable locoregional disease had a significant prognostic impact, whereas the number of distant metastatic sites had no prognostic impact. Liver metastasis was a poor prognostic factor for recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.